From Sir Walter Besant's 'London': Harper and Brothers

The London house, either in Saxon or Norman time, presented no kind of

resemblance to the Roman villa. It had no cloisters, no hypocaust, no

suite or sequence of rooms. This unlikeness is another proof, if any

were wanting, that the continuity of tenure had been wholly broken. If

the Saxons went into London, as has been suggested, peaceably, and left

the people to carry on their old life and their trade in their own way,

the Roman and British architecture--no new thing, but a style grown up

in course of years and found fitted to the climate--would certainly have

remained. That, however, was not the case. The Englishman developed his

house from the patriarchal idea.

First, there was the common hall; in this the household lived, fed,

transacted business, and made their cheer in the evenings. It was built

of timber, and to keep out the cold draughts it was afterwards lined

with tapestry. At first they used simple cloths, which in great houses

were embroidered and painted; _perches_ of various kinds were affixed to

the walls, whereon the weapons, the musical instruments, the cloaks,

etc., were hung up. The lord and lady sat on a high seat; not, I am

inclined to think, on a dais at the end of the hall, which would have

been cold for them, but on a great chair near the fire, which was

burning in the middle of the hall. This fashion long continued. I have

myself seen a college hall warmed by a fire in a brazier burning under

the lantern of the hall. The furniture consisted of benches; the table

was laid on trestles, spread with a white cloth, and removed after

dinner; the hall was open to all who came, on condition that the guest

should leave his weapons at the door.

The floor was covered with reeds, which made a clean, soft, and warm

carpet, on which the company could, if they pleased, lie round the fire.

They had carpets or rugs also, but reeds were commonly used. The

traveler who chances to find himself at the ancient and most interesting

town of Kingston-on-Hull, which very few English people, and still fewer

Americans, have the curiosity to explore, should visit the Trinity

House. There, among many interesting things, he will find a hall where

reeds are still spread, but no longer so thickly as to form a complete

carpet. I believe this to be the last survival of the reed carpet.

The times of meals were: the breakfast at about nine; the "noon-meat,"

or dinner, at twelve; and the "even-meat," or supper, probably at a

movable time, depending on the length of the day. When lighting was

costly and candles were scarce, the hours of sleep would be naturally

longer in winter than in the summer.

In their manner of living the Saxons were fond of vegetables, especially

of the leek, onion, and garlic. Beans they also had (these were

introduced probably at the time when they commenced intercourse with the

outer world), pease, radishes, turnips, parsley, mint, sage, cress, rue,

and other herbs. They had nearly all our modern fruits, though many show

by their names, which are Latin or Norman, a later introduction. They

made use of butter, honey, and cheese. They drank ale and mead. The

latter is still made, but in small quantities, in Somerset and Hereford

shires. The Normans brought over the custom of drinking wine.

In the earliest times the whole family slept in the common hall. The

first improvement was the erection of the solar, or upper chamber. This

was above the hall, or a portion of it, or over the kitchen and buttery

attached to the hall. The arrangement may be still observed in many of

the old colleges of Oxford or Cambridge. The solar was first the

sleeping-room of the lord and lady; though afterward it served not only

this purpose, but also for an ante-chamber to the dormitory of the

daughters and the maid-servants. The men of the household still slept in

the hall below. Later on, bed recesses were contrived in the wall, as

one may find in Northumberland at the present day. The bed was commonly,

but not for the ladies of the house, merely a big bag stuffed with

straw. A sheet wrapped round the body formed the only night-dress. But

there were also pillows, blankets, and coverlets. The early English bed

was quite as luxurious as any that followed after, until the invention

of the spring mattress gave a new and hitherto unhoped-for joy to the

hours of night.

The second step in advance was the ladies' bower, a room or suite of

rooms set apart for the ladies of the house and their women. For the

first time, as soon as this room was added, the women could follow their

own vocations of embroidery, spinning, and needlework of all kinds,

apart from the rough and noisy talk of the men.

The main features, therefore, of every great house, whether in town or

country, from the seventh to the twelfth century, were the hall, the

solar built over the kitchen and buttery, and the ladies' bower.

There was also the garden. In all times the English have been fond of

gardens. Bacon thought it not beneath his dignity to order the

arrangement of a garden. Long before Bacon, a writer of the twelfth

century describes a garden as it should be. "It should be adorned on

this side with roses, lilies, and the marigold; on that side with

parsley, cost, fennel, southernwood, coriander, sage, savery, hyssop,

mint, vine, dettany, pellitory, lettuce, cresses, and the peony. Let

there be beds enriched with onions, leeks, garlic, melons, and

scallions. The garden is also enriched by the cucumber, the soporiferous

poppy, and the daffodil, and the acanthus. Nor let pot herbs be wanting,

as beet-root, sorrel, and mallow. It is useful also to the gardener to

have anise, mustard, and wormwood.... A noble garden will give you

medlars, quinces, the pear main, peaches, pears of St. Regle,

pomegranates, citrons, oranges, almonds, dates, and figs." The latter

fruits were perhaps attempted, but one doubts their arriving at

ripeness. Perhaps the writer sets down what he hoped would be some

day achieved.

The indoor amusements of the time were very much like our own. We have a

little music in the evening; so did our forefathers. We sometimes have a

little dancing; so did they, but the dancing was done for them. We go to

the theatres to see the mime; in their days the mime made his theatre in

the great man's hall. He played the fiddle and the harp; he sang songs,

he brought his daughter, who walked on her hands and executed

astonishing capers; the gleeman, minstrel, or jongleur was already as

disreputable as when we find him later on with his _ribauderie_. Again,

we play chess; so did our ancestors. We gamble with dice; so did they.

We feast and drink together; so did they. We pass the time in talk; so

did they. In a word, as Alphonse Karr put it, the more we change, the

more we remain the same.

Out-of-doors, as Fitz-Stephen shows, the young men skated, wrestled,

played ball, practiced archery, held water tournaments, baited bull and

bear, fought cocks, and rode races. They were also mustered sometimes

for service in the field, and went forth cheerfully, being specially

upheld by the reassuring consciousness that London was always on the

winning side.

The growth of the city government belongs to the history of London.

Suffice it here to say that the people in all times enjoyed a freedom

far above that possessed by any other city of Europe. The history of

municipal London is a history of continual struggle to maintain this

freedom against all attacks, and to extend it and to make it

impregnable. Already the people are proud, turbulent, and confident in

their own strength. They refuse to own any other lord but the king

himself; there is no Earl of London. They freely hold their free and

open meetings, their folk-motes,--in the open space outside the

northwest corner of St. Paul's Churchyard. That they lived roughly,

enduring cold, sleeping in small houses in narrow courts; that they

suffered much from the long darkness of winter; that they were always in

danger of fevers, agues, "putrid" throats, plagues, fires by night, and

civil wars; that they were ignorant of letters,--three schools only for

the whole of London,--all this may very well be understood. But these

things do not make men and women wretched. They were not always

suffering from preventable disease; they were not always hauling their

goods out of the flames; they were not always fighting. The first and

most simple elements of human happiness are three; to wit, that a man

should be in bodily health, that he should be free, that he should enjoy

the produce of his own labor. All these things the Londoner possessed

under the Norman kings nearly as much as in these days they can be

possessed. His city has always been one of the healthiest in the world;

whatever freedom could be attained he enjoyed; and in that rich trading

town all men who worked lived in plenty.

The households, the way of living, the occupations of the women, can be

clearly made out in every detail from the Anglo-Saxon literature. The

women in the country made the garments, carded the wool, sheared the

sheep, washed the things, beat the flax, ground the corn, sat at the

spinning-wheel, and prepared the food. In the towns they had no shearing

to do, but all the rest of their duty fell to their province. The

English women excelled in embroidery. "English" work meant the best kind

of work. They worked church vestments with gold and pearls and precious

stones. "Orfrey," or embroidery in gold, was a special art. Of course

they are accused by the ecclesiastics of an overweening desire to wear

finery; they certainly curled their hair, and, one is sorry to read,

they painted, and thereby spoiled their pretty cheeks. If the man was

the hlaf-ord [lord],--the owner or winner of the loaf,--the wife was the

hlaf-dig [lady], its distributor; the servants and the retainers were

hlaf-oetas, or eaters of it. When nunneries began to be founded, the

Saxon ladies in great numbers forsook the world for the cloister. And

here they began to learn Latin, and became able at least to carry on

correspondence--specimens of which still exist--in that language. Every

nunnery possessed a school for girls. They were taught to read and to

write their own language and Latin, perhaps also rhetoric and

embroidery. As the pious Sisters were fond of putting on violet

chemises, tunics, and vests of delicate tissue, embroidered with silver

and gold, and scarlet shoes, there was probably not much mortification

of the flesh in the nunneries of the later Saxon times.

This for the better class. We cannot suppose that the daughters of the

craftsmen became scholars of the nunnery. Theirs were the lower

walks--to spin the linen and to make the bread and carry on the

housework.

Library of the World's Best Literature, Ancient and Modern — Volume 04 · 第 267 / 316 题