From Berlioz's Autobiography

It appears, however,--so at least I am assured,--that the Italians do

occasionally listen. But at any rate, music to the Milanese, no less

than to the Neapolitans, Romans, Florentines, and Genoese, means nothing

but an air, a duet, or a trio, well sung. For anything beyond this they

feel simply aversion or indifference. Perhaps these antipathies are

mainly due to the wretched performance of their choruses and orchestras,

which effectually prevents their knowing anything good outside the

beaten track they have so long followed. Possibly, too, they may to a

certain extent understand the flights of men of genius, if these latter

are careful not to give too rude a shock to their rooted predilections.

The great success of 'Guillaume Tell' at Florence supports this opinion,

and even Spontini's sublime 'Vestale' obtained a series of brilliant

representations at Naples some twenty-five years ago. Moreover, in those

towns which are under the Austrian rule, you will see the people rush

after a military band, and listen with avidity to the beautiful German

melodies, so unlike their usual insipid cavatinas. Nevertheless, in

general it is impossible to disguise the fact that the Italians as a

nation really appreciate only the material effects of music, and

distinguish nothing but its exterior forms.

Indeed, I am much inclined to regard them as more inaccessible to the

poetical side of art, and to any conceptions at all above the common,

than any other European nation. To the Italians music is a sensual

pleasure, and nothing more. For this most beautiful form of expression

they have scarcely more respect than for the culinary art. In fact, they

like music which they can take in at first hearing, without reflection

or attention, just as they would do with a plate of macaroni.

Now, we French, mean and contemptible musicians as we are, although we

are no better than the Italians when we furiously applaud a trill or a

chromatic scale by the last new singer, and miss altogether the beauty

of some grand recitative or animated chorus, yet at least we can listen,

and if we do not take in a composer's ideas it is not our fault. Beyond

the Alps, on the contrary, people behave in a manner so humiliating both

to art and to artists, whenever any representation is going on, that I

confess I would as soon sell pepper and spice at a grocer's in the Rue

St. Denis as write an opera for the Italians--nay, I would _sooner_

do it.

Added to this, they are slaves to routine and to fanaticism to a degree

one hardly sees nowadays, even at the Academy. The slightest unforeseen

innovation, whether in melody, harmony, rhythm, or instrumentation, puts

them into a perfect fury; so much so, that the _dilettanti_ of Rome, on

the appearance of Rossini's 'Barbiere di Seviglia' (which is Italian

enough in all conscience), were ready to kill the young maestro for

having the insolence to do anything unlike Paisiello.

But what renders all hope of improvement quite chimerical, and tempts

one to believe that the musical feeling of the Italians is a mere

necessary result of their organization,--the opinion both of Gall and

Spurzheim,--is their love for all that is dancing, brilliant,

glittering, and gay, to the utter neglect of the various passions by

which the characters are animated, and the confusion of time and

place--in a word, of good sense itself. Their music is always laughing:

and if by chance the composer in the course of the drama permits himself

for one moment not to be absurd, he at once hastens back to his

prescribed style, his melodious roulades and _grupetti_, his trills and

contemptible frivolities, either for voice or orchestra; and these,

succeeding so abruptly to something true to life, have an unreal effect,

and give the _opera seria_ all the appearance of a parody or caricature.

I could quote plenty of examples from famous works; but speaking

generally of these artistic questions, is it not from Italy that we get

those stereotyped conventional forms adopted by so many French

composers, resisted by Cherubim and Spontini alone among the Italians,

though rejected entirely by the Germans? What well-organized person with

any sense of musical expression could listen to a quartet in which four

characters, animated by totally conflicting passions, should

successively employ the same melodious phrase to express such different

words as these: "O, toi que j'adore!" "Quelle terreur me glace!" "Mon

coeur bat de plaisir!" "La fureur me transporte!" To suppose that music

is a language so vague that the natural inflections of fury will serve

equally well for fear, joy, and love, only proves the absence of that

sense which to others makes the varieties of expression in music as

incontestable a reality as the existence of the sun.... I regard the

course taken by Italian composers as the inevitable result of the

instincts of the public, which react more or less on the composers

themselves.

Library of the World's Best Literature, Ancient and Modern — Volume 04 · 第 237 / 316 题