TO THE ROYAL AND IMPERIAL HIGH COURT OF APPEAL

JANUARY 7th, 1820.

The welfare of my nephew is dearer to my heart than it can be to any one

else. I am myself childless, and have no relations except this boy, who

is full of talent, and I have good grounds to hope the best for him, if

properly trained.

* * * * *

My efforts and wishes have no other aim than to give the boy the best

possible education--his abilities justifying the brightest hopes--and to

fulfill the trust placed in my brotherly love by his father. The shoot

is still flexible; but if longer neglected it will become crooked and

outgrow the gardener's training hand, and upright bearing, intellect,

and character be destroyed for ever....

I know no duty more sacred than the education and training of a child.

The chief duties of a guardian consist in knowing how to appreciate what

is good, and in adopting a right course; then alone has proper attention

been devoted to the welfare of his ward, whereas in opposing what is

good he neglects his duty.

Indeed, keeping in view what is most for the benefit of the boy, I do

not object to the mother in so far sharing in the duties of a guardian,

that she may visit her son, and see him, and be apprised of all the

measures adopted for his education; but to intrust her with his sole

guardianship without a strict guardian by her side would cause the

irretrievable ruin of her son.

On these cogent grounds I reiterate my well-founded solicitation, and

feel the more confident of a favorable answer, as the welfare of my

nephew alone guides my steps in this affair.

Library of the World's Best Literature, Ancient and Modern — Volume 04 · 第 196 / 316 题