A DIALOGUE BETWEEN SYLLA AND FUNDANUS.

Sec. I. _Sylla._ Those painters, Fundanus, seem to me to do well who,

before giving the finishing touches to their paintings, lay them by for

a time and then revise them; because by taking their eyes off them for a

time they gain by frequent inspection a new insight, and are more apt to

detect minute differences, that continuous familiarity would have

hidden. Now since a human being cannot so separate himself from himself

for a time, and make a break in his continuity, and then approach

himself again--and that is perhaps the chief reason why a man is a worse

judge of himself than of others--the next best thing will be for a man

to inspect his friends after an interval, and likewise offer himself to

their scrutiny, not to see whether he has aged quickly, or whether his

bodily condition is better or worse, but to examine his moral character,

and see whether time has added any good quality, or removed any bad one.

On my return then to Rome after an absence of two years, and having been

with you now five months, I am not at all surprised that there has been

a great increase and growth in those good points which you formerly had

owing to your admirable nature; but when I see how gentle and obedient

to reason your former excessive impetuosity and hot temper has become,

it cannot but occur to me to quote the line,

"Ye gods, how much more mild is he become!"[676]

And this mildness has not wrought in you sloth or weakness, but like

cultivation of the soil it has produced a smoothness and depth fit for

action, instead of the former impetuosity and vehemence. And so it is

clear that your propensity to anger has not been effaced by any

declining vigour or through some chance, but has been cured by good

precepts. And indeed, for I will tell you the truth, when our friend

Eros[677] reported this change in you to me, I suspected that owing to

goodwill he bare witness not of the actual state of the case, but of

what was becoming to all good and virtuous men, although, as you know,

he can never be persuaded to depart from his real opinion to ingratiate

himself with anyone. But now he is acquitted of false witness, and do

you, as your journey gives you leisure, narrate to me the mode of cure

you employed to make your temper so under control, so natural, gentle

and obedient to reason.

_Fundanus._ Most friendly Sylla, take care that you do not in your

goodwill and affection to me rest under any misconception of my real

condition. For it is possible that Eros, not being able always himself

to keep his temper in its place in the obedience that Homer speaks

of,[678] but sometimes carried away by his hatred of what is bad, may

think me grown milder than I really am, as in changes of the scale in

music the lowest notes become the highest.

_Sylla._ Neither of these is the case, Fundanus, but oblige me by doing

as I ask.

Sec. II. _Fundanus._ One of the excellent precepts then of Musonius that I

remember, Sylla, is this, that those who wish to be well should diet

themselves all their life long. For I do not think we must employ reason

as a cure, as we do hellebore, by purging it out with the disease, but

we must retain it in the soul, to restrain and govern the judgement. For

the power of reason is not like physic, but wholesome food, which

co-operates with good health in producing a good habit of body in those

by whom it is taken. But admonition and reproof, when passion is at its

height and swelling, does little or no good, but resembles very closely

those strong-smelling substances, that are able to set on their legs

again those that have fallen in epileptic fits, but cannot rid them of

their disease. For although all other passions, even at the moment of

their acme, do in some sort listen to reason and admit it into the soul,

yet anger does not, for, as Melanthius says,

"Fell things it does when it the mind unsettles,"

for it absolutely turns reason out of doors, and bolts it out, and, like

those persons who burn themselves and houses together, it makes all the

interior full of confusion and smoke and noise, so that what would be

advantageous can neither be seen nor heard. And so an empty ship in a

storm at open sea would sooner admit on board a pilot from without, than

a man in a tempest of rage and anger would listen to another's advice,

unless his own reason was first prepared to hearken. But as those who

expect a siege get together and store up supplies, when they despair of

relief from without, so ought we by all means to scour the country far

and wide to derive aids against anger from philosophy, and store them up

in the soul: for, when the time of need comes, we shall find it no easy

task to import them. For either the soul doesn't hear what is said

without because of the uproar, if it have not within its own reason

(like a boatswain as it were) to receive at once and understand every

exhortation; or if it does hear, it despises what is uttered mildly and

gently, while it is exasperated by harsh censure. For anger being

haughty and self-willed and hard to be worked upon by another, like a

fortified tyranny, must have someone born and bred within it[679] to

overthrow it.

Sec. III. Now long-continued anger, and frequent giving way to it, produces

an evil disposition of soul, which people call irascibility, and which

ends in passionateness, bitterness, and peevishness, whenever the mind

becomes sore and vexed at trifles and querulous at everyday occurrences,

like iron thin and beaten out too fine. But when the judgement checks

and suppresses at once the rising anger, it not only cures the soul for

the moment, but restores its tone and balance for the future. It has

happened to myself indeed twice or thrice, when I strongly fought

against anger, that I was in the same plight as the Thebans, who after

they had once defeated the Lacedaemonians, whom they had hitherto thought

invincible, never lost a battle against them again. I then felt

confident that reason can win the victory. I saw also that anger is not

only appeased by the sprinkling of cold water, as Aristotle attested,

but is also extinguished by the action of fear; aye, and, as Homer tells

us, anger has been cured and has melted away in the case of many by some

sudden joy. So that I came to the conclusion that this passion is not

incurable for those who wish to be cured. For it does not arise from

great and important causes, but banter and joking, a laugh or a nod, and

similar trifles make many angry, as Helen by addressing her niece,

"Electra, maiden now for no short time,"[680]

provoked her to reply,

"Your wisdom blossoms late, since formerly

You left your house in shame;"[681]

and Callisthenes incensed Alexander, by saying, when a huge cup was

brought to him, "I will not drink to Alexander till I shall require the

help of AEsculapius."

Sec. IV. As then it is easy to put out a flame kindled in the hair of hares

and in wicks and rubbish, but if it once gets hold of things solid and

thick, it quickly destroys and consumes them, "raging amidst the lofty

work of the carpenters," as AEschylus[682] says; so he that observes

anger in its rise, and sees it gradually smoking and bursting forth into

fire from some chatter or rubbishy scurrility, need have no great

trouble with it, but can frequently smother it merely by silence and

contempt. For as a person puts out a fire by bringing no fuel to it, so

with respect to anger, he that does not in the beginning fan it, and

stir up its rage in himself, keeps it off and destroys it. And so,

though Hieronymus has given us many useful sayings and precepts, I am

not pleased with his remark that there is no perception of anger in its

birth, but only in its actual developement, so quick is it. For none of

the passions when stirred up and set in motion has so palpable a birth

and growth as anger. As indeed Homer skilfully shows us, where he

represents Achilles as seized at once with grief, when word was brought

him _of Patroclus' death_, in the line,

"Thus spake he, and grief's dark cloud covered him;"[683]

whereas he represents him as waxing angry with Agamemnon slowly, and as

inflamed by his many words, which if either of them[684] had abstained

from, their quarrel would not have attained such growth and magnitude.

And so Socrates, as often as he perceived any anger rising in him

against any of his friends, "setting himself like some ocean promontory

to break the violence of the waves," would lower his voice, and put on a

smiling countenance, and give his eye a gentler expression, by inclining

in the other direction and running counter to his passion, thus keeping

himself from fall and defeat.

Sec. V. For the first way, my friend, to overcome anger, like the putting

down of some tyrant, is not to obey or listen to it when it bids you

speak loud, and look fierce, and beat yourself, but to remain quiet, and

not to make the passion more intense, as one would a disease, by tossing

about and crying out. In love affairs indeed, such things as revellings,

and serenadings, and crowning the loved one's door with garlands, may

indeed bring, some pleasant and elegant relief.

"I went, but asked not who or whose she was,

I merely kissed her door-post. If that be

A crime, I do plead guilty to the same."[685]

In the case of mourners also giving up to weeping and wailing takes away

with the tears much of the grief. But anger on the contrary is much more

fanned by what angry persons do and say. It is best therefore to be

calm, or to flee and hide ourselves and go to a haven of quiet, when we

feel the fit of temper coming upon us as an epileptic fit, that we fall

not, or rather fall not on others, for it is our friends that we fall

upon most and most frequently. For we do not love all, nor envy all, nor

fear all men; but nothing is untouched or unassailed by anger; for we

are angry with friends and enemies, parents and children, aye, and with

the gods, and beasts, and even things inanimate, as was Thamyris,

"Breaking his gold-bound horn, breaking the music

Of well-compacted lyre;"[686]

and Pandarus, who called down a curse upon himself, if he did not burn

his bow "after breaking it with his hands."[687] And Xerxes inflicted

stripes and blows on the sea, and sent letters to Mount Athos, "Divine

Athos, whose top reaches heaven, put not in the way of my works stones

large and difficult to deal with, or else I will hew thee down, and

throw thee into the sea." For anger has many formidable aspects, and

many ridiculous ones, so that of all the passions it is the most hated

and despised. It will be well to consider both aspects.

Sec. VI. To begin then, whether my process was wrong or right I know not,

but I began my cure of anger by noticing its effects in others, as the

Lacedaemonians study the nature of drunkenness in the Helots. And in the

first place, as Hippocrates tells us that disease is most dangerous in

which the face of the patient is most unlike himself, so observing that

people beside themselves with anger change their face, colour, walk, and

voice, I formed an impression as it were of that aspect of passion, and

was very disgusted with myself if ever I should appear so frightful and

like one out of his mind to my friends and wife and daughters, not only

wild and unlike oneself in appearance, but also with a voice savage and

harsh, as I had noticed in some[688] of my acquaintance, who could

neither preserve for anger their ordinary behaviour, or demeanour, or

grace of language, or persuasiveness and gentleness in conversation.

Caius Gracchus, indeed, the orator, whose character was harsh and style

of oratory impassioned, had a pitch-pipe made for him, such as musicians

use to heighten or lower their voices by degrees, and this, when he was

making a speech, a slave stood behind him and held, and used to give him

a mild and gentle note on it, whereby he lowered his key, and removed

from his voice the harsh and passionate element, charming and laying the

heat of the orator,

"As shepherds' wax-joined reed sounds musically

With sleep provoking strain."[689]

For myself if I had some elegant and sprightly companion, I should not

be vexed at his showing me a looking-glass in my fits of anger, as they

offer one to some after a bath to little useful end. For to behold

oneself unnaturally distorted in countenance will condemn anger in no

small degree. The poets playfully tell us that Athene when playing on

the pipe was rebuked thus by a Satyr,

"That look no way becomes you, take your armour,

Lay down your pipes, and do compose your cheeks,"

and though she paid no attention to him, yet afterwards when she saw her

face in a river, she felt vexed and threw her pipes away, although art

had made melody a compensation for her unsightliness. And Marsyas, it

seems, by a sort of mouthpiece forcibly repressed the violence of his

breath, and tricked up and hid the contortion of his face,

"Around his shaggy temples put bright gold,

And o'er his open mouth thongs tied behind."

Now anger, that puffs up and distends the face so as to look ugly,

utters a voice still more harsh and unpleasant,

"Moving the mind's chords undisturbed before."

They say that the sea is cleansed when agitated by the winds it throws

up tangle and seaweed; but the intemperate and bitter and vain words,

which the mind throws up when the soul is agitated, defile the speakers

of them first of all and fill them with infamy, as always having those

thoughts within their bosom and being defiled with them, but only giving

vent to them in anger. And so for a word which is, as Plato styles it,

"a very small matter," they incur a most heavy punishment, for they get

reputed to be enemies, and evil speakers, and malignant in disposition.

Sec. VII. Seeing and observing all this, it occurs to me to take it as a

matter of fact, and record it for my own general use, that if it is good

to keep the tongue soft and smooth in a fever, it is better to keep it

so in anger. For if the tongue of people in a fever be unnatural, it is

a bad sign, but not the cause of their malady; but the tongue of angry

people, being rough and foul, and breaking out into unseemly speeches,

produces insults that work irremediable mischief, and argue deep-rooted

malevolence within. For wine drunk neat does not exhibit the soul in so

ungovernable and hateful a condition as temper does: for the outbreaks

of the one smack of laughter and fun, while those of the other are

compounded with gall: and at a drinking-bout he that is silent is

burdensome to the company and tiresome, whereas in anger nothing is more

highly thought of than silence, as Sappho advises,

"When anger's busy in the brain

Thy idly-barking tongue restrain."

Sec. VIII. And not only does the consideration of all this naturally arise

from observing ourselves in the moments of anger, but we cannot help

seeing also the other properties of rage, how ignoble it is, how

unmanly, how devoid of dignity and greatness of mind! And yet to most

people its noise seems vigour, its threatening confidence, and its

obstinacy force of character; some even not wisely entitle its

savageness magnanimity, and its implacability firmness, and its morosity

hatred of what is bad. For their actions and motions and whole demeanour

argue great littleness and meanness, not only when they are fierce with

little boys, and peevish with women, and think it right to treat dogs

and horses and mules with harshness, as Otesiphon the pancratiast

thought fit to kick back a mule that had kicked him, but even in the

butcheries that tyrants commit their littleness of soul is apparent in

their savageness, and their suffering in their action, so that they are

like the bites of serpents, that, when they are burnt and smart with

pain, violently thrust their venom on those that have hurt them. For as

a swelling is produced in the flesh by a heavy blow, so in softest souls

the inclination to hurt others gets its greater strength from greater

weakness. Thus women are more prone to anger than men, and people ill

than people well, and old men than men in their prime, and the

unfortunate than the prosperous; the miser is most prone to anger with

his steward, the glutton with his cook, the jealous man with his wife,

the vain man when he is spoken ill of; and worst of all are those "men

who are too eager in states for office, or to head a faction, a manifest

sorrow," to borrow Pindar's words. So from the very great pain and

suffering of the soul there arises mainly from weakness anger, which is

not like the nerves of the soul, as some one defined it, but like its

strainings and convulsions when it is excessively vehement in its thirst

for revenge.

Sec. IX. Such bad examples as these were not pleasant to look at but

necessary, but I shall now proceed to describe people who have been mild

and easy in dealing with anger, conduct gratifying either to see or hear

about, being utterly disgusted[690] with people who use such language

as,

"You have a man wronged: shall a man stand this?"

and,

"Put your heel upon his neck, and dash his head against

the ground,"

and other provoking expressions such as these, by which some not well

have transferred anger from the woman's side of the house to the man's.

For manliness in all other respects seems to resemble justice, and to

differ from it only in respect to gentleness, with which it has more

affinities. For it sometimes happens to worse men to govern better ones,

but to erect a trophy in the soul against anger (which Heraclitus says

it is difficult to contend against, for whatever it wishes is bought at

the price of the soul), is a proof of power so great and victorious as

to be able to apply the judgement as if it were nerves and sinews to the

passions. So I always try to collect and peruse the remarks on this

subject not only of the philosophers, who foolish[691] people say had no

gall in their composition, but still more of kings and tyrants. Such was

the remark of Antigonus to his soldiers, when they were abusing him near

his tent as if he were not listening, so he put his staff out, and said,

"What's to do? can you not go rather farther off to run me down?" And

when Arcadio the Achaean, who was always railing against Philip, and

advising people to flee

"Unto a country where they knew not Philip,"

visited Macedonia afterwards on some chance or other, the king's friends

thought he ought to be punished and the matter not looked over; but

Philip treated him kindly, and sent him presents and gifts, and

afterwards bade inquiry to be made as to what sort of account of him

Arcadio now gave to the Greeks; and when all testified that the fellow

had become a wonderful praiser of the king, Philip said, "You see I knew

how to cure him better than all of you." And at the Olympian games when

there was defamation of Philip, and some of his suite said to him, that

the Greeks ought to smart for it, because they railed against him when

they were treated well by him, he replied, "What will they do then if

they are treated badly by me?" Excellent also was the behaviour of

Pisistratus to Thrasybulus, and of Porsena to Mucius, and of Magas to

Philemon. As to Magas, after he had been publicly jeered at by Philemon

in one of his comedies at the theatre in the following words,

"Magas, the king hath written thee a letter,

Unhappy Magas, since thou can'st not read,"

after having taken Philemon, who had been cast on shore by a storm at

Paraetonium, he commanded one of his soldiers only to touch his neck with

the naked sword and then to go away quietly, and dismissed him, after

sending him a ball and some dice as if he were a silly boy. And Ptolemy

on one occasion, flouting a grammarian for his ignorance, asked him who

was the father of Peleus, and he answered, "I will tell you, if you tell

me first who was the father of Lagus." This was a jeer at the obscure

birth of the king, and all his courtiers were indignant at it as an

unpardonable liberty; but Ptolemy said, "If it is not kingly to take a

flout, neither is it kingly to give one." And Alexander was more savage

than usual in his behaviour to Callisthenes and Clitus. So Porus, when

he was taken captive, begged Alexander to use him as a king. And on his

inquiring, "What, nothing more?" he replied "No. For everything is

included in being used as a king." So they call the king of the gods

Milichius,[692] while they call Ares Maimactes;[693] and punishment and

torture they assign to the Erinnyes and to demons, not to the gods or

Olympus.

Sec. X. As then a certain person passed the following remark on Philip when

he had razed Olynthus to the ground, "He certainly could not build such

another city," so we may say to anger, "You can root up, and destroy,

and throw down, but to raise up and save and spare and tolerate is the

work of mildness and moderation, the work of a Camillus, a Metellus, an

Aristides, a Socrates; but to sting and bite is to resemble the ant and

horse-fly. For, indeed, when I consider revenge, I find its angry method

to be for the most part ineffectual, since it spends itself in biting

the lips and gnashing the teeth, and in vain attacks, and in railings

coupled with foolish threats, and eventually resembles children running

races, who from feebleness ridiculously tumble down before they reach

the goal they are hastening to. So that speech of the Rhodian to a

lictor of the Roman praetor who was shouting and talking insolently was

not inapt, "It is no matter to me what you say, but what your master

thinks."[694] And Sophocles, when he had introduced Neoptolemus and

Eurypylus as armed for the battle, gives them this high

commendation,[695]

"They rushed into the midst of armed warriors,"

Some barbarians indeed poison their steel, but bravery has no need of

gall, being dipped in reason, but rage and fury are not invincible but

rotten. And so the Lacedaemonians by their pipes turn away the anger of

their warriors, and sacrifice to the Muses before commencing battle,

that reason may abide with them, and when they have routed a foe do not

follow up the victory,[696] but relax their rage, which like small

daggers they can easily take back. But anger kills myriads before it is

glutted with revenge, as happened in the case of Cyrus and Pelopidas the

Theban. But Agathocles bore mildly the revilings of those he was

besieging, and when one of them cried out, "Potter, how are you going to

get money to pay your mercenaries?" he replied laughingly, "Out of your

town if I take it." And when some of those on the wall threw his

ugliness into the teeth of Antigonus, he said to them, "I thought I was

rather a handsome fellow." But after he had taken the town, he sold for

slaves those that had flouted him, protesting that, if they insulted him

again, he would bring the matter before their masters. I have noticed

also that hunters and orators are very unsuccessful when they give way

to anger.[697] And Aristotle tells us that the friends of Satyrus

stopped up his ears with wax when he was to plead a cause, that he might

not make any confusion in the case through rage at the abuse of his

enemies. And does it not frequently happen with ourselves that a slave

who has offended escapes punishment, because they abscond in fear of our

threats and harsh words? What nurses then say to children, "Give up

crying, and you shall have it," may usefully be applied to anger, thus,

"Do not be in a hurry, or bawl out, or be vehement, and you will sooner

and better get what you want." For a father, seeing his boy trying to

cut or cleave something with a knife, takes the knife from him and does

it himself: and similarly a person, taking revenge out of the hand of

passion, does himself safely and usefully and without harm punish the

person who deserves punishment, and not himself instead, as anger often

does.

Sec. XI. Now though all the passions need such discipline as by exercise

shall tame and subdue their unreasoning and disobedient elements, yet

there is none which we ought to keep under by such discipline so much as

the exhibition of anger to our servants. For neither envy, nor fear, nor

rivalry come into play between them and us; but our frequent displays of

anger to them, creating many offences and faults, make us to slip as if

on slippery ground owing to our autocracy with our servants, which no

one resists or prevents. For it is impossible to check irresponsible

power so as never to break out under the influence of passion, unless

one wields power with much meekness, and refuses to listen to the

frequent complaints of one's wife and friends charging one with being

too easy and lax with one's servants. And by nothing have I been more

exasperated against them, as if they were being ruined for want of

correction. At last, though late, I got to see that in the first place

it is better to make them worse by forbearance, than by bitterness and

anger to distort oneself for the correction of others. In the next place

I observed that many for the very reason that they were not corrected

were frequently ashamed to be bad, and made pardon rather than

punishment the commencement of their reformation, aye, and made better

slaves to some merely at their nod silently and cheerfully than to

others with all their beatings and brandings, and so I came to the

conclusion that reason gets better obeyed than temper, for it is not as

the poet said,

"Where there is fear, there too is self-respect,"

but it is just the other way about, for self-respect begets that kind of

fear that corrects the behaviour. But perpetual and pitiless beating

produces not so much repentance for wrong-doing as contrivances to

continue in it without detection. In the third place, ever remembering

and reflecting within myself that, just as he that teaches us the use of

the bow does not forbid us to shoot but only to miss the mark, so it

will not prevent punishment altogether to teach people to do it in

season, and with moderation, utility, and decorum, I strive to remove

anger most especially by not forbidding those who are to be corrected to

speak in their defence, but by listening to them. For the interval of

time gives a pause to passion, and a delay that mitigates it, and so

judgement finds out both the fit manner and adequate amount of

punishment. Moreover he that is punished has nothing to allege against

his correction, if he is punished not in anger but only after his guilt

is brought home to him. And the greatest disgrace will not be incurred,

which is when the servant seems to speak more justly than the master. As

then Phocion, after the death of Alexander, to stop the Athenians from

revolting and believing the news too soon, said to them, "Men of Athens,

if he is dead to-day, he will certainly also be dead to-morrow and the

next day," so I think the man who is in a hurry to punish anyone in his

rage ought to consider with himself, "If this person has wronged you

to-day, he will also have wronged you to-morrow and the next day; and

there will be no harm done if he shall be punished somewhat late;

whereas if he shall be punished at once, he will always seem to you to

have been innocent, as has often happened before now." For which of us

is so savage as to chastise and scourge a slave because five or ten days

before he over-roasted the meat, or upset the table, or was somewhat

tardy on some errand? And yet these are the very things for which we put

ourselves out and are harsh and implacable, immediately after they have

happened and are recent. For as bodies seem greater in a mist, so do

little matters in a rage. We ought therefore to consider such arguments

as these at once, and if, when there is no trace of passion left, the

matter appear bad to calm and clear reason, then it ought to be taken in

hand, and the punishment ought not to be neglected or abandoned, as we

leave food when we have lost our appetites. For nothing causes people to

punish so much when their anger is fierce, as that when it is appeased

they do not punish at all, but forget the matter entirely, and resemble

lazy rowers, who lie in harbour when the sea is calm, and then sail out

to their peril when the wind gets up. So we, condemning reason for

slackness and mildness in punishing, are in a hurry to punish, borne

along by passion as by a dangerous gale. He that is hungry takes his

food as nature dictates, but he that punishes should have no hunger or

thirst for it, nor require anger as a sauce to stimulate him to it, but

should punish when he is as far as possible from having any desire for

it, and has to compel his reason to it. For we ought not, as Aristotle

tells us slaves in his time were scourged in Etruria to the music of the

flute, to go headlong into punishing with a desire and zest for it, and

to delight in punishing, and then afterwards to be sorry at it--for the

first is savage, and the last womanish--but we should without either

sorrow or pleasure chastise at the dictates of reason, giving anger no

opportunity to interfere.

Sec. XII. But this perhaps will not appear a cure of anger so much as a

putting away and avoiding such faults as men commit in anger. And yet,

though the swelling of the spleen is only a symptom of fever, the fever

is assuaged by its abating, as Hieronymus tells us. Now when I

contemplated the origin of anger itself, I observed that, though

different persons fell into it for different reasons, yet in nearly all

of them was the idea of their being despised and neglected to be found.

So we ought to help those who try to get rid of anger, by removing as

far as possible from them any action savouring of contempt or contumely,

and by looking upon their anger as folly or necessity, or emotion, or

mischance, as Sophocles says,

"In those that are unfortunate, O king,

No mind stays firm, but all their balance lose."[698]

And so Agamemnon, ascribing to Ate his carrying off Briseis, yet says to

Achilles,

"I wish to please you in return, and give

Completest satisfaction."[699]

For suing is not the action of one who shews his contempt, and when he

that has done an injury is humble he removes all idea of slighting one.

But the angry person must not expect this, but rather take to himself

the answer of Diogenes, who, when it was said to him, "These people

laugh at you," replied, "But I am not one to be laughed at," and not

think himself despised, but rather despise the person who gave the

offence, as acting from weakness, or error, or rashness, or

heedlessness, or illiberality, or old age, or youth. Nor must we

entertain such notions with regard to our servants and friends. For they

do not despise us as void of ability or energy, but owing to our

evenness and good-nature, some because we are mild, and others presuming

on our affection for them. But as it is we not only fly into rages with

wife and slaves and friends, as if we were slighted by them, but we also

frequently, from forming the same idea of being slighted, fall foul of

innkeepers and sailors and muleteers, and are vexed at dogs that bark

and asses that are in our way: like the man who was going to beat an

ass-driver, but when he cried out he was an Athenian, he said to the

ass, "You are not an Athenian anyway," and beat it with many stripes.

Sec. XIII. Moreover those continuous and frequent fits of anger that gather

together in the soul by degrees, like a swarm of bees or wasps, are

generated within us by selfishness and peevishness, luxury and softness.

And so nothing causes us to be mild to our servants and wife and friends

so much as easiness and simplicity, and the learning to be content with

what we have, and not to require a quantity of superfluities.

"He who likes not his meat if over-roast

Or over-boiled, or under-roast or under-boiled,

And never praises it however dressed,"

but will not drink unless he have snow to cool his drink, nor eat bread

purchased in the market, nor touch food served on cheap or earthenware

plates, nor sleep upon any but a feather bed that rises and falls like

the sea stirred up from its depths, and with rods and blows hastens his

servants at table, so that they run about and cry out and sweat as if

they were bringing poultices to sores, he is slave to a weak querulous

and discontented mode of life, and, like one who has a continual cough

or various ailments, whether he is aware of it or not, he is in an

ulcerous and catarrh-like condition as regards his proneness to anger.

We must therefore train the body to contentment by plain living, that it

may be easily satisfied: for they that require little do not miss much;

and it is no great hardship to begin with our food, and take it silently

whatever it is, and not by being choleric and peevish to thrust upon

ourselves and friends the worst sauce to meat, anger.

"No more unpleasant supper could there be"[700]

than that wherein the servants are beaten, and the wife scolded, because

something is burnt or smoked or not salt enough, or because the bread is

too cold. Arcesilaus was once entertaining some friends and strangers,

and when dinner was served, there was no bread, through the servants

having neglected to buy any. In such a case as this which of us would

not have broken the walls with vociferation? But he only smiled and

said, "How unfit a sage is to give an entertainment!" And when Socrates

once took Euthydemus home with him from the wrestling-school, Xanthippe

was in a towering rage, and scolded, and at last upset the table, and

Euthydemus rose and went away full of sorrow. But Socrates said to him,

"Did not a hen at your house the other day fly in and act in the very

same way? And we did not put ourselves out about it." We ought to

receive our friends with gaiety and smiles and welcome, not knitting our

brows, or inspiring fear and trembling in the attendants. We ought also

to accustom ourselves to the use of any kind of ware at table, and not

to stint ourselves to one kind rather than another, as some pick out a

particular tankard or horn, as they say Marius did, out of many, and

will not drink out of anything else; and some act in the same way with

regard to oil-flasks and scrapers,[701] being content with only one out

of all, and so, if such an article is broken or lost, they are very much

put out about it, and punish with severity. He then that is prone to

anger should not use rare and dainty things, such as choice cups and

seals and precious stones: for if they are lost they put a man beside

himself much more than the loss of ordinary and easily got things would

do. And so when Nero had got an eight-cornered tent constructed, a

wonderful object both for its beauty and costliness, Seneca said to him,

"You have now shown yourself to be poor, for if you should lose this,

you will not be able to procure such another." And indeed it did so

happen that the tent was lost by shipwreck, but Nero bore its loss

patiently, remembering what Seneca had said. Now this easiness about

things generally makes a man also easy and gentle to his servants, and

if to them, then it is clear he will be so to his friends also, and to

all that serve under him in any capacity. So we observe that

newly-purchased slaves do not inquire about the master who has bought

them, whether he is superstitious or envious, but only whether he is a

bad-tempered man: and generally speaking we see that neither can men put

up with chaste wives, nor wives with loving husbands, nor friends with

one another, if they be ill-tempered to boot. So neither marriage nor

friendship is bearable with anger, though without anger even drunkenness

is a small matter. For the wand of Dionysus punishes sufficiently the

drunken man, but if anger be added it turns wine from being the

dispeller of care and inspirer of the dance into a savage and fury. And

simple madness can be cured by Anticyra,[702] but madness mixed with

anger is the producer of tragedies and dreadful narratives.

Sec. XIV. So we ought to give anger no vent, either in jest, for that draws

hatred to friendliness; or in discussion, for that turns love of

learning into strife; or on the judgement-seat, for that adds insolence

to power; or in teaching, for that produces dejection and hatred of

learning: or in prosperity, for that increases envy; or in adversity,

for that deprives people of compassion, when they are peevish and run

counter to those who condole with them, like Priam,

"A murrain on you, worthless wretches all,

Have you no griefs at home, that here you come

To sympathize with me?"[703]

Good temper on the other hand is useful in some circumstances, adorns

and sweetens others, and gets the better of all peevishness and anger by

its gentleness. Thus Euclides,[704] when his brother said to him in a

dispute between them, "May I perish, if I don't have my revenge on you!"

replied, "May I perish, if I don't persuade you!" and so at once turned

and changed him. And Polemo, when a man reviled him who was fond of

precious stones and quite crazy for costly seal-rings, made no answer,

but bestowed all his attention on one of his seal-rings, and eyed it

closely; and he being delighted said, "Do not look at it so, Polemo, but

in the light of the sun, and it will appear to you more beautiful." And

Aristippus, when there was anger between him and AEschines, and somebody

said, "O Aristippus, where is now your friendship?" replied, "It is

asleep, but I will wake it up," and went to AEschines, and said to him,

"Do I seem to you so utterly unfortunate and incurable as to be unworthy

of any consideration?" And AEschines replied, "It is not at all wonderful

that you, being naturally superior to me in all things, should have been

first to detect in this matter too what was needful."

"For not a woman only, but young child

Tickling the bristly boar with tender hand,

Will lay him prostrate sooner than an athlete."

But we that tame wild beasts and make them gentle, and carry in our arms

young wolves and lions' whelps, inconsistently repel our children and

friends and acquaintances in our rage, and let loose our temper like

some wild beast on our servants and fellow-citizens, speciously trying

to disguise it not rightly under the name of hatred of evil, but it is,

I suppose, as with the other passions and diseases of the soul, we

cannot get rid of any of them by calling one prudence, and another

liberality, and another piety.

Sec. XV. And yet, as Zeno said the seed was a mixture and compound drawn

from all the faculties of the soul, so anger seems a universal seed from

all the passions. For it is drawn from pain and pleasure and

haughtiness, and from envy it gets its property of malignity--and it is

even worse than envy,[705] for it does not mind its own suffering if it

can only implicate another in misery--and the most unlovely kind of

desire is innate in it, namely the appetite for injuring another. So

when we go to the houses of spendthrifts we hear a flute-playing girl

early in the morning, and see "the dregs of wine," as one said, and

fragments of garlands, and the servants at the doors reeking of

yesterday's debauch; but for tokens of savage and peevish masters these

you will see by the faces, and marks, and manacles of their servants:

for in the house of an angry man

"The only music ever heard is wailing,"

stewards being beaten within, and maids tortured, so that the spectators

even in their jollity and pleasure pity these victims of passion.

Sec. XVI. Moreover those to whom it happens through their genuine hatred of

what is bad to be frequently overtaken by anger, can abate its excess

and acerbity by giving up their excessive confidence in their intimates.

For nothing swells the anger more, than when a good man is detected of

villainy, or one who we thought loved us falls out and jangles with us.

As for my own disposition, you know of course how mightily it inclines

to goodwill and belief in mankind. As then people walking on empty

space,[706] the more confidently I believe in anybody's affection, the

more sorrow and distress do I feel if my estimate is a mistaken one. And

indeed I could never divest myself of my ardour and zeal in affection,

but as to trusting people I could perhaps use Plato's caution as a curb.

For he said he so praised Helicon the mathematician, because he was by

nature a changeable animal, but that he was afraid of those that were

well educated in the city, lest, being human beings and the seed of

human beings, they should reveal by some trait or other the weakness of

human nature. But Sophocles' line,

"Trace out most human acts, you'll find them base,"

seems to trample on human nature and lower its merits too much. Still

such a peevish and condemnatory verdict as this has a tendency to make

people milder in their rage, for it is the sudden and unexpected that

makes people go distracted. And we ought, as Panaetius somewhere said, to

imitate Anaxagoras, and as he said at the death of his son, "I knew that

I had begotten a mortal," so ought every one of us to use the following

kind of language in those contretemps that stir up our anger, "I knew

that the slave I bought was not a philosopher," "I knew that the friend

I had was not perfect," "I knew that my wife was but a woman." And if

anyone would also constantly put to himself that question of Plato, "Am

I myself all I should be?" and look at home instead of abroad, and curb

his propensity to censoriousness, he would not be so keen to detect evil

in others, for he would see that he stood in need of much allowance

himself. But now each of us, when angry and punishing, quote the words

of Aristides and Cato, "Do not steal, Do not tell lies," and "Why are

you lazy?" And, what is most disgraceful of all, we blame angry people

when we are angry ourselves, and chastise in temper faults that were

committed in temper, unlike the doctors who

"With bitter physic purge the bitter bile,"

for we rather increase and aggravate the disease. Whenever then I busy

myself with such considerations as these, I try also to curtail my

curiosity. For to scrutinize and pry into everything too minutely, and

to overhaul every business of a servant, or action of a friend, or

pastime of a son, or whisper of a wife, produces frequent, indeed daily,

fits of anger, caused entirely by peevishness and harshness of

character. Euripides says that the Deity

"In great things intervenes, but small things leaves

To fortune;"[707]

but I am of opinion that a prudent man should commit nothing to fortune,

nor neglect anything, but should put some things in his wife's hands to

manage, others in the hands of his servants, others in the hands of his

friends, (as a governor has his stewards, and financiers, and

controllers), while he himself superintends the most important and

weighty matters. For as small writing strains the eyes, so small matters

even more strain and bother people, and stir up their anger, which

carries this evil habit to greater matters. Above all I thought that

saying of Empedocles, "Fast from evil,"[708] a great and divine one, and

I approved of those promises and vows as not ungraceful or

unphilosophical, to abstain for a year from wine and Venus, honouring

the deity by continence, or for a stated time to give up lying, taking

great heed to ourselves to be truthful always whether in play or

earnest. With these I compared my own vow, as no less pleasing to the

gods and holy, first to abstain from anger for a few days, like spending

days without drunkenness or even without wine at all, offering as it

were wineless offerings of honey.[709] Then I tried for a month or two,

and so in time made some progress in forbearance by earnest resolve, and

by keeping myself courteous and without anger and using fair language,

purifying myself from evil words and absurd actions, and from passion

which for a little unlovely pleasure pays us with great mental

disturbance and the bitterest repentance. In consequence of all this my

experience, and the assistance of the deity, has made me form the view,

that courtesy and gentleness and kindliness are not so agreeable, and

pleasant, and delightful, to any of those we live with as to ourselves,

that have those qualities.[710]

[676] Homer, "Iliad," xxii. 373.

[677] Alluded to again "On the tranquillity of the

mind," Sec. i.

[678] The allusion is to Homer's "Odyssey," xx. 23.

[679] Reading [Greek: ex heautou] with Reiske.

[680] Euripides, "Orestes," 72.

[681] Euripides, "Orestes," 99.

[682] Fragment 361.

[683] Homer, "Iliad," xvii. 591.

[684] The reading of the MSS. is [Greek: auton].

[685] Lines of Callimachus. [Greek: phlien] is the

admirable emendation of Salmasius.

[686] Sophocles, "Thamyras," Fragm. 232.

[687] "Iliad," v. 214-216.

[688] Reading [Greek: eniois], as Wyttenbach suggests.

[689] Aeschylus, "Prometheus," 574, 575.

[690] It will be seen I adopt the reading and

punctuation of Xylander.

[691] This is the reading of Reiske and Duebner.

[692] That is _mild_. Zeus is so called, Pausanias, i.

37; ii. 9, 20.

[693] That is, _fierce_, _furious_. It will be seen I

adopt the suggestion of Reiske.

[694] Literally "is silent about." It is like the saying

about Von Moltke that he can be silent in six or seven

languages.

[695] Adopting Reiske's reading.

[696] Compare Pausanias, iv. 8.

[697] Duebner puts this sentence in brackets.

[698] Sophocles, "Antigone," 563, 564.

[699] Homer, "Iliad," xix. 138.

[700] Homer, "Odyssey," xx. 392.

[701] Or strigils.

[702] Anticyra was famous for its hellebore, which was

prescribed in cases of madness. See Horace, "Satires,"

ii. 3. 82, 83.

[703] Homer, "Iliad," xxiv. 239, 240.

[704] A philosopher of Megara, and disciple of Socrates.

Compare our author, "De Fraterno Amore," Sec. xviii.

[705] So Reiske. Duebner reads [Greek: phobou]. The MSS.

have [Greek: phonou], which Wyttenbach retains, but is

evidently not quite satisfied with the text. Can [Greek:

phthonou]--[Greek: heteron] be an account of [Greek:

epichairekakia]?

[706] Up in the clouds. Cf. [Greek: aerobateo].

[707] Horace, remembering these lines no doubt, says "De

Arte Poetica," 191, 192,

"Nec deus intersit nisi dignus vindice nodus Inciderit."

[708] It is quite likely that the delicious poet Robert

Herrick borrowed hence his "To starve thy sin not bin,

That is to keep thy Lent." For we know he was a student

of the "Moralia" when at the University of Cambridge.

[709] See AEschylus, "Eumenides," 107. Sophocles,

"Oedipus Colonaeus," 481. See also our author's "De

Sanitate Praecepta," Sec. xix.

[710] Jeremy Taylor has closely imitated parts of this

Dialogue in his "Holy Living," chapter iv. sect. viii.,

"Twelve remedies against anger, by way of exercise,"

"Thirteen remedies against anger, by way of

consideration." Such a storehouse did he make of the

"Moralia."

Plutarch's Morals · 第 27 / 34 题