Who with the trees they cherish live and die?—

and does not

The joyous Bacchus send increase of fruit,

The chaste autumnal light, to every tree?—

as Pindar sings), and who yet will not allow that the nourishment and

growth of children and young people, who in the flower of their age are

to be formed and shaped into several varieties of beauty, is under the

care and tuition of any Deity; or that there is any Divinity to take

care that man, being once born, may be guided and conducted in the true

paths of virtue, and to prevent the tender plant from being bowed and

bent the wrong way for want of a good instructor, or by the depraved

conversation of those with whom he lives. For my part, I look upon it

as a heinous piece of indignity and ingratitude thus to say, while we

are all the time enjoying the bounty and benignity of God, which he is

ready to disperse and diffuse over all, and which never abandons the

distresses and needs of mortals. And yet in many of these needs the

duty to be performed is rather necessary than pleasant. Thus our being

delivered from the mother’s womb is no such delightful thing, as being

attended with pain and issues of blood; and yet there is a celestial

midwife and overseer that takes particular care of that necessity,

which is Lucina. And indeed a man had better never be born, than to be

made bad and wicked for want of a good tutor and guardian. Nay, we find

that the divine power does not desert us in our sickness, nor after we

are dead; there being still some Deity or other who claims some certain

peculiar employment or function, even upon those occasions. Among the

rest, there is one that helps to convey the souls of such as have ended

this life into the other world, and lays them asleep, according to this

of the poet:

For shady night ne’er brought me forth to play

With artful touch upon the tuneful lyre,

Nor to be mistress of prophetic fire,

Nor pains of rude distempers to allay;

But to convey the souls of the deceased

Each one to their appointed place of rest.[93]

Nevertheless these ministerial functions have many difficulties and

troubles which attend them; whereas we cannot imagine any employment

more holy, any exercise more sacred, or any contention for prize and

glory more becoming a Deity, than to direct and assist the lawful

endeavors and pursuits of lovers in their prime of years and beauty.

There is nothing dishonorable, nothing of forced necessity in this; but

gentle persuasion and alluring grace, rendering labor delightful, leads

to virtue and friendship, which never attains the true accomplishment

of the end it aims at without some divine assistance, nor can have any

other conductor and master than Cupid himself, who is the friend and

companion of the Muses, the Graces, and Venus his own mother. For,

according to Melannippides,

Great Love it is, that in the heart of man

Sows the sweet harvest of unstained desire;

and he always mingles those things that are sweetest with those that

are fairest. What do you say, Zeuxippus? Can we believe it to be

otherwise?

16. In truth, I judge it so, replied Zeuxippus; and I think it would be

absurd to affirm the contrary. And would it not be absurd indeed, said

my father, since there are four sorts of friendships, according to the

determination of the ancients,—the first, say they, is natural, the

next is that of kindred and relations, the third is that of friends and

acquaintance, and last is that of lovers,—if three of these have their

several tutelar Deities, under the names of the patron of friendship,

the patron of hospitality, and he who knits affection between those of

the same race and family; while only amorous affection, as if it were

unhallowed and under interdiction, is left without any guardian or

protector, which indeed requires the greatest care and government above

all the rest? All that you say, replied Zeuxippus, is undeniable.

By the way, replied my father, we may here take notice of what Plato

says upon this subject, as pertinent to our discourse. For he says,

that there is a certain madness transmitted from the body to the soul,

proceeding from a malignant mixture of ill-humors, or a noxious

vapor or rather pernicious spirit that possesses the heart; which

madness is a rugged and terrible disease. The other is a kind of fury,

partaking something of divine inspiration; neither is it engendered

within, but is an insufflation from without, and a disturbance of the

rational and considerative faculty, deriving its beginning and motion

from some stronger power; the common affection of which is called the

enthusiastic passion. For as ἔμπνοος signifies _filled with breath_,

and ἔμφρων denotes _replete with prudence_; so this commotion of the

soul is called enthusiasm (from ἔνθεος) by reason it participates of

a more divine power. Now the prophetic part of enthusiasm derives

itself from the inspiration of Apollo possessing the intellect of the

soothsayer; but Bacchanal fury proceeds from Father Bacchus.

And with the Corybantes ye shall dance,

says Sophocles. For as for the extravagancies of the priests of Cybele,

the mother of the Gods, and those which are called panic terrors and

ejaculations, they are all of the same nature with the Bacchanal

orgies. There is also a third sort of enthusiasm, proper to the Muses,

which, possessing an even tempered and placid soul, excites and rouses

up the gifts of poetry and music. But as for that same warlike fury

which is called Arimanian, it is well known to descend from the God of

War; a sort of fury, wherein there is no grace nor musical sweetness,

calling forth tearful Mars, and rousing up the people to discord and

tumult.[94]

There remains yet one sort more of alienation of the understanding

in man, the same neither obscure, nor yet altogether calm and quiet;

concerning which I would fain ask Pemptides,

Which of the Gods it is who shakes the spear

That beareth fruit so lovely and so fair.

But without expecting a resolution of this question, I mean that erotic

fury that possesses lovely youths and chaste women, yet a hot and

vehement transport. For do we not see how the warrior lays down his

arms, and submits to this more prevalent rage?

His grooms, o’erjoyed he had the war forsook,

His ponderous arms from off his shoulders took;[95]

and thus having renounced the hazards of battle, he sits down a quiet

spectator of other men’s dangers. As for these Bacchanalian motions and

frisking of the Corybantes, there is a way to allay those extravagant

transports, by changing the measure from the Trochaic and the tone

from the Phrygian. And the Pythian prophetess, descending from her

tripos and quitting the prophetic exhalation, becomes sedate and calm

again. Whereas the fury of love, wherever it seizes either man or

woman, sets them in a flame; no music, no appeasing incantations, no

changes of place are able to quench or put a stop to it; but being in

presence, they love; being absent, they desire; by day they prosecute

their importunate visits; by night they serenade at the windows;

sober, they are continually calling upon their loves; and when they

are fuddled, are always teasing the company with their love songs and

madrigals. Neither, as one was pleased to say, are poetical fancies,

by reason of their lively expressions, rightly called waking dreams;

but the dialogues of persons enamored, discoursing with their absent

loves, and dallying, embracing, and expostulating with them as if they

were present, much rather deserve this name. For the sight seems to

delineate other fancies in the water, that quickly glide away and slip

out of the mind; whereas the imaginations of lovers, being as it were

enamelled by fire, leave the images of things imprinted in the memory,

moving, living, speaking, and remaining for a long time. So that Cato

the Roman was wont to say, that the soul of a lover dwelt in the soul

of the person beloved, for that there is settled and fixed in the one

the form, shape, manners, conversation and actions of the other; by

which being led, the lover quickly dispatches a long journey,—as the

Cynics say they have found a compendious and direct road to virtue,—and

he is carried from love to friendship, as it were with wind and tide,

the God of Love assisting his passion. In short then I say, that the

enthusiasm of lovers is neither void of divine inspiration, neither

is it under the guardianship and conduct of any other Deity but him

whose festivals we solemnize, and to whom we offer our oblations.

Nevertheless, in regard we measure the excellency of a Deity by his

puissance and by the benefit which we receive at his hands, and esteem

power and virtue to be the two chiefest and most divine of all human

blessings, it may not be unseasonable to consider whether Love be

inferior in power to any other of the Gods. For, according to Sophocles,

Great is the puissance of the Cyprian Queen,

And great the honor which her triumphs win.[96]

Great is also the dominion of Mars; and indeed we see the power of all

the rest of the Gods divided in some measure between these two,—the one

being most naturally allied to the beautiful, the other most mighty in

the resistance of evil, and both being originally bred in the soul, as

Plato says of his ideas.

Now then let us consider, the venereal delight is a thing that may

be purchased for a drachm, and there is no man that ever underwent

any pain or danger for the sake of venereal enjoyments, unless he

were inflamed with the fires of love. Insomuch, that not to mention

such courtesans as either Phryne or Lais, we find that the harlot

Gnathaenion,

By lanthorn-light, at evening late,

Waiting and calling for some mate,

is often passed by and neglected;

But if some spirit blow the fire,

Kindled by love’s extreme desire,

this makes the pleasure equally esteemed and valued with the treasures

of Tantalus and all his vast dominions. So faint and so soon cloyed is

venereal desire, unless rendered grateful by the charms and inspiration

of love. Which is more evidently confirmed by this; for that many men

admit others to partake of their venereal pleasures, prostituting not

only their mistresses and concubines, but also their own wives, to the

embraces of their friends; as it is reported of the Roman Gabba, who

inviting Maecenas to his house, and perceiving him winking and nodding

upon his wife, turned away his head upon his pillow, as if he had been

asleep, while they dallied together; yet at the same time, when one of

the servants came creeping out of the next room, to steal a bottle of

wine from the cupboard, presently turning about with his eyes open,

Varlet, said he, ’tis only to pleasure Maecenas that I sleep. But this

perhaps is not so strange, considering that Gabba was a low buffoon.

At Argos there was a great animosity between Nicostratus and Phayllus,

so that they always opposed each other and quarrelled at the

council-board. Now when King Philip made a visit to that city, Phayllus

bethought himself, that he could not miss the highest preferment the

government could afford, if he could but oblige the king with the

company of his wife, who was both beautiful and young. Nicostratus,

smelling this design, walked to and fro before Phayllus’s house with

some of his servants, to observe who went in and out. They had not

stayed long, but out came Phayllus’s wife, whom he had dressed up in

high shoes, with a mantle and cap after the Macedonian fashion, like

one of the king’s pages, in which disguise she secretly passed in

to the king’s lodgings. Since then there ever were and still are so

many lovers, did you ever know of any one that ever prostituted his

particular male friend, though it were to gain the honors ascribed to

Jupiter himself? Truly, I believe there never was any such. For why?

There never was any one that would pretend to oppose and contend with

a tyrant; but there are many rivals and competitors, that will quarrel

and fight for boys that are beautiful and in the prime of their years.

It is reported of Aristogiton the Athenian, Antileon of Metapontum,

and Melanippus of Agrigentum, that they never contested with tyrants,

though they wasted and ruined the commonwealth and indulged the

impetuosity of their lust, until they found them attempting their own

male concubines: then they withstood them with the utmost peril of

their lives, as if they had been to defend their temples and their most

sacred sanctuaries. Alexander also is said to have sent to Theodorus,

the brother of Proteas, in these words: Send me that musical girl

that plays and sings so well, and take ten talents for her, unless

thou lovest her thyself. Another time, when one of his minions,

Antipatridas, came to be jovial with him, and brought a minstrel in

his company to complete the mirth, being greatly affected with the

girl’s playing and singing, he asked Antipatridas whether he had any

extraordinary kindness for her? He answered, that he loved her as

his eyes. Then all the plagues of mankind light upon thee, quoth the

prince. However, he would not so much as touch the girl.

17. Consider also what vast power love has over martial men and

warriors, not slothful, as Euripides[97] will have it to be, nor

unwarlike, nor

Plutarch's Essays and Miscellanies, Vol. 4 (of 5) · 第 62 / 145 题