BY JOHN OSWALD.

Is the grandeur and power of the Roman Empire due to Virtue, or

to Fortune? 198. Virtue and Fortune, though different in nature,

conspire to produce the same results, 198. Both united in rearing

that stupendous structure, the Roman Empire, 199. The world was full

of change, confusion, and disorder, till the power of Rome extended

over the nations, 200. Virtue and Fortune now come forward in this

discussion to maintain their respective claims as architects and

supporters of the Roman greatness, 200. In the train of Virtue are

Fabricius, Camillus, Cincinnatus, Marcellus, Scipio, and others, 201.

Fortune, having deserted the Persians, Greeks and Carthaginians,

comes forward leading Numa, Aemilius Paulus, Metellus, Sylla, as

her favored sons, 201-203. The Romans themselves attributed their

greatness to Fortune, and built many temples to it, 203, 211. Caesar

relied much on Fortune, and was greatly assisted by it, 204, 205.

Augustus was the favored child of Fortune, 205. Fortune was manifest

in all the affairs of Rome from the beginning, as in the birth and

education of Romulus, 206-208. In the long, wise, and peaceful

reign of Numa, 208-210. In the birth, elevation, and prosperity of

Servius Tullius, 212, 213. In the triumphs of the Romans over Philip,

Antiochus, and the Carthaginians, and especially the expeditions of

Pompey, 214. The favor of Fortune was constant, from age to age:

it attended the Romans in all their enterprises, 215. The great

overthrow at the river Allia was not fatal to Rome, 216-218. The

cackling of the sacred geese, a piece of good fortune, saved Rome,

217. Alexander of Macedon was intending war against the Romans, but

Fortune ordered his death just at the right time for them, 219. [The

remainder of this treatise, containing the arguments in behalf of

Virtue, is lost.]

Plutarch's Essays and Miscellanies, Vol. 4 (of 5) · 第 11 / 145 题