CHAPTER XXVI.

After-Effects of the Conspiracy—Calling Council of 1876—Principle of

Selection—Mr. Beecher Cautions his Church—Bowen Reappears; Proposes

a Secret Tribunal—Mr. Beecher’s Reply—Bowen Dropped by Plymouth

Church—Deliverance of Council sustaining Plymouth—Mr. Beecher’s

Persecutors Denounced—Special Tribunal.

But now the organized determination to break down Mr. Beecher’s ministry

and overthrow his church manifested itself by a new line of tactics.

There were at this time a few members whose relation to the church was

very peculiar, who were neither in it nor out of it, apparently, who did

not ask, or who refused positively, to take letters to other churches,

who were not amenable to the discipline of the church, but who stood

off, would not attend its meetings nor observe its ordinances, and who,

when dealt with fraternally, in every way the church knew how, to

procure them peaceably to sever their connection and relieve the church

from responsibility, refused to do it or neglected to do it; and then,

when it was proposed to drop them, without any reflection more than

belonged to the nature of the case, they threatened, “If you drop us we

will call a council.” There were at one time four councils threatened,

by four different members on these grounds. It soon became very clearly

understood, that the tactics of the adversary were now, to wear out the

patience of the people, by a continuous series of councils, which would

at last weary men from coming to a church where there was such incessant

trouble.

It was in consequence of these tactics, that Plymouth Church determined

to end all such annoyances, by calling a National Advisory Council, that

should look through its rules and principles, and its entire

administration under them; to have it of such magnitude, and made up of

such churches and men, as that its deliverances would be final, making

an end of all these controversies and giving the church solid ground to

go on.

Invitations were sent to one hundred and seventy-two churches, to be

represented by pastor and delegate, and twenty ministers without

charges, principally theological writers and professors in theological

colleges. None were invited from New York City or Brooklyn, because of

the general local feeling.

The principal questions submitted were, substantially, whether Plymouth

Church had acted contrary to the word of God or the principles of

Christian justice in allowing to itself in any case any other mode of

terminating membership than death, letters of dismission, and

excommunication?

2. What course ought it to pursue towards those who persistently

absented themselves from its services for various personal reasons?

3. And towards those who were reported as having made insinuations

affecting the character of other members, but who neither admit nor deny

such reports?

4. Whether the church should have called a mutual council to investigate

the charges against its pastor when so required by a member who submits

no charges, and more than a year after a full investigation by the

church, in which the pastor had been sustained by a unanimous vote?

5. Whether its course in the case of Mrs. Moulton had been wise and

just?

6. Whether, in its maintenance of order, it had gone beyond its rights,

so as to justly forfeit its claim to the confidence and fellowship of

Congregational churches?

The letter-missive was dated February 1, 1876, and the council was

called for the 15th.

The principle upon which the council was made up, we can learn from a

letter written January 28, 1876, by Mr. Beecher to an eminent doctor of

divinity whose advice he wished respecting certain churches in his

vicinity:

“Allow me to say a word as to the principles of selection in this

council. It will be gathered from the whole land, as far West as the

Mississippi. It leaves out men committed to a policy, or who are known

to be working in league with adversary churches. But I wish to have

honest men, capable of judging upon facts and evidence, who are not so

obstinate that they will not yield to conviction, or so tied to theories

that they will look at everything under a bias. I don’t care whether

they like me or not, whether they agree with my views, whether they

approve or disapprove of all the policy of Plymouth Church. I only want

men who will be candid and who will act impartially.”

Quite a number attended who had been members of the prior council of

1874; and when the council met, a considerable majority—their views

having been acquired from newspaper reports—entertained grave doubts as

to the regularity of Plymouth Church in its previous conduct. The effect

which the evidence presented had upon their minds will appear later on.

At the Friday night prayer-meeting just preceding the sitting of

council, Mr. Beecher cautioned his people respecting their conduct

during the council.

“This church has for years been called to go through deep waters. For

more than twenty years we had well-nigh unabated prosperity, and we were

almost ready to boast that we had such wise methods of government and

such signal presentations of truth as made our church life easy; that we

had not the vexations which belonged to other churches; and it is not

unlikely that we may have become proud and self-sufficient. But

certainly for the last few years God has been dealing with us as with

sons, and has chastened us; and it becomes us to bear in mind that the

best gift of God to an individual or to a church is that kind of

chastisement which works out trust, patience, long-suffering, kindness,

and fruitfulness in labor.

“With these thoughts in mind, I wish to-night to speak a few words to

you, and exhort you, even more signally in days that are to come, than

you have in days that are past (for from my heart I can commend you in

this respect), to carry out and ennoble that patience, that fidelity,

and that churchly love, which, under great difficulties you have shown.

“My beloved, beware lest your intelligent judgment and conscientiousness

in the cause of Christ, be absorbed in the feeling of personal love and

sympathy for your elder brother. Beware lest you be drawn into a kind of

clannish feeling of anxiety for him. I know that I have your love and

sympathy, and I know that I am prayed for by you. That suffices me; but

on your part it will be very bad for you to suffer this mere human

feeling toward an individual to fill so large a place in your heart as

that it may be said to fill your experience. You are a church of Christ

set on a hill, and you cannot be hid; and your business here is to

manifest Jesus Christ to the world in such a way as to win them to a

nobler life; and you ought not to forget for what you are ordained. I

have tried to set you an example. I have endeavored to keep free from

such states of mind, and from such personality, either as regards you or

myself, as should interfere with the teaching and the reception here of

the fullest and most edifying truths of our common faith; and by the

grace of God I have been enabled mainly to succeed in doing it. I doubt

if any one hearing the sermons that have been preached here, with one or

two exceptions, for the last five years, would from them suspect

anything of that history through which this church has gone.

“So far as you are concerned, I do not say that it is possible for you

not to converse about our difficulties in your families, and with each

other; but you may do it too much; and, therefore, I wish to emphasize

that your business as a church is not to take care of me, but to take

care of and forward the work of the Lord Jesus Christ, your Head and

Master. Do not, therefore, under the influence of amiable feelings, and

warm sympathies, make the mistake of supposing that you are in a

campaign of any sort, except that of rallying around about our appointed

Leader. In the church, in your families, and in our mission schools,

your business is to promote the teaching of Christ, for the awakening of

men, and for the building up of all those who have undertaken the

Christian life.

“In pursuing this course, it behooves you to remember that under such

severe and prolonged trouble, God expects of you, not only that you will

be constant and faithful in His service, but that you will grow richer,

more spiritual, and in every way more like Christ. You have had, and are

having, a better opportunity for fulfilling the disposition set forth in

the Gospel, than is given to one church in a hundred. God has been and

is dealing with you as with sons.

“We are on the eve of a memorable week. In 1874 a great council was

called in Brooklyn to sit on our affairs, in which we were not to

participate; now we have called a council to act upon our own affairs,

and in this we must needs participate; and there are one or two things

that I wish to say to you.

“First, you that receive the brethren into your households, ought to set

up in your hearts a sentiment of honor that shall have no downfall nor

intermission. Those gentlemen that come to take part in this council

come impartially. Their office is to hear, and to give such advice as

the Lord may inspire in them, upon the facts that shall be presented. In

some sense—not technically—they are as judges; and you must not attempt

in your homes to influence them, nor by your sympathy and kindness in

the least degree to beguile them from the fullest and fairest discharge

of their duty. Even if their judgment should be adverse to your

convictions and mine, nevertheless it is very plainly a matter of

Christian honor that they should be in your families, without in the

least being biassed by social influences.

“Secondly, when you shall attend the open meetings of the council (for

it must needs be that largely the audience will be composed of members

of this church and society), I beseech of you, by all that is honorable

and by all that is gentlemanly, that there be, neither from the gallery

nor from any other part of the house, first or last, the slightest

exhibition either of approval or disapproval. I could wish that you

might sit in your pews as if you were marble, though I know that your

hearts are hot within you. That council ought to be able to sit in the

midst of the congregation of this church and never hear a whisper nor

feel a wave of influence exerted upon them. We called them that they

might do their duty faithfully; and I trust that you will commend

yourselves in their sight by the most absolute abstention from any

expression of thought or feeling in their presence.

“In the third place, I beg of you, both now and when they shall have

assembled, to bear them in your hearts in prayer, morning and night,

before God.

“If you will pray more for men you will have less occasion to do

anything else; and, in regard to this council, praying for them is a

mode of exerting an influence upon them, which you may indulge in. Do

you believe in God? Do you believe in the Holy Spirit? Do you believe in

prayer? Do you not believe that it is in the power of God to descend

into such a council, to bring a summer atmosphere into them and around

them, and to lead them by the invisible hand of truth, of love, and of

justice? Pray much for them.

“And in one last word let me say that while all this agitation is going

on, while the papers are full of bickerings, full of fiery darts that

fall like sparks from the smith’s forge, remember that your duty is in

church work and in church life. So far as possible, throw these

unpleasant things off from your mind; take care of your classes and

schools; attend faithfully to your mission work; live sweeter and holier

lives in the family; be better men and better Christians in the

household; do not let too much of the storm whistle through the cracks

and crevices of your experience—keep it out; live individually and

collectively near to Christ, and He will take care of me and of you. As

He has done in times past, so will He do, and more abundantly, in the

future, to the joy of our hearts and to the honor of His own great

name.”

In the interim between the calling of the council and its convening, the

case of Mr. Bowen came up before the church. For several years past, the

old stories, which were supposed to have originated with him, had been

set in circulation again, and quite recently a card appeared in a

Brooklyn paper, over the signature of Mr. Bowen’s son, in effect

repeating these slanders. A committee of Plymouth Church waited upon Mr.

Bowen, but he refused to admit or deny that he was the originator of the

stories—refused to make any statement or do anything. Ultimately he sent

a letter to the committee (at the same time publishing it in the

newspapers) making charges against Mr. Beecher, but in effect refusing

to substantiate them, because he had not time to look up his evidence;

but offering to submit his charges to a confidential committee of three,

provided he should not be called on to give names, and that the

committee should report only their conclusions.

When this letter was read at a church meeting Mr. Beecher arose and

said:

“I do not propose to argue this question to-night—it is not fit that I

should do it. I only propose to say one or two words on the matter; and

one is: if for the last fifteen years and more, Mr. Bowen has been in

possession of such facts as he now alleges in his letter, that he has,

and never has mentioned them to me, nor communicated them to any officer

of this church, nor in anywise brought them to the knowledge of the

church itself, he deserves to be expelled from the church for a

violation of his covenant. If I am what he alleges me to be, and have

been what he alleges I have been, and he knew it, and permitted it,

without a word of warning to me or to this church, he has committed a

crime against the church, and against morality; and if his allegation is

not true, but is a lie, then he is guilty of one of the blackest crimes

that ever emanated from the bottomless pit—and, before God, I pronounce

the allegations that he has, made to be utterly false.

“Further let me say that when Mr. Bowen, being called upon to state what

these facts are, and what are the proofs of them which he has in his

possession, pleads that he is upon trial, and that he has not time to

look them up, what are we to think of such a plea? He had time to write

that letter, and to charge me with being a criminal before the public of

this continent, and, having had time to represent me as a monster, and

to publish that representation in the newspapers, now, when he is asked,

‘What is your evidence?’ he has not time to produce it! Ought not that

to have been thought of before he made the charge public?

“I have another word to say, and that is in regard to the tribunal which

he proposes—a tripartite committee, a committee composed of three

persons—on condition that in their presence he may hide names, and that

then their judgment be given out in adjudication of the question. Now, I

say that no secrecy shall rest on this matter. I do not say that I would

not in some respects be willing to go before such a committee, but this

I say: Nothing on this subject shall be kept secret. If this matter is

not explored to the bottom it shall be because my will is set aside. I

do not propose that Mr. Bowen shall hide himself, nor will I permit

anything to be hidden about me, by having the matter referred to any

three gentlemen who shall only let out what they _think_. What they

think will not satisfy you; what they think will not satisfy me; and

since the allegations have been made public through the newspapers, and

Mr. Bowen’s name is attached to them, he has got to face the facts, he

has got to produce the evidence. And as for myself, I have only this to

say: I pronounce all the insinuations and allegations he has made as

false, and, with Almighty God and the judgment day before me, I arraign

him as a slanderer and a liar.”

Mr. Bowen produced no evidence to sustain his charges, and the church

subsequently voted that they could dispense with him.

On the 15th of February the council, the largest of its kind that had

ever been convened in this country, met. Dr. Bacon was chosen moderator;

ex-Governor Dingley, of Maine, and General Erastus N. Bates, assistant

moderators.

While the questions presented to the council were principally as to

church regularity, the sixth also opened up the question of the action

and result of the Investigating Committee referred to, and, generally,

the whole conduct of the church with reference to its pastor; this

naturally led to questions being put to Mr. Beecher personally as to the

policy he had followed respecting the scandal.

Both Mr. Beecher and the committee of the church invited the fullest

questioning on any point that could be suggested; urged the council to

invite Drs. Storrs and Budington to be present, to call Mrs. Moulton’s

counsel, and to examine Mr. Bowen—all of which the council did, Drs.

Storrs and Budington declining to attend.

For eight days—three sessions each day, morning, afternoon, and

evening—Mr. Beecher and the committee stood as targets for the questions

of the council.

We present some of Mr. Beecher’s replies, as throwing light upon

himself, and his actions, during the origin and growth of the scandal.

To the question why he had remained silent during the earlier rumors set

afloat by Bowen and Tilton, and did not demand an investigation, he

said: “This was the reason. The relations which subsisted between me and

my people were those of very strong personal affection. I know all of

you must be very much beloved by those whom you attend in sickness, to

whom you preach, and whose troubles and sorrows you console. My God has

given me a sympathetic nature, ardent and loving. I attract friends to

me, and usually I hold them. I was dear to very many; and it has been

the honor, as it has been the glory, of my recollection, that I have

been beloved by those, to be beloved by whom is itself enough witness

and enough honor. And it was because, from various reasons, intimations

were made pointing to one, and another, and another, that I saw that, if

I were to rush recklessly out after every rumor of this kind, which came

insidiously and circuitously, I should bring a torrent of publicity and

reproach upon one, two, three, many persons; and the question with me

was, not simply what I ought to do, but, ‘Will you, for your own

vindication, bring on an investigation, and project into publicity those

persons who have the rights, the sanctities, and the delicacies of the

domestic circle around about them?’ And now you see, when the first of

these rumors has been brought into public notice, how it has spread and

gone, like a fire on a prairie, all over the United States; and you see

just what I apprehended would be the case. Having connected with me, in

my relations to public affairs, parties and discussions of many sorts, I

knew that the connection with my name in one of these various matters,

under the circumstances, would proclaim it throughout Christendom; and

the question with me was: ‘Will you stand patiently for God to vindicate

you from these suggestions, putting to shame those that accuse you

falsely; or will you vindicate yourself by bringing sheeted publicity,

and lurid investigation, on one, on two, or on scores?’ I chose the

course of silence.”

In reply to another question:

“Now, I wish to hear the other part of the question, sir—whether I am

willing that Dr. Storrs and Dr. Budington should state anything that

they know—any facts? I should like to know how much longer a man need be

at the focus of a solar microscope, with all the sun in the heavens

concentrated upon him for six months, and everything that could be

raked, from the North Pole to the South Pole, and round the earth forty

times circuited, raked up and brought in, and be willing to have it

raked up and brought in again? How much longer does a man want to have

his willingness to have the truth come out, vindicated? If there is any

man on earth that has anything to say—that he wants to say—if there is

any man on earth that has anything to say to my detriment, I here and

now challenge him to say it! I go further than that. If there be any

angel of God, semi-prescient and omniscient, I challenge him to say

aught. I go beyond that, and, in the name of our common Redeemer, and

before Him who shall judge you and me, I challenge the truth from God

Himself! And what is all this going to do? To-morrow morning it will be

said in the local journals: ‘Well, Mr. Beecher—how rhetorically he

managed the matter!’ And it will be put in the religious papers: ‘Oh!

yes; that was a very plausible statement at the time, but—but—’ And I am

in judgment between two devils, ‘But’ and ‘If.’ Nothing that I say is

taken to be true, and I am put upon a perpetual trial of my veracity;

although I am willing to be tried, I don’t disguise from myself,

suppressing every sentiment of natural honor that pertains to a

gentleman—I know perfectly well this whole process is a continuous trial

and crucifixion of every sentiment of honor and every sensibility of my

soul, and that I am questioned, and questioned, and questioned, and

questioned, as I have been, through months and years, on the supposition

that the truth has not been got out. And I suppose it will be so to the

end of my life. I don’t look with any great hope for the result of this

council. I don’t look for any hope from the result of any council or

tribunal. I think there is hope in the grave, and beyond; but for me, I

expect to walk with a clouded head, not understood, until I go to

heaven, and that is not far off—that is not far away. And I am content

to bear just that lot that my dear Lord puts on me. He knows what is

best. I have accepted it. Though the natural man rebels once in a while

and bubbles out, yet grace in the end puts it down. But I am content to

walk so. All my sorrow is that the preciousness of the Gospel, which it

is given to me to preach, is hindered somewhat by this trouble; but to

work for Christ, and to save men, is my calling, and not to vindicate

myself.”

Again, referring to the perverse malignity that had characterized his

enemies: “I said, and now I repeat it, that this church and its pastor

have been systematically, studiously pursued with perversions and what

cannot be considered other than deliberate falsehoods. In some quarters,

whatever has happened has been so uniformly twisted, as to indicate what

I supposed to be the truth—namely, an organized movement to pervert

everything and destroy that influence which I formerly had with the

common people of America, and then to bring vexations, so many and so

frequent, upon the church as to disintegrate its patience, and thus to

leave me alone without anything. And I will say that the backbitings,

the whisperings, the innuendoes, the studious shutting of the

understanding to all fairness, when I make statements, and the opening

it wide to all partisan misrepresentations, when those statements were

reported otherwise, have been such as to open a new chapter in my mind

of human experience, and to carry me far back towards the old doctrine

of total depravity.”

In the course of one of the sessions the pastor of a Boston church,

referring to the unjust rumor, current in certain quarters, that since

the scandal had come out the church and its pastor had not brought out

all the facts, that there were rumors of _something_ yet unpublished,

and that they were now unreasonably refusing to submit the matter before

some new tribunal, expressed his surprise at hearing the statement of

the committee, and wondered that Mr. Beecher and his church had not been

better understood by the public. To this Mr. Beecher replied:

“Gentlemen, you won’t suspect me of any disrespect to you, but I want to

put a home question to you. This church has been occupied in publishing

to the world for the last three years, a statement of those facts that

have set you perfectly aghast, as novel and wonderful. What are you

going to do when the representatives of the morality and the

intelligence of this nation won’t read a word that is published, of the

results of the church investigation, and the court investigation, but,

coming up after they have been published for months, yet are amazed at

the simple statement of that, which has been in the newspapers and the

court records, during all this time? Are we forced not only to forge

wedges of intelligence, but use clubs to drive them into your heads? We

have been doing everything that man could do, in opening, in publishing,

and, as far as it took any definite shape, in meeting. But you cannot

hunt a stench; you can an arrow, but a smell you can’t. And therefore

these odorous beasts are going up and down the streets, casting some

venom and some odor; we can’t spend the time of a Christian church for

ever hunting these things. Am I to run after every rat in creation? Am I

to run after every leech, and worm, and every venomous insect?

“You have a right to demand of us that we shall meet accusations when

they come up responsibly stated. Did we not meet them the moment the

‘Bacon letter’ appeared? Within the time that was necessary to bring me

back from the country and back to the city, did we not instantly meet

them with a call for investigation in the church? Was not that

investigation made with a proclamation to the world to bring in

everything known? It was not zeal covering me, it was dissection, and

when the investigation had been made it was published to the world. No

sooner had it been completed than we all distributed ourselves in the

country for rest. When we came back I went instantly to a civil court.

That trial was noticed for action immediately on my return, and I

continued for six months in that court-room, and every paper in the

United States helped distribute the information of the facts that were

then disclosed. In July or August the court adjourned and we went back

into the country. We had scarcely come back again from the summer

vacation, before we took the matter up again in regard to members of

this church, and issued process upon them, and this process has been

that which has filled, the whole time since, the newspapers and the

clerical mind of the country. Where has been the time and space in which

we could institute anything else? Have we not been busy? Or shall we

stay up all night, and turn Sunday into a judicial day, and investigate

somewhat more?

“I don’t know—as long as God knows, and my mother, how it is, I have

come to about the state of mind that I don’t care for you or anybody

else. Well, you know that is not so: I do care and I don’t, and I do

again and then I don’t—just as I happen to feel. I am tired of you; I am

tired of the world; I am tired of men that make newspapers, and men that

read them; I am tired of a community that has not a particle of moral

reaction. I am tired of an age which will permit the newspapers to be

flooded, and to make themselves the common sewers of filth and scandal;

I am tired of a community that can read them, and read them, and read

them without revolting. I am tired of waiting for an honorable man that

shall stand up at last, and say, in the name of honor and manhood, ‘This

is outrageous!’

“And yet I am going to bear it, and I am going on preaching, and I am

going to preach here, and when I am shut up here I don’t know where I

shall preach; but I don’t believe that I shall live long after I have

stopped preaching. But what I want is to do God’s work, and if it is

necessary to have a reputation in Andover, or a reputation in Chicago,

before I am to preach, I may as well stop at once. But my own feeling

about it is this: I am entrusted with the tidings of salvation to dying

men, and the first wish of my heart, is not my good name nor my

reputation. Dear as they are to me for my children’s sake, and for the

sake of my family, after all there is a Name that is better to me than

mine, there is a Name above every other name—for my trouble has brought

me very near to it, and the glory of Christ. God’s glory and God’s

delicacy, and sweetness and love were never made so apparent to me, as

since I have felt the need of them in other folks.

”... I will answer as regards any paper that is in the possession of any

man, woman, or child on this continent, or on the sea, or on the land,

and beyond the sea; anybody in heaven and anybody in hell, that has any

document that I have ever written, or any information that touches me in

any manner, I hereby give my permission to them to produce it, and I

challenge them to produce it, and if it is anything that will throw

light on me and inculpate me, I demand, by every consideration of honor,

truth, and justice, that it be delivered now and here, or that for ever

after they and everybody shall hold their peace.”

At another time, referring to the burden of expense in the civil trial

alone:

“I think people look upon my being tried as if it was a game of

battledore and shuttlecock, and as if being tried was nothing but being

tossed through the air by two clever fellows, and as if I ought to like

it. And any expression of preference of one tribunal over another, or

any arithmetical expression of how many times I would like to be tried,

is said to be covering up something or other. I would like to state to

the brethren here that my expenses for the trial of six months, and

expenses of living for the year, amounted to $118,000. I do not feel

disposed to go through a great many more such trials, but I trust you

won’t think it is because I want to cover anything up, unless it is my

pockets. And if there is anybody who wishes to take my place in the

matter, and will pay the expenses, I will give up most cheerfully and

let them represent me. I ought to state further in regard to these

expenses—I state it in love and honor to my dear friend Shearman—that he

would not take one penny for the whole year’s service, and that, aside

from serving freely without money and without price, he so absolutely

abandoned his business, that his income was cut down nine-tenths or more

of what he was accustomed to receive, and that, great as my expenses

were, relatively, his were double mine, for the love-service which he

performed during this time.”

On the 24th of February the “result of council was announced.”

In this the council sustained Plymouth Church on every point, at the

same time recommending a few changes in its manual which it was thought

might save complication in the future.[14]

-----

Footnote 14:

Most of them had at the time been proposed by the church, and all were

promptly adopted.

-----

The council further advised in its “result”:

“In view of the fact that the pastor of this church has demanded that

his accusers be brought to face him, and has invited such investigation

as this council may think desirable, for the peace and prosperity of the

churches, and in order to protect Plymouth Church from further vexatious

proceedings, this council advises this church to accept and empower a

commission of five members, to be created by a committee of three,

hereinafter specified, out of the twenty men hereinafter named; the duty

of which commission shall be to receive and examine all charges against

the pastor which they may regard as not already tried....

“We hold the pastor of this church, as we and all others are bound to

hold him, innocent of the charges reported against him until

substantiated by proof.” The time within which such charges should be

preferred was limited to sixty days.

This tribunal was thereafter appointed, and waited a year. It is perhaps

needless to say that no charges were preferred.

In the closing addresses of the council to the church the speakers

expressed more freely the prevailing personal feeling.

We quote Dr. Wellman, the first speaker:

“I would not depreciate at all the intense interest with which many of

us, strangers to the pastor, have looked upon him, and watched him, and

heard him as he has appeared before us and addressed us. But while I say

that, I must say, for one, that I watched with still keener interest the

men associated with him, and who came upon this platform to present this

case—the members of the Plymouth Church Investigating Committee. And why

have I watched these men with such intense interest? Now, all men know

the power of this man of God to persuade men; and some of us, who live

far away, have been told again and again, that this pastor had such

persuasive power, that he could manage all his men here, and make them

believe anything and do anything, and therefore it did not follow that,

because this great church and people were so loyal to their pastor, that

he was an innocent and pure man. Now, your loyal and magnificent

devotion to your pastor, is your praise all over this land and all over

this world. We had not seen you; we did not know what kind of men were

associated with this man of God; and it was possible, we thought, that

they were weak men, who could be blinded and could be made to believe

anything. I have watched these men, and I aver to-night that they are

not men of feeble mind, and not men who would have an impure pastor here

if they knew it, and not men to be managed by any pastor; and it has

been the joy of my heart to find that such men have been associated,

during these years of your darkness and sorrow, with this man of God.

“It has been said that this pastor is managing this council. Somehow

people all over the world have great confidence in the managing power of

this man. So far as I can see, he is the very last man to manage

anybody; and as to his managing this council, I wish to say here and

now, once for all, and I wish it to go through you to all the world,

that he has managed us—just as that man going down from Jerusalem to

Jericho, and robbed, and stripped, and wounded and thrown aside and left

half-dead, managed that other man who came to his distress and bent over

him and poured oil upon his wounds and dressed them, and took him up and

brought him to the inn and cared for him. So this man has managed us,

and in no other way. I had no acquaintance with him; I never spoke to

him until the last week; but, coming here, I have been greatly

touched—indeed, nothing has touched me more than the manner in which

this pastor has laid bare his heart to us, and asked us to search him

through and through, his heart and his life, and tell him if there be

anything wrong in him or in what he has done. He has done this again and

again, before the council, and it has made me feel, for one, that there

was no need of searching such a man. I have noticed repeatedly, during

the presentation of this case, that the pastor of this church seemed to

be living two kinds of lives, one a sad one, and the other a life of

earnest duty. Underneath his work and his addresses to us, there came

out every now and then a sad undertone, as if he felt that he must live

and toil for all the rest of his life, under this dark cloud of

suspicion and constant misrepresentation, and with these constant

dagger-rents in his heart. Now, I do not believe that he is to live the

rest of his life under this cloud and this burden of trouble. Ever since

this council was by itself, I have seen out of all this darkness a

bright morning coming, and never has that morning seemed so near and so

close as it does to-night.”

And from the address of Dr. Sturtevant, president of Illinois College:

“What now are we to expect? What is to be the result of this? This:

Brother Beecher and his church are to be assured from this hour that

they have our confidence. He is to be regarded as innocent until charges

of guilt have been tabled and substantiated—not floating rumors, not the

slime of the crawling serpent, but charges clear, definite, with all

needed specifications of names and dates and witnesses, charges behind

which there stands a responsible endorser; and while he stands thus, we

extend to him the hand of our hearty fellowship, and entire confidence,

until those charges are tabled and established. That confidence begins

here and now; and it enables him to say, and his people to say: ‘All

these rumors, these innuendoes, these floating stories that circulate

through the press, and through the ten thousand channels in which rumor

flows, are worthy of no account until they are backed by responsible

men, who are willing to face that commission, and to attempt to prove

those charges before that commission; and if men continue to rail and

continue to tell horrible stories of what they know, how it was ten

years ago, and seven years ago, and five years ago, etc., and what this

man said and what that woman said—if they continue to say such things,

believe them not. They are just as respectable as Shimei was, when he

went along the hill and cursed David.’”

From parts of Mr. Beecher’s address to the council at the close, after

the “result” had been announced, we get a clearer insight of his

feelings, and of his life during these troublesome times, than from most

anything else that he has uttered:

“It has come to pass that for so many years I have read of myself and

heard of myself, that I have ceased in some moods to have any actual

self, and am projected as an idea before my own mind. And if I shall

therefore speak somewhat freely, after the manner of men, about myself,

I wish you to consider it a part of those metaphysics which Dr. Porter

says are very bad. I have often read as if I were reading in a novel

about the bad hero, and waked up from the dream and grimly laughed as I

asked myself: ‘Is it me that they mean? Is it possible for a man to live

as long as I have, and as openly, and to have acted upon so large a

theatre, and been agitated by such world-shaking events, and be so

utterly misconceived?’ I have had the reputation of being a frank man.

But it may be true that I am a man of very cautious speech, and may

therefore sometimes not have expressed myself intelligently, though at

other times I have had the reputation of being able to make myself

understood! Nevertheless it has come to pass that I supposed myself to

have been more thoroughly canvassed, and construed in no very enviable

light, than it has befallen to any of my contemporaries. I am very sorry

that it should be so. I have no love of being a hero, and I have still

less of being such a hero as I have been made to be. I tell you that to

hear men talking whether I am or am not guilty makes the very

mother-thought shiver within me. For I have sensibility—I am open to the

keenest sense of truth and purity, and honor and right; and to be held

before a jury, and to sit six long months, and to have rained upon me

perjury and professional abuse, and to feel that over the whole broad

extent of this land, I was the focal point on which journalism was

expending itself, and that, too, not as to whether I was Republican or

Democrat, not whether I was orthodox or heterodox, not whether this or

that system expounded was rightly held, but whether I was an ineffable

culprit! I have not been hunted as an eagle is hunted; I have not been

pursued as a lion is pursued; I have not been pursued even as wolves and

foxes. I have been pursued as if I were a maggot in a rotten corpse. And

do you suppose that it is in human nature to go through that, through

months and through years, and not feel it? And yet, if it please God,

who has enabled me to go through the desert and the Red Sea, that I

should go on, God is my judge, that I am both willing and I am able to

go on again another five years; for I can do all things, Christ

strengthening me, and the life that I now live in the flesh, I live by

faith in the Son of God, who loved me never so much as now.

“At some time it may be in my power to defend myself on every count and

charge. It may be in my power, at some time, with dates and

circumstances to expound the reason of my conduct. I am the child of a

noble mother and of a noble father, and I was brought up in an austere

morality and in a pure and unblemished household, with a most reverent

honor for truth, for duty, for love. And to me has been given a nature

for which, whether it be prudent or whether it be not, I am not

questionable. When they rebuke the vine for throwing out tendrils and

holding on to anything that is next to it, whether it be homely or

handsome, whether it be dry or full of sap, then they may rebuke me.

When you shall find a heart to rebuke the twining morning-glory, or any

other plant that holds on to that which is next to it, you may rebuke me

for misplaced confidence; you may rebuke me for loving where I should

not love. It is not my choice; it is my necessity. And I have loved on

the right and on the left, here and there, and it is my joy, that to-day

I am not ashamed of it. I am glad of it, and if I had my life to live

over again, and were to choose between a cold caution, calculating every

step, without trust and confidence in man, I would, with all its

liabilities, choose to be generous, to be magnanimous, and to be

trustful, and to lean though some should step aside and let me fall to

the ground. And let me say further that I was brought up in a household

where the name of woman was only next to the name of saint, and with

good reason I always thought it should stand there. The memory of my

mother has been to me, what the Virgin Mary has been to a devotee of the

Roman Church. She has been part and parcel of my upper life—a star whose

parallax I could not take, but nevertheless, shining from afar, she has

been the light that lit me easier into the thought of the invisible and

the presence of the Divine. My sisters I need not speak of. My

associations have been with women who have left upon my mind an

indelible impression of honor, of reverence, and of affection; and all

that I have gone through, and all that I have suffered at the hands of

those that are of another school, has not changed, nor in the slightest

degree blurred, the sense that I have of the dignity and the sacredness

and the beauty of womanhood. And when I have stood upon the threshold of

what seemed to me—knowing the secret elements that were in it, and how a

cloud no bigger than a man’s hand might roll up and cover the whole

heaven—when I have stood and looked out upon what might come, what

misery might be, I have said, and God knows the sincerity and the depth

of it, ‘It is better for me—if it be possible—it is better for me to

stand, and be misunderstood than that there should be suffering over so

wide a circle,’ as I believed there would be. And that there have been

so many heart-aches, that there have been so many, whose faces I never

saw, that have been bathed in tears, that there has been even the

eclipse of faith that has been mentioned in many, only shows how much

would have been saved to humanity, if it had been possible that that

policy of suffocating a domestic trouble, and keeping it in the origin

of it, had been followed out and honorably observed. The fire, that at

the first is only so much that you can stamp it out, may, by fanning

winds or reckless hands, be spread beyond your reach, and the whole city

deluged with flame, the whole prairie be sheeted with fire. That which,

in its beginning, seems quite manageable, it seems to me policy not

only, but duty, to suppress and maintain in its seclusion; for if it

bursts out it will know no bounds and no termination. The endeavor I do

not regret; the ill success of it I do.

“But having gone through it all, my only question—that is, my only

deepest question—is, Has it wrenched you from the foundations of a true

manhood? Do you believe in God? Do you trust in the Lord Jesus Christ?

Do you live by the communications of the Holy Ghost? Is the higher part

of your nature in commerce with God? I look around among men and I say,

Has it made you hating? Has it made you jealous? Has it made you a

misanthropist or a misogynist? Are you sound—sound in your chest, sound

in your heart? Are you a man? Do you love men? Do you trust men? Do you

honor women? Do you trust them? Are you willing to labor for them? Are

you willing to suffer for them? I think I may say, without any fear, I

do believe that I live in the Spirit of God and very near to Him, and in

regard to my feelings toward mankind there does not live the man on the

face of this earth that I would harm if I had him in my power. There is

not that human creature—I know it—there is not that human creature that

lives, that I would not rather help than hurt. There is not that

creature that lives for whom I would not bear suffering, if I could save

him from greater suffering. I have tried to live in the spirit of

Christ, who wrought our joy by His sorrow, who saved us by sacrificing

Himself. I have endeavored to so live. And now let me say further than

this, that while I make these asseverations of the honesty of my intent,

and while I mean to convey, in the strongest language, my consciousness

of innocence and rectitude, and honor and purity, I do not mean to say

that I have always been wise, and still less that I should advise

another to attempt to walk the path that I have walked, or that I have

always kept my temper, or that I have always restrained my tongue.

These, which I will not call infirmities, if you please to call them

wrongs or sins—name them yourselves, and I will still excel you in

condemning, in myself, anything that has been less than the straight

line of sweetness, and of meekness, and of gentleness. I do condemn

myself often that I am rash, that in an over-heat I said things I ought

not to have said, and I am the more concerned, when I learn that these

words are not merely a rhetorical fault, nor regarded simply as a blur

upon me, but that they go like poisoned arrows and afflict other hearts;

and if there is any word that I have said, that has hurt the pastors of

near churches, or churches afar off, I would to God that I could so

utterly recall it, that they should never think of it again; and I would

be the first of all to humble myself before them, and crave that pardon

of them, which I have asked before of God. And if that which I have said

or done is a hindrance to a full reconciliation, I would to God that all

the waters of the Jordan might wash it out from every memory. I disown

it and take it all back, and beseech of you, as I beseech of every other

one, to remember of me, only those things that are like the Lord Jesus

Christ, and that by His grace I have been enabled to do rightly. I am

discharged of all jealousy. I have no pride that hinders me from saying

these things to you, and giving you leave to give to them the utmost

latitude in their application.

“Allusion has been made to sadness on my part, of which no man may know.

For whatever may be the range of a man’s outward life, there is a world

within, unknown to any but God, and the most vital part of every man’s

life, is that which is within the crystal cave of his own silence and

secrecy; and of that I do not propose to speak any further than

this—that I have often felt that my life had come very near to its end.

I live in the shadow of that feeling every day. At some hour or other of

every day, it seems to me as though but a hand’s breadth was between me

and the New Jerusalem. It is not either, necessarily a desire for dying

nor an expectation of dying; it is a sentiment. And I live very much in

that habit; not altogether a painful one—often far from it. But this I

have felt in looking back in those moments upon my past life—I have felt

a great joy that no man can take it from me. I lived when the

reformation of intemperance first began, and I gave great time and

strength to recover my countrymen from the vice. I began early my

career, when there were few to plead for the liberty of the slave. I

have lived in a minority all my days, contesting for the right and for

liberty. I had the privilege of living through that glorious

revolutionary epoch of our time, when the political economy, and the

politics, and the constitutional elements of our land were regenerated.

Few men have ever had such a chance, or the health, or the opportunity

to put in labor, in a field so rich in future results. No man can take

it from me that I have loved my country and that I have labored for her.

No man can take it from me that I have loved the Church of Jesus Christ

and that I have labored for it. No man can take it from me that I have

loved my kind without caste or distinction. No man can take it from me!

Now, I do not care for my reputation after I am dead and gone. That kind

of love of reputation I never had, but there is something that is to me

as sweet as the bells of heaven. If I have been able to inject into the

literature of my time a truly sweet and Christian spirit; if I have been

able to clothe nature so that children and women and grown people will

have associations with trees and clouds, with the ground, with all the

processes of annual resuscitation; if I have been able to clothe them

with religious associations, so that the heavens declare again the glory

of God and the earth His handiwork; if I have put into words that which

will cheer the sick and the poor, that will inspire the young, and that

will go on working after I am dead—this has been a very sustaining and a

very comforting thought to me. There is my joy for posterity—that when

by and by the clouds are all gone, when by and by the truth is as much

known as the earth will ever know truth, that which I have done will

stand, that which I am God will know, and cause it to stand for ever and

ever.”

We give some extracts from his diary, and from letters written near this

time, which show how he looked upon the past few years:

“I have never read or heard of an instance where a pastor was called to

carry forward a great church under such a pressure as I have. Whatever

is deepest, tenderest, and best in manhood has been crucified with a

prolonged crucifixion. I have seen the poisonous malaria, affecting my

reputation in the whole community where I have dwelt for so many years

with an unblemished character. I have seen false brethren silently

bringing to bear upon me the odium of the most damaging suspicions. I

have seen them secretly taking counsel together, tampering with the

fidelity of the members of Plymouth Church, and seducing my personal

friends, violating, under false pretences, ecclesiastical good

neighborhood, calling councils to interfere with the peace and harmony

of Plymouth Church, and thus spreading a local scandal and a ruinous

suspicion over, literally, the wide world. From this persecution among

false brethren the trouble broke out into public and prolonged trial by

the newspapers of the country.

“With a few honorable exceptions, the religious press was quick to

believe evil and to confirm suspicion, and, with a few equally honorable

exceptions, the secular press joined my adversaries.

“I was next tried by my own church, and after a minute research, and

upon grounds never controverted or undermined, I was acquitted and

justified. For six months thereafter I was subjected to the disgrace of

sitting before a court of justice and having every atom of evidence

admitted that money and malice could bring together. And after this long

and weary trial the jury refused to grant to my enemy the verdict which

he sought; whereupon my ministerial neighbors, reversing the fact that

the jury refused him damages, reported that I was not cleared—as if I

had gone into court voluntarily, sought a verdict, and lost my suit.

“Following the civil trial, these insidious enemies commenced a course

of vexatious attempts to call councils, and so to weary the patience of

the Plymouth people.

“To meet this vexatious proceeding the church called the largest council

ever convened upon this continent. Its members came almost to a man,

with doubting hearts, but went away with enthusiastic joy, having

justified the church and justified its pastor. But, perceiving the

venomous spirit that disguised itself under pretence of anxiety for

ecclesiastical regularity, the Great Council provided a court to sit and

act when the council should be dissolved—a court composed of legal men,

than whom none more impartial, just, and pure were ever called to sit

upon the bench. No one dared to bring charges, though the court waited

for years.

“In this long and dreadful season it would be difficult to say which

suffered most intensely, the church or its pastor.

“No one will ever know the nervous strain required to bear this terrible

pressure, to maintain a Christian spirit, to carry on my pulpit duties,

and to encourage and sustain the spirit of the church.”

NOVEMBER, 1875.

“_Nov. 12, Friday morning._—For several years I have been passing

through severe trials on account of the troubles in the Tilton family.

This has taken hold upon the church, personal friends, family,

newspapers, civil courts, ecclesiastical bodies, etc. I have thus been

like a lamb, not before her shearers, but before a fire, every stick of

which has had enough heat in it to consume one’s peace and comfort. In

all this six years I have laid down for myself the strictest adherence

to Christian principles, in all my feelings toward each person or party

concerned, and upon my conduct in every part of the perplexing and

exhausting struggle for life—for my life is aimed at, and the struggle

is for life, in every sense in which life is a blessing.”

“_Tuesday, Nov. 23, 1875._—H——— called from Missionary Association to

inquire what I thought of their asking Dr. Storrs to speak at opening of

Fisk University at Nashville. Replied, No reason against, unless they

thought that just at this time, when he heads and inspires a movement

against Plymouth Church and me. But that _they_, and not I, should

determine.

“In myself there are two thoughts: (1) Should I give help to an enemy

who will use it for my harm? and (2), and a better one, Ought I to take

any care or notice of the ascent or descent in influence of one not

friendly? Is it not better to go on doing duty and leave wholly to the

Over-ruler the disposition of affairs?

“‘_Fret not thyself because of evil-doers._’”

Shortly after the council had adjourned, and on the 27th of February,

1876, Dr. Leonard Bacon, in that spirit of brotherly love that filled

the council at its close, wrote to Mr. Beecher:

“... ‘A brother offended,’ whether Storrs (R. S.) or Budington, ‘is

harder to be won than a strong city.’ But is it not possible for you

(God helping you) to win Brother Storrs, and then to win Budington also?

“Of course you are an innocent man, grievously calumniated, pierced

through and through with arrows, like St. Sebastian. You feel that the

position of those two brethren in relation to you is unbrotherly and

unkind. You complain (and, I will say, reasonably) that neither of them

came to you in the beginning of these troubles, or has come to you at

any later time, with a request for explanation or with offers of

sympathy and assistance. They, on the other hand, think that you have

withheld your confidence and have stood aloof from them.... Is it not

possible for you to win Storrs?... You will not win him by waiting till

he shall come to you.... What, then, would be the effect on Brooklyn, on

our country, on ‘English-speaking Christianity,’ if it should be

announced that you three are ‘brothers reconciled’? Have I proposed an

impracticable thing? Am I imagining an impossible result? If so,

alas!...”

To this Mr. Beecher replied:

“BROOKLYN, March 1, 1876.

”MY DEAR DOCTOR BACON:

“I heartily thank you for your letter and its kind and Christian

suggestions. They are such as a father might give to a son, and I am

emboldened to hope that for _my_ father’s sake you will allow me to

hold, in some degree, such a relation to you.

“There is nothing in _my heart_ to prevent a reconciliation with my

offended brethren.

“If it required only that I should express my regret for unanswered

letters, and my sorrow for harsh words forced from me in the height of

distress, the whole matter might be settled in an hour. But it has

largely ceased to be a personal affair, and has assumed the complex

character of two _parties_ with strong party feeling.

“So that Dr. Storrs, for instance, is not at liberty to act from

personal considerations alone.

“Pass by his long and repeated interviews with Mr. Tilton as late as

last New Year’s, and take the most recent case, that of Mrs. Moulton.

“Mrs. M. and I are in such opposition as admits of no middle ground. To

take her up is to take sides against me. Our testimony in court is in

deadly opposition.

“But Dr. Storrs has assumed her cause to the extent, that, (aside from

all counsel during her negotiations with Plymouth Church) he sends her

to Mr. Bell (who has just taken charge of the Mission Sabbath-school of

his church), with a letter requesting him _to give her a class_. Such an

act, at such a time, produced profound impressions, even more within his

own church than out of it. After two Sundays’ attendance Mrs. Moulton

retired from the school under plea of ill health, a great excitement

having arisen within the school.

“Dr. Storrs is surrounded by such men as ———, ———, ———, and ———, whose

animosity reaches bitterness.

“I have very little hope, therefore, of favorable results.

“You should be aware that from time to time during the two years past, I

have conveyed to these brethren my desire of reconciliation.

“After the civil suit of last summer I drew up a letter to Dr. Storrs at

the request of several members of his church (warm friends of mine), in

which I expressed everything which one Christian gentleman could to

another. But my advisers said that such a letter should not be sent

until it was distinctly ascertained that Dr. S. would take it kindly;

for, if disposed to do so, it might lay the foundations for a refusal

with reasons, which would leave the case far worse than it was before.

As the summer vacation was at hand, the matter was dropped.

“I fear that Dr. Storrs is so fully committed that it is too late. He

could not have made a declaration of war more effectually than by taking

up Mrs. Moulton, considering her deadly antagonism to me and her

peculiar relations to Plymouth Church.

“But if the Lord will open a way, you may be sure that I shall not hold

back nor hesitate. I do not regard my own personal feelings or interests

as comparable to the welfare of these neighboring churches, and the

cause of religion in all churches. I would go to the very verge of truth

and honor in my expressions of regret and retraction. Yet, with all

this, I fear, alas! there is no hope.

“But I leave all to God. The effect of a reconciliation would be

pentecostal.

“I am the man going to Jericho, stripped, wounded, and left for dead.

Nevertheless I am writing to apologize both to the priest and Levite,

for not considering the proprieties and respect due them as they passed

by.

“Gratefully yours,

“HENRY WARD BEECHER.”

“P.S. I have thought long and anxiously upon this matter. I have sent

friends to Dr. Storrs, who could get no word of encouragement. He

eschews even my personal friends who were his warm friends.

“I have thought that any movement with hope of success must come from

within his own church. But there is an undeveloped _party_ on each side.

“On the whole, I have come to about this:

“That the _families_ of the two churches should hold on to each other

more firmly than ever before, and on both sides refuse to be separated.

“Then, as time goes on and the scandal gives place to other things in

the public mind, occasions or influences which we do not now command may

arise in God’s good providence, and a way be opened.

“I have often and often thought that if it were God’s will that I might

die, a great stumbling-block would be taken away, and health would come

out of my grave to the ailing hearts about me.

“And why not?

“I have lived long, and no one ever had leave to live in an age of such

_opportunities_, as those who have had their prime in the past thirty

years. One ought not to be greedy of years.”

The hope in which the Great Council was called was realized. The pastors

and delegates, called from twenty-one States, returning to their homes,

became centres of a noble, generous influence, correcting false

impressions, setting doubts at rest, renewing again the old love and

confidence.

It is true that here and there, especially in certain theological

centres, there were those whose partisan zeal, jealous malice, or even

personal hatred would not let them rest content with the deliverance;

who would rather have kept Christendom deluged with the vile mess than

that Mr. Beecher should stand cleared and justified.

But the great serpent was dead; only its tail wiggled and stirred a

little dust for a short time. After a little even that lay quiet.

The clouds were dissipating, the sky was clearing, and soon the sun

shone with its former brightness, giving comfort, light, and life to

many thousands.

The conspiracy had failed. Where to-day are the conspirators?[15]

-----

Footnote 15:

A friend has aptly put the story in a few short lines:

-----

THE FALSE SECRET.

“’Twas the thistle that told the yellow-bird,

And the yellow-bird told the bee,

And the gossip winds that overheard

Went telling the willow-tree;

And that is the way the little tree-frog

Is supposed to know it all;

He told his cousins that lived in a bog,

And they croaked to the rushes tall;

They whispered the reptiles that live in the mud,

And wiggle and creep and crawl,

To tell the mosquitoes that feast on blood

That a _star_ was seen to fall.

“But the lilies knew that it could not be true,

The lilies that looked on high;

And the waters blue, where the lilies grew.

Not so the little fire fly:

He met his friends where the garden ends

And the low marsh meadows lie;

They said it was sad as sad could be

That a star must fall and die,

And the goblin meteors danced with glee—

_But the star is still in the sky_.”

A Biography of Rev. Henry Ward Beecher · 第 26 / 33 章