CHAPTER III

THE GREAT VICTORY

In naval warfare there are many actions but few battles. An action is

any engagement between war vessels of any size, but a battle is a

contest between ships of the battle-line—sometimes called “capital

ships” upon the results of which depends the vital issues of a war.

During the whole of the long contest with Napoleon, there were only two

battles of this decisive kind—the Nile and Trafalgar.

And although the fighting by sea and land went on for ten years after

Trafalgar had given to us the supreme control of the world’s seas, there

were no more naval battles. Battles at sea are very rare because, when

fought out, they are so crushingly decisive. This characteristic feature

of the great naval battle has been greatly emphasised by modern

conditions. Upon land armies have outgrown the very earth itself;

fighting frontiers have become lines of trenches; battles have become

the mere swaying of these trench lines—a ripple here or there marks a

success or failure—but the lines re-formed remain. Even after weeks or

months of fighting, if the lines remain unbroken, neither side has

reached a decision. War upon land between great forces is a long

drawn-out agony of attrition.

But while battles upon land have become much less decisive than in the

simpler days of small armies and feeble weapons, fighting upon the sea

has become much quicker, much more crushingly final, in its effects and

results than in the days of our grandfathers. Speed and gun power are

now everything. The faster and more powerful fleet—more powerful in its

capacity for dealing accurate and destructive blows—can annihilate its

enemy completely within the brief hours of a single day. The more

powerful and faster his ships the less will the victor himself suffer.

Only under one condition can a defeated fleet escape annihilation, and

that is when the lack of light or of sea room snatches from the victor a

final decision. If an enemy can get away under shelter of his shore

fortifications, or within the protection of his minefields, he can defy

pursuit; but if there be ample room and daylight Speed and Power wielded

by men such as ours, will prevail with absolute mathematical

certainty—the losers will be sunk, the victors will, by comparison, be

little damaged. Every considerable engagement during the war has added

convincing proof to the conclusions which our Navy drew from the

decisive battle in the Sea of Tsushima between the Japanese and the

Russians, and the not less decisive action upon a smaller scale in which

the Americans destroyed the Spanish squadron off Santiago, Cuba. In both

cases the losers were destroyed while the victors suffered little hurt.

These outstanding lessons were not lost upon the Royal Navy, its

officers had themselves seen both fights, and so in its silent way the

Navy pressed upon its course always seeking after more speed, more gun

power, and above all more numbers. “Only numbers can annihilate,” said

Napoleon, and what the Emperor declared to be true of land fighting is

the more true of fighting by sea. Only numbers can annihilate.

Upon the evening of August 4th, 1914, I was sitting in a London office

beside a ticking tape machine awaiting the message that the Germans had

declined our ultimatum to withdraw from Belgium, and that war had been

declared. “There will be a big sea battle this evening,” observed my

companion. “There has been a big battle,” observed I, “but it is now

over.” Although he and I used similar language we attached to the words

very different meanings. He thought, as the bulk of the British people

thought at that time, that the British and German battle fleets would

meet and fight off the Frisian Islands. But I meant, and felt sure, that

the last thing our Grand Fleet desired was to fight in restricted and

dangerous waters, amid the perils of mines and submarines, when it had

already won the greatest fight of the war without firing a shot or

risking a single ship or man. There had been no “battle” in the popular

sense, but there had in fact been achieved a tremendous decisive victory

which through all the long months to follow would dominate the whole war

by sea and by land. Our great battleships were at that moment cruising

between Scapa Flow in the Orkneys and the Cromarty Firth on the

north-eastern shores of Scotland. Our fastest battle cruisers were in

the Firth of Forth together with many of the better pre-Dreadnought

battleships which, though too slow for a fleet action, had heavy

batteries available for a close fight in narrow waters. Many other older

and slower battleships and cruisers were in the Thames. The narrow

straits of Dover were thickly patrolled by destroyers and submarines,

and more submarines and destroyers were on watch off the mouths of the

Weser, the Jade, the Elbe and the Ems. Light cruisers hovered still

farther to the north where the Skagerrak opens between Denmark and the

Norwegian coast. The North Sea had become a _mare clausum_—no longer,

as the mapmakers term it, a German Ocean, but one which at a single

stroke had become overwhelmingly British.

Take a map of the North Sea and consider with me for a moment the

relative strengths and dispositions of the opposing battle fleets. There

was nothing complicated or super-subtle about the Royal Navy’s plans; on

the contrary they had that beautiful compelling simplicity which is the

characteristic feature of all really great designs whether in war or in

peace.

There are two outlets to the North Sea, one wide to the north and west

beyond the Shetlands, the other narrow and shallow to the south-west

through the Straits of Dover. The Straits are only twenty-one miles

wide; opposite the north of Scotland the Sea is 300 miles wide. But

before German battleships or cruisers could get away towards the wide

north-western outlet beyond the Shetlands they would have to steam some

400 miles north of Heligoland. Except for the Pacific Squadron based

upon Tsing-tau in the Far East and cruising upon the east and west

coasts of Mexico, all the fleets of our enemy were at his North Sea

ports or in the Baltic—a land-locked sheet of water which for the

moment is out of our picture. From Heligoland to Scapa Flow in the

Orkneys—where Admiral Jellicoe had his headquarters and where he had

under his hand twenty-two of our most powerful battleships—is less than

550 miles. Jellicoe had also with him large numbers of armoured and

light cruisers. In the Firth of Forth, less than 500 miles from

Heligoland, Admiral Beatty had five of the fastest and most powerful

battle cruisers afloat and great quantities of lighter cruisers and

destroyers. In the Thames, about 350 miles from Heligoland, lay most of

our slower and less powerful pre-Dreadnought battleships and cruisers,

vessels of a past generation in naval construction, but in their huge

numbers and collective armaments a very formidable force to encounter in

the narrow waters of the Straits of Dover.

Three possible courses of action lay before the German Naval Staff. They

had at their disposal seventeen battleships and battle cruisers built

since the first _Dreadnought_ revolutionised the battle line, but, as I

have already pointed out, these vessels, class for class and gun for

gun, were lighter, slower, and less well armed than were the

twenty-seven great war vessels at the disposal of Jellicoe and Beatty.

The Germans could have tried to break away to the north with their whole

battle fleet, escorting all their lighter cruisers, in the hope that

while the battle fleets were engaged the cruisers might escape round the

north of Scotland, and get upon our trade routes in the Atlantic. That

was their first possible line of action—a desperate one, since Jellicoe

and Beatty with much stronger forces lay upon the flank of their course

to the north, and the preponderating strength and swiftness of our light

and heavy cruisers would have meant, in all human probability, not only

the utter destruction of the enemy’s battle fleet but also the wiping

out of his would-be raiders. Our cruisers could have closed the passages

between the Orkneys and Iceland long before the Germans could have

reached them. This first heroic dash for the free spaces of the outer

seas would have been so eminently gratifying to us that it is scarcely

surprising that the Germans denied us its blissful realisation.

[Illustration: THE NORTH SEA.]

The second possible course, apparently less heroic but in its ultimate

results probably as completely destructive for the enemy as the first

course, would have been to bear south-west, hugging the shallows as

closely as might be possible, and to endeavour to break a way through

the Straits of Dover and the English Channel. From Heligoland to the

Straits is over 350 miles, and we should have known all about the German

dash long before they could have reached the Narrows. Those Narrow Seas

are like the neck of a bottle which would have been corked most

effectually by our serried masses of pre-Dreadnought battleships and

cruisers interspersed by swarming hundreds of submarines and destroyers

with their vicious torpedo stings. We can quite understand how the

Germans, who had read Sir Percy Scott’s observations of a month or two

before on the deadliness of submarines in narrow waters, liked a dash

for the Straits as little as they relished a battle with Jellicoe and

Beatty in the far north, more especially as their line of retreat would

have been cut off by the descent from their northern fastnesses of our

battle fleets. Not then, nor a week or two later when we were passing

our Expeditionary Force across the Channel, did the Germans attempt to

break through the Straits and cut us off from our Allies the French.

The third course was the one which the Germans in fact took. It was the

famous course of Brer Rabbit, to lie low and say nuffin’, and to wait

for happier times when perchance the raids of their own submarines, and

our losses from mines, might so far diminish our fighting strength as to

permit them to risk a Battle of the Giants with some little prospect of

success. And in adopting this waiting policy they did what we least

desired and what, therefore, was the safest for them and most

embarrassing for us. Never at any time did we attempt to prevent the

German battle fleets from coming out. We no more blockaded them than

Nelson a hundred years earlier blockaded the French at Toulin and Brest.

We maintained, as Nelson did, a perpetual unsleeping watch on the

enemy’s movements, but our desire always was the same as Nelson’s—to

let the enemy come out far enough to give us space and time within which

to compass his complete and final destruction.

Although the Germans, by adopting a waiting policy, prevented the Royal

Navy from fulfilling its first duty—the seeking out and destruction of

an enemy’s fighting fleets—their inaction emphasised the completeness

of the Victory of Brains and Soul which the Navy had won during those

few days before the outbreak of war. It was because our mobilisation had

been so prompt and complete, it was because the disposition of our

fleets had been so perfectly conceived, that the Germans dared not risk

a battle with us in the open and were unable to send out their cruisers

to cut off our trading ships and to break our communications with

France. Although the enemy’s fleets had not been destroyed, they had

been rendered very largely impotent. We held, more completely than we

did even after the crowning mercy of Trafalgar, the command of the seas

of the world. The first great battle was bloodless but complete, it had

won for us and for the civilised world a very great victory, and the

Royal Navy had never in its long history more fully realised and

revealed its tremendous unconquerable Soul.

* * * * *

It may be of some little interest, now that the veil of secrecy can be

partly raised, to describe the opposing battle fleets upon which rested

the decision of victory or defeat. Before the war it had become the

habit of many critics, both naval and civilian, to exalt the striking

power of the torpedo craft—both destroyers and submarines—and to talk

of the great battleship as an obsolete monster, as some vast Mammoth at

the mercy of a wasp with a poison sting. But the war has shown that the

Navy was right to hold to the deep beliefs, the outcome of all past

experience, that supremacy in the battle line means supremacy in Sea

Control. The smaller vessels, cruisers, and mosquito craft, are vitally

necessary for their several rôles,—without them the great ships cannot

carry out a commercial blockade, cannot protect trade or transports,

cannot conduct those hundreds of operations both of offence and defence

which fall within the duties of a complete Navy. But the ultimate

decision rests with the Battle Fleets. They are the Fount of Power.

While they are supreme, the seas are free to the smaller active vessels;

without such supremacy, the seas are closed to all craft, except to

submarines and, as events have proved, to a large extent even to those

under-water wasps.

In August, 1914, our Battle Fleets available for the North Sea—and at

the moment of supreme test no vessels, however powerful, which were not

on the spot were of any account at all—were not at their full strength.

The battleships were all at home—the ten Dreadnoughts, each with ten

12-inch guns, the four Orions, the four K.G.V.s and the four Iron Dukes,

each with their ten 13.5-inch guns far more powerful than the earlier

Dreadnoughts,—and were all fully mobilised by August 3rd. But of our

nine fast and invaluable battle cruisers as many as four were far away.

The _Australia_ was at the other side of the globe, and three others had

a short time before been despatched to the Mediterranean. Beatty had the

_Lion_, _Queen Mary_, and _Princess Royal_, each with eight 13.5-inch

guns and twenty-nine knots of speed, in addition to the _New Zealand_,

and _Invincible_ each with eight 12-inch guns. The First Lord of the

Admiralty announced quite correctly that we had mobilised thirty-one

ships of the battle line, but actually in the North Sea at their war

stations upon that fateful evening of August 4th—which now seems so

long ago—Jellicoe and Beatty had twenty-seven only of first line

ships. They were enough as it proved, but one rather grudged at

that time, those three in the Mediterranean and the _Australia_ at

the Antipodes. Had there been a battle of the Giants we should have

needed them all, for only numbers can annihilate. Jellicoe had, in

addition to those which I have reckoned, the _Lord Nelson_ and

_Agamemnon_—pre-Dreadnoughts, each with four 12-inch guns and ten

9.2-inch guns—useful ships but not of the first battle line.

Opposed to our twenty-seven available monsters the Germans had under

their hands eighteen completed vessels of their first line. I do not

count in this select company the armoured cruiser _Blücher_, with her

twelve 8-inch guns, which was sunk later on in the Dogger Bank action by

the 13.5-inch weapons of Beatty’s great cruisers. Neither do I count the

fine cruiser _Goeben_, a fast vessel with ten 11-inch guns which, like

our three absent battle cruisers, was in the Mediterranean. The _Goeben_

escaped later to the Dardanelles and ceased to be on the North Sea roll

of the German High Seas Fleet.

Germany had, then, eighteen battleships and battle cruisers, and had it

been known to the public that our apparent superiority in available

numbers was only 50 per cent. in the North Sea, many good people might

have trembled for the safety of their homes and for the honour of their

wives and daughters. But luckily they did not know, for they could with

difficulty have been brought to understand that naval superiority rests

more in speed and in quality and in striking power than in the mere

numbers of ships. When I have said that numbers only can annihilate, I

mean, of course, numbers of equal or superior ships. In quality of ships

and especially of men, in speed and in striking power, our twenty-seven

ships had fully double the strength of the eighteen Germans who might

have been opposed to them in battle. None of our vessels carried

anything smaller—for battle—than 12-inch guns, and fifteen of them

bore within their turrets the new 13.5-inch guns of which the weight of

shell and destructive power were more than 50 per cent. greater than

that of the earlier 12-inch weapons. On the other hand, four of the

German battleships (the _Nassau_ class) carried 11-inch guns and were

fully two knots slower in speed than any of the British first line.

Three of their battle cruisers also had 11-inch guns. While therefore we

had guns of 12 and 13.5 inches the Germans had nothing more powerful to

oppose to us than guns of 11 and 12 inches. Ship for ship the Germans

were about two knots slower than ourselves, so that we always had the

advantage of manœuvre, the choosing of the most effective range, and the

power of preventing by our higher speed the escape of a defeated foe.

Had the Germans come north into the open sea, we could have chosen

absolutely, by virtue of our greater speed, gun power and numbers, the

conditions under which an action should have been fought and how it

should have been brought to a finish.

An inch or two in the bore of a naval gun, a few feet more or less of

length, may not seem much to some of my readers. But they should

remember that the weight of a shell, and the weight of its explosive

charge, vary as the _cube_ of its diameter. A 12-inch shell is a third

heavier than one of 11 inches, while a 13.5-inch shell is more than

one-half heavier than a 12-inch and twice as heavy as one of 11 inches

only. The power of the bursting charge varies not as the weight, but as

the _square_ of the weight of a shell. The Germans were very slow to

learn the naval lesson of the superiority of the bigger gun and the

heavier shell. It was not until after the Dogger Bank action when

Beatty’s monstrous 13.5-inch shells broke in a terrible storm upon their

lighter-armed battle cruisers that the truth fully came home to them.

Had Jellicoe and Beatty fought the German Fleet in the wide spaces of

the upper North Sea in August, 1914, we should have opposed a fighting

efficiency in power and weight of guns of more than two to one. Rarely

have the precious qualities of insight and foresight been more

strikingly shown forth than in the superiority in ships, in guns, and in

men that the Royal Navy was able to range against their German

antagonists in those early days of August, when the fortunes of the

Empire would have turned upon the chances of a naval battle. In the long

contest waged between 1900 and 1914, in the bloodless war of peace, the

spiritual force of the Navy had gained the victory; the enemy had been

beaten, and knew it, and thenceforward for many months, until the spring

of 1916, he abode in his tents. Whenever he did venture forth it was not

to give battle but to kill some women, some babes, and then to scuttle

home to proclaim the dazzling triumph which “Gott” had granted to his

arms.

* * * * *

It may seem to many a fact most extraordinary that in August, 1914, not

one of our great ships of the first class—the so-called

“super-Dreadnoughts”—upon which we depended for the domination of the

seas and the security of the Empire, not one was more than three years

old. The four Orions—_Orion_, _Conqueror_, _Thunderer_ and

_Monarch_—were completed in 1911 and 1912. The four K.G. Fives—_King

George V_, _Centurion_, _Ajax_, and _Audacious_ in 1912 and 1913; and

the four Iron Dukes—_Iron Duke_, _Marlborough_, _Emperor of India_ and

_Benbow_—in 1914. All these new battleships carried ten 13.5-inch guns

and had an effective speed of nearly 23 knots. The super-battle

cruisers—_Lion_, _Queen Mary_ and _Princess Royal_—were completed in

1912, carried eight 13.5-inch guns, and had a speed of over 29 knots.

Upon these fifteen ships, not one of which was more than three years

old, depended British Sea Power. The Germans had nothing, when the war

broke out, which was comparable with these fifteen splendid monsters.

Their first line battleships and battle cruisers completed in the

corresponding years, from 1911 to 1914—their “opposite numbers” as the

Navy calls them—were not superior in speed, design and power of guns to

our Dreadnought battleships and battle cruisers, which had already

passed into the second class, and which, long before the war ended, had

sunk to the third class. But the newness and overwhelming superiority of

our true first line do not surprise those who realise that these fifteen

great ships were the fine flower of our naval brains and soul. The new

Navy of the three years immediately preceding the war was simply the old

Navy writ large. As the need had arisen, so had the Navy expanded to

meet it. The designs for these fifteen ships did not fall down from

Heaven; they were worked out in naval brains years before they found

their material expression in steel. The vast ships issued forth upon the

seas, crushingly superior to anything which our enemy could put into

commission against us, because our naval brains were superior to his and

our naval Soul was to his as a white glowing flame to a tallow candle.

In a sentence, while Germany was laboriously copying our Dreadnoughts we

had cast their designs aside, and were producing at a speed, with which

he could not compete, Orions, K.G. Fives, Iron Dukes and Lions.

* * * * *

The North Sea, large as it may appear upon a map, is all too small for

the manœuvres of swift modern fleets. No part of that stretch of water

which lies south of the Dogger Bank—say, from the Yorkshire coast to

Jutland—is far enough removed from the German bases to allow of a sure

and decisive fleet action. There was no possibility here of a clean

fight to a finish. An enemy might be hammered severely, some of his

vessels might be sunk—Beatty showed the German battle cruisers what we

could do even in a stern chase at full speed—but he could not be

destroyed. On the afternoon and night of May 31st-June 1st, 1916, the

Grand Fleet had the enemy enveloped and ripe for destruction, but were

robbed of full victory by mist and darkness and the lack of sea room.

Nelson spoke with the Soul of the Navy when he declared that a battle

was not won when any enemy ship was enabled to escape destruction. So

while the divisions of the Grand Fleet, and especially the fastest

battle cruisers of some twenty-eight to twenty-nine knots speed (about

thirty-three miles per hour) neglected no opportunity to punish the

enemy ships that might venture forth, what every man from Jellicoe to

the smallest ship boy really longed and prayed for, was a brave ample

battle in the deep wide waters of the north. Here there was room for a

newer and greater Trafalgar, though even here the sea was none too

spacious. Great ships, which move with the speed of a fairly fast train

and shoot to the extreme limits of the visible horizon, really require a

boundless Ocean in which to do their work with naval thoroughness. But

the upper North Sea would have served, and there the Grand Fleet waited,

ever at work though silent, ever watchfully ready for the Great Day. And

while it waited it controlled by the mere fact of its tremendous power

of numbers, weight, and position the destinies of the civilised world.

* * * * *

The task of the Royal Navy in the war would have been much simpler had

the geography of the North Sea been designed by Providence to assist us

in our struggle with Germany. We made the best of it, but were always

sorely handicapped by it. The North Sea was too shallow, too well

adapted for the promiscuous laying of mines, and too wide at its

northern outlet for a really close blockade. Had the British Isles been

slewed round twenty degrees further towards Norway, so that the outlet

to the north was as narrow as that to the English Channel—and had there

been a harbour big enough for the Grand Fleet between the Thames and the

Firth of Forth—then our main bases could have been placed nearer to

Germany and our striking power enormously increased. We could then have

placed an absolute veto upon the raiding dashes which the Germans now

and then made upon the eastern English seaboard. As the position in fact

existed we could not place any of our first line ships further south

than the Firth of Forth—and could place even there only our fastest

vessels—without removing them too far from the Grand Fleet’s main

concentration at Scapa Flow in the Orkneys. Invergordon in the Cromarty

Firth was used as a rest and replenishing station. The German

raids—what Admiral Jellicoe called their tactics of “tip and run”—were

exasperating, but they could not be allowed to interfere with the naval

dispositions upon which the whole safety of the Empire depended. We had

to depend on the speed of our battle cruisers in the Firth of Forth to

give us opportunity to intercept and punish the enemy. The German battle

cruisers which fired upon Scarborough, Whitby, and the Hartlepools were

nearly caught—a few minutes more of valuable time and a little less of

sea haze would have meant their destruction. A second raid was

anticipated and the resulting Dogger Bank action taught the enemy that

the Navy had a long arm and long sight. For a year he digested the

lesson, and did not try his luck again until April, 1916, when he dashed

forth and raided Lowestoft on the Norfolk coast. The story of this raid

is interesting. The Grand Fleet had been out a day or two before upon

what it called a “stunt,” a parade in force of the Jutland coast and the

entrance to the Skaggerak. It had hunted for the Germans and found them

not, and returning to the far north re-coaled the ships. The Germans,

with a cleverness which does them credit, launched their Lowestoft raid

immediately after the “stunt” and before the battle cruisers,

re-coaling, could be ready to dash forth. Even as it was they did not

cut much time to waste. It was a dash across, a few shots, and a dash

back.

Then was made a re-disposition of the British Squadrons, not in the

least designed to protect the east coast of England—though the enemy

was led to believe so—but so to strengthen Beatty’s Battle Cruiser

Squadrons that the enemy’s High Seas Fleet, when met, could be fought

and held until Jellicoe with his battle squadrons could arrive and

destroy it. The re-disposition consisted of two distinct movements.

First: the pre-Dreadnought battleships and battle cruisers which had

been stationed in the Forth were sent to the Thames. Second: Admiral

Evan-Thomas’s fifth battle squadron of five Queen Elizabeth battleships

(built since the war began)—of twenty-five knots speed and each

carrying eight 15-inch guns—_Queen Elizabeth_, _Barham_, _Valiant_,

_Warspite_, and _Malaya_—were sent from Scapa to the Firth of Forth to

reinforce Beatty and to give him a support which would enable him and

Evan-Thomas to fight a delaying action against any force which the

Germans could put to sea. Three of the Invincible type of battle

cruisers were moved from the Forth to Scapa to act as Jellicoe’s advance

guard, and to enable contact to be quickly made between Beatty and

Jellicoe. But for this change in the Grand Fleet’s dispositions, which

enabled the four splendid battleships—_Barham_, _Valiant_, _Warspite_

and _Malaya_ (the _Queen Elizabeth_ was in dock)—to engage the whole

High Seas Fleet on the afternoon of May 31st, 1916, while Beatty headed

off the German battle cruisers and opened the way for Jellicoe’s

enveloping movement, the Battle of Jutland could never have been fought.

The Silent Watchers England's Navy during the Great War: What It Is, and What We Owe to It · 第 3 / 12 章