CHAPTER I

EVERYMAN’S LIBRARY

EDITED BY ERNEST RHYS

FICTION

RUNNYMEDE

AND LINCOLN FAIR

WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY

L. K. HUGHES

THE PUBLISHERS OF _EVERYMAN’S LIBRARY_ WILL BE PLEASED TO SEND FREELY TO

ALL APPLICANTS A LIST OF THE PUBLISHED AND PROJECTED VOLUMES TO BE

COMPRISED UNDER THE FOLLOWING THIRTEEN HEADINGS:

TRAVEL SCIENCE FICTION

THEOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY

HISTORY CLASSICAL

FOR YOUNG PEOPLE

ESSAYS ORATORY

POETRY & DRAMA

BIOGRAPHY

REFERENCE

ROMANCE

[Illustration: colophon]

IN FOUR STYLES OF BINDING: CLOTH,

FLAT BACK, COLOURED TOP; LEATHER,

ROUND CORNERS, GILT TOP; LIBRARY

BINDING IN CLOTH, & QUARTER PIGSKIN

LONDON: J. M. DENT & SONS, LTD.

NEW YORK: E. P. DUTTON & CO.

A TALE

WHICH

HOLDETH

CHILDREN

FROM PLAY

& OLD MEN

FROM THE

CHIMNEY

CORNER

SIR PHILIP SIDNEY

RUNNYMEDE

and LINCOLN

FAIR · A Story

of the Great

Charter · By

J.G. EDGAR.

[Illustration: colophon]

LONDON: PUBLISHED

by J·M·DENT·&·SONS·L{TD}

AND IN NEW YORK

BY E·P·DUTTON & CO

FIRST ISSUE OF THIS EDITION 1908

REPRINTED 1914

INTRODUCTION

_Runnymede and Lincoln Fair_ was the last story drawing upon the wars

and great affairs of English history which its author was destined to

write. Like _Cressy and Poictiers_, which is already included in

“Everyman’s Library,” and which preceded it by some three years in its

original issue, it first ran as a serial through the magazine

particularly associated with Edgar--the _Boys’ Own Magazine_; it was

first published as a separate book in 1866.

Some further particulars of the brief career of its writer may be added

to what has already been told of him in the earlier volume. John George

Edgar was the fourth son of the Rev. John Edgar of Hutton in

Berwickshire, who was said to be a representative of the ancient family

of Edgar of Wedderlie, settled for ages in the parish of Westruther in

that county. There seems to be some disagreement as to the date of his

birth. The _Gentleman’s Magazine_ for 1864 and Cooper’s _Biographical

Dictionary_ give it as 1834, but James Hannay in _Characters and

Criticisms_, published in 1865, says that Edgar was born in the year

1827. From Edgar’s literary record and subsequent career one is inclined

to believe the latter version the more correct; and to further quote

Hannay: “He was educated at Coldstream school under a man of good local

reputation, Mr. Richard Henderson, and the Latin he acquired there

proved of great value to him afterwards, in reading the old mediæval

chronicles. He went to a commercial situation in Liverpool in 1843; and

in 1846 left Liverpool for the West Indies, where he remained till 1848.

Returning to Liverpool in the last-mentioned year, he resumed his

Liverpool duties till 1852, when he settled in London.”

Thenceforward Edgar deserted commerce and devoted himself to

literature, and in little more than ten years he wrote some sixteen

volumes, intended mainly for the reading and entertainment of boys. He

was the first editor of _Every Boy’s Magazine_, and its constant

contributor. Nor was that the only periodical to which he contributed;

we find his name in other journals, and he occasionally wrote political

articles, from a typically conservative point of view; but, as Hannay

says, Edgar was always “rather a writer of books than a journalist. He

studied his subjects for their own sake, and then made what literary use

he could of them; but he was little interested in the general pursuits

of the literary world proper, and profoundly indifferent to the arts by

which literary advancement is sometimes pursued there. Indeed, his

appearance in the modern metropolitan world of wags and cynics and

tale-writers had something about it that was not only picturesque but

unique. He came in among those clever, amusing, and essentially modern

men like one of Scott’s heroes. Profoundly attached to the feudal

traditions,--a Tory of the purest Bolingbrokian School, as distinct from

the Pittite Tory or modern Conservative, and supporting these doctrines

with a fearless and eccentric eloquence, to which his fine person and

frank and gallant address gave at once an easy and a stately charm,--he

represented in London the Scot of a past age.... He made serious

preparation for a book on the barons’ war, in which he was to take the

side of the English monarchy, and which would have certainly exhibited

admirable knowledge, and talents for investigation and description, that

must have commanded an attention which his previous performances had

been too modest even to desire to invite.”

Edgar died of congestion of the brain on April 15, 1864, and his remains

lie buried in Highgate Cemetery.

That an author of so much power and promise should have had to end

there, half-way, at that comparatively early age, is the more to be

lamented, because it was due to the physical carelessness which often

wrecks men to whom nature has given a splendid constitution. According

to Hannay, Edgar presumed too much on his strength: “He thought it would

fight him through anything, so after a bout of solitary literary labour,

during which he had lived _more suo_ upon tea and tobacco, he was

attacked with brain fever. He would not believe it serious, nor would

he send for advice till it was too late.”

When Edgar wrote _Runnymede and Lincoln Fair_, he filled a gap in

English historical fiction. Scott had left the period untouched, and

Shakespeare, as a dramatist, had naturally preferred to dwell on the

deeds and characters of individuals, rather than on the political

controversies of John and his subjects.

Yet the thirteenth century is one of the most important and interesting

periods in English history; but it was not an age of chivalry and

romance, and this must be borne in mind when we are obliged to admit

that _Runnymede and Lincoln Fair_ does not rank so high as _Cressy and

Poictiers_ as a work of fiction. Moreover, there is no contemporary

chronicler so vivacious and romantic as Froissart for the novelist to

draw upon.

The historical literature of the time of Magna Charta is largely

monastic, and Edgar follows pretty closely the chronicles of Roger of

Wendover and his editor and continuator, Matthew Paris, who was the

greatest of the thirteenth-century chroniclers. But he has drawn on

various sources besides, among which are the _Memoriale_ of Walter of

Coventry, the annals of Waverly, Dunstable, and other monasteries, the

chronicle of Ralph of Coggeshall, a full and important chronicle giving

many details. For the description of London which Edgar made use of to

such advantage he was indebted to _The Life of Thomas à Becket_ by a

twelfth-century writer, William Fitzstephen.

The hero of the tale, Oliver Icingla, in so far as being the descendant

of Saxon chiefs, and of the house of De Moreville, gives us the keynote

of the period--the amalgamation of the two races, Saxon and Norman, to

form an English nation. Towards the close of the twelfth century a new

language began to be formed, a blending of Anglo-Saxon and Norman; and

by the end of the thirteenth century the last manifest difference of

race, the distinctive peculiarities of dress, had passed away. But in

character Icingla does not represent this fusion of the races. He does

not join the united barons and English people in the struggle for

national freedom, but appears as a champion of the royal cause; and

later, of England against the foreigners.

One cannot help perceiving, as one reads the story, that the sympathy

of the author is chiefly with the crown. Walter Merley is the only

Norman noble of the king’s adversaries whom he would have us admire.

This is also the tone of Roger of Wendover, who calls the leaders of the

barons “the chief promoters of this pestilence.” Yet according to

Matthew Paris, who is very fair and just, with all his enthusiasm, the

barons were not all rogues. He gives the following incident which Edgar

has omitted in connection with the siege of Rochester:--“One day during

the siege of Rochester Castle, the king and Sauvery were riding round it

to examine the weaker parts of it, when a crossbowman in the service of

William d’Albini saw them, and said to his master, ‘Is it your will, my

lord, that I should slay the king, with this arrow which I have ready?’

To this William replied, ‘No, no; far be it from us, villain, to cause

the death of the Lord’s anointed.’ The crossbowman said, ‘He would not

spare you in a like case.’ To which the knight replied, ‘The Lord’s will

be done. The Lord disposes events, not he.... This circumstance was

afterwards known to the king, who, notwithstanding this, did not wish to

spare William when his prisoner, but would have hung him had he been

permitted.”

In the opening chapters of his story Edgar gives an idea of the

turbulent state of the country just after the battle of Bouvines--the

defeat to which, according to the historians, England owes its Magna

Charta. The barons had now the upper hand. John was crestfallen, and

“concealed his hatred of the barons under a calm countenance,” says

Matthew Paris.

When describing the great day of Runnymede, Edgar shows that he did not

consider the resistance to royal tyranny to be a constitutional and

really national movement. The reader is frequently reminded that the

barons were fighting for their own selfish ends.

The period of cruelty and ravage between Runnymede and the battle of

Lincoln is enlivened by touches of romance, and exploits such as those

of William de Collingham, which remind us of Robin Hood, but all the

more interesting because Collingham is a historical character mentioned

by the contemporary writers. Roger of Wendover says, “A young man named

William, refusing to make his fealty to Louis, collected a company of a

thousand crossbowmen, and taking to the woods and forests with which

that part of the country[1] abounded, he continued to harass the French

during the whole war, and slew many thousands of them.”

[1] Sussex.

Edgar’s description of the sea-fight between Hubert de Burgh and Eustace

the Monk is much the same as that given by the chroniclers, but he omits

the answer of the nobles who, when Hubert proposed that they should go

to meet the French fleet, said: “We are not sailors, pirates, or

fishermen, do you go therefore and die.”

So also in his account of Lincoln Fair, and of the rising of Fitzarnulph

and the citizens of London, he still keeps close to the old chronicle of

Wendover; especially is he in his element on Lincoln Fair day, and able

to give full rein to his patriotic fire, the essential point of which,

in his case, as in that of the chronicler, was loyalty to the king. But

Edgar adds to Roger’s account when he introduces us to Nichola de

Camville, whose story is given by Walter of Coventry.

Finally, when the temporary peace was established, Edgar concludes his

tale in the conventional way, dear to novel readers in every age, with

the rescue of the heroine by the hero, and the “living happy ever

after.”

Hannay says of Edgar’s style: “It is not a showy style; but it is

singularly clear, masculine, and free from every trace of literary

impurity or fashionable affectation.” It is certain that he was at his

best when describing boyish adventures or historic events. Beatrix de

Moreville’s only essential place in the story is as an object of

admiration for Oliver Icingla, thereby causing the former friends,

Oliver and Fitzarnulph, to become romance-rivals as well as political

opponents. It is not, in truth, of such as Beatrix de Moreville that the

great heroines are made. With Wolf, the son of Styr, the author is, on

the contrary, much more at home; and he makes us at last as interested

as he was himself in the boy who was the loyal servant of his master.

Edgar, with his strong conservative instinct and his feeling for the old

chroniclers, had much to aid him in his special service of making

history into pure story. If he had gone on to write the major work he

had planned on the subject of this last story of his, he might have left

a more solid fame behind him. His story will help, as it is, to send

other students and writers to review the turbulent reign of that John

whom he over-estimated.

L. K. HUGHES.

_April 1908._

The following are the published works of John George Edgar:--

Biography for Boys, 1853; The Boyhood of Great Men, 1853; History

for Boys, 1855; Boy Princes, 1857; The Heroes of England, 1858; The

Wars of the Roses, 1859; The Crusades and the Crusaders, 1860;

Cavaliers and Roundheads, 1861; Sea Kings and Naval Heroes, 1861;

Memorable Events of Modern History, 1862; Danes, Saxons, and

Normans, 1863; Cressy and Poictiers (in Beeton’s _Boys’ Own

Magazine_, 1863), 1865; Historical Anecdotes of Animals, 1865;

Runnymede and Lincoln Fair, 1866.

CONTENTS

CHAPTER PAGE

I. A SQUIRE AND A CITIZEN 1

II. THE ICINGLAS 7

III. AN UNBIDDEN GUEST 10

IV. CHRISTMAS 18

V. THE TOWER OF LONDON 22

VI. KING JOHN 25

VII. A MAN OF THE FOREST 31

VIII. THE KING AND THE BARONS 37

IX. A BLOW IN SEASON 43

X. WILLIAM DE COLLINGHAM 49

XI. ANCIENT LONDON 53

XII. THE BARONS IN LONDON 59

XIII. EVACUATION OF THE TOWER 63

XIV. A HEROINE IN DANGER 67

XV. ISABEL OF ANGOULÊME 72

XVI. TAKEN BY SURPRISE 76

XVII. THE WINDSOR OF KING JOHN 83

XVIII. THE DAY OF RUNNYMEDE 87

XIX. CHAS-CHATEIL 91

XX. OLIVER’S CAPTIVITY 96

XXI. DE MOREVILLE’S DAUGHTER 100

XXII. HOW THE KING BIDED HIS TIME 108

XXIII. TURNING TO BAY 115

XXIV. A DESPERATE EXPEDIENT 119

XXV. THE VOWS OF THE HERON 123

XXVI. A PAINFUL INTERVIEW 127

XXVII. THE INVADER AND HIS DUPES 130

XXVIII. STYR THE ANGLO-SAXON AND HIS SON 135

XXIX. HUNTING A WILD BOAR 139

XXX. A GRAND FEAT OF HORSEMANSHIP 143

XXXI. PEDRO THE PAGE 149

XXXII. THE SUBTERRANEAN PASSAGE 154

XXXIII. WARRIORS IN DISGUISE 158

XXXIV. A RIDE FOR LIFE 165

XXXV. THE RUDDY LION RAMPANT 173

XXXVI. END OF KING JOHN 176

XXXVII. THE GREAT EARL OF PEMBROKE 179

XXXVIII. CORONATION OF THE BOY HENRY 182

XXXIX. A CONQUEROR IN IMAGINATION 186

XL. A CAMP OF REFUGE 190

XLI. OLIVER’S DREAM 197

XLII. BURNING OF OAKMEDE 200

XLIII. FOUND DYING 207

XLIV. A MYSTERIOUS EXIT 210

XLV. A FRENCH ARMAMENT 215

XLVI. A SEA-FIGHT 218

XLVII. THE SIEGE OF MOUNT SORREL 221

XLVIII. LINCOLN 225

XLIX. COLLINGHAM’S RAVENS 229

L. THE BATTLE 233

LI. DE MOREVILLE IN BATTLE HARNESS 237

LII. DEFIANT TILL DEATH 242

LIII. AFTER THE BATTLE 245

LIV. AN AWKWARD PREDICAMENT 247

LV. SUNSHINE AND CLOUDS 252

LVI. THE WRESTLING-MATCH 255

LVII A MEDIÆVAL RESTAURANT 259

LVIII. WRESTLING FOR THE RAM 263

LIX. A STARTLING SPECTACLE 267

LX. A DEMAGOGUE AND HIS DESPERADOES 271

LXI. AN OFFERING TO THE WINDS 276

RUNNYMEDE AND LINCOLN FAIR

A STORY OF THE GREAT CHARTER

CHAPTER I

A SQUIRE AND A CITIZEN

It was the eve of Christmas in the year 1214, when John was King of

England; and, albeit England was on the verge of a sanguinary civil war,

which was to shake the kingdom to its centre, and cause infinite

suffering to families and individuals, London--then a little city,

containing some forty thousand inhabitants, and surrounded by an old

Roman wall, said to have been built by the Emperor Constantine--wore

quite a holiday aspect, when, as the shades of evening were closing over

the banks of the Thames, a stripling of eighteen, or thereabouts, walked

up one of the long, narrow streets--some of which, indeed, were so

narrow that the inmates, when they ascended to the house-tops, could

converse and even shake hands with their opposite neighbours--and

knocked loudly at the gate of a high house. It had the appearance of

being the abode either of some great noble in attendance on the court,

or one of those mediæval merchants who called themselves “barons,” and

boasted of such wealth as few of the feudal nobles could call their own.

In fact, it was the residence of the Fitzarnulphs, the proudest,

richest, and most influential of the citizens of London.

The stripling was of gallant bearing and fair to look upon. He was tall,

though not so tall as to be in any way remarkable; and his person, well

proportioned and compactly formed, indicated much strength, and promised

much endurance. His countenance, which was set off with a profusion of

fair hair and a growing moustache, was frank and open--so frank and

open, indeed, that it seemed as if you might have read in his clear blue

eye every working of the mind; and he had neither the aquiline features

nor air of authority which distinguished the Norman warriors, young and

old. His dress, however, was similar to that which a Norman squire--a De

Vesci or a De Roos--would have worn; and he had the air, the manner, and

the style of one who had been early apprenticed to arms, and trained in

feudal castles to perform the feats of chivalry on which the age set so

high a value. Nor was it clear that he had not been engaged in other

than the mimic warfare of the tiltyard. More than one scar--none of

them, fortunately, such as to mar his beauty--told of fields on which

warriors had fought desperately for victory and for life.

Admitted after some delay into the courtyard, and, after passing through

it, into the interior of the high house at the gate of which he had

knocked, the squire was ceremoniously conducted through what might be

called the great hall of the mansion, and received in a small

comfortably matted and heated chamber by a person somewhat his senior,

who wore the gabardine of a citizen, and on his dark countenance a look

of abstraction and gloom, which contrasted remarkably with the lightness

and gaiety of his visitor. Wholly unaffected by this difference,

however, the squire held out his hand, grasped that of the young

Londoner, and said in a voice, not musical indeed, but joyous and

hearty--

“Constantine Fitzarnulph, I greet thee in the name of God and of good

St. Edward.”

“Oliver Icingla!” exclaimed the citizen, taken by surprise. “Do I, in

truth, see you, and in the body? Ere this I deemed you were food for

worms.”

“By the Holy Cross, Constantine,” replied the squire, “you do see me in

the body. I have, it is true, passed through many adventures and perils,

seeing I am but a youth; but as for being food for worms, I have as yet

no ambition to serve that purpose, being, as is well known to you, the

last of my line, and in no haste, credit me, to sing ‘_Nunc Dimittis_’

till I have done something to employ the tongues of minstrels.”

“Of what adventures and perils speak you?” asked the citizen somewhat

jealously; for he himself had passed through neither, save in his

visions by day and his dreams by night.

“I would fain not appear vainglorious,” answered the squire, smiling,

“and, therefore, I care not to recount my own exploits. But you know

that, when I was withdrawn from your companionship, and from the lessons

in grammar and letters, to which, be it confessed, I never took very

kindly, I entered the castle of my mother’s remote kinsman, William

Longsword, Earl of Salisbury, and there, not without profit, served my

apprenticeship to chivalry. But no sooner did I attain the rank of

squire than I began to sigh for real war, and such fields of fight as,

for years, I had been dreaming of. And it chanced that about that time

Don Diego Perez, a knight from Spain, reached the castle of Salisbury

with tidings that Alphonso of Castille was hard pressed by the Moors,

and like to lose his kingdom if not aided by the warriors of

Christendom. On hearing Don Diego’s report I and others in my Lord of

Salisbury’s household, with the noble earl’s sanction, accompanied the

knight to Castille; and I fought at Muradel on that day when the

Christian chivalry swept the Moorish host before them as the wind does

leaves at Yule.”

“In good faith?”

“In good faith, Constantine,” continued the squire. “But it speedily

appeared that we had done our work too well, and routed the Moors so

thoroughly that there was no likelihood of reaping more honour or more

profit under King Alphonso’s banners; and I was even thinking of going

to the Holy Land to fight for the recovery of the Holy Sepulchre, when

news reached the court of Castille that King John had allied himself

with the Emperor of Germany and the Count of Flanders to oppose the King

of France, and that my Lord of Salisbury was leading an English force to

join them; and I and others resolved thereupon to hasten where blows

were like to be going; and we made our way, through countless perils, to

the great earl’s side on the very day when the two armies--one headed by

the Emperor Otho, the other by King Philip--drew up in battle array

between Lille and Tournay.”

“By St. Thomas!” exclaimed the citizen with a sneer, “you soon learned

to your cost that you had better have gone elsewhere.”

“Nay, nay,” replied the squire sharply--for the sneer of the citizen had

not been unobserved--“it is the fortune of warriors to know defeat as

well as victory, and we did all that brave men could do on that August

day--now four months since--when we came face to face with the French at

the bridge of Bovines. It was a long and furious battle; but, from the

first, fortune favoured the French, and, when all was lost, my Lord of

Salisbury yielded his sword to the Bishop of Beauvais, a terrible

warrior, who fought not with a sword, lest he should be accused of

shedding men’s blood, but with a mighty club, with which he smashed at

once head-piece and head. For my own part,” added the squire carelessly,

as one who did not relish speaking of himself, “I fought till I was sore

wounded in the face and beaten down; and I should have been trodden

under foot but for the earl, who, like a noble warrior as he is, looked

to my safety; so I accompanied him into captivity; and, when he

covenanted for his own ransom, he, at the same time, paid mine for my

mother’s sake, and here I am in England safe and sound; but, I almost

grieve to add, hardly a free man.”

“Not a free man, Oliver Icingla? How cometh that?” asked the citizen.

“Even in this wise, Constantine,” answered the squire. “It seems that

the king, in order to settle his disputes with the barons, has demanded

some of the sons or kindred of each as hostages, and my kinsman, Hugh de

Moreville, who scandalously withholds from my mother the castle and

manors which she inherited, and which my father enjoyed in her right,

albeit he has never before troubled himself much about my existence,

suddenly bethinks him that I shall serve his purpose on this occasion,

and has named me to the king.”

“And will you go, Oliver Icingla? Will you put yourself into the lion’s

den?”

“Ay, man, as blithely as ever lover went to his lady’s bower.”

“And place yourself at the disposal of a tyrant--a cruel, remorseless,

hateful tyrant, who murdered his own nephew, Arthur of Brittany, who

hanged twenty-six Welsh boys, who poisoned the daughter of that noble

man, Robert Fitzwalter, and who allowed the wife and children of William

de Braose to perish of hunger in the dungeons of Windsor?”

The squire changed colour, and his lip quivered nervously.

“Fables, Constantine!” exclaimed he, recovering his serenity with an

effort, and tossing his head disdainfully backwards--“fables devised by

Philip of France and the barons of England to justify their own selfish

and ambitious schemes, and such as ought never to gain credit with a

person such as thou. But let French kings and Norman barons make dupes

and tools of whom they may, I swear by the Holy Cross that never shall

Oliver Icingla be either their dupe or their tool. So help me God and

good St. Edward!”

And, as he spoke these words with flashing eye, the squire drew his

sword and reverently kissed the cross on its hilt.

“Oliver Icingla,” said the citizen, after a pause, during which he eyed

his visitor keenly, “if I comprehend thee aright, thou dreamest, as I

believe thy fathers ever did, of the restoration of the Anglo-Saxon race

to power in England?”

“And if I do, who has a better right?--I, an Icingla, with the blood of

Cerdic in my veins?”

“Dreams, Oliver, vain dreams,” replied the citizen. “This is not the age

of Hereward, and every chance is gone; and, but for being blinded by

hereditary prejudices, you would see, as plainly as you now see me, that

your race is vanquished once and for ever.”

“Constantine,” said the squire sadly and thoughtfully, “the words you

have spoken, harsh as they may sound in the ear of an Icingla, are

partly words of truth and soberness, but only in part. This is not,

indeed, the age of Hereward; nor did I, even in my most enthusiastic

moments, dream of raising the old cry, ‘Let every man that is not a

nothing, whether in the town or in the country, leave his house and

come!’ and attempting to make England what it was before Duke William

prevailed at Hastings over the usurper Harold. But let me tell you, wise

as you deem yourself, that, when you speak of the ancient race as

vanquished for ever, you therein greatly err. A great race, like a great

family, is never wholly done till it is extinct; and I tell you, for

your instruction, ill as you may like to hear the truth, that this

Anglo-Saxon race which you mention so contemptuously has been rising, is

rising, and will continue to rise, and increase in influence, till

Providence grants us a king under whose auspices will reappear, in more

than its ancient vigour, the England that disappeared after the death of

the Confessor.”

“The past cannot be recalled, and the future is with God and His

saints,” said the citizen gravely; “and, for the present, the king and

the barons are at daggers drawn, and may any day appeal to the sword;

and, when the crisis comes--and I care not how soon--be it mine to

persuade the citizens of London to take part against the king, who is a

false tyrant, and with the barons, who are true men. Oliver Icingla, I

would to God you were of our determination; for I perceive that, under a

light and gay demeanour, you hide an ambitious soul and an imagination

that can conjure up a future--mayhap, the ingenuity that could fashion a

future in spite of fate.”

“Constantine,” interrupted the squire solemnly, “even now you remarked

that the future was with God and His saints.”

“True,” replied the citizen; “but, be that as it may, ally yourself with

me at this crisis, and give me your hand in token of good faith, and I

will reveal projects which would make thee and me great, and bring both

king and barons to our feet.”

The squire smiled at the citizen’s somewhat wild enthusiasm, and shook

his head.

“Farewell, Constantine,” said he, stretching out his hand. “I know not

how all this may end; but one thing I feel strongly: that there can be

no alliance between you and me. However, as the shadows are falling, and

the ways are somewhat perilous, I must mount and ride homeward, so as to

reach our humble dwelling ere the night sets in; and so, Constantine,

again I say farewell, and in whatever projects your ambition involves

you, may God and the saints have you in their keeping!”

And thus closing an interview which neither of them regarded without a

feeling of disappointment, the squire and the citizen parted, and soon

after Oliver Icingla was riding on a black horse of high mettle through

Ludgate, while Constantine Fitzarnulph, surrounded by his household, sat

gloomily at his board, revolving schemes both dark and dangerous. Their

next interview was to take place under circumstances infinitely more

tragic.

Runnymede and Lincoln Fair · 第 1 / 61 章