sparkling eyes. “Ann Kirk thet hed the name of bein’ as mean as me, was
berried to day, and folks that keered nawthin’ fur her is a goin’ to
hev her money an’ make it fly. They say ’round here no grass will ever
grow on her grave, fur ev’ry blade will be blarsted by the curses of
the poor.”
“M’ri, you a perfessed Christian!” cried Silas.
“There’s good folks unperfessed,” interposed the stranger; “but I dunno
but a near Christian is better nor a spendthrift one as fetches up at
the poorhouse.”
“Right you air!” said Silas, almost affably feeling he had an advocate.
The stranger was tall and bony, with a thin, wrinkled face bronzed by
wind and weather, with a goatee and mustache of pale brown hair, and a
sparse growth of the same above a high bald forehead; his eyes were a
faded brown, too, and curiously wistful in expression. His clothing was
worn and poor, his hands work-hardened, and he stooped slightly. When
the meal was ready he drew up to the table, Maria plying him with food.
“Would you rather have coffee?” she asked.
“Now you’ve got me, marm, but land! tea’ll do.”
“I should think it would,” snarled Silas; but his grumbling was
silenced in the grinding of the coffee mill. When the appetizing odor
floated from the stove, Silas sniffed it, and his stomach began to
yearn. “You put in a solid cup full,” he muttered, trying to worry
himself into refusing it.
“We want a lot,” laughed Maria.
“Set up an’ eat,” called the stranger cheerily; “let’s make a banquet;
it’s Chrismus Eve!”
“That ham do smell powerful good,” muttered Silas, unconsciously
drawing his chair up to the table, where the stranger handed him a
plate and passed the ham. Maria went on frying eggs, as if, thought
her husband, “they warn’t twenty-five cents a dozen,” and then ran
down into the cellar, returning panting and good-humored with a pan of
apples and a jug of cider; then into the pantry, bringing a tin box out
of which she took a cake.
“That’s pound cake, M’ri,” cried Silas, aghast, holding his knife and
fork upraised in mute horror. She went on cutting thick slices, humming
under her breath.
“Might I, marm,” asked the stranger, pleasantly, “put this slice of ham
and cake and this cup of milk aside, to eat bymeby?”
“How many meals do you eat in a evening?” growled Silas, awestruck at
such an appetite; “an’ I want you to know this ain’t no tavern.”
“Do eat a bite yourself, marm,” said the stranger, as Maria carried the
filled plate to the cupboard. The impudence of a tramp actually asking
the mistress of the house to eat her own food, thought Silas. “We’ve
eat our supper,” he hurled at the stranger.
“I couldn’t tech a mite,” said Maria, beginning to clear up, and as
he was through eating, the stranger gallantly helped her while Silas
smoked in speechless rage.
“I’m used to being handy,” explained the tramp. “I allus helped wife.
She’s bin dead these twenty years, leaving me a baby girl that I
brought up.”
“You was good to her?” asked Maria wistfully; the stranger had such a
kind voice and gentle ways.
“I done the best I could, marm.”
Doubting his senses, Silas saw Maria bring out the haircloth
rocking-chair with the bead tidy from the best front room.
“Lemme carry it,” said the tramp politely. “Now set in’t yerself, marm,
an’ be comfurble.” He took a wooden chair, tilted it back and picked up
the cat. Maria, before she sat down, unmindful of Silas’s bewildered
stare, filled one of his pipes with his tobacco.
“I know you smoke, mister,” she smiled.
“Wal, I do,” answered the tramp, whiffing away in great comfort.
“’Pears to me you’re the biggest-hearted woman I ever see.”
She laughed bitterly. “There wan’t a cluser woman in Corinth than me,
an’ folks’ll tell you so. I turned my own son outer doors.”
“It was part my fault, M’ri, an’ you hush now,” pleaded Silas,
forgiving even her giving his tobacco away if she would not bring out
that family skeleton.
“I’ve heered you was cluse,” said the stranger, “an’ thet you sent Jim
off because he went to circuses in Bath, an’ wore store clothes, an’
wanted wages to pay for ’em.”
“All true,” said Maria, “an’ he wanted to ride the horse, an’ was mad
at workin’ him so hard.” She went on then, and told how the old animal
had come home.
“An’ me thinkin’ the critter was a speerit,” said the stranger in a
hushed voice. “Beat’s all what a dumb brute knows!”
“I thought mebbe,” went on Maria, twisting her thin fingers, “as Jim
might be comin’ home this time. They says things happens curious when
folks is goin’ ter die--”
“Your good fur a good meny years, M’ri,” said Silas, pitifully.
“There’s folks in this wurld,” said the stranger, his kindly face
growing sad and careworn since the mother’s eager words, “that ain’t
mean enuff, an’ comes to charity to the end--”
“That there be,” assented Silas.
“And as can’t bring up their folks comfurble, nor keep ’em well an’
happy, nor have a home as ain’t berried under a mortgage they can’t
never clear off.”
“Ay, there’s lots of ’em,” cried Silas, “an’ Mis Lowell was a twitting
me this very night of bein’ mean.”
“An’ this good home, an’ the fields I passed thro’, an’ the lane where
the old hoss come a gallopin’ up behind me, is paid fur, no mortgage on
a acre?”
“There never was on the Lowell prop’ty; they’ll tell ye thet
ennywhere,” said Silas.
“We uns in the South, where I come from,” said the stranger, shading
his face with his bony hand, “ain’t never fore-handed somehow. My name
is Dexter Brown, marm, an’ I was allus misfortinat. I tell you, marm,
one day when my creditors come an’ took the cotton off my field, thet
I’d plarnted and weeded and worked over in the brilin’ sun, my wife
says--an’ she’d been patient and long-sufferin’--‘Dex, I’m tired out;
jest you bury me in a bit of ground that’s paid fur, an’ I’ll lie in
peace,’ an’ she died thet night.”
“Mebbe she never knowed what it were to scrimp an’ save, an’ do
without, an’ never see nawthin’, till all the good died in her,”
muttered Maria.
“Part o’ my debt was wines an’ good vittles fur her, marm.”
“I’ll warrant!” said Maria quickly, “an’ she never wept over the graves
of her dead children, an’ heered their father complainin’ of how much
their sickness hed cost him. Oh, I tell you, there’s them that reckons
human agony by dollars an’ cents, an’ they’re wus’n murderers!”
“M’ri!” cried Silas.
“Mebbe, marm, you are over-worrited ternight,” said the stranger
softly; “wimmen is all feelin’, God bless ’em! an’ how yer son loved
ye, a tellin’ of yer bright eyes an’ red cheeks--”
She turned to him with fierce eagerness. “He couldn’t keer fur me, I
wan’t the kind. I don’t mind me of hardly ever kissin’ him. I worked
him hard; I was cross an’ stingy. He sed to me, ‘There’s houses that
is never homes, mother.’ I sneered an’ blamed him for his little
present.” She ran and brought the vase. “I’ve kept that, Mr. Brown,
over twenty years, but when he give it to me, bought outer his poor
little savin’s, I scolded him. I never let him hev the boys here to pop
corn or make candy; it was waste and litter. Oh, I know what he meant;
this was never a home.”
“But he only spoke kind of ye allus.”
“Did you know Jim? Been gone this ten year, an’ never a word.”
Silas, a queer shadow on his face, looked eagerly at Brown.
“I did know him,” slowly and cautiously--“he was a cowboy in Texas, as
brave as the best.”
“He could ride,” cried Maria, “as part of a horse, an’ Tige was the
dead image of that Washington horse in the pictur, an’ Jim used to
say thet girl there in the blue gown was his girl--the one with the
bouquet; an’ I used to call him silly. I chilled all the fun he hed
outer him, an’ broken-speerited an’ white-faced he drifted away from
us, as far away as them in the graveyard, with the same weary look as
they hed in goin’.”
“An’ he took keer of much as a hundred cattle,” said Silas; “they has
thet meny I’ve heerd, in Texas?”
“They has thousands; they loses hundreds by drought--”
“Wanter know?” cried Silas, his imagination refusing to grasp such
awful loss.
“Wal, I knowed Jim, an’ he got merried--”
“Merried!” from both the old parents.
“He did. He says, ‘I wunt write the home-folks till I’m well off, for
mother will worrit an’ blame me, an’ I hain’t money, but Minnie an’ I
love each other, an’ are satisfied with little.’”
“Minnie,” the mother repeated. “Was she pretty?”
“Woman all over you be, to ask thet, an’ she was,” said Brown, sadly
“with dark eyes, sorter wistful, an’ hair like crinkled sunshine, an’
a laugh like a merry child, fur trouble slipped off her shoulders like
water off a duck’s back.”
“An’ they got prosperous?” asked Silas uneasily.
“They was happy,” said Brown with gentle dignity; “they was allus
happy, but they lived under a mortgage, an’ it was drift from pillar to
post, an’ ups an’ downs.”
“An’ they’re poor now,” muttered Silas, visions of Jim and his family
to support coming to him.
“Hush!” cried Maria. “Tell me, sir, was there children? Oh, the heart
hunger I’ve had for the sound of a child’s voice, the touch of baby
hands. You an’ me grandpa and grandma, Sile! an’, my God! you think of
money now.”
“Set calm,” pleaded Brown, “for I must hev courage to tell ye all.”
“An’ they sent ye to tell us they was comin’?” asked Silas, judging of
their prosperity from the shabby herald.
“They asked me to come, an’ I swore it. There’s a queer blight as
creeps inter our country, which without thet might be like everlasting
Paradise. Ourn is a land of summer an’ flowers, but up here in this
ice-bound region, the air is like water in runnin’ brooks, it puts life
an’ health in ye.”
“There’s the blight o’ consumption here. We’re foreordained to suffer
all over this airth,” muttered the woman.
“But there it comes in waves of trouble--in awful haste--an’ takes
all at once, an’ them that’s well flees away and the sick dies alone.
So the yellow fever come creepin’ inter my home, fur Minnie was my
child--the daughter I’d keered fur; an’ fust the baby went from her
arms, an’ then little Silas (arter you, sir). Then Minnie sickened, an’
her laugh is only an echo in my heart, for she died and was berried,
the baby in her arms, and Jim was took next--an’ he says” (only the
ticking of the clock sounded now, never so loud before): “‘I want you,
dad,’ (he called me dad) ‘to go to my old home in Maine. I want you
to tell my father I named my dead boy for him, and I thought of his
frugal, saving life with pain, and yet I am proud that his name is
respected as that of an honest man, whose word is his bond. I’ll never
go up the old lane again,’ says Jim, ‘nor see mother standing in the
door with her bright eyes and red cheeks that I used to think was like
winter apples. And the old horse, she said she’d care for, I won’t see
him again, nor hear the bells. In this land of summer I only long for
winter, and dad, if I could hear those hoarse old jolly bells I’d die
in peace. Queer, ain’t it? And I remember some rides I took mother;
she wan’t afraid of the colt, and looked so pretty, a white hood over
her dark hair. You go, dad, and say I was sorry, and I’d planned to
come some day prosperous and happy, but it’s never to be. Tell mother
to think of me when she goes a Sunday afternoon to the buryin’-ground,
as she used to with me, and by those little graves I felt her mother’s
heart beat for me, her living child, and I knew, though she said
nothing, she cared for me.’ He died tellin’ me this, marm, an’ was
berried by my girl, an’ I think it was meant kind they went together,
for both would a pined apart. So I’ve come all the way from Texas,
trampin’ for weary months, for I was poor, to give you Jim’s words.”
“Dead! Jim dead!” cried Silas, in a queer, dazed way. “M’ri,”
querulously, “you allus sed he was so helthy!”
She went to him and laid her hand on his bowed head.
“An’ we’ve saved an’ scrimped an’ pinched fur strangers, M’ri, fur
there ain’t no Lowell to have the prop’ty, an’ I meant it all fur Jim.
When he was to come back he’d find he was prosperous, an’ he’d think
how I tried to make him so.”
“The Lord don’t mean all dark clouds in this life,” said the stranger.
“Out of that pestilence, that never touched her with its foul breath,
came a child, with Minnie’s face and laugh, but Jim’s own eyes--a bit
of mother an’ father.”
The old people were looking at him with painful eagerness, dwelling on
his every word.
“It was little May; named Maria, but we called her May for she was
borned three year ago in that month; a tiny wee thing, an’ I stood by
their graves an’ I hardened my heart. ‘They drove her father out; they
sha’n’t crush her young life,’ I said. ‘I’ll keep her.’ But I knowed I
couldn’t. Poverty was grinding me, and with Jim’s words directin’ me,
I brought her here.”
“Brought her here!” cried the poor woman.
“Ay! She’s a brave little lass, an’ I told her to lie quiet in the
basket till I told her to come out, fur mebbe you wan’t kind an’ would
send us both out, but I found your hearts ready fur her--”
With one spring Maria reached the basket and flung open the lid,
disclosing a tiny child wrapped in a ragged shawl, sleeping peacefully
in her cramped bed, but with tears on her long lashes, as if the
waiting had tried her brave little soul.
“Jest as gritty,” said Brown, “an’ so good to mind; poor lass!”
Maria lifted her out, and the child woke up, but did not cry at the
strange face that smiled on her with such pathetic eagerness. “Oh, the
kitty!” cried May. “I had a kitty once!” That familiar household object
reconciled her at once. She ate the cake eagerly and drank the milk,
insisting on feeding the ham to the cat.
“Him looks hungy,” she said.
“We’ve all been starved!” cried Maria, clasping the child to her heart.
Such a beautiful child, with her merry eyes and laugh and her golden
curls, a strange blossom from a New England soil, yet part of her
birthright was the land of flowers and sunshine. Somehow that pathetic
picture of the past faded when the mother saw a blue and gilt vase in
the baby’s hand--Jim’s baby’s.
“It’s pitty; fank you!” said the little creature. Then she got down to
show her new dress and her shoes, and made excursions into the pantry,
opening cupboard doors, but touching nothing, only exclaiming, “Dear
me, how pitty!” at everything. Then she came back, and at Brown’s
request, with intense gravity, began a Spanish dance she had learned
when they stopped at San Antonio, from watching the Mexican senoritas.
She held up her little gown on one side and gravely made her steps
while Dexter whistled. The fire leaped up and crackled loudly, as if
it would join her, the cat purred, the tea-kettle sung from the back
of the stove, and little snowflakes, themselves hurrying, skurrying in
a merry dance, clung to the window-pane and called other little flakes
to hasten and see such a pretty sight. Maria watched in breathless
eagerness, and Silas, carried beyond himself, forgetting his scruples,
cried out:
“Wal, ef that don’t beat all I ever see! Come here, you little chick!”
holding out his silver watch.
With a final pirouette she finished with a grave little courtesy, then
ran to Silas: “Is there birdie in der?” and he caught her up and kissed
her.
* * * * *
When the old lane is shady in summertime, and golden-rod and daisies
crowd the way, and raspberries climb the stone-wall, and merry
squirrels chatter and mock the red-breasted robins, and bees go humming
through the odorous air, there comes a big white horse that looks like
Washington’s in the picture; and how carefully he walks and bears
himself, for he brings a little princess who has made the old house
a home. Such a fairy-like little thing, who from her sunshine makes
everybody bright and happy, and Silas’s grim old face is smiling as he
leads the horse, and Maria, with her basket of berries, is helped over
the wall by Dexter Brown, who always says he must go but never does,
for they love him, and he and Silas work harmoniously together. And
grandma’s eyes are brighter than ever and her cheeks as red.
“What comfortable folks they air gittin’ to be,” say the neighbors,
“kinder livin’, but I dunno but goin’ a berryin’ a hull arternoon is
right down shiftless.”
Winter is over and forever gone from that household on the hill; the
coming of gracious, smiling spring in a sweet child’s presence has made
eternal sunshine in those ice-bound hearts.
HINTS TO FOOTBALL CAPTAINS.
BY WALTER C. CAMP.
Much has been written from time to time of the growth of the game of
football, and the reasons for its popularity, but no one has described
that which is the real secret of its fascination; viz., planning the
campaign. Planning a football campaign is a most interesting piece of
strategic work, and the amount of thought expended on it would astonish
the majority of that eager audience which crowds the Polo Grounds on
Thanksgiving Day.
“Get some of your old men back to coach,” is a bit of advice often
given to captains of crews and ball nines. But to no one is it so
invaluable as to football captains. It is the careful planning of the
season’s work that will bring victory in November. Through the summer
the captain has been counting over the material he will have as a
nucleus in the fall, and he has also calculated about how much he can
rely upon from preparatory schools. As a rule he treats with distrust
all reports of wonderful men in the incoming class, for the players who
may have been giants on school teams are generally lost in the crowd on
a university field.
His first interest on looking over the men he means to make use of is
this: Are there enough old men to steady the team? With five old men
no captain should be discouraged, and with six or over he ought to be
hopeful, provided he has a half-back and a quarter among them. The
reason for this is that he can then arrange to have a veteran next to
every novice in his team, by scattering the three old rushers. It is
amazing what steadiness can be infused into a team in this way. If the
captain has six instead of five, he can then strengthen the weak side
of his team by putting an old hand as an end-rusher on the side of the
green half-back.
This plan of formation is merely for the early weeks of the season
until the real campaign can be laid out. The veterans act as coaches
to the new men, and after ten or fifteen days of playing in this way,
the novices, if they be at all promising men, will have learned the
general system of play, for the positions in which they stand. That is,
the rushers will have learned not to bunch, _i. e._, keep too close to
the next man, and also not to lag, or be slow in lining up when the
ball is down. They will have been repeatedly cautioned against tackling
high and not getting through hard. A new half will have learned about
how far back he ought to stand, and how quickly he has to kick. In this
way the captain can accomplish a double amount of work, for while he is
looking over his new material, and deciding upon what men will develop
into the service, his old players are giving very efficient assistance
to him by coaching the new ones and rapidly breaking them in. Were it
not for this, things would be in almost as much of a mess after ten
days’ playing as at the start, for it frequently happens that a green
captain will make so little use of his old men in the way of coaching
that the new men will be blundering on in the middle of the season full
of faults which might have been stopped the first week.
Two weeks’ work will enable the captain to select about sixteen men
from whom he sees his team must be drawn. If he is wise he will be
inclined at this period to favor those men who are showing rapid
improvement rather than those whom he knows have already reached their
best days. He will also put some thought upon the general weight of his
team as well as the probable weight of the other teams he must meet.
When he has considered these matters well, and made up in his own mind
the strongest team he can select, he should play these men together as
nearly as possible for some three or four days, and after making any
changes that may seem to him necessary, get his coaches together and
stand with them for one afternoon, when all will have a good look at
the practice. That evening he should have a meeting of the team and
coaches, and a thorough discussion of the strength and weakness of the
team. One learns very rapidly at such a meeting what the team considers
its strong points and where they fear an enemy. During the next week
the captain and coaches should decide finally upon what the strongest
plays of the team are likely to be. The great necessity of doing this
early is to thoroughly provide against accident, not only by being
more than usually careful of the one or two men most engaged in these
plays, but also to train others up to a moderate degree of skillfulness
to take the places of men who may be injured. A decision must also
be reached regarding the weak points of the team, and these not only
strengthened but made less evident to opponents.
Following upon these decisions should come a week or more of very hard
individual coaching. Each man is taken by himself and worked at as
though upon him and his particular plays depended the victory or defeat
of the team. A curious fact is that just at this point in the season,
not only the team, but very often the captain and coaches are sure that
their playing is poor and that defeat stares them in the face. The
true explanation of this is that the enthusiasm has been worked off
to a great extent, and the players have not yet gained the dexterity
that practice will give, so that the poor playing is really painfully
apparent.
Let us review the plan of the campaign up to this point. The captain
first sprinkled his veterans among the raw recruits, so that it was
necessary for them to mingle. By doing this he has prevented the old
men from banding together and looking down upon the new ones, and has
also compelled the green men to ask questions of the experts. While
all were thus being well shaken together, he has had an opportunity
to select the best team, and, by actual trial, to judge in what line
of action they would prove strongest. All this has been effected with
the least possible loss of time, for, owing to the shortness of the
football season, time is too valuable to be wasted even in experiments.
Of individual coaching, little need be said, as it is only a means of
improving details, and does not affect the campaign, except in the way
of dexterity.
The captain next begins to study the best offensive and defensive
tactics for his team. He starts with the problem in such shape as this:
Given the kick-off with an adverse wind, what is the best opening for
the style of game his team plays? He may kick the ball as far down the
field as possible. But this is very seldom a good opening, because
the side that wins the toss, having the choice of goal or kick-off,
it invariably happens that the kick-off is made against the wind. The
captain knows that if he makes a straight kick down the field under
these circumstances it will be returned, and with the help of the wind,
will most surely be put back some distance into his own territory, so
that the play will have lost him considerable ground.
The next thing to be considered is a long kick down the field and
out of bounds on the side. This opening was a strong feature of the
Yale game for several years, owing to the combination of two happy
possessions--a strong place-kicker and a very fast end-rusher. The
play usually means that the ball, when it goes into touch, is first
reached by the opponents and they return it into the field at the point
where it went out. Of course, the ball has made considerable advance
into the enemy’s territory; but as an offset to this, they have gained
possession of the ball, and, if their play is strong and accurate, they
should be able to return it past the center of the field on their first
kick. While the above is the usual result of the play, it does happen
that a fast end-rusher, in perfect unanimity with the place-kicker,
will succeed in reaching the ball before the opponents. In this case
there is an actual gain of the distance from the centre of the field to
the spot where the ball crossed the touchline. Another opening is to
dribble the ball and then pass it back for the half to punt. This gives
the rushers a chance to get up the field and prevent a return kick. In
this case, unless the ball is fumbled, there is only an apparent gain,
for the ball is in the possession of the enemy and after the down will
be returned probably beyond the centre of the field.
The opening most popular during the past season was the “running
break” or “V.” The ball was dribbled and passed back to a half who was
protected by the rushers enough to insure his having a fair start. He
then made a break for the opening in the line and carried the ball as
far as he could. The amount of interference allowed last year made this
a strong opening, because the player usually made several yards, and
that without losing the ball.
From this point on, however, comes the real strategy of the game. An
illustration of this is the statement made and carried out by one of
the coaches of a team which competed one Thanksgiving Day, not many
years ago. After a conference with the captain and other coaches the
night before the game, he made the astonishing statement that his team
would, if they lost the toss, put the ball over the enemy’s goal-line
in less than five minutes from the time of kick-off. The diagram of
the plans was laid out on paper, and is still in the possession of one
of the men. The plays were these: The ball was dribbled and passed by
a long throw to the right half-back, whose run was made successfully.
The ball was snapped and passed to the rusher next the end on the same
side. This play was strong, because the position of the men and the
throw of the quarter made it appear that the ball was again going to
the half, and the opposing rushers went through the more eagerly. The
next play was a centre-play--the guard giving the ball to the quarter
for a run, and the final play, which carried the ball over the line,
was out next the end once more. The immense superiority of such a
system over the usual method of sending the ball wherever there seems
the most chance was conclusively proven, for, with the exception of a
slight fumble, which caused one more down, there was no break in the
chain, and each man made within a few yards of the spot which had been
marked on the paper.
While it is, of course, impossible to lay out the entire progress of
the game, owing to the element of uncertainty introduced by ignorance
of what line of action may be adopted by one’s opponents, it is
possible to plan what ought to be done at certain stages in the game.
For instance, for many years it was thoroughly believed by all the
best football men that the kicking game could not be played against
the wind under even the most favorable circumstances. This theory has,
however, fallen through, and it is generally concluded that with fast,
good rushers, and strong, accurate kickers, the running game can with
advantage be supplemented with a few timely kicks.
The opening of the game has been discussed; the next point is the
placing of the men on the first down by the opponents. This is
something of vital interest to the captain, for if the opponents have
any strong line of play they will undoubtedly develop it early in the
game. To discover and prevent the surprise is, therefore, the end to be
aimed at, for a strong play successfully made at this point seriously
weakens the adversaries, not only taking from them the actual ground,
but upsetting their confidence and nerve as well.
Upon the use of the quarter depends the style of this first defensive
play. Some captains keep him back of the line where he may assist
the half-backs; others send him up into the line as an extra rusher.
Neither of these two plans can be said to be the right one in all
cases, for there are two elements which govern the play and should
enter into the decision. The first is the relative skill of the rushers
and halves. It is always possible for a captain to say whether he is
strongest “in the line” or “behind it,” and the quarter is most needed
with the weaker set of players. The second is the wind. If this is
very strong and straight with the opponents, there is the greatest
necessity of checking their running before they shall have advanced the
ball within kicking distance of the goal, even though by doing this
the captain for the time being leaves his halves and back less secure.
Therefore the wise captain brings up his quarter into or just behind
the rush line, and concentrates all his strength on preventing the gain
of five yards on three downs. In this way he can oblige his opponents
to kick or lose the ball before they are far enough advanced to be in
dangerous proximity to his goal. Of these two elements, then, it may
be conclusively argued the wind is the greater, and if very strong,
should decide him to bring his quarter up, even though his line of
forwards be exceptionally strong.
The next point worthy of consideration is the offensive and defensive
play about the goals. Most important are: _guarding a goal against the
wind_, and _trying for a goal with the wind_. The former is of the most
vital importance, and time spent upon studying the situation will prove
of advantage to every captain. Let us suppose the case of a touch-back
(_i. e._, where the ball has crossed the goal-line, but without
compelling a safety), for it is generally at this point that the
condition becomes most serious. The captain finds himself driven back
into his own goal and facing a wind and a team encouraged by success.
His own team, on the contrary, are tired with the effort of contesting
the ground, and they are also nervous with the feeling that the
least slip on their part means a goal or a touch-down. The privilege
of a kick-out--at best a privilege of less than twenty-five yards
start--seems pitifully small in the face of the odds. The situation
is the same as at the kick-off upon beginning, with the exception of
the proximity of the goal and the attendant danger. The ball may be
place-kicked or drop-kicked down the field or out of bounds; it may be
dribbled and passed back for a punt or run. There is one thing which
must not be done, and that is to kick or pass the ball out toward the
centre of the field or across the goal, for as surely as the ball falls
into the enemy’s hands in front of the goal, they will, if their play
be accurate, not fail to score. Next to be borne in mind is that when
the ball does go into their hands it must be either a down or a fair,
_i. e._, it must not be a fair catch, but must go out of bounds, or
into their hands on the roll with a rusher close enough to make them
have it down. There are three ways to accomplish this: the first is
to place or drop-kick the ball down the edge of the field and out of
bounds, or accomplish the same result by a dribble and punt; the second
is to attempt the running game until two downs are exhausted, and then
kick out of bounds; and the third, and most aggressive of all, to kick
the ball a short distance ahead but well up in the air, and putting all
the men on side, rely upon getting possession of the ball in air or in
the scramble as it falls. If the last plan is adopted every man in the
line must go forward with one idea in his mind, and that is to prevent
a fair catch at all hazards.
Another question is often discussed regarding the protection of a goal,
and that is: Is a man ever justified in running round behind his own
goal with the ball on the chance of getting out far enough on the other
side to gain ground? The only answer to this question lies in the head
of the man who has to do it. There are some who can be trusted to know
when it can be done, but most should be told to never do it unless at
that point in the game a safety will turn the balance of the score, and
they should not do it in the first half.
But to pass to the attack. A side has advanced the ball within kicking
distance of their opponents’ goal, having the wind and the ball with
them. Should they at once attempt a field-kick, or by running try to
get nearer, or even rely upon a touch-down? If they try a field-kick,
should it be a drop at goal, or should they punt the ball just short of
the goal and chance a muff or a fumble by their adversaries to yield a
touch-down? Unless a team is remarkably strong in the running game, and
has been making their five yards, it is silly to try a touch-down or
nothing. Again, unless there is plenty of time remaining, it takes too
long to work the ball up to the line and get it across, beside the many
risks of losing possession of it in the meantime. Finally, a punt up in
front of the goal is too decidedly a confession of the lack of a good
drop-kicker.
As a rule, then, the first down had better be utilized by getting the
ball in front of the goal if it is off at the side of the field. The
second down should be an attempt to get somewhat nearer only in case
the snap-back and quarter are sure men. Otherwise the drop-kick should
be tried after the first down. One thing to be said in favor of trying
the drop-kick at once, without attempting to bring the ball in front of
the goal, is that the adversaries are then much less prepared for the
try, and hence the kicker has a more uninterrupted aim and longer time.
After the first down the opponents concentrate their attention more
upon the kicker.
These are salient features, but, of course, there is an infinity of
detail, of which the present article does not give space to speak.
[Illustration: Editor’s Open ~Window~.]
THE NATIONAL HORSE SHOW.
“It’s an ill wind that blows nobody good;” and let the press, comic and
otherwise, deride anglomania as it may, the good effects of this same
craze are plainly visible in some directions. Since Richard Ten Broeck
won the Cesarewitch Stakes with Prioress in 1857, since the victories
of Foxhall and Iroquois, no one has doubted that the race-horses of
America are in every respect equal to the English standard. But the
same can scarcely have been said of the carriage-horses, hacks, cobs,
and ponies, while until a comparatively recent date the hunter, in the
English acceptation of the term, was unknown. The rankest “_laudator
temporis acti_,” who took a stroll in Madison Square Garden during the
horse-show week, would not venture to deplore “the good old days” as
far as horseflesh is concerned. The prevalence of the “bang” tail and
hog mane may offend the eye of some, and when such treatment is carried
out on an elephantine dray-horse--as was the case with some of the
exhibits--the result is truly absurd. But the sporting, capable class
of horse with the best of action, which was so well represented--more
so than in any previous year--must of necessity have favorably
impressed the true disciple of horseflesh.
The exhibition was very good--in some cases extremely so--and in a
rising scale from Mr. Pierre Lorillard’s happy family of Shetlands up
to Mr. A. Palmer Morewood’s colossal Clydesdale “Marlborough,” there
were shapes and sizes to please every eye. From East, West, North, and
South they came to constitute this goodly array, and in some cases
laurels gained in English show rings were supplemented with American
honors.
In the high-jumping, however, as in former years, lay the special
feature of the show. When it is possible for _green_ hunters--save the
mark!--to be put to jump 6 ft. 6 in., even though it prove somewhat
beyond their powers, it may well make even old horsemen open their
eyes, and wonder where this emulation will stop. Such feats have never
been accomplished or indeed attempted in England, but in the New York
Show the standard rises year by year, and the record, unlike that of
trotting, is all the time being broken. The jump of 6 ft. 9⅞ in.,
accomplished by Mr. F. Gebhardt’s “Leo,” ridden by “Pete” Smith, the
only man who can induce this wonderful horse to put forth his powers,
and Messrs. Durland & Co.’s “Filemaker,” ridden by that graceful
rider, Mr. McGibbon, is something which, unless one has seen it done,
he receives with doubting ears. The riding and driving was very good.
In the latter department, Mr. F. Asshenden, as usual, distinguished
himself. He drove in every competition which enters into his province,
with such success that only on one occasion did he leave the ring
without a “ribbon.”
The management of the show was very well conducted, and with the
exception of some complaints of dampness--which was attributable to
Jupiter Pluvius and not to the management--there were no grounds for
objection. The health of the horses was excellent, the veterinary
department under Drs. Carmody and Field left nothing to be desired,
and the equine visitors left the Garden after their week’s sojourn in
strange quarters in no way the worse for their experience.
~Sporting Tramp.~
* * * * *
PLAIN TALK ABOUT STEEPLE-CHASING.
For several years past the steeple-chase associations and hunt clubs
have been making strenuous efforts to raise the cross-country branch
of racing to its proper level. Five years ago steeple-chasing was a
byword and a reproach. The scandalous and open swindles that took place
at some of the large tracks were a disgrace, and the managers of these
tracks sat with folded hands while the press exposed the swindles and
urged them to do something or expunge altogether the cross-country
farces from the programme, but nothing was done. The truth is the
managers did not understand steeple-chasing, and would not learn, and
yet it was too lucrative a branch to expunge, as the public enjoyed the
excitement and liked to see the accidents and falls.
About four years ago the members of the Rockaway Hunt Club formed the
Rockaway Steeple-chase Association, and with the Meadow Brook Hunt
Club as well as members of all the other hunt clubs, joined in trying
to raise the level of steeple-chasing. That they were successful
is shown by the records. What the cost was to their private purses
they themselves only know. It is hardly to the credit of the general
public or to the society element in New York, that associations of
this kind that provide honest and fair sport, should lose thousands
at each meeting. Naturally the members object to this continual
drain, and a change of some kind will have to be made. Neither the
Rockaway Steeple-chase Association nor the Country Club Steeple-chase
Association can continue running at a loss any longer.
It might be well, however, to analyze the reason for the loss. When
in 1886, the future of racing in this State was jeopardized and
politicians were endeavoring to stop the sport for purposes of their
own, the leading men of both these associations cheerfully lent a
helping hand and worked to get the Pool bill through. Their endeavors
were successful. Racing was limited to the dates between May 15 and
October 15. So far so good. Then came the question of the dates for
the respective meetings, and the large associations at once seized
all they could get. The principal sinner in this respect has been the
Brooklyn Jockey Club, which has shown great precocity in its grabbing
propensities during the short time it has been in existence. Not
content with taking the days the Rockaway people wanted, the Brooklyns
encroached on Jerome Park’s dates and wanted those also. The Country
Club Association had to deal with Jerome, and found that association
very fair and open about its dates. No attempt was made to “grab,” and
every help was cheerfully given that could be. The weather, however,
knocked out the Country Club Association, and also took a hand in
marring the chances of the Rockaway, which, buffeted on all sides,
lost money steadily. Now for the cure. The Steeple-chase Associations
will have to reduce their meetings to the level of hunt races, _pur
et simple_, with cups and very small money added--with perhaps one
large handicap of $1,000 at most, and wait for better times. Another
alternative is to induce the Legislature to alter the Pool bill in
such a way that steeple-chasing may commence in New York State on
May 1 and end on Nov. 1, thus giving the Association a month to hold
their meetings. The third remedy would be to discontinue the meetings
altogether, a course which would be very regrettable. The Rockaway
people have an expensive plant at Cedarhurst, and the Country Club is
making arrangements for something of the same kind. Some measures will
have to be taken to protect their interests as well as those of the
other hunting clubs.
~C. S. Pelham-Clinton.~
* * * * *
THE GAME OF LACROSSE.
The season which closed November 1 has not been so productive of good
results as those interested in the success of Canada’s national game
anticipated. Certain innovations, which were introduced last spring
and promised well, have proved to be impracticable. Then, again, the
splitting of the old National Association into two minor leagues has
not brought about closer relationship between the clubs. Not one of the
New England clubs has signified its intention of joining the Eastern
Association. A local championship series and a few games with outside
clubs have satisfied them.
The Western Association, and its doings during the first season of
its existence, remain unknown to the lacrosse men in the East. For
some reason efforts to bring about cordial relations between the two
sections of the country have failed. The Western men appear to think
that enough deference is not paid them on account of their possession
of the National Championship, which was gained, not on the field, but
on paper.
The Brooklyn Club will have the honor of being the champion club until
1889. It has made astonishing strides forward. Faithful practice and
attention to team-play has made it a strong organization. The Staten
Island Club, on the other hand, may safely be relied upon making every
effort next spring to regain the coveted honor which so long was theirs.
The other clubs in the Eastern Association--Philadelphia, Baltimore,
Jersey City, Staten Island Cricket Club--have not done much during
the summer, except to build up their organizations. There is every
indication, however, that the season of 1889 will witness some exciting
games.
That nothing encourages so much as success, is seen in the vigor and
enthusiasm with which Princeton, the champion of the College League,
has gone to work since the opening of college. Usually the lacrosse
men do very little in the fall in the way of practice. But this year,
intent upon again winning the championship in 1889, class games have
been played, and the University team has also had several games with
outside clubs. This has not escaped Harvard, her most dangerous rival.
The _Crimson_ has repeatedly called upon the college to give better
support to the lacrosse team, which has at times been almost the only
one to bring back a championship. In the spring the time is too limited
to get the men into first-class condition, and fall and winter work
should be indulged in when possible.
Lehigh is thoroughly delighted with lacrosse, and Cornell is taking
it up. Williams is considering whether it will not draw too many men
from the other sports, and other colleges and schools are getting ready
to introduce the game. This is very gratifying. To play the game well
requires so much attention to training, and such thorough self-command,
that, as a mere matter of discipline, it ought to be recommended;
besides, no game is more exciting, and certainly none more graceful.
~J. C. Gerndt.~
* * * * *
RABBIT COURSING.
For every man who owns a greyhound, at least a dozen own some kind of a
terrier. The terrier is essentially man’s companion among all the dogs.
Bright, intelligent, and full of spirits, he also has the happy knack
of knowing how to make his presence unobtrusive. Among the many breeds
which have at the present day attained popularity, the fox-terrier is
_facile princeps_, and of late years owners have bethought themselves
of a good plan to avail themselves of the natural instinct of the dog.
The fox-terrier is naturally possessed of a speed out of proportion to
his looks, and since “the nature of the beast” is to pursue anything in
the line of game or vermin, he has readily fallen in with man’s scheme
to course the rabbit with his aid.
The advantages of this sport over coursing with greyhounds are many.
The grounds have not to be so spacious or complete; the dogs are not
so expensive, either in initial cost, maintenance, or elaboration of
training; impromptu matches can be easily arranged, and, especially
in this country, the difficulty of supplying the requisite quarry
for greyhounds is obviated. The rabbit, on the contrary, is fairly
plentiful in the Eastern States, and a goodly supply of them is
generally forthcoming. The meetings that have hitherto been held have
been very successful, and it is a cause of great satisfaction to all
sportsmen that the recent case at Hempstead reached such a favorable
termination.
This sport has not as yet, in America, gone beyond the limits of the
select circle which patronizes polo and fox-hunting; but no real reason
exists why this should be so. The writer has witnessed and taken part
in very successful impromptu coursing-matches in the South, where the
intentions of the dogs were better than their looks or breeding. It is,
in fact, a sport open to every man who owns a decent terrier, and as
such it is regarded in many parts of England, where the farmers will
not only allow but will take part in matches run over their land.
~Sporting Tramp.~
[Illustration: ~The Outing Club.~]
THE DISSENSION IN THE ATHLETIC WORLD.
Some time since ~Outing~ entered into communication with
the various gentlemen who are taking leading parts in the serious
disruption which has shaken the athletic world of America to its very
centre. For some reason best known to those addressed, the majority
of these gentlemen have not seen fit to favor us with their views on
the situation. We have, however, been placed in a position to give
the public some extracts from what appears to us to be an impartial
review of the facts, from the Union’s side of the question. We quote as
follows:
“In 1879 the New York Athletic Club decided to give up the management
of the Amateur Championship Meeting, so successfully established by
it three years previously. This course was taken because it brought a
great deal of additional work on the officers of the club, and although
the games had been profitable to the organization, its officers no
longer desired to be continually appealed to for decisions and rulings
upon athletic matters. For these reasons the N. Y. A. C. was willing to
relinquish the conduct of the championship games to properly organized
associations of clubs.”
Thus it came about that in the spring of 1879 the National Association
of Amateur Athletes of America was organized. In 1880 we find the list
of clubs that were members numbered twenty-one. In 1885 we find that
this number had sunk to twelve, and in 1887 it was still twelve, while
the New York Athletic Club, “through some personal club trouble,” had
resigned in 1885.
“With these facts before us it can readily be seen that although the
Association may have been, and no doubt was, national some years ago,
it failed to keep pace with many of the leading clubs during the past
three or four years. Some of these, notably the New York and Staten
Island Athletic clubs, made such rapid strides that not only were
meetings given that were far superior to the championships, but also
many championship of America events were given by them and at their
expense, among them being the boxing, wrestling, swimming, general
gymnastic, general athletic, etc.
“In 1887 the Athletic Club of the Schuylkill Navy started the Amateur
Athletic Union of the U. S.” The why and wherefore of its inception is
thus accounted for. “The first time the A. C. S. N. participated in any
other athletic competition than those held under its own management
was in February, 1886, when a number of entries were made in the
championship boxing and wrestling tournament given under the auspices
of the New York Athletic Club, at Tammany Hall, New York. Of the three
representatives of the A. C. S. N. at this competition, one, Mr.
Charles A. Clark, won the championship at feather-weight boxing, and
another, Dr. J. K. Shell, was fortunate enough to meet Joe Ellingsworth
in the middle-weight boxing class; the latter, it was learned just
in time to enter a protest, was so tainted with professionalism as
to render his presence at an amateur competition preposterous. The
protest against Ellingsworth was made by Captain Huneker of the A. C.
S. N. to the New York Athletic Club, by whom he was referred to the
National Association of Amateur Athletes of America for a decision as
to Ellingsworth’s standing. The latter association refused to take any
action, claiming that they had no jurisdiction in the matter.
“The inconsistent part of the National Association’s action in this
matter is the fact of its having refused to take any action in this
instance and claiming that it had no jurisdiction, while many will
undoubtedly remember that sufficient jurisdiction was claimed in the
cases of the wrestlers who were disqualified about six months previous
for competing at unapproved meetings.
“From the time of this occurrence dates the desire of the A. C. S. N.
to see formed an association national in character, which would take
cognizance of and exercise jurisdiction over all kinds and classes
of athletic sports over which no recognized association already in
existence, exercised special authority. This, together with the sincere
wishes of the club to contribute by every means within their power to
an effort to exclude from the amateur ranks the semi-professional,
‘tough’ and ‘shady’ element which has proved so great a detriment to
the natural growth and popularity of all true amateur sport, dwarfed
its possibilities and rendered competition in many of its classes
obnoxious to gentlemen, are the reasons which mainly influenced the A.
C. S. N. to request the New York Athletic Club, which organization was
not a member of the National, to join in a call for a meeting of all
the recognized amateur athletic organizations of the United States to
consider the formation of a new association.
“The meeting of such a body and its outcome is a matter of athletic
history. From this convention emanated the Amateur Athletic Union. From
the inception of the Union the A. C. S. N. at once became prominent
in its councils, one of its delegates, Mr. W. H. McMillan, being
unanimously elected president of the new association.
“When the circular calling for a meeting of all the clubs to consider
the formation of an association was received by the Staten Island
A. C., a letter was at once sent to Mr. John F. Huneker, captain
of the A. C. of the Schuykill Navy, inquiring what club was at the
bottom of this move, and what were the ideas and reasons in forming
such an organization. The reply, as received, was read to the Board
of Directors, and, after satisfying themselves as to its honesty
and advisability, a committee with power was appointed, consisting
of President J. W. Edwards, Secretary W. C. Davis, Treasurer G. M.
Mackellar, and Director F. W. Janssen.
“This entire committee attended the first meeting of the A. A. U.
After carefully noting and satisfying themselves on every point, they
unanimously decided to join; so the Staten Island A. C. at once became
a member of the Union.
“Later on, the Union showed so many advantages over the National,
and had so many respectable clubs in it, its affairs being conducted
on so much better and more business-like principles, that after duly
considering the case, the Staten Island A. C. sent its resignation to
the National Association. When the Union selected September 19, 1888,
at Detroit, as the date and place of their championship of America
games, the National scheduled its similar meeting for September
15, 1888, at New York, and, in order to detract from the Detroit
meeting, empowered the Missouri Athletic Club of St. Louis to hold a
Western championship on its grounds September 9. The Union, to show
its strength, at once authorized the Chicago Athletic Club to hold
a Western championship meeting on its grounds September 1, in order
to establish a set of Western champions for 1888 before the National
meeting could be held.
“As time went by, the Union representatives considered the advisability
of taking some final action in the matter, and, after some six weeks’
deliberation, at a meeting held August 25, 1888, unanimously passed the
following resolution:
“‘Resolved, That any amateur athlete competing in any open amateur
games in the United States not governed by rules approved by the
Amateur Athletic Union, shall be debarred from competing in any games
held under the rules of the Amateur Athletic Union. This resolution
shall take effect immediately.’
“The idea was to have the Western clubs and athletes recognize but one
championship meeting of the West (that of the A. A. U. at Chicago).
“The National (or rather now the Manhattan A. C.) found it impossible
to hold its championship meeting in New York, owing to the fact that
all the athletes, with very few exceptions outside the Manhattan Club,
belonged to Union clubs, and would not compete under the National
rules; so a cable was sent by the Manhattans to the Irish Gaelic Team
to the effect that the meeting had been postponed until October 6 in
order to allow them to compete.
“In the West the two championship meetings were held, and those
athletes who took part at the St. Louis National meeting were debarred
from competing at the Detroit Union games.
“The Union Board held a full meeting of the Executive Committee at
Detroit, on September 18, 1888, when the above resolution was again
unanimously approved of. The committee also unanimously refused to
rescind the same or to reinstate any of the athletes who competed at
the St. Louis National meeting.
“The so-called National meeting held in New York city, on October 13,
1888, was, with very few exceptions, between the teams of the Irish
Gaelic Association and the Manhattan Athletic Club.
“At the Detroit meeting of the Union, a committee consisting of Otto
Ruhl, James E. Sullivan, and Fred W. Janssen was appointed, with
power to confer with Mr. Cullinan, the manager of the Irish team. To
him, after explaining matters, the following proposition was made, on
condition that his team should not recognize the National Association
as an authorized body to give a championship of American meeting, viz.:
The A. A. U. would give his team a testimonial meeting whenever he
desired; would give all the American and Irish championship events,
and an all-round competition. His association was to take all the gate
receipts over and above expenses, and the following guarantees were
made for tickets: Staten Island Athletic Club, $500; N.Y. Athletic
Club, $500; Pastime Athletic Club, $200.
“This offer was refused by Mr. Cullinan, and he wrote a letter to the
Secretary of the Union asking that the resolution be not enforced so
far as his team was concerned. As a similar request was made at Detroit
on behalf of the Western athletes, and Messrs. Schifferstein and
Pursell of the Olympic Club, San Francisco, and refused, no action was
taken. The request could not have been granted owing to the fact that
the Irish team seemed bound by contract to the Manhattan A. C., and
paid little or no attention to the Union’s propositions.
“The National published on its official circular the following
Executive Committee: President, Walton Storm, Manhattan A. C.;
vice-president, Wm. Halpin, Olympic A. C.; secretary, C. H. Mapes,
Intercollegiate A. C.; treasurer, W. C. Rowland, Staten Island A. C.;
S. S. Safford, American A. C.; W. G. Hegeman, Nassau A. C.; Geo. S.
Rhoades, Missouri A. A. A.; and on the Games Committee, W. C. Rowland,
Staten Island A. C.; Walton Storm, Manhattan A. C.; W. G. Hegeman,
Nassau A. C.
“Now, the following delegates and clubs mentioned on the Executive
Committee were not members of the National, viz.: Vice-President,
William Halpin, Olympic A. C.; treasurer, W. C. Rowland, Staten Island
A. C.; S. A. Safford, American A. C.; W. G. Hegeman, Nassau A. C.; and
of the Games Committee: W. C. Rowland, Staten Island A. C.; and W. G.
Hegeman, Nassau A. C., the clubs having resigned and joined the Amateur
Athletic Union. This left on the Executive Board of the so-called
National: President Walton Storm, Manhattan A. C.; secretary, C. H.
Mapes, Intercollegiate A. A., and George S. Rhoades, Missouri A. A.
A., with Walton Storm on the Games Committee. On both the circulars
and postal-cards, issued respectively under dates of September 3 and
September 18 by the so-called National, were found no names whatsoever,
nor did the parties left claim any more members. Therefore, the
following articles taken from the constitution and by-laws of the
so-called N. A. A. A. A. proved beyond a doubt to any fair-minded
person that such an association was virtually out of existence since
the resignations of afore-mentioned organizations, to wit:
CONSTITUTION.--ARTICLE III.
_Membership._
The membership of this association shall be limited to amateur
athletic clubs, and any associate club not giving at least one
public outdoor athletic meeting each year, to consist of not
less than five games, open to all amateurs, shall pay a fine of
twenty-five dollars, to be paid at or before the next annual
meeting, and in default of such payment such club shall forfeit its
membership.
And the Intercollegiate Athletic Association may become a member of
this association, such Intercollegiate Association to be deemed an
amateur athletic club for all purposes herein.
ARTICLE VI.
_Application for Membership._
Any amateur athletic club desiring to join the association shall
send to the secretary an application for membership, a copy of its
constitution and by-laws, and a list of its officers and members.
The secretary shall submit this application to each member of the
Executive Committee in turn, and these members shall endorse their
decision. The approval of seven members of the Executive Committee
shall be necessary to constitute an election.
BY-LAWS.--ARTICLE III.
_Meetings._
The annual meeting of the Executive Committee shall be held at the
close of the annual meeting of the association. Special meetings
of the Executive Committee shall be called by the secretary either
at the written request of three members of the committee or by
order of the president, and one week’s notice of said meeting shall
be sent to every member of the committee. At all meetings of the
committee five members shall constitute a quorum.
“By the first it is proven that the Intercollegiate Association was but
a single organization in the so-called National Association. The second
shows that it was necessary to have seven members of the Executive
Committee present in order to elect a new club to membership, and
the third that there should have been five members present to hold a
meeting. As the so-called N. A. A. A. A. had not been able to hold a
meeting or transact business under its own constitution and by-laws,
the organization in the Union refused to recognize the existence of
the so-called National Association of Amateur Athletes of America,
and in so doing stated that the respective clubs comprising the Union
positively denied having in any way boycotted the Irish Gaelic Team,
owing to the fact that the latter simply joined with the Manhattan and
Missouri Athletic clubs in preference to the Amateur Athletic Union
which was composed of twenty-seven leading associations.
“The M. A. C. _Chronicle_ of October, 1888, published the following
clubs as having had delegates present at the so-called National’s
annual meeting held about October 13: Missouri A. A. A., St. Louis;
Manhattan A. C., New York City; Star A. C., Long Island City; West
Side A. C., New York City; Allerton A. C., New York City; and
Intercollegiate A. A.
“The Allerton A. C. was organized in September, 1888, by members of the
Manhattan A. C. Mr. G. M. L. Sacks is treasurer, and Mr. G. M. L. Sacks
of the Manhattan A. C. represents the club on the so-called National
Association’s Executive Committee. Of late the Manhattan A. C. men have
organized several so-called athletic clubs in order to swell the list
of clubs belonging to the so-called National Association, and in the
M. A. C. _Chronicle_ of November, 1888, we find Walton Storm, G. M. L.
Sacks and Fred A. Ware, three well-known M. A. C. men on the Executive
Committee of the so-called National Association, and probably two or
three others of which it is not positive.
“None of the so-called National clubs own any property, except the
land which Mr. Walton Storm of the M. A. C. lately purchased for about
$160,000, on which it is proposed to build a club-house. We, therefore,
arrive at the following totals:
_National Clubs._ _Membership._ _Property._
Manhattan A. C. 400 None.
Missouri A. A. A. 200 “
Star A. C. 60 “
West Side A. C. 40 “
Allerton A. C. 50 “
--- --------
Entire National 750 Nothing.
“The so-called National during the past year has given the St. Louis
championship meeting, New York championship meeting, and a ten-mile
championship run. (The New York meeting was twice postponed and the
ten-mile run was also postponed.)
_Union Clubs._ _Membership._ _Property._
New York A. C. 2,500 $410,000
New York Turn Verein 2,500 150,000
A. C. of Schuylkill Navy 680 85,000
Staten Island A. C. 900 85,000
Columbia A. C. (Wash.) 400 65,000
Orange A. C. 650 60,000
Detroit A. C. 500 35,000
New Jersey A. C. 500 35,000
Flushing A. C. 200 25,000
Jersey City A. C. 500 35,000
Berkeley A. C. 250 225,000
----- ----------
Eleven Union Clubs out of
membership of 29 9,580 $1,210,000
“During the past ten months of the A. A. U.’s existence, six
championship meetings have been given, namely:
“Boxing, wrestling and fencing championships; general gymnastic
championships; swimming championships; Chicago Western championships;
Detroit American championships; New York indoor American championships.”
The programme for the coming year, arranged by the A. A. U., is most
extensive and comprises a really notable list of events.
“In view of all these facts it can readily be seen that the Amateur
Athletic Union has done more during its short period of existence to
encourage and foster athletic sports than the National has done in
almost its entire history of ten years. The Union has nationalized
athletics, and has proved itself to be national in character. It is
composed of more and stronger clubs than the National, and it has not
only come to stay, but also to make itself felt throughout the entire
United States.”
In regard to the personal attacks made upon the leading spirits of the
Union by the Manhattan Athletic Club _Chronicle_, we do not propose
to say anything. We pass them by with the remark that “abuse is not
argument,” and that such indiscriminate scattering of verbal mud can
further no cause.
In conclusion, we wish to remark that the evil effects of this
disruption are already becoming apparent. “Union is strength,” and the
following fact shows that the athletic world is losing its unity:
“A Western Association has now been formed with a view to governing
the sport solely in the West. To further this cause, the Missouri Club
resigns from the N. A. A. A. A. and the Union, while the Wanderers of
Chicago club resigned from the A. A. U.”
[Illustration]
OUR THEATRICAL PLAYGROUND.
The Casino, for the time being, has deserted the French and German
composers of comic opera and taken up the early English humor of
Gilbert wedded to the modern English music of Sullivan. “The Yeoman of
the Guard,” the latest production of these two writers, is now in the
full tide of its run at the Casino. It is doubtful, however, if its
prosperity will approach anywhere near that of its predecessor, “The
Mikado.” The theme does not admit of the same supply of fun, life,
color or picturesqueness in acting, and while Sir Arthur Sullivan has
given us some of the best music he has ever written, it is not destined
to strike the popular fancy. A comic opera that does not win popular
taste is sure to be short-lived. This may not be evidence of good
taste, but it is true, nevertheless. The manner, however, in which “The
Yeoman of the Guard” is put on the stage here, as regards costumes and
appointments, is good; but when the cast is considered it is time to
hesitate in praise. With the exception of Miss Bertha Ricci, Mr. Ryley
and Mr. Solomon, the other principals engaged to present it are unequal
to the task. In women, particularly, is “The Yeoman” weak. Miss Sylvia
Gerrish and Miss Isabella Urquhart are, to put it mildly, not happy in
the rôles to which they are assigned. Vocally, they are not up to the
mark, and their acting is on a parallel with their singing. The male
members of the company are also of inferior make-up. All the coaching
of Mr. Richard Barker, the London stage-manager, cannot make singers
and actors without the proper material. With a good caste, “The Yeoman
of the Guard” would have been a great success here, as it is now given.
While it is by no means a failure, it has disappointed numbers who
anticipated with pleasure its production.
A MELODRAMATIC UNDER-CURRENT.
Augustin Daly has once more plunged into the exciting scenes and
thrilling situations of melodrama. With the production of “The
Under-Current” at Niblo’s, he has gone back to his first and early
love. “The Under Current” is a reminiscent kind of work in which
familiar scenes are called to mind, but Mr. Daly has been candid enough
to acknowledge the source from which he had taken them. To “Under the
Gaslight,” one of the most successful local dramas of its day, and “A
Flash of Lightning,” he is indebted for some of his effects. Both plays
named were written by Mr. Daly. He has availed himself of some of the
material contained in these works effectively. “The Under-Current” is
English in story, English in character, and the scenes are all laid
in England. The play was not successful, and after a short time was
withdrawn from the stage of Niblo’s.
THE ROUGH-AND-TUMBLE DRAMA.
Charles H. Hoyt is one of the most prolific writers of the present day
in a class of so-called farcical comedies. “A Hole in the Ground,” “The
Parlor Match” and “A Brass Monkey” are the names of a few of his most
successful works. They have been played in this and other cities to
overflowing houses. One peculiarity of the Hoyt _pot-pourri_ is that
while people as a rule declare that the productions are rubbish and
“all that kind of thing,” they crowd the theatres in which they are
given, to enjoy the Hoyt nonsense and be amused at its absurdities. It
is not, however, the story, its manner of construction, or the dialogue
of a Hoyt skit which entertains, nearly so much as the situations,
music, and rough-and-tumble business of a number of fairly clever
people of variety-show tendencies. The Hoyt order of play will not
live long, but the prolific author of this curiously named theatrical
driftwood is bright enough to perceive that amusement seekers relish
nonsense and absurdity on the stage, no matter how ridiculous, and he
furnishes a supply equal to the demand.
OUR MARY’S RETURN.
Mary Anderson’s return to the United States and her reappearance in
this city was hailed with welcome. It is three years since she left
here to play a return engagement in England. Her success abroad has
been such as she may feel just pride in. It moreover serves as a rebuke
to a certain class of people who claim there is no English recognition
for American talent. The absurdity of this assumption is self-evident.
“A Winter’s Tale,” as presented at Palmer’s Theatre by Miss Anderson
and her company is a creditable production.
ENGLISH BURLESQUE BY ENGLISH PLAYERS.
Nellie Farren and Fred Leslie, of the Gaiety Theatre, London, arrived
in this city just prior to the presidential election, and opened at
the Standard Theatre shortly after in the burlesque, “Monte Cristo,
Jr.” Miss Farren has been the pet of the London public for twenty years
or more. She won her place to honorable regard by her acknowledged
abilities as an actress of burlesque characters. Her talent, however,
is not confined to this class of entertainment alone. A long experience
on the stage--she began her career before the footlights when she was a
child--has given her opportunity to attempt all kinds of parts. In the
romantic, domestic and Shakespearian drama she has made a commendable
record. Boys’ parts are her particular specialty, and in these she
excels. Miss Farren has introduced English burlesque in its best form
to New Yorkers. The attempt has been made before by other companies
from London, but shapely forms in scanty costumes were suborned to the
artistic requirements of the performers. In English burlesque, as given
by Miss Farren and her Gaiety Company, we get an attractive travesty
told with intelligent action, bright music, movement and life. It has
made an impression as it deserved, while it has given contradiction
to the theory entertained by the few that because Londoners could not
recognize the burlesque elements in an American company sent hastily
abroad, a New York public would reject an English burlesque company
here. Bringing coals to Newcastle must, in the regular order of things,
prove unprofitable, but there was no good reason why the theatre-goers
of this city should withhold their patronage from an entertainment
which has won the attention of the amusement seekers of the British
metropolis. The engagement of the London Gaiety Company at the Standard
has taught us much in the line of burlesque.
~Richard Neville.~
[Illustration: ~Among the Books~]
~A story~ which deals with a routine of life, strangely unlike
the common every-day existence of civilization, is the novel, entitled
“A Mexican Girl,” by Frederick Thickstun (Boston: Ticknor & Co. 1888).
The most _blasé_ novel reader will find his attention riveted by
the novelty and wildness of the scenes depicted. The word-painting
and dialect are good throughout, and, as a rule, the characters are
very strongly drawn; but there is a striking improbability in the
supposition that any man could, like the New England schoolmaster, have
reached the age of thirty, or thereabouts, and remained so ignorant
of the ways of the world. The climax of the story is, moreover,
somewhat unsatisfactory. The principal character is dismissed rather
summarily. In spite of such disadvantages, the volume is full of
strong situations, and the interest is well sustained, while the
scene, laid in the Southwest, in a community composed of Americans,
Anglo-Americans, and Mexicans, serves as a weird and picturesque
background.
* * * * *
~An~ amusing and interesting account of a yachting expedition
is to be found in “The Devil of a Trip; or, The Log of the Yacht
Champlain,” by J. Armoy Knox, the well-known editor of _Texas Siftings_
(New York: National Literary Bureau). The volume forms a number of “The
Unique Series,” and is entitled to its position. It consists, in fact,
of a photo-engraved reproduction of the letters from Colonel Knox, as
they originally appeared in the columns of sundry well-known daily
papers, with the addition of clever marginal sketches by Thomas Worth.
The voyage was an inland one, and apart from the entertainment to be
derived from the book, it may serve to furnish many hints to intending
voyagers of desirable routes of travel.
* * * * *
~Messrs. A. G. Spalding & Bros.~ have issued a little hand-book
entitled “Baseball,” by Harry Palmer, in view of their Australian
tour. It contains short and interesting biographies of the players who
compose the Australian teams, and careful directions and explanations
as to the science of the game. Every lover of the national game should
own a copy of this manual, if only for reference in settling knotty
points in the intricacies of play.
* * * * *
~When~ Mr. W. W. Greener adds another to his list of works on
the subject of guns, the sportsman may feel sure of gaining valuable
information by the perusal of the volume. “_Ne sutor ultra crepidam_,”
is a motto which should especially apply to writers of books on such
subjects, and a volume of this description, unless from the pen of an
expert, is worse than useless. In “Modern Shotguns” (Messrs. Cassell
& Co.) the author, without reiterating what he has already published,
has given sportsmen a valuable guide to the selection of the right
weapon in the right place. The mass of useful and interesting facts
and information incorporated will please every one interested in such
matters, while the cuts and diagrams are a markedly useful feature.
* * * * *
~An~ account of a winter sojourn in the kindly climate of a
tropic land may, to readers enduring the rigors of a northern latitude,
serve either of two purposes. It may inspire with envy and malice,
or serve to transport one for a while far from the interminable snow
and slush. Such as can read, without evoking the darker passions, a
prettily told narrative of a winter spent in the pleasant warmth of a
land blessed with
“A snow of blossoms, and a wild of flowers,”
should promptly peruse “A Winter Picnic,” by J. and C. E. Dickinson
and S. E. Dowd (New York: H. Holt & Co. 1888). The ladies who have
contributed to the book seem to have basked the winter through in the
glorious sunshine, but also have not neglected to chronicle, in an
amusing way, many a small inconvenience and drawback. The primitive
civilization of Nassau, the queer traits of the negroes, and, in short,
all the curious features of a country utterly unlike the great marts of
commerce, are duly set forth in an entertaining fashion.
* * * * *
~The~ literature of amateur photography--that most fascinating
pastime--grows apace. “The International Annual of Anthony’s
Photographic Bulletin, for 1888” (New York: Messrs. E. & H. T. Anthony;
London: Messrs. H. Greenwood & Co.), is a charming contribution. It
embodies a vast collection of papers on the various aspects of the
art from the pens of the best authorities on the subject. Information
on any and every point can be found in the pages, and no amateur
photographer should omit to study it. Messrs. Anthony’s manual for
amateurs, “How to Make Photographs,” contains a variety of practical
instructions and formulæ which are of substantial service.
* * * * *
~We~ have received some charming children’s story-books of an
exceptionally interesting character. Messrs. Lee & Shepard, Boston,
and Charles T. Dillingham, New York, are the publishers, and the
excellent appearance of these seasonable little volumes reflects
much credit on them. The mere fact that the text of “The King of the
Golden River, or the Black Brothers,” a legend of Stiria, is from the
pen of John Ruskin, and the illustrations by Richard Doyle, speaks
for itself. “The Last of the Hugger-muggers, a Giant Story,” and its
sequel, “Kobboltozo,” by Christopher Pearse Cranch, are thrilling tales
for the delectation of the little ones. Other two books for juvenile
readers, but for those out of the nursery, from the same publishers,
are “A Start in Life,” by J. T. Trowbridge, and “Little Miss Wheezy’s
Brother,” by Penn Shirley. Both are admirably calculated to effect
the purpose for which they were written, and will prove admirable
gift-books for this holiday season.
[Illustration: AMENITIES.]
THE BRITISH FOX’S LAMENT.
“‘A southerly wind and a cloudy sky,’
So runs a line of the hunting song;
But a bleak nor’-easter is what suits me,
Driving and whirling the snow along.
“From the times of yore has the fox been sung
As a sly old rogue and merry wight,
Who loves the gay sound of the horn and hound
And gobbles chickens the livelong night.
“Such things may have been, but the times are changed;
Chickens are scarce, and the farmers keen,
And with all the hunting that’s going on,
I’m quite played out and am growing lean.
“Now, a neighbor was lately telling me
Of a land that sounds like Paradise,
Where instead of a fox they hunt a bag,
Where chickens are cheap and very nice.
“And I wonder much if such things can be;
Egad! how I’d laugh to see that sport;
But they ‘break us up’ when they catch us here--
What do they do when the bag is caught?
“I have half a mind to speak to my wife
And take the cubs to these promised lands:
As I go back home, I’ll call at the bank
And see how much to my credit stands.
“But, hark! I’ll be hanged if it ain’t that horn--
I guess I’ll skip ere the hounds catch on.”
A few minutes after, the pack came up
And found the old “varmint” home had gone.
_Sporting Tramp._
[Illustration: ~Tally Ho!~
~Gone Away!!~]
[Illustration: Editor’s Scrap Book]
AT THE RIDING SCHOOL.
~In~ her new riding habit of soft olive green
She appeared quite as lovely and proud as a queen,
As around the big ring with a petulant bob
She sailed on the spine of the old sorrel cob.
She rocked like the reed in the breezes a-dream,
She rocked like a lily upon a wild stream;
And she made the old cob like a bald-eagle fly
When she hit him right over his only good eye.
Oh, she seemed like a queen in the yellow side-saddle,
When she made the wild horse to “Erminie” skedaddle!
And when the band ceased, from the stirrup she dropped,
And over the platform most gracefully hopped.
Then I heard her observe with a gesture elate:
“I am now riding daily to pull down my weight--
I am losing flesh daily by riding, and that
Is the reason I’ve stopped taking Smith’s anti-fat!”
--_Puck._
* * * * *
~Miss Gushington~ (_enjoying a sleigh ride_): I think you have a
lovely horse, Mr. De Lyle. About what does such a fine horse cost?
~Mr. de Lyle~: Two dollars an hou--oh--er--yes, that horse is worth
about eight hundred dollars, Miss Gushington.--_Epoch._
* * * * *
~Smith~: What paper are you working on now?
~Jones~: Ain’t working on any paper. The season is over with me.
“How’s that?”
“I was the humorist on the _Bugle_ who got off jokes on the baseball
umpire. As soon as the baseball season closed I was bounced. I’m
trying to get a position as a coal-dealer and slipped-up-on-the-ice
humorist.”--_Texas Siftings._
* * * * *
~A pretty~ maiden fell overboard at New Bedford the other day,
and her lover leaned over the side of the boat, as she rose to the
surface, and said: “Give me your hand.” “Please ask papa,” she gently
murmured, as she calmly sank for the second time.--_Boston Herald._
* * * * *
ANOTHER HUNTING INCIDENT.
~Doctor P.~ had been asked to make one of a party to shoot over
some private preserves. It turned out to be one of his unlucky days.
“I give you my word,” he at last exclaimed, in despair, “I can’t kill a
thing!”
“Come, doctor,” suggested his host, “just imagine that you are at the
bedside of a patient.”--_Judge._
* * * * *
~Oh~! music sweet has charms, you know,
To soothe the savage breast;
It lightens troubles, calms all woe,
And gives the weary rest.
In order, then, to kill his cares,
And all his sorrows check,
The blear-eyed, big-mouthed bull-dog wears
A brass band round his neck.
--_New York Journal._
* * * * *
~Wife~ (_indignantly_): I’ve heard through a certain married
lady in town, John, that you bet me against a horse the other night
that your candidate would win?
~Husband~: Well, what of it? My candidate is bound to win;
the other man hasn’t the ghost of a show, and, as you’ve always
wanted a riding horse, I thought I would just get you one, and get it
cheap.--_The Epoch._
* * * * *
~Parson’s Wife~: Why, Johnny, you’re not going fishing on
Sunday, are you?
~Johnny~: Oh, no--no. I--I only thought I’d take the pole away
from the house so that my brothers needn’t be tempted.--_Life._
* * * * *
~Captain~: Well, what do you make it out to be?
~Miss Culture~ (_of Boston_): Why, it is a feline vessel, a
Grimalkin craft.
~Captain~: Oh, yes; we call ’em cat-boats.--_Ocean._
* * * * *
~Jones~: Ramrod, they say that it takes a temperature of 64°
below zero to kill a wild goose.
~Ramrod~: Well, what of it?
~Jones~: Oh, I was just thinking that you won’t be likely to get
any wild geese this season, that’s all.--_Burlington Free Press._
[Illustration: ~Pleasure Travel and Resorts~]
~The~ following extracts from Mr. H. H. Johnston’s paper in the
_Fortnightly Review_ for October will interest sportsmen. Mr. Johnston
grows enthusiastic over the new territory ceded by the Sultan of
Zanzibar to the Imperial British East African Company:
“The animal products of this region are typically African, and at
the time of my journeyings therein it was a sportsman’s paradise....
Buffaloes, which abound so as to be dangerous, provide very eatable
beef. Rhinoceros are so numerous in the interior that the horns are an
important item in trade, for they may be sold on the coast for three
or four rupees each (say 6s.). Hippopotami are abundant in the rivers
and lakes.... The elephant abounds in the neighborhood of Kilimanjaro
and Kenia to the extent of many thousands. He here becomes quite a
mountaineer, and ranges through the magnificent forests that clothe the
upper slopes of these giants among African peaks. The natives waylay
his forest tracks with artfully devised pitfalls and traps, preferring
this more cowardly way of procuring their ivory to facing the elephant
in the chase.... Lions’ skins are less easy to obtain from the natives,
as that animal is rarely killed by them; but sportsmen might shoot him
to a considerable extent, as he is both common and bold. Monkey skins
of the handsome variety of bushy white-tailed Colobus, which is alone
found in this region, are valuable.
“Ostriches are exceedingly numerous throughout this district of
East Africa; the species which is here represented is the _Struthio
Danaoides_ of Captain Shelley’s determination. It differs from the
widespread _Struthio Camelus_ in the color of the soft parts and naked
skin, and the size and markings of the egg. When living in Taveita, in
the summer and autumn of 1884, I and my men used to largely subsist on
their eggs, which were brought us in numbers by the natives, and sold
for about a pennyworth of cloth each. Of course, to any ornithologist,
this country is exceedingly interesting, and there is an abundance of
guinea-fowl, francolin, pigeons, and bustards.”
* * * * *
~Should~ the disappearance of all kinds of game, with which
we are so much threatened in America, really come to pass, it looks
as if Scandinavia would be a good field to seek. Bears and wolves
were unusually numerous in Sweden last summer; in the province of
Jemtland four were seen on one occasion, and much damage to cattle
was reported. Elks were very plentiful, in consequence of rigid
preservation, particularly in Central and Southern Sweden, large herds
having been seen of these noble animals. A great royal elk hunt took
place recently on the Hunneberg estate, in Sudermania, a Swedish crown
property, when upwards of 100 elks were killed. As to feather game,
the season in Sweden was better than was anticipated after so long and
severe a winter. From several parts came good reports of blackgame,
capercailzie and partridges. For the protection of the last during the
winter, when the snow makes feeding difficult, the Swedish Shooting
Association has decided upon granting awards to farmers who feed these
birds during that season.
In Norway, however, game was scarce, owing to the terribly severe and
long winter. This was particularly the case with the rype, or brown
ptarmigan. The reindeer shooting was good, and bears seem to have been
more than usually numerous last summer, particularly in South-central
Norway.
* * * * *
~The~ following facts may, however, prove instructive to
Americans who think of emulating the example set by some few of their
countrymen, and seeking their sport abroad at the present time. In the
Valuation Appeal Court for Inverness, held recently, the first case
called was that of Donald Cameron, of Lochiel, who appealed against the
valuation of his deer forest at the rate of £25 per stag, and of his
grouse-shootings at 10s. per brace. Finally the case was settled at the
rate of £20 per stag, and 10s. per brace of grouse. It would be of much
interest to know what the rating of these properties would be if they
were used for agricultural purposes. It is worthy of note that Scotch
venison does not fetch more than 10c. per pound for the hind quarter in
the London market, and half that sum for the fore quarter.
* * * * *
~The~ following chronology of railways affords a good index to
the progressiveness of the countries mentioned: The first railway was
opened in England on Sept. 27, 1825; Austria, Sept. 30, 1828; France,
Oct. 1, 1828; United States, Dec. 28, 1829; Belgium, May 3, 1835;
Germany, Dec. 7, 1835; Cuba, in 1837; Russia, on April 4, 1838; Italy,
in September, 1839; Switzerland, on July 15, 1844; Jamaica, Nov. 21,
1845; Spain, Oct. 24, 1848; Canada, in May, 1850; Mexico and Peru, in
1850; Sweden, in 1851; Chili, in January, 1852; India, on April 18,
1853; Norway, in July, 1853; Portugal, in 1854; Brazil, April 21, 1854;
Victoria (Australia), Sept. 14, 1854; Columbia, Jan. 28, 1850; New
South Wales, Sept. 25, 1850; Egypt, in January, 1856; Natal, on June
26, 1860; and in Turkey, on Oct. 4, 1860.
[Illustration: ~Our MONTHLY RECORD~]
~This~ department of ~Outing~ is specially devoted to paragraphs
of the doings of members of organized clubs engaged in the
reputable sports of the period, and also to the recording of the
occurrence of the most prominent events of the current season. On
the ball-fields it will embrace _Cricket_, _Baseball_, _Lacrosse_
and _Football_. On the bays and rivers, _Yachting_, _Rowing_ and
_Canoeing_. In the woods and streams, _Hunting_, _Shooting_ and
_Fishing_. On the lawns, _Archery_, _Lawn Tennis_ and _Croquet_.
Together with Ice-Boating, Skating, Tobogganing, Snowshoeing,
Coasting, and winter sports generally.
Secretaries of clubs will oblige by sending in the names of their
presidents and secretaries, with the address of the latter,
together with the general result of their most noteworthy contests
of the month, addressed, “Editor of ~Outing~,” 239 Fifth Avenue,
New York.
TO CORRESPONDENTS.
_All communications intended for the Editorial Department should
be addressed to “The Editor,” and not to any person by name.
Advertisements, orders, etc., should be kept distinct, and
addressed to the manager. Letters and inquiries from anonymous
correspondents will not receive attention. All communications to be
written on one side of the paper only._
AMATEUR PHOTOGRAPHY.
~At~ a meeting of the Photographic Society of Philadelphia, held
recently, the executive committee of the Interchange reported that it
had selected from the slides of 1886-’87 two hundred specimens to be
sent to England in exchange for the same number to be sent to this
country.
* * * * *
~During~ the past year the Chicago Lantern Slide Club has added
materially to its numbers. The following new members were admitted
some time since: C. E. Bradbury, J. L. Atwater, E. H. Reed, G. H.
Daggett, Charles Stadler, F. S. Osborn, B. D. Washington, and Wallace
Fairbank. Three members were added to the executive committee: Dr. C.
F. Matteson, E. J. Wagner, and G. A. Douglas.
* * * * *
~The~ Society of Amateur Photographers of New York gave a
Smoking Concert, November 18, which proved a very enjoyable affair.
There was some good vocal and instrumental music, and after the concert
was over, the audience had a “German-American tea”--the tea having been
brewed in a keg, after the manner of the German. Strange to say, on
the conclusion of the repast there were several “kegs full,” after the
manner of the American.
* * * * *
~The~ New Orleans Camera Club has recently taken a number of
sketches of an “outing” along the line of the Northeastern railroad.
Some pretty bits of scenery and quaint negro characters were taken
during the trip. The following gentlemen headed the excursion party:
President William Mandeville, Vice-President Joseph A. Hincks,
Secretary Charles E. Fermer, Treasurer Harry T. Howard.
ATHLETICS.
~The~ fall handicap meeting of the Harvard Athletic Association
was held November 5, on Holmes’ Field, Cambridge, Mass. The events were
as follows:
100-yards run--_First heat_, O. K. Hawes, ’92 (2 yds.), first. Time,
10½s. _Second heat_, E. C. Moen, ’91 (scratch), first. Time, 10 2-5s.
_Final heat_, O. K. Hawes, ’92 (2 yds.), first. Time, 10 2-5s.
Running broad jump--G. R. White (scratch), first. Distance, 20 ft.
2½ in.
One-mile walk--C. T. R. Bates, ’92 (30 sec.), first. Time, 8m. 1½s.
J. E. Howe, ’91 (scratch), second.
One-mile run--J. L. Dodge, ’91 (100 yds.), first. Time, 4m. 34s. A. M.
White, ’92 (100 yds.), second.
Running high jump--E. W. Dustan, ’89 (3 in.), first. Distance, 5 ft.
440-yards run--T. J. Stead, ’91 (10 yds.), first. Time, 52¾s. W. H.
Wright, ’92, second.
Half-mile run--G. L. Batchelder, ’92 (40 yds.), first. Time, 2m. 3s.
220-yards run--S. Wells, Jr., ’91 (12 yds.), first. Time, 23 2-5s. O.
K. Hawes, ’92 (5 yds.), second.
The officers of the course were: Referee, G. B. Morrison, ’83; Judges,
J. D. Bradley, L. S., F. B. Lund, ’88; Judge of Walking, H. H. Bemis,
’87; Timekeepers, J. G. Lathrop, F. D. Fisher, ’86, J. T. Taylor, E. S.
Wright, L. S.; Scorer, Allston Burr, ’89.
* * * * *
~The~ fall games of the Friends’ Central School, Philadelphia,
were held November 4, at the University Grounds.
Pole vault--Stuart, 7 ft. 5 in.
One-mile run--Emerick, 6m. 13 3-5s.
Running high jump--Sill, 4 ft. 8 in.
Standing broad jump--Goldsmith, 9 ft. 2 in.
Half-mile walk--Wilkeson, 4m. 27½s.
100-yards run (juniors)--_Final heat_, Stuart, 11 4-5s.
Throwing baseball--Burrough, 1.
100-yards run (seniors)--_Final heat_, Goldsmith, 11 4-5s.
440-yards run--A’Becket, 1.
Three-legged race--Burrough and Marter, 11 4-5s.
One-mile bicycle race--Mode, 3m. 38 2-3s.
Putting the shot--Meredith, 27 ft. 9 in.
Running broad jump--Dumont, 18 ft. 4 in.
Hurdle race--Dickeson, 22 2-5s.
Tug-of-war--Class of ’89, 1, by 3 inches.
* * * * *
~The~ Athletes of the Gaelic Club of Ireland left for home on
the _City of Rome_, October 31. The trip to this country did not prove
a great financial success.
* * * * *
~The~ first annual games of the Outing Athletic Club were held
on the grounds of the Brooklyn Athletic Association, November 6. The
attendance was large, the management good, the track in fine condition,
and the racing events were closely contested and interesting. Nearly
six hundred people witnessed the sports, which resulted as follows:
100-yards professional race, handicap--E. Herline, Wilmington (5½ yds.)
first; Steve Farrell, Rockville, Conn., second. Time, 10 1-5s.
120-yards run, handicap (amateur)--Thomas Lee, N. Y. Y. M. C. A.,
first; N. Linicus, Olympic A. C., second. Time, 12½s.
Running high jump, handicap--M. O. Sullivan, Pastime A. C., first;
R. K. Pritchard, Staten Island A. C., second. Height, 5 ft. 5 in.,
handicap 5 in.; second, 5 ft. 8½ in.
One-mile walk, handicap--W. F. Pollman, Pastime A. C., first (40 sec.);
J. B. Keating second. Time, 7m. 1-5s.
Half-mile run, handicap--A. Aspengein, Prospect Harriers (42 yds.),
first; W. H. Moore, N. Y. A. C. (45 yds.), second. Time, 2m. 2 3-5s.
350-yards run, handicap--R. R. Houston, I. H. (20 yds.), first; W. E.
Hughes, Pastime A. C., second. Time, 39 4-5s.
Running broad jump, handicap--S. D. See, (36 in.), Brooklyn A. C.,
first, 18 ft. 9½ in.; W. Neuman, Olympic A. C. (30 in.), second.
One-mile run, handicap--P. C. Petrie, Olympic A. C. (43 yds.), first;
E. Hjertberg, Olympic A. C., (35 yds.), second.
220-yards hurdle race, handicap--A. Brown, Pastime A. C. (8 yds.),
first; W. H. Struse, S. I. A. C., second. Time, 27½s.
Putting the 16-lb. shot, handicap--W. Neuman, Olympic A. C. (6 ft.),
first; Alf. Ing, Y. M. C. A. (1 ft.), second. Distance, 31 ft. 4½ in.
* * * * *
~I. B. Meredith~, the well-known sprinter and football player of
Ireland is coming to America.
* * * * *
~Schifferstein~, the California amateur sprinter, has decided to
become a professional. He and Bethune will be a great pair at 100 yards.
* * * * *
~An~ athletic enterprise has been set on foot by the National
Assoc. of Amateur Athletes of America. It is this: The association
has determined to hold a national meeting immediately before their
international championship next May. The meeting will be open to every
amateur in the United States, and the winners of contests will form
an international team which will make a tour of Europe, entering all
amateur championship games held in foreign countries. The team will
also hold a series of games at the Paris Exposition of 1889. Many
prominent men interested in athletics are very favorably impressed with
the scheme and believe that it will be a successful one.
* * * * *
~The~ following definition of an amateur has been adopted by the
Western Association: An amateur athlete is one who has never competed
with or against a professional for a prize, or who has never competed
for a staked bet or other monetary consideration or under a fictitious
name, or who has never, directly or indirectly, either in competition
or as an instructor, or as an assistant or through any connection
whatever with any form of athletic games obtained any financial
consideration, either directly or indirectly; who has never sold or
pledged any prize or token won or obtained through connection with
athletics, or whose membership in any athletic organization is of no
pecuniary benefit to himself, directly or indirectly.
* * * * *
~The~ games of the Manhattan Athletic Club, November 6, were of
a high order. Four new records were made, two on the running path and
two on the field. The cinder-path was in excellent condition. Arthur
George and G. L. Young, the champion cross-country runners of England,
gave exhibitions of their style. Conneff and Mitchell, the Irish runner
and the weight thrower, made new records. The following is a summary of
the events:
100-yards run--_First heat_: F. Westing, M. A. C. (scratch), and A. F.
Copeland, M. A. C. (2 yds.), a dead heat, in 10 2-5s. _Second heat_:
J. S. Wieners, Jr., M. A. C. (9 yds.), first, in 10 4-5s. _Third
heat_: H. Shipman (4½ yds.), first, in 10 4-5s. _Fourth heat_: J.
C. Devereaux, M. A. C. (5 yds.), first, in 10 4-5s. _Fifth heat_: W.
M. Macdermott, M. A. C. (7 yds.), first, in 10 4-5s. _Final heat_:
Macdermott first, Devereaux second, Copeland third; time, 10 1-5s. It
was a fine race, and less than 18 inches divided the four men at the
finish.
Two-mile walk--E. D. Lange, M. A. C. (scratch), first, time 14m. 45
2-5s.; F. Fillistrand, W. S. A. C. (80 sec.), second, in 16m. 21s.; F.
A. Ware, M. A. C. (25 sec.), third, not timed.
Throwing 16-lb. hammer--M. W. Ford, Brooklyn (25 feet), first, at 78
ft. 11 in.; J. S. Mitchell, M. A. C. (scratch), second, at 101 ft. 4
in.; F. L. Lambrecht, M. A. C. (scratch), third, at 101 ft. 3 in.
Two-mile run--T. P. Conneff, M. A. C. (scratch), first, in 9m. 43s.; A.
Sheridan, W. S. A. C. (175 yds.), second; T. Owens, W. S. A. C. (205
yds.), third; won easily. Conneff made 1 mile in 4m. 48s.; 1¼ miles,
6m. 3 4-5s.; 1½ miles, 7m. 19s., and 1¾ miles, 8m. 32 2-5s. His time
at 1¼ miles supplants P. D. Skillman’s 6m. 5 4-5s. made at Brooklyn,
July 4, 1887, and his time at 1¾ miles is the best American record,
there having been no previous record for the distance. Had Conneff been
pushed he could have broken Carter’s two-mile record of 9m. 38 3-5s.
120-yards hurdle race over 3 ft. 6 in. obstacles--A. F. Copeland, M. A.
C., first; H. Mapes, Columbia College, second; E. M. Vandervoort, M.
A. C., third. Won easily in 16 2-5s. The record is 16 1-5s., by A. A.
Jordan, N. Y. A. C.
Quarter-mile run for novices--J. E. Gounison, Columbia College, first;
W. Bogardus, M. A. C., second; J. A. Allen, Star A. C. C., third. Won
by 5 ft., after a good race, in 58 4-5s.
Running broad jump--Victor Mapes, C. C. A. A. (1 ft. 6 in.), first, at
22 ft. 4½ in.; A. F. Remsen, M. A. C. (1 ft. 3 in.), second, at 22 ft.
4 in.; Z. A. Cooper, U. A. C. (3 ft. 6 in.), third, at 22 ft. 3 in.
350-yards run--J. C. Devereaux, M. A. C. (9 yds.), first; A. F.
Copeland, M. A. C. (3 yds.), second; H. Shipman, M. A. C. (12 yds.),
third. Copeland got a good start, but was unable to get through the
field. He ran a close second in the good time of 39 3-5s.
Field officers: Referee, G. W. Carr, M. A. C.; Judges, C. H. Mapes,
Columbia College; W. Gage, M. A. C., and G. L. M. Sacks, M. A. C.;
Timers, M. P. Bagg, M. A. C.; G. A. Avery, M. A. C., and A. F. Kimbel,
M. A. C.; Judge of Walking, G. L. M. Sacks; Starter, H. P. Pike, M. A.
C.
* * * * *
~The~ amateur athletic clubs of Chicago and vicinity, at
present members of the Amateur Athletic Union, have organized a local
committee, to be known as the Executive Committee of the Associated A.
A. U. Clubs of Chicago and vicinity. The committee will be composed of
three delegates from each A. A. U. club within fifty miles of Chicago,
and will legislate, under the board of managers of the A. A. U., on all
matters pertaining to the interests of the associated clubs and Western
athletics in general. The committee is at present composed of delegates
from the following clubs: Chicago Amateur Athletic Association, Garden
City Athletic Club, First Regt. (I. N. G.) A. A., and Pullman Athletic
Club. Officers: Hall T. K. Fake, P. A. C., chairman; Noah Clark, C. A.
A. A., secretary and treasurer. The following circular has been issued:
~To the Amateur Athletic Organizations of Chicago and
Vicinity~:
The Executive Committee of the Associated A. A. U. clubs of
Chicago and vicinity beg to call your attention to the enclosed
announcement. It is to the interest of all amateur athletic
clubs to associate themselves with a national and thoroughly
representative governing body, having for its object the
advancement of American amateur athletics and whose rulings shall
be final and authoritative on all points of importance in such
matters, and whose decisions shall have international recognition.
The formation of the local executive committee insures the proper
representation of each local club, as well as the thorough
investigation and care of the mutual interests of the associate
clubs and Western athletic interests in general.
Respectfully,
~Noah Clark~, Sec’y.
_Chicago_, Oct. 17, 1888.
* * * * *
~The~ American Athletic Union held its first supplementary
indoor meeting for the Championship of the United States, November 21,
at Madison Square Garden in this city. W. B. Curtis was referee and
the judges A. V. De Gorcouria, E. C. Carter, and John Huneker. The
following is a summary of the events:
Seventy-five yards--_First heat_, W. C. White, N. Y. A. C., first; A.
J. Murburg, second; time, 8 2-5s. _Second heat_, Horace Walker, Yale A.
C., first; W. E. Hughes, P. A. C., second; time, 8 2-5s. _Third heat_,
F. W. Robinson, Yale College and N. Y. A. C., first; H. Luerson, P.
A. C., second; time, 8 2-5s. _Fourth heat_, Thomas J. Lee, O. A. C.,
first; N. H. Strusse, S. I. A. C., second; time, 8 2-5s. _Fifth heat_,
S. J. King, Col. A. C., Washington, first; F. H. Babcock, N. Y. A. C.,
second; time, 8 2-5s. Sixteen competed. _Final heat_, Robinson, Walker,
King and Lee competed, the others being beaten in the supplementary
heats. Robinson won by a foot; time, 8 2-5s; King second.
200-yards hurdle (3 feet 6 inches)--Run in one heat. Won by A.
A. Jordan, N. Y. A. C.; time, 30 4-5s.; G. Schwegler, second; E.
Lentilhon, Yale College and N. Y. A. C., third. Four ran. Jordan won as
he pleased.
Three-quarter mile walk--T. Sherman, N. J. A. C.; W. R. Burckhardt, P.
A. C.; H. Dimse, P. A. C.; Otto Hassell, Chicago A. A. A., and J. C.
Kouth, P. A. C., competed. Won easily by Burckhardt; time, 5m. 14s.;
Sherman second, Kouth third.
Standing high jump--W. Norris, S. I. A. C.; A. Shroeder, N. Y. A. C.;
S. Crook, M. A. C.; F. T. Ducharme, Detroit A. C.; Samuel Toch, S.
I. A. C.; R. K. Pritchard, S. I. A. C.; J. R. Elder, Columbia A. C.,
Washington, D. C.; John Scheurer, O. A. C.; E. Giannini, N. Y. A. C.,
and B. L. Harrison, Orange A. C., competed. Crook won with 4 ft. 11½
in. This is within three-quarters of an inch of the American record,
and beats the English record 1½ inches. The start was made at 3 ft. 6
in.
1,000 yards run--G. V. Gilbert, N. Y. A. C.; E. A. Merrick, M. A. C.;
S. Barr, S. I. A. C.; W. T. Thompson, S. I. A. C., and W. J. Gregory,
Birmingham A. C., competed. It was a good race, and during the last lap
and a half Gilbert and Thompson were in advance and running for their
lives. Gilbert lasted the longest and won by several yards. Time, 2m.
26 4-5s.
150-yards run--_First heat_, W. C. White, N. Y. A. C., first; Thomas S.
Lee, O. A. C., second; time, 17 1-5s. _Second heat_, S. J. King, Col.
A. C., Washington, D. C., first; W. E. Hughes, P. A. C., second; time,
17½s. _Third heat_, F. T. Ducharme, Detroit A. C., first; S. E.
Corbett, S. I. A. C., second. _Final heat_, White won a splendid race
by less than a foot. Time, 17 1-5s. King was second and Hughes third.
Kicking Football (for accuracy)--C. T. Schlesinger, N. Y. A. C.; T.
O. Speir, Orange A. C.; Frank Cunningham, S. I. A. C.; E. J. Chapman,
S. I. A. C.; D. A. Lindsay, S. I. A. C.; W. F. Allen, M. A. C.; C. T.
Hollister, M. A. C.; E. J. Laidlaw, N. Y. A. C.; G. A. White, M. A. C.;
H. Sinclair, M. A. C., and J. J. Barker, P. A. C., competed. Cunningham
won, Sinclair second and Allen third.
600-yards run--Stewart Barr, S. I. A. C.; J. F. Robinson, S. I. A.
C.; E. E. Barnes, O. A. C.; A. W. S. Cochrane, N. Y. A. C., and J. P.
Thornton, N. Y. A. C., competed. Thornton won in hand. Time, 1m. 23
2-5s. Barnes was second and Cochrane third.
56-lb. weight (for height)--E. Giannini, N. Y. A. C.; George R. Gray,
N. Y. A. C.; C. A. J. Queckberner, S. I. A. C.; J. Hackett, P. A. C.,
and M. O. Sullivan, P. A. C., competed. Sullivan won it with 13 ft. 11⅝
in., beating his own record 2⅝ in., made October 2, 1886. Queckberner
was second at 13 ft. 7⅝ in. and Hackett at 13 ft. 5⅝ in.
300-yards hurdle (2 feet 6 inches)--Run in one heat. A. A. Jordan, N.
Y. A. C.; A. Brown, P. A. C.; G. Schwelger, A. A. C., and E. Lentilhon,
Yale College and N. Y. A. C., competed. Jordan won without trouble.
Time, 41s. Brown was second and Schwelger third.
Running hop, step and jump--Nine of fourteen entries competed. G. R.
Robertson, M. A. C., won with 43 ft. 1 in.; E. E. Smith, B. A. A.,
second, 40 ft. 5 in., and T. H. Babcock, N. Y. A. C., third, 40 ft. The
world’s record is 48 ft. 3 in., by J. Purcell, Limerick, June 9, 1887,
and the American 44 ft. 1¾ in., by M. W. Ford, New York, May 10, 1884.