WILLIAM E. DUELLMAN AND BARBARA BERG

In recent years various museums have issued lists of the type specimens

in their collections. These lists are valuable to systematists by

providing these workers with information that otherwise sometimes is

difficult to obtain. Although by comparison with the large museums in

the eastern part of the United States, such as the American Museum of

Natural History, the United States National Museum, and the Museum of

Comparative Zoology at Harvard, the herpetological collections in the

Museum of Natural History at The University of Kansas are relatively

small (70,000 specimens), a large number of types are contained in the

collection. The largest number of types are of species described from

Costa Rica by Edward H. Taylor between 1949 and 1958. Beginning in

1932 and continuing until World War II, Taylor described many species

from México; types of these species were contained in the Edward H.

Taylor--Hobart M. Smith collection. Inquiries from herpetologists

reveal that many workers suppose that the EHT-HMS collection is in

the Museum of Natural History. Such is not the case, for the EHT-HMS

collection has been divided between the Chicago Natural History Museum

and the University of Illinois Museum of Natural History.

The list of type specimens presented here includes all holotypes

and paratypes that are known in the museum as of April 15, 1962.

Only specimens actually designated as paratypes by the original

describer are considered as such. Each species or subspecies is

listed in the combination as it was originally proposed. If the name

has been subjected to subsequent nomenclatural change or has been

placed in synonymy, the name in current use is given after an equals

sign, together with a citation to the authority for the change. The

arrangement in the following list is alphabetical by genus and species

within orders (suborders in the Squamata). Current combinations of

names that have been changed subsequent to their original proposal are

listed in the correct alphabetical place with a cross-reference to the

original combination.

All original citations have been checked, and actual dates of

publication are given for each. The checking of original citations,

museum catalogues, labels, and sometimes collectors’ field catalogues

has revealed numerous errors. In some cases the catalogue numbers

of the holotypes and paratypes given by Taylor actually were his

field numbers. In the following list the museum numbers that were

subsequently assigned are given. Certain localities have been given

incorrectly; for example, Taylor described several species from Moravia

de Chirripó, which he gave as being in Limón Province, Costa Rica.

Actually Moravia de Chirripó is in Cartago Province. We have attempted

to correct all such errors.

The holotype and two paratypes of _Rana taylori_ Smith are stated to

be in the Museum of Natural History. Smith (Herpetologica, 15:214,

December 8, 1959) proposed the name _Rana taylori_ for three specimens

discussed by Taylor (Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 35:906, July 1, 1952),

who gave the numbers 2976-2978. Number 2978 was designated the holotype

of _Rana taylori_ by Smith, who never saw the frogs. The numbers

2976-2978 are E. H. Taylor’s field numbers; the specimens never have

been catalogued in the Museum of Natural History, and their present

location is unknown.

The 125 species and subspecies represented by holotypes and paratypes

in the collection are distributed among the orders of amphibians and

reptiles as follows:

Type specimens of amphibians and reptiles in the Museum of Natural History, the University of Kansas · 第 5 / 13 题