HUNGARY.

Hungary is mainly a fertile plain, traversed by the Danube and Theiss,

an agricultural country, with the forest confined to the hilly portions,

to the mountainous southern provinces of Slavonia and Croatia, and to

the Carpathians, which bound it on the north and east. Nevertheless,

while wood in the plain is scarce, the total forest area, including that

of the two mentioned provinces, is but little less than that of Austria

proper, namely, 23,000,000 acres (28%). Large areas of shifting sands,

and, along the Danube and Theiss rivers, swamps, partly created by

deforestation, are interspersed with the heavy black prairie and compact

clay-soils.

At present, of the 23 million acres of forest the State owns 16%,

corporations somewhat over 20%, churches, cloisters and other institutes

7.5%, and the balance, over 13 million acres, is owned privately. The

administration of the State forests is in the Department of Agriculture

but some are still under the control of the military and railroad

departments.

All but the private forests are under State surveillance. Of the private

properties the majority consists of large holdings and about ten per

cent. are entailed, a hopeful condition for conservative management. Yet

with an export of 10 to 12 million dollars or more, exploitation would

appear still to be general, and devastated areas abound. It is claimed

that half the area is under working plans, and that the 1000 million

cubic feet of annual cut do not approach the annual increment. The State

forests yield now in the neighborhood of $600,000 net.

Although naturally influenced by Austrian precedent, forestry matters in

Hungary like all matters of administration are largely independent of

Austria, the connection being only in the identity of the ruler.

The forests, which had been for the most part the property of the kings

of the Arpad dynasty, had by them been turned over from time to time in

donations to the churches, cloisters and to colonists, so that when the

Hapsburgs succeeded on the throne, in 1526, only a small portion

remained undisposed, and this became State property.

In the forests which were necessary for the working of the royal mines

and furnaces, an attempt was early made to secure systematic treatment

under an ordinance (1565) which gave instructions as to the order of

fellings, the reservation of seed trees, etc. But, otherwise, the

government did not make much effort at regulating forest use until the

middle of the 18th century, and then, largely owing to military

considerations, urged by General von Engelshofen commanding on the

frontier against the Turks. The planting of forests for defense was

ordered (1743) by Maria Theresa, but this order was probably never

executed.

About this time, however, movements of reform in various directions are

noticeable. Complete working plans were made for the Kremnitz forest in

1750, and for the Schemnitz forest in 1763. The forest ordinances of

1770 and 1781 and the law of 1791 attempted to regulate the use of

communal forests, and ordered the reservation of devastated forest

areas. Other legislation followed in 1807, designed to arrest the

further extension of shifting sands.

Although, since 1809, forest inspectors had been employed to look after

the execution of the forest laws, mismanagement and forest destruction

by promiscuous cutting, pasture and fire remained the rule, and with

the advent of the railroads, in 1850, increased apace.

Political troubles prevented any attempts at improvement until, in 1867,

comparative peace and the new régime had arrived, and finally, in 1879,

it became possible to pass a reform law, which is the basis of present

conditions.

A general forest law had been enacted in 1807; this was superseded in

1858 by the adoption of the Austrian law of 1852. But, in 1879, a new

law reorganized forest policy and forest service. In that year, the

State interests were placed under the administration of the

Department of Agriculture with a technical forester at the head

(Oberlandforstmeister), assisted by four section chiefs, one in charge

of the State forest administration, one for the administration of

corporation forests, one for the elaboration of working plans, and one,

with the assistance of 20 forest inspectors having supervision of the

execution of all forest laws. Otherwise the general features of German

administrative methods prevail, except that for purposes of executing

the protective forest laws, committees composed of three members chosen

from the country officials co-operate with the government service.

The law of 1879, modified and intensified in 1898, provides government

supervision of the management of corporation and of protection of

forests, and prescribes that land unfit for farming, i.e., absolute

forest soil (three-quarters of all forest land), no matter by whom

owned, is to be reforested within six years after having been stripped,

and no new clearings may be made on such soils. Mountain forests, which

are classed as protection forests (around one million acres or 5.4% of

the forest area so classed), as well as entailed properties, must be

managed according to working plans approved by the forest department.

The declaration of protective forests was to be made by a commission

within five years of the enactment of the law. New planting for

protective purposes could also be ordered, and this under certain

conditions may be done by the interested, i.e., protected parties, which

may associate themselves for this purpose. Violations of this law are

liable to be punished by a fine for each acre, imposed annually as long

as the offense continues. Two-thirds of the whole forest area is thus

more or less under State supervision, and working plans for over 12

million acres have been, or are to be prepared by the government. An

area allotment method with a normal forest formula as a check has been

mostly employed in this work, which is by no means as yet completed.

To promote forest planting several nurseries have been established by

the government, from which around 10 million plants are annually

distributed free of charge, and subventions for reforestation of wastes

are also granted annually. It is interesting to note in this connection

that more than 170,000 acres have been planted to Black Locust, which is

managed as coppice for vineyard stakes.

In 1884, a special fund for the purchase of forest land by the State was

instituted by turning all moneys received from eventual sales of forest

land into that fund. Another fund for forest improvement is accumulated

by placing four-fifths of all penalties collected for forest trespasses

into a separate account for that purpose. These funds have not

accumulated very fast, the forest improvement fund, in 1896, being only

about $120,000.

Similar to the Landes in France, there exist in various parts of Hungary

extensive sand wastes and shifting sands, partly caused by

deforestation. Ever since 1788, legislation has attempted to secure a

rehabilitation of these waste areas, which cover in all some 600 square

miles. In 1817, a first systematic beginning was made in the Banat, on

the “Alföld” of the Magyars, under the forest director _Bachofen_,

similar to _Brémontier’s_ undertaking in France. By 1842, the total

plantations amounted to about 12,000 acres, and by 1869, some 20,000

acres had been reforested, and parts of the plantations had begun to

yield profits. But even to-day, there are still large areas in a desert

condition.

A classic volume in German by _Joseph Wessely_, Hungarian forest

director, _Der europäische Flugsand und seine Kultur_, describes in

detail the principles and methods of reclamation of shifting sands.

Most of the Hungarian forestry literature being written in the Magyar

language, is inaccessible to the rest of the world.

Efforts by private endeavor to promote forestry education date back as

early as 1796, when Forest Inspector _Vizner_ opened an elementary

forest school and wrote a forestry catechism.

This effort was followed, in 1806, by introducing the subject in the

agricultural school at Keszthely, and, in 1808, in the school of mines

in Schemnitz (Selmecz banya), a German forester _Wilkins_ filling the

chair, while a special forest school was established at Hermannstadt in

1817.

The forestry courses at Schemnitz were enlarged and the school

re-organized in 1846 and again in 1872; one of the changes being the use

of the Hungarian language in its instruction, which had originally been

in German. In 1904, the course, which was 3 years and only optionally 4

(one year for engineering education), was made 4 years for all, and is

obligatory for all higher grade State officials.

In Croatia-Slavonia, which is in many respects separately administered,

an agricultural and forestry school exists at Kreutz (Körös) with a

three-year course.

For the lower service four schools of two-year courses have been

established by the government, the instruction being given by

practitioners, and some of the students receiving free tuition.

A forest experiment station was established in 1898; it issues a

quarterly magazine, _Irdeszeti Kiserletek_, in which its results are

recorded.

A Hungarian forestry association was formed in 1866; it issues a monthly

journal, distributes pamphlets, gives prizes for literary effort, etc.,

and is, with over 2000 members, an active agent in the work of reform. A

separate forestry association, which also publishes a monthly in the

Slavish language, exists in Croatia.

A Brief History of Forestry. In Europe, the United States and Other Countries · 第 68 / 157 题