And so it would have been, had the gases been closely confined at the

moment they were made to explode. If, for instance, we were to put in

this bottle a mixture of hydrogen gas and atmospheric air; and if, after

corking the bottle, we should kindle the mixture by a very small

orifice, from the sudden dilatation of the gases at the moment of their

combination, the bottle must either fly to pieces, or the cork be blown

out with considerable violence.

CAROLINE.

But in the experiment which we have just seen, if you did not kindle the

hydrogen gas, would it not equally combine with the oxygen?

MRS. B.

Certainly not; for, as I have just explained to you, it is necessary

that the oxygen and hydrogen gases be burnt together, in order to

combine chemically and produce water.

CAROLINE.

That is true; but I thought this was a different combination, for I see

no water produced.

MRS. B.

The water resulting from this detonation was so small in quantity, and

in such a state of minute division, as to be invisible. But water

certainly was produced; for oxygen is incapable of combining with

hydrogen in any other proportions than those that form water; therefore

water must always be the result of their combination.

If, instead of bringing the hydrogen gas into sudden contact with the

atmosphere (as we did just now) so as to make the whole of it explode

the moment it is kindled, we allow but a very small surface of gas to

burn in contact with the atmosphere, the combustion goes on quietly and

gradually at the point of contact, without any detonation, because the

surfaces brought together are too small for the immediate union of

gases. The experiment is a very easy one. This phial, with a narrow

neck, (PLATE VIII. fig. 5.) is full of hydrogen gas, and is carefully

corked. If I take out the cork without moving the phial, and quickly

approach the candle to the orifice, you will see how different the

result will be----

EMILY.

How prettily it burns, with a blue flame! The flame is gradually sinking

within the phial--now it has entirely disappeared. But does not this

combustion likewise produce water?

MRS. B.

Undoubtedly. In order to make the formation of the water sensible to

you, I shall procure a fresh supply of hydrogen gas, by putting into

this bottle (PLATE VIII. fig. 6.) iron filings, water, and sulphuric

acid, materials similar to those which we have just used for the same

purpose. I shall then cork up the bottle, leaving only a small orifice

in the cork, with a piece of glass-tube fixed to it, through which the

gas will issue in a continued rapid stream.

CAROLINE.

I hear already the hissing of the gas through the tube, and I can feel a

strong current against my hand.

MRS. B.

This current I am going to kindle with the candle--see how vividly it

burns----

EMILY.

It burns like a candle with a long flame. But why does this combustion

last so much longer than in the former experiment?

MRS. B.

The combustion goes on uninterruptedly as long as the new gas continues

to be produced. Now if I invert this receiver over the flame, you will

soon perceive its internal surface covered with a very fine dew, which

is pure water----

CAROLINE.

Yes, indeed; the glass is now quite dim with moisture! How glad I am

that we can see the water produced by this combustion.

EMILY.

It is exactly what I was anxious to see; for I confess I was a little

incredulous.

MRS. B.

If I had not held the glass-bell over the flame, the water would have

escaped in the state of vapour, as it did in the former experiment. We

have here, of course, obtained but a very small quantity of water; but

the difficulty of procuring a proper apparatus, with sufficient

quantities of gases, prevents my showing it you on a larger scale.

The composition of water was discovered about the same period, both by

Mr. Cavendish, in this country, and by the celebrated French chemist

Lavoisier. The latter invented a very perfect and ingenious apparatus to

perform, with great accuracy, and upon a large scale, the formation of

water by the combination of oxygen and hydrogen gases. Two tubes,

conveying due proportions, the one of oxygen, the other of hydrogen gas,

are inserted at opposite sides of a large globe of glass, previously

exhausted of air; the two streams of gas are kindled within the globe,

by the electrical spark, at the point where they come in contact; they

burn together, that is to say, the hydrogen combines with the oxygen,

the caloric is set at liberty, and a quantity of water is produced

exactly equal, in weight, to that of the two gases introduced into the

globe.

CAROLINE.

And what was the greatest quantity of water ever formed in this

apparatus?

MRS. B.

Several ounces; indeed, very nearly a pound, if I recollect right; but

the operation lasted many days.

EMILY.

This experiment must have convinced all the world of the truth of the

discovery. Pray, if improper proportions of the gases were mixed and set

fire to, what would be the result?

MRS. B.

Water would equally be formed, but there would be a residue of either

one or other of the gases, because, as I have already told you, hydrogen

and oxygen will combine only in the proportions requisite for the

formation of water.

EMILY.

Look, Mrs. B., our experiment with the Voltaic battery (PLATE VIII. fig.

2.) has made great progress; a quantity of gas has been formed in each

tube, but in one of them there is twice as much gas as in the other.

MRS. B.

Yes; because, as I said before, water is composed of two volumes of

hydrogen to one of oxygen--and if we should now mix these gases together

and set fire to them by an electrical spark, both gases would entirely

disappear, and a small quantity of water would be formed.

There is another curious effect produced by the combustion of hydrogen

gas, which I shall show you, though I must acquaint you first, that I

cannot well explain the cause of it. For this purpose, I must put some

materials into our apparatus, in order to obtain a stream of hydrogen

gas, just as we have done before. The process is already going on, and

the gas is rushing through the tube--I shall now kindle it with the

taper----

EMILY.

It burns exactly as it did before---- What is the curious effect which

you were mentioning?

MRS. B.

Instead of the receiver, by means of which we have just seen the drops

of water form, we shall invert over the flame this piece of tube, which

is about two feet in length, and one inch in diameter (PLATE VIII.

fig. 7.); but you must observe that it is open at both ends.

EMILY.

What a strange noise it makes! something like the Æolian harp, but not

so sweet.

CAROLINE.

It is very singular, indeed; but I think rather too powerful to be

pleasing. And is not this sound accounted for?

MRS. B.

That the percussion of glass, by a rapid stream of gas, should produce a

sound, is not extraordinary: but the sound here is so peculiar, that no

other gas has a similar effect. Perhaps it is owing to a brisk vibratory

motion of the glass, occasioned by the successive formation and

condensation of small drops of water on the sides of the glass tube, and

the air rushing in to replace the vacuum formed.*

[Footnote *: This ingenious explanation was first suggested by

Dr. Delarive. --See Journals of the Royal Institution, vol. i.

p. 259.]

CAROLINE.

How very much this flame resembles the burning of a candle.

MRS. B.

The burning of a candle is produced by much the same means. A great deal

of hydrogen is contained in candles, whether of tallow or wax. This

hydrogen being converted into gas by the heat of the candle, combines

with the oxygen of the atmosphere, and flame and water result from this

combination. So that, in fact, the flame of a candle is owing to the

combustion of hydrogen gas. An elevation of temperature, such as is

produced by a lighted match or taper, is required to give the first

impulse to the combustion; but afterwards it goes on of itself, because

the candle finds a supply of caloric in the successive quantities of

heat which results from the union of the two electricities given out by

the gases during their combustion. But there are other circumstances

connected with the combustion of candles and lamps, which I cannot

explain to you till you are acquainted with _carbon_, which is one of

their constituent parts. In general, however, whenever you see flame,

you may infer that it is owing to the formation and burning of hydrogen

gas*; for flame is the peculiar mode of burning hydrogen gas, which,

with only one or two apparent exceptions, does not belong to any other

combustible.

[Footnote *: Or rather, _hydro-carbonat_, a gas composed of

hydrogen and carbon, which will be noticed under the head

_Carbon_.]

EMILY.

You astonish me! I understood that flame was the caloric produced by the

union of the two electricities, in all combustions whatever?

MRS. B.

Your error proceeded from your vague and incorrect idea of flame; you

have confounded it with light and caloric in general. Flame always

implies caloric, since it is produced by the combustion of hydrogen gas;

but all caloric does not imply flame. Many bodies burn with intense heat

without producing flame. Coals, for instance, burn with flame until all

the hydrogen which they contain is evaporated; but when they afterwards

become red hot, much more caloric is disengaged than when they produce

flame.

CAROLINE.

But the iron wire, which you burnt in oxygen gas, appeared to me to emit

flame; yet, as it was a simple metal, it could contain no hydrogen?

MRS. B.

It produced a sparkling dazzling blaze of light, but no real flame.

EMILY.

And what is the cause of the regular shape of the flame of a candle?

MRS. B.

The regular stream of hydrogen gas which exhales from its combustible

matter.

CAROLINE.

But the hydrogen gas must, from its great levity, ascend into the upper

regions of the atmosphere; why therefore does not the flame continue to

accompany it?

MRS. B.

The combustion of the hydrogen gas is completed at the point where the

flame terminates; it then ceases to be hydrogen gas, as it is converted

by its combination with oxygen into watery vapour; but in a state of

such minute division as to be invisible.

CAROLINE.

I do not understand what is the use of the wick of a candle, since the

hydrogen gas burns so well without it?

MRS. B.

The combustible matter of the candle must be decomposed in order to

emit the hydrogen gas, and the wick is instrumental in effecting this

decomposition. Its combustion first melts the combustible matter,

and . . . .

CAROLINE.

But in lamps the combustible matter is already fluid, and yet they also

require wicks?

MRS. B.

I am going to add that, afterwards, the burning wick (by the power of

capillary attraction) gradually draws up the fluid to the point where

combustion takes place; for you must have observed that the wick does

not burn quite to the bottom.

CAROLINE.

Yes; but I do not understand why it does not.

MRS. B.

Because the air has not so free an access to that part of the wick which

is immediately in contact with the candle, as to the part just above, so

that the heat there is not sufficient to produce its decomposition; the

combustion therefore begins a little above this point.

CAROLINE.

But, Mrs. B., in those beautiful lights, called _gas-lights_, which are

now seen in many streets, and will, I hope, be soon adopted every where,

I can perceive no wick at all. How are these lights managed?

MRS. B.

I am glad you have put me in mind of saying a few words on this very

useful and interesting improvement. In this mode of lighting, the gas is

conveyed to the extremity of a tube, where it is kindled, and burns as

long as the supply continues. There is, therefore, no occasion for a

wick, or any other fuel whatever.

EMILY.

But how is all this gas procured in such large quantities?

MRS. B.

It is obtained from coal, by distillation. --Coal, when exposed to heat

in a close vessel, is decomposed; and hydrogen, which is one of its

constituents, rises in the state of gas, combined with another of its

component parts, carbon, forming a compound gas, called _Hydrocarbonat_,

the nature of which we shall again have an opportunity of noticing when

we treat of carbon. This gas, like hydrogen, is perfectly transparent,

invisible, and highly inflammable; and in burning it emits that vivid

light which you have so often observed.

CAROLINE.

And does the process for procuring it require nothing but heating the

coals, and conveying the gas through tubes?

MRS. B.

Nothing else; except that the gas must be made to pass, immediately at

its formation, through two or three large vessels of water, in which it

deposits some other ingredients, and especially water, tar, and oil,

which also arise from the distillation of coals. The gas-light

apparatus, therefore, consists simply in a large iron vessel, in which

the coals are exposed to the heat of a furnace,--some reservoirs of

water, in which the gas deposits its impurities,--and tubes that convey

it to the desired spot, being propelled with uniform velocity through

the tubes by means of a certain degree of pressure which is made upon

the reservoir.

EMILY.

What an admirable contrivance! Do you not think, Mrs. B., that it will

soon get into universal use?

MRS. B.

Most probably, as to the lighting of streets, offices, and public

places, as it far surpasses any former invention for that purpose; but

as to the interior of private houses, this mode of lighting has not yet

been sufficiently tried to know whether it will be found generally

desirable, either in regard to economy or convenience. It may, however,

be considered as one of the happiest applications of chemistry to the

comforts of life; and there is every reason to suppose that it will

answer the full extent of public, expectation.

I have another experiment to show you with hydrogen gas, which I think

will entertain you. Have you ever blown bubbles with soap and water?

EMILY.

Yes, often, when I was a child; and I used to make them float in the air

by blowing them upwards.

MRS. B.

We shall fill some such bubbles with hydrogen gas, instead of

atmospheric air, and you will see with what ease and rapidity they will

ascend, without the assistance of blowing, from the lightness of the

gas. --Will you mix some soap and water whilst I fill this bladder with

the gas contained in the receiver which stands on the shelf in the

water-bath?

CAROLINE.

What is the use of the brass-stopper and turn-cock at the top of the

receiver?

MRS. B.

It is to afford a passage to the gas when required. There is, you see,

a similar stop-cock fastened to this bladder, which is made to fit that

on the receiver. I screw them one on the other, and now turn the two

cocks, to open a communication between the receiver and the bladder;

then, by sliding the receiver off the shelf, and gently sinking it into

the bath, the water rises in the receiver and forces the gas into the

bladder. (PLATE IX. fig. 1.)

[Illustration: Plate IX. Vol. I. p. 228

Fig. 1. Apparatus for transferring gases from a Receiver into a

bladder.

Fig. 2. Apparatus for blowing Soap bubbles.]

CAROLINE.

Yes, I see the bladder swell as the water rises in the receiver.

MRS. B.

I think that we have already a sufficient quantity in the bladder for

our purpose; we must be careful to stop both the cocks before we

separate the bladder from the receiver, lest the gas should escape.

--Now I must fix a pipe to the stopper of the bladder, and by dipping

its mouth into the soap and water, take up a few drops--then I again

turn the cock, and squeeze the bladder in order to force the gas into

the soap and water at the mouth of the pipe. (PLATE IX. fig. 2.)

EMILY.

There is a bubble--but it bursts before it leaves the mouth of the pipe.

MRS. B.

We must have patience and try again; it is not so easy to blow bubbles

by means of a bladder, as simply with the breath.

CAROLINE.

Perhaps there is not soap enough in the water; I should have had warm

water, it would have dissolved the soap better.

EMILY.

Does not some of the gas escape between the bladder and the pipe?

MRS. B.

No, they are perfectly air tight; we shall succeed presently, I dare

say.

CAROLINE.

Now a bubble ascends; it moves with the rapidity of a balloon. How

beautifully it refracts the light!

EMILY.

It has burst against the ceiling--you succeed now wonderfully; but why

do they all ascend and burst against the ceiling?

MRS. B.

Hydrogen gas is so much lighter than atmospherical air, that it ascends

rapidly with its very light envelope, which is burst by the force with

which it strikes the ceiling.

Air-balloons are filled with this gas, and if they carried no other

weight than their covering, would ascend as rapidly as these bubbles.

CAROLINE.

Yet their covering must be much heavier than that of these bubbles?

MRS. B.

Not in proportion to the quantity of gas they contain. I do not know

whether you have ever been present at the filling of a large balloon.

The apparatus for that purpose is very simple. It consists of a number

of vessels, either jars or barrels, in which the materials for the

formation of the gas are mixed, each of these being furnished with a

tube, and communicating with a long flexible pipe, which conveys the gas

into the balloon.

EMILY.

But the fire-balloons which were first invented, and have been since

abandoned, on account of their being so dangerous, were constructed,

I suppose, on a different principle.

MRS. B.

They were filled simply with atmospherical air, considerably rarefied by

heat; and the necessity of having a fire underneath the balloon, in

order to preserve the rarefaction of the air within it, was the

circumstance productive of so much danger.

If you are not yet tired of experiments, I have another to show you. It

consists in filling soap-bubbles with a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen

gases, in the proportions that form water; and afterwards setting fire

to them.

EMILY.

They will detonate, I suppose?

MRS. B.

Yes, they will. As you have seen the method of transferring the gas from

the receiver into the bladder, it is not necessary to repeat it. I have

therefore provided a bladder which contains a due proportion of oxygen

and hydrogen gases, and we have only to blow bubbles with it.

CAROLINE.

Here is a fine large bubble rising--shall I set fire to it with the

candle?

MRS. B.

If you please . . . .

CAROLINE.

Heavens, what an explosion! --It was like the report of a gun: I confess

it frightened me much. I never should have imagined it could be so loud.

EMILY.

And the flash was as vivid as lightning.

MRS. B.

The combination of the two gases takes place during that instant of time

that you see the flash, and hear the detonation.

EMILY.

This has a strong resemblance to thunder and lightning.

MRS. B.

These phenomena, however, are generally of an electrical nature. Yet

various meteorological effects may be attributed to accidental

detonations of hydrogen gas in the atmosphere; for nature abounds with

hydrogen: it constitutes a very considerable portion of the whole mass

of water belonging to our globe, and from that source almost every other

body obtains it. It enters into the composition of all animal

substances, and of a great number of minerals; but it is most abundant

in vegetables. From this immense variety of bodies, it is often

spontaneously disengaged; its great levity makes it rise into the

superior regions of the atmosphere; and when, either by an electrical

spark, or any casual elevation of temperature, it takes fire, it may

produce such meteors or luminous appearances as are occasionally seen in

the atmosphere. Of this kind are probably those broad flashes which we

often see on a summer-evening, without hearing any detonation.

EMILY.

Every flash, I suppose, must produce a quantity of water?

CAROLINE.

And this water, naturally, descends in the form of rain?

MRS. B.

That probably is often the case, though it is not a necessary

consequence; for the water may be dissolved by the atmosphere, as it

descends towards the lower regions, and remain there in the form of

clouds.

The application of electrical attraction to chemical phenomena is likely

to lead to many very interesting discoveries in meteorology; for

electricity evidently acts a most important part in the atmosphere. This

subject however, is, as yet, not sufficiently developed for me to

venture enlarging upon it. The phenomena of the atmosphere are far from

being well understood; and even with the little that is known, I am but

imperfectly acquainted.

But before we take leave of hydrogen, I must not omit to mention to you

a most interesting discovery of Sir H. Davy, which is connected with

this subject.

CAROLINE.

You allude, I suppose, to the new miner’s lamp, which has of late been

so much talked of? I have long been desirous of knowing what that

discovery was, and what purpose it was intended to answer.

MRS. B.

It often happens in coal-mines, that quantities of the gas, called by

chemists _hydro-carbonat_, or by the miners _fire-damp_, (the same from

which the gas-lights are obtained,) ooze out from fissures in the beds

of coal, and fill the cavities in which the men are at work; and this

gas being inflammable, the consequence is, that when the men approach

those places with a lighted candle, the gas takes fire, and explosions

happen which destroy the men and horses employed in that part of the

colliery, sometimes in great numbers.

EMILY.

What tremendous accidents these must be! But whence does that gas

originate?

MRS. B.

Being the chief product of the combustion of coal, no wonder that

inflammable gas should occasionally appear in situations in which this

mineral abounds, since there can be no doubt that processes of

combustion are frequently taking place at a great depth under the

surface of the earth; and therefore those accumulations of gas may arise

either from combustions actually going on, or from former combustions,

the gas having perhaps been confined there for ages.

CAROLINE.

And how does Sir H. Davy’s lamp prevent those dreadful explosions?

MRS. B.

By a contrivance equally simple and ingenious; and one which does no

less credit to the philosophical views from which it was deduced, than

to the philanthropic motives from which the enquiry sprung. The

principle of the lamp is shortly this: It was ascertained, two or three

years ago, both by Mr. Tennant and by Sir Humphry himself, that the

combustion of inflammable gas could not be propagated through small

tubes; so that if a jet of an inflammable gaseous mixture, issuing from

a bladder or any other vessel, through a small tube, be set fire to, it

burns at the orifice of the tube, but the flame never penetrates into

the vessel. It is upon this fact that Sir Humphry’s safety-lamp is

founded.

EMILY.

But why does not the flame ever penetrate through the tube into the

vessel from which the gas issues, so as to explode at once the whole of

the gas?

MRS. B.

Because, no doubt, the inflamed gas is so much cooled in its passage

through a small tube as to cease to burn before the combustion reaches

the reservoir.

CAROLINE.

And how can this principle be applied to the construction of a lamp?

MRS. B.

Nothing easier. You need only suppose a lamp enclosed all round in glass

or horn, but having a number of small open tubes at the bottom, and

others at the top, to let the air in and out. Now, if such a lamp or

lanthorn be carried into an atmosphere capable of exploding, an

explosion or combustion of the gas will take place within the lamp; and

although the vent afforded by the tubes will save the lamp from

bursting, yet, from the principle just explained, the combustion will

not be propagated to the external air through the tubes, so that no

farther consequence will ensue.

EMILY.

And is that all the mystery of that valuable lamp?

MRS. B.

Conversations on Chemistry, V. 1-2 In Which the Elements of that Science Are Familiarly Explained and Illustrated by Experiments · 第 11 / 33 段