As lodged in my memory, the third line was,--

"But this I'm sure I know full well."

That Dr. Fell, with some learning and a character for loyalty, had

somewhat in him which a discerning observer could not like, is become

notorious since the publication of his correspondence with the

obsequious and unprincipled Earl of Sunderland respecting Locke, whom

James II. wished the Dean to deprive of the income he received as a

student of Christ Church. (See Appendix to _Fox's History of Early Part

of Reign of James II._) Dr. Fell there tells the Earl that he had long

watched Mr. Locke, and made "strict inquiries," but that no person had

ever heard him speak a word against the government. He adds, that

language disparaging Locke's political friends had frequently been used

for the treacherous purpose of provoking such replies as might have been

used to his ruin, but hitherto all in vain; and that, as he had

withdrawn to the Continent, some other plan must now be adopted. He

accordingly proposes a mode of ensnaring him, subjoining, that if the

King would simply order his expulsion, the mandate should be obeyed,

without asking for any proof of his deserving such a sentence. This was

accordingly done; but in two short years the circumstances of all the

parties were changed. The Bishop and Dean was gone to appear before Him

who has said, "Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment;" the King had

withdrawn to the Continent, expelled by his own terrors, and deprived of

his inheritance; Locke was returning to his native land, to be counted

one of its chief ornaments; the Earl of Sunderland had betrayed his

master, and was desiring to be allowed to do any dirty work for another.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 129, April 17, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 121 / 154 题