E. S. TAYLOR.

_Analysis._--Is algebra rightly termed analysis? Edgar Poe, a very queer

American author, maintains the negative: he also enters into the

question as to whether games of skill and chance are useful to the

analytical powers, and gives the preference to draughts over chess, and

to whist over either. But he seems to think the chief applications of

analysis are to the interpretation of cryptographies, the

disentanglement of police puzzles, and the solution of charades!

There is, however, plausibility in his theory that a good analyst must

be both poet and mathematician. This is Ruskin's "imagination

penetrative:" such a faculty belonged to the minds of Verulam and

Newton, of Kepler and Galileo. I do not, however, see the necessity of

Ruskin's threefold division of the "imaginative faculty." Would not

"imagination analytic and creative" suffice?

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 129, April 17, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 65 / 154 题