It will be recollected that Ashmole, in his Diary, says--

"Decem. 12, 1659. Mr. Tredescant and his wife told me they had

been long considering upon whom to bestow their close of

curiosities when they died, and at last resolved to give it unto

me."

Two days afterwards (on the 14th) they had given their scrivener

instructions to prepare a deed of gift to that effect, which was

executed by Tredescant, his wife being a subscribing witness on the

16th, as Ashmole records with astrological minuteness, "5 hor. 30

minutes post meridian." On May 30th, 1662, little more than a month

after John Tredescant's death, he records--

"This Easter term, I preferred a bill in Chancery against Mrs.

Tredescant, for the rarities her husband had settled on me."

Dr. Hamel succeeded in finding the protocols in this suit among the

records of the Court of Chancery, in which Ashmole sets forth, that in

December, 1659, he visited the Tredescants in South Lambeth, and that he

was entertained by Tredescant and his wife with great professions of

kindness. That Mrs. Tredescant told him that her husband had come to the

determination to bequeath to him "the rarities and antiquities, bookes,

coynes, medalls, stones, pictures, and mechanicks contained in his

Closett of Raryties, knowing the great esteeme and value he put upon

it." That Tredescant himself had afterwards said to him, that in

acknowledgment of his (Ashmole's) previous trouble concerning the

preparation of the catalogue of his museum and gardens[2], he purposed

to do so, and that in effect Ashmole and Mrs. Tredescant, as long as she

lived, should enjoy it together. Ashmole also says, Tredescant had made

it a condition that he should, after Mrs. Tredescant's decease, pay a

certain Mary Edmonds, or her children, one hundred pounds sterling. That

he did then actually let a deed be prepared, by which he made over to

him his collection of every kind of curiosities of nature and art within

or near the house (Ashmole here cunningly includes the botanic garden);

Mrs. Tredescant was to have the joint proprietorship, and nothing was to

be abstracted from the collection.

[Footnote 2: In the preface to the catalogue the assistance of two

friends is mentioned; it appears that the other was Dr. Thomas

Warton.]

This deed Tredescant had, on the 16th of December (1659), confirmed

under his hand and seal. Mrs. Tredescant fetched a Queen Elizabeth's

milled shilling, which Tredescant handed over to him, together with the

conveyance, and thereby he came into possession of the collection.[3]

[Footnote 3: Ashmole says, "It was not thought fit to clogge the

deed with the payment of the said hundred pounds to Mrs. Edmonds

or her children, to the end that the same might better appear to

be a free and generous gift, and therefore the consideracion of

the deed was expressed to be for the entire affeccion and singular

esteeme the said John Tredescant had to him (Ashmole), who he did

not doubt would preserve and augment the said rarities for

posterity." He declares that he will pay the money; and in his

Diary we find that after Mrs. Tredescant's death, in 1678, he pays

to a Mrs. Lea, probably one of the daughters of Mrs. Edmonds, one

hundred pounds.]

Mrs. Tredescant had signed the deed as witness; but, when Ashmole was

about to leave the house, she had requested him to leave it with her, as

she wished to ask some of her friends whether, by having signed it as

witness, her right as joint proprietress of the collection might not be

diminished. He left the document with her, in expectation that it would

soon be restored to him, but this was never done. Now, after the death

of Tredescant, she maintains that her husband never made such a

conveyance; but the truth is she has burnt or destroyed it in some other

manner.

Against this Mrs. Tredescant refers to her husband's last will and

testament of the 4th of May, 1661, by which all previous dispositions of

his property, of whatever kind, were declared invalid, and strongly

urges that the museum was expressly bequeathed to her and her alone,

with the stipulation that she should leave it either to the University

of Oxford or to that of Cambridge. And she adds, that she had determined

to leave it to the University of Oxford.

I must not now further trespass upon your space; you shall have the

sequel for your next Number.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 129, April 17, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 57 / 154 题