That there has been no encouragement given, to this day, for the

establishment and cultivation of two such important articles to all

British subjects, can be accounted for on no other principle, but that

of custom, founded upon the strongest prejudice. From the first time

that a Latin grammar is put into our hands, we are taught to believe,

that a complete knowlege of Latin and Greek will of course give a

complete knowlege of English; that reading the ancient writers upon

oratory will furnish us with all the powers of elocution; that the same

master who instructs pupils in the one, can also teach the other; and

that, therefore, any particular establishments for those purposes would

be unnecessary: and this prepossession has been so early in life, and

with such force stamped upon us, that neither the experience of more

than two centuries, nor daily demonstration to the contrary, are able to

erase it. Nor need we wonder, that the prejudice has been so universal,

when we reflect that some of the most eminent men that these countries

have produced were strongly tinctured with it: nay, when we find, in the

passage before quoted, that the clear-sighted and candid Mr. Locke was

so blinded by it, as not to see that, in the very instance mentioned by

him, with regard to the French, he had attributed our deficiency to a

wrong cause. For though he has laid the whole blame of the want of

culture and improvement in the English tongue, on the masters of

grammar-schools, yet he shews clearly, that the culture and improvement

of the French took their rise from another source; where he says, 'We

see the polity of some of our neighbours hath not thought it beneath the

"public care to promote and reward the improvement of their own

language." Polishing and enriching their tongue is no small business

amongst them; "it hath colleges and stipends appointed it;" and there is

raised amongst them a great ambition and emulation of writing

correctly.' Was it not, therefore, more natural to impute the low state

of English amongst us to the want of such institutions and

encouragement, than to the neglect of masters who do not profess to

teach it? And was it not more rational to expect the improvement of our

tongue from the same methods which brought forward the French; from

public encouragement, from colleges and stipends appointed it, than from

one which never was found to answer, nay, which, in its own nature,

never can answer the end? In like manner, in speaking of elocution, he

has imputed our general deficiency in that point also, to the neglect of

the masters of grammar-schools; though, at the same time, he clearly

points out the only means by which knowlege in that art can be acquired,

in these-words: 'This (speaking of elocution), as all other things of

practice, is to be learned not by a few, or a great many rules given,

but by exercise and application, according to good rules, or rather

patterns, till habits are got, and a facility of doing it well.' Now, if

there be no such system of rules in being, with regard to English

elocution, how can a master give his pupils practice according to good

rules? Or what pattern can he afford them, but in himself? And is such a

model likely to be a perfect one? Is it not probable, that masters of

grammar-schools may have contracted bad habits in that respect, as well

as any others trained in the same way? Will the profession itself

inspire them with propriety of pronunciation, proper management of the

voice, and graceful gesture and deportment? It is time to put an end to

such gross prejudice. After waiting for more than two centuries, to no

purpose, in hopes that things would mend in one way, it is more than

time that another course should be tried. The only method which can be

followed with success, is obvious enough. When Cicero gave a definition

of elocution, he, at the same time, pointed out the means by which it is

to be acquired. His words are these: "Pronunciatio est vocis, et vultus,

et gestus moderatio, cum venustate. Haec omnia tribus modis assequi

poterimus, arte, imitatione, exercitatione[14]." Here we see that art is

placed first; and, indeed, without that guide our labour would be either

fruitless, or productive of error. Imitation alone can go no farther

than to give us the manner of those whom we imitate; if that be bad, the

imitation of it must be so too; but if it should be good upon the whole,

and faulty only in part, it doth not follow that we shall acquire both

in the same degree; on the contrary, it is generally the case, that the

faulty part only, as being the most easily caught, is the consequence

of imitation without art: and practice grounded upon such imitation, can

only serve to confirm and rivet us in error.

[Footnote 14: "Elocution is the proper and graceful management of the

voice, the countenance and gesture in speaking. These we shall be able

to acquire by three ways, art, imitation, practice."]

Since, therefore, nothing can be done without art, and all art is

founded upon principles, and should be taught by rules, the first

necessary step is, to trace the principles of elocution. Those once

discovered, to establish upon them a system of rules, peculiarly adapted

to the genius of the English tongue, whereby the art of elocution may be

as regularly acquired as any other art now is, and a knowlege of

English, so far as regards elocution, methodically obtained. To shew

that this is far from being impracticable, is one of the chief objects

of the first course of lectures which I propose to give upon these

subjects. In this course I shall endeavour to lay open the principles of

elocution, and the peculiar constitution of the English language, with

regard to the powers of sound and numbers, in a method, which should it

prove to be as rational as it is new, will, I hope, give the author of

these lectures no cause to repent of the time and pains which his

researches into these abstruse subjects have cost him. He hopes also to

see some good fruits immediately produced from this first course; and

that not only the young, but the adult, who should not think these

points below their attention, may, from the knowlege of those

principles, and some general rules deduced from them, have sure lights

to guide them in their future enquiries into those subjects, hitherto

involved in the shades of darkness; or obscurely and falsely viewed

through the mists of error.

Should his principles be allowed to be just, and his system so far meet

with the sanction of men of learning and discernment, he will be

encouraged to proceed from a general, to a more particular course; in

which he hopes to give all necessary lights to assist, not only

speculation, but practice; and by going up to the very first elements,

point out a regular way by which children may be rightly trained in the

art of speaking, and knowlege of their mother tongue, from the earliest

rudiments; instead of being necessarily corrupted and led astray, by the

false principles and rules which at present are laid down to them, from

the moment the primer is put into their hands, and of the bad effects

of which, few ever get the better during the remainder of their lives.

Should it be known in the world, that a design was set on foot at the

universities, of introducing the study of the English language, and the

art of speaking, upon a practicable plan, and in a systematic way, there

would not be wanting all due encouragement to such an undertaking from

many of their grateful offspring. What numbers of their illustrious

sons, when they have entered into life, have had occasion to lament,

that through the neglect of these necessary branches, the chief

advantages of their education have been concealed from the world; and

all their funds of knowlege, like the hoards of misers, shut up in their

own breasts. How many well instructed minds, and honest hearts,

furnished with the means, and most ardent inclination to serve their

country, have sat still in silent indignation, where her interests were

nearly concerned, for want of a practised tongue to disclose what passed

in their minds? How many of our wisest members, in the great national

council, has shame on that score, kept silent like Mr. Addison? And how

many others, after a few attempts, have closed their lips for ever,

from self-disappointment, in not finding their utterance correspond to

their conceptions? The experience of what they have suffered on such

occasions, will teach them to feel, and as far as in them lies, to

prevent the sufferings of others in like circumstances.

Should, therefore, upon a candid examination, the proposed plan be

judged practicable, there cannot be any doubt but that there would be

many found sufficiently jealous of the honour of their country, to

contribute to the support of such an establishment, as might wipe away

that stain of barbarism which still rests upon this nation, of having

left their language hitherto to the guidance of chance: and when it is

considered, that no country ever produced so many instances of private

benefactions for public service, particularly in the seminaries of

learning, it is to be supposed, that, in case of future endowments, a

due attention will be paid to that language which is now solely used on

all public occasions throughout these realms, and whose improved state

must add to the glory of the nation, as well as to that art, which, of

all others, is most likely to contribute to the benefit and ornament of

individuals, and of the state in general.

Here I cannot help observing, how necessary the introduction of these

studies will be to the promoting, and rendering more effectual, the new

institutions, which have been lately adopted by the wisdom of the

university of Oxford. And first, as to the Vinerean endowment for the

study of the law. It has been lately proved, by the strongest and

clearest arguments, that not only they who intend to make that their

profession, but that all gentlemen in general should acquire a competent

knowlege in that branch; but more especially such as have reason to

expect that they shall become members of the legislative body. Would it

not be a strong inducement to such noblemen or gentlemen to apply more

closely to such a study, if, at the same time, they were practised and

perfected in an art, which alone could enable them to display to

advantage their superior knowlege in the constitution and laws of their

country, to their own honour and credit, and support of that

constitution, and those laws? And, with respect to Lord Clarendon's

benefaction for the introduction of the bodily exercises, that

institution may not of itself be found a sufficient inducement to

prolong the stay of young gentlemen at the university beyond the usual

time, or put an end to the custom of going upon their travels at the

most unfit and dangerous season of life (which has proved the chief bane

of our British youth), inasmuch as those exercises can also be acquired

abroad; and, from caprice or fashion, perhaps, it will be thought too in

a more perfect way. But should a critical inquiry into the genius and

powers of their own tongue succeed to their knowlege of Latin and Greek;

should they be regularly instructed and practised in the art of

elocution, in all its various branches; in that case, the most necessary

and ornamental of all accomplishments to British subjects could be had

only in this country, and would of course detain them from all foreign

academies or masters. The very delight which would accompany both the

speculative and practical part of those studies, would hold them by the

surest tie, that of inclination.

Should eloquence, that "regina rerum," establish her throne here, they

would with pleasure pay her homage; they would listen to the voice of

the charmer, far sweeter than the syren's song; nor would they quit the

academic grove, till they were masters of the harmony which reigned

there. Possessed of that, how greedily would they hoard up knowlege of

all kinds, which they might then be enabled to draw forth at will, and

display to the utmost advantage! They would not, in that case, think of

going into life, till they were well qualified to discharge whatever

office they should enter upon. Or such as chose to travel, might then do

it with great benefit to themselves, and to their country. "We should

not then need" (to make use of a passage in Milton) "the Monsieurs of

Paris to take our hopeful youth into their slight and prodigal

custodies, and send them over back again transformed into mimics, apes,

and kickshaws. But if they desire to see other countries at two or

three-and-twenty years of age, not to learn principles, but to enlarge

experience, and make wise observation, they will, by that time, be such

as shall deserve the regard and honour of all men where they pass, and

the society and friendship of those in all places, who are best, and

most eminent. And, perhaps, then other nations will be glad to visit

us for their breeding, or else to imitate us in their own country. Or

whether they be to speak in parliament or council, honour and attention

would be waiting on their lips. There would then also appear in pulpits

other visages, other gestures, and stuff otherwise wrought, than what we

now sit under, oft-times to as great trial of our patience, as any other

that they preach to us."

As the motives to the study of elocution will, probably, be allowed to

be sufficiently strong, it would be no small inducement to set about the

work with vigour, if there were reason to believe, that the speedy

accomplishment of the point would follow the attempt; and that we have

just grounds for such an opinion, we may easily see, by considering the

state of that art in the only country where we can exactly trace its

rise and progress. We know that in Rome, from the time that oratory was

first regularly taught there as an art, it arrived to its maturity in a

very short space; and if it can be shewn, that we enjoy great advantages

over the Romans in all the material points necessary to the perfection

of that art, it is but reasonable to conclude, that its progress here

might be still more rapid.

As this matter has already been discussed in an essay, called,[15]

British Education, and as I shall have sufficient opportunities, in my

course of lectures, to prove all that has been there advanced, it would

be unnecessary, in this place, to expatiate upon this head.

And as I fear that I have already exhausted your patience, I shall

hasten to close, with the same exhortation to the revival of the art of

elocution, which Quintilian used to the Romans, to engage them in the

support of it, when in its declining state.

After having invalidated several objections to the study of that art, he

concludes thus: "Ante omnia sufficit ad exhortationem studiorum, non

cadere in rerum naturam, ut quicquid non est factum, ne fieri quidem

possit: cum omnia quae magna sunt atque admirabilia, tempus aliquod quo

primum efficerentur, habuerint. Verum etiam si quis summa desperet (quod

cur faciat, cui ingenium, valetudo, facultas, praeceptor, non deerunt?)

tamen est (ut Cicero ait) pulchrum in secundis tertiisque consistere.

Adde quod magnos modica quoque eloquentia parit fructus: ac si quis haec

studia utilitate sola metiatur, pene illi perfectae par est. Neque erat

difficile, vel veteribus, vel novis exemplis palam facere; non aliunde

majores honores, opes, amicitias, laudem praesentem, futuram, hominibus

contigisse, si tamen dignum literis esset, ab opere pulcherrimo, (cujus

tractatus, atque ipsa possessio, plenissimam studiis gratiam refert)

hanc minorem exigere mercedem, more eorum qui a se non virtutes, sed

voluptatem quae fit ex virtutibus, peti dicunt. Ipsam igitur orandi

majestatem, qua nihil Dii mortales melius homini dederunt, et qua remota

muta sunt omnia, et luce praesenti et memoria posteritatis carent, toto

animo petamus, nitamurque semper ad optima: quod facientes, aut evademus

in summum, aut certe multos infra nos videbimus."

[Footnote 15: Vide B. I. Ch. xv. B. II. Ch. ix.]

FINIS.

NOTES TO THE TEXT

In the following notes, numbers refer to pages and lines in the present

text. All translations from the Latin are from Loeb Classical Library

editions.

6:1-8. Thomas Sheridan, _British Education_ (London, 1756), p. 52.

6:24-7:7. _Ibid._, p. 53.

12:4-6. _Aeneid_, V, 194. Trans. H. Ruston Fairclough. "No more do I

seek the first place ... it were a shame to return last."

17:7-22. _British Education_, p. 85.

17:26-18:15. _Ibid._, pp. 85-86.

19:24-20:5. _De Oratore_, III.xxxv.143. Trans. H. Rackham. "But if on

the contrary we are trying to find the one thing that stands top of the

whole list, the prize must go to the orator who possesses the learning.

And if they allow him also to be a philosopher, that is the end of the

dispute; but if they keep the two separate, they will come off second

best in this, that the consummate orator possesses all the knowledge of

the philosophers, but the range of philosophers does not necessarily

include eloquence."

37:22-24. _Brutus_, vi. 23.

38:11-12. Horace, _Epistles_, I.ii.43. Trans. H. Ruston Fairclough. "...

waiting for the river to run out: yet on it glides, and on it will

glide, rolling its flood forever."

38:20-23. Richard Steele, _Spectator_, 484, 15 September 1712.

38:25-39:3. George Berkeley, "The Querist," in _Works_, ed. A. A. Luce

and T. E. Jessop (London, 1948), IV, Query 203.

39:7-41:11. John Locke, "Some Thoughts Concerning Education," in _Works_

(London, 1823), IX, 181-182.

47:10-19. _Ibid._, p. 182.

48:9-15. _Ibid._, p. 179. Sheridan indicates that Locke is discussing

elocution, but his topic is writing and speaking.

49:9-13. _Rhetorica ad Herennium_, I.ii.3.

56:14-57:3. John Milton, "Of Education," _Works_ (New York, 1931), IV,

290-291.

57:3-10. _Ibid._, pp. 286-287.

58:17-59:23. _Institutio Oratoria_, XII.xi. 25-26, 29-30. Trans. H. E.

Butler. "To which I reply that sufficient encouragement for study may be

found in the fact, firstly, that nature does not forbid such achievement

and it does not follow that, because a thing never has been done, it

therefore never can be done, and secondly, that all great achievements

have required time for their first accomplishment.... Finally, whatever

is best in its own sphere must at some previous time have been

nonexistent. But even if a man despair of reaching supreme excellence

(and why should he despair, if he have talents, health, capacity and

teachers to aid him?), it is none the less a fine achievement, as Cicero

says, to win the rank of second or even third.... Add to this the

further consideration that even moderate eloquence is often productive

of great results and, if such studies are to be measured solely by their

utility, is almost equal to the perfect eloquence for which we seek. Nor

would it be difficult to produce either ancient or recent examples to

show that there is no other source from which men have reaped such a

harvest of wealth, honour, friendship and glory, both present and to

come. But it would be a disgrace to learning to follow the fashion of

those who say that they pursue not virtue, but only the pleasure derived

from virtue, and to demand this meaner recompense from the noblest of

all arts, whose practice and even whose possession is ample reward for

all our labours. Wherefore let us seek with all our hearts that true

majesty of oratory, the fairest gift of god to man, without which all

things are stricken dumb and robbed alike of present glory and the

immortal record of posterity; and let us press forward to whatsoever is

best, since, if we do this, we shall either reach the summit or at least

see many others far beneath us."

THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY

WILLIAM ANDREWS CLARK MEMORIAL LIBRARY

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES

PUBLICATIONS IN PRINT

[Illustration]

1948-1949

16. Henry Nevil Payne, _The Fatal Jealousie_ (1673).

18. Anonymous, "Of Genius," in _The Occasional Paper_, Vol. III, No. 10

(1719), and Aaron Hill, Preface to _The Creation_ (1720).

1949-1950

19. Susanna Centlivre, _The Busie Body_ (1709).

20. Lewis Theobald, _Preface to the Works of Shakespeare_ (1734).

22. Samuel Johnson, _The Vanity of Human Wishes_ (1749), and two

_Rambler_ papers (1750).

23. John Dryden, _His Majesties Declaration Defended_ (1681).

1951-1952

31. Thomas Gray, _An Elegy Wrote in a Country Churchyard_ (1751), and

_The Eton College Manuscript_.

1952-1953

41. Bernard Mandeville, _A Letter to Dion_ (1732).

1963-1964

104. Thomas D'Urfey, _Wonders in the Sun; or, The Kingdom of the Birds_

(1706).

1964-1965

110. John Tutchin, _Selected Poems_ (1685-1700).

111. Anonymous, _Political Justice_ (1736).

112. Robert Dodsley, _An Essay on Fable_ (1764).

113. T. R., _An Essay Concerning Critical and Curious Learning_ (1698).

114. _Two Poems Against Pope_: Leonard Welsted, _One Epistle to Mr. A.

Pope_ (1730), and Anonymous, _The Blatant Beast_ (1742).

1965-1966

115. Daniel Defoe and others, _Accounts of the Apparition of Mrs. Veal_.

116. Charles Macklin, _The Covent Garden Theatre_ (1752).

117. Sir George L'Estrange, _Citt and Bumpkin_ (1680).

118. Henry More, _Enthusiasmus Triumphatus_ (1662).

119. Thomas Traherne, _Meditations on the Six Days of the Creation_

(1717).

120. Bernard Mandeville, _Aesop Dress'd or a Collection of Fables_

(1704).

1966-1967

123. Edmond Malone, _Cursory Observations on the Poems Attributed to Mr.

Thomas Rowley_ (1782).

124. Anonymous, _The Female Wits_ (1704).

125. Anonymous, _The Scribleriad_ (1742). Lord Hervey, _The Difference

Between Verbal and Practical Virtue_ (1742).

126. _Le Lutrin: an Heroick Poem, Written Originally in French by

Monsieur Boileau: Made English by N. O._ (1682).

1967-1968

127-128. Charles Macklin, _A Will and No Will, or a Bone for the

Lawyers_ (1746). _The New Play Criticiz'd, or The Plague of Envy_

(1747).

129. Lawrence Echard, Prefaces to _Terence's Comedies_ (1694) and

_Plautus's Comedies_ (1694).

130. Henry More, _Democritus Platonissans_ (1646).

131. John Evelyn, _The History of Sabatai Sevi, The Suppos'd Messiah of

the Jews_ (1669).

132. Walter Harte, _An Essay on Satire, Particularly on the Dunciad_

(1730).

Publications of the first fifteen years of the Society (numbers 1-90)

are available in paperbound units of six issues at $16.00 per unit, from

the Kraus Reprint Company, 16 East 46th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.

Publications in print are available at the regular membership rate of

$5.00 yearly. Prices of single issues may be obtained upon request.

Subsequent publications may be checked in the annual prospectus.

William Andrews Clark Memorial Library: University of California, Los

Angeles

THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY

2520 CIMARRON STREET, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90018

_General Editors_: William E. Conway, William Andrews Clark Memorial

Library; George Robert Guffey, University of California, Los Angeles;

Maximillian E. Novak, University of California, Los Angeles

_Corresponding Secretary_: Mrs. Edna C. Davis, William Andrews Clark

Memorial Library

The Society's purpose is to publish rare Restoration and

eighteenth-century works (usually as facsimile reproductions). All

income of the Society is devoted to defraying costs of publication and

mailing.

Correspondence concerning memberships in the United States and Canada

should be addressed to the Corresponding Secretary at the William

Andrews Clark Memorial Library, 2520 Cimarron Street, Los Angeles,

California. Correspondence concerning editorial matters may be addressed

to the General Editors at the same address. Manuscripts of introductions

should conform to the recommendations of the MLA _Style Sheet_. The

membership fee is $5.00 a year in the United States and Canada and

L1.16.6 in Great Britain and Europe. British and European prospective

members should address B. H. Blackwell, Broad Street, Oxford, England.

Copies of back issues in print may be obtained from the Corresponding

Secretary.

Publications of the first fifteen years of the Society (numbers 1-90)

are available in paperbound units of six issues at $16.00 per unit, from

the Kraus Reprint Company, 16 East 46th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.

Make check or money order payable to THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA

REGULAR PUBLICATIONS FOR 1968-1969

133. John Courtenay, _A Poetical Review of the Literary and Moral

Character of the Late Samuel Johnson_ (1786). Introduction by

Robert E. Kelley.

134. John Downes, _Roscius Anglicanus_ (1708). Introduction by John

Loftis.

135. Sir John Hill, _Hypochondriasis, a Practical Treatise on the

Nature and Cure of that Disorder Call'd the Hyp or Hypo_ (1766).

Introduction by G. S. Rousseau.

136. Thomas Sheridan, _Discourse ... Being Introductory to His

Course of Lectures on Elocution and the English Language_ (1759).

Introduction by G. P. Mohrman.

137. Arthur Murphy, _The Englishman From Paris_ (1756).

Introduction by Simon Trefman. Previously unpublished manuscript.

138. [Catherine Trotter], _Olinda's Adventures_ (1718).

Introduction by Robert Adams Day.

SPECIAL PUBLICATION FOR 1968-1969

_After THE TEMPEST._ Introduction by George Robert Guffey.

Next in the continuing series of special publications by the Society

will be _After THE TEMPEST_, a volume including the Dryden-Davenant

version of _The Tempest_ (1670); the "operatic" _Tempest_ (1674); Thomas

Duffet's _Mock-Tempest_ (1675); and the "Garrick" _Tempest_ (1756), with

an Introduction by George Robert Guffey.

Already published in this series are:

1. John Ogilby, _The Fables of Aesop Paraphras'd in Verse_ (1668),

with an Introduction by Earl Miner.

2. John Gay, _Fables_ (1727, 1738), with an Introduction by Vinton

A. Dearing.

3. Elkanah Settle, _The Empress of Morocco_ (1673) with five

plates; _Notes and Observations on the Empress of Morocco_ (1674)

by John Dryden, John Crowne and Thomas Shadwell; _Notes and

Observations on the Empress of Morocco Revised_ (1674) by Elkanah

Settle; and _The Empress of Morocco. A Farce_ (1674) by Thomas

Duffet; with an Introduction by Maximillian E. Novak.

A Discourse Being Introductory to his Course of Lectures on Elocution and the English Language (1759) · 第 3 / 4 段