CHAPTER V.

EARLY HISTORY OF THE LOCOMOTIVE--GEORGE STEPHENSON BEGINS ITS

IMPROVEMENT.

The rapid increase in the coal-trade of the Tyne about the beginning of

the present century had the effect of stimulating the ingenuity of

mechanics, and encouraging them to devise improved methods of

transporting the coal from the pits to the shipping places. From our

introductory chapter, it will have been observed that the improvements

which had thus far been effected were confined almost entirely to the

road. The railway waggons still continued to be drawn by horses. By

improving and flattening the tramway, considerable economy in horse-power

had indeed been secured; but unless some more effective method of

mechanical traction could be devised, it was clear that railway

improvement had almost reached its limits.

Many expedients had been tried with this object. One of the earliest was

that of hoisting sails upon the waggons, and driving them along the

waggon-way, as a ship is driven through the water by the wind. This

method seems to have been employed by Sir Humphrey Mackworth, an

ingenious coal-miner at Neath in Glamorganshire, about the end of the

seventeenth century.

After having been lost sight of for more than a century, the same plan of

impelling carriages was revived by Richard Lovell Edgworth, with the

addition of a portable railway, since revived also, in Boydell's patent.

But although Mr. Edgworth devoted himself to the subject for many years,

he failed in securing the adoption of his sailing carriage. It is indeed

quite clear that a power so uncertain as wind could never be relied on

for ordinary traffic, and Mr. Edgworth's project was consequently left to

repose in the limbo of the Patent Office, with thousands of other equally

useless though ingenious contrivances.

A much more favourite scheme was the application of steam power for the

purpose of carriage traction. Savery, the inventor of the working

steam-engine, was the first to propose its employment to propel vehicles

along the common roads; and in 1759 Dr. Robison, then a young man

studying at Glasgow College, threw out the same idea to his friend James

Watt; but the scheme was not matured.

[Picture: Cugnot's Engine]

The first locomotive steam-carriage was built at Paris by the French

engineer Cugnot, a native of Lorraine. It is said to have been invented

for the purpose of dragging cannon into the field independent of horses.

The original model of this machine was made in 1763. Count Saxe was so

much pleased with it, that on his recommendation a full-sized engine was

constructed at the cost of the French monarch; and in 1769 it was tried

in the presence of the Duc de Choiseul, Minister of War, General

Gribeauval, and other officers. At one of the experiments it ran with

such force as to knock down a wall in its way. But the new vehicle,

loaded with four persons, could not travel faster than two and a half

miles an hour. The boiler was insufficient in size, and it could only

work for about fifteen minutes; after which it was necessary to wait

until the steam had again risen to a sufficient pressure. To remedy this

defect, Cugnot constructed a new machine in 1770, the working of which

was more satisfactory. It was composed of two parts--the fore part

consisting of a small steam-engine, formed of a round copper boiler, with

a furnace inside, provided with two small chimneys and two single-acting

brass steam cylinders, whose pistons acted alternately upon the single

driving-wheel. The hinder part consisted merely of a rude carriage on

two wheels to carry the load, furnished with a seat in front for the

conductor. This engine was tried in the streets of Paris; but when

passing near where the Madeleine now stands, it overbalanced itself on

turning a corner, and fell over with a crash; after which, its employment

being thought dangerous, it was locked up in the arsenal to prevent

further mischief. The machine is, however, still to be seen in the

collection of the Conservatoire des Arts et Metiers at Paris. It has

very much the look of a long brewer's cart, with the addition of the

circular boiler hung on at one end. Rough though it looks, it was a

highly creditable piece of work, considering the period at which it was

executed; and as the first actual machine constructed for the purpose of

travelling on ordinary roads by the power of steam, it is certainly a

most curious and interesting mechanical relic, well worthy of

preservation.

But though Cugnot's road locomotive remained locked up from public sight,

the subject was not dead; for we find inventors employing themselves from

time to time in attempting to solve the problem of steam locomotion in

places far remote from Paris. The idea had taken root in the minds of

inventors, and was striving to grow into a reality. Thus Oliver Evans,

the American, invented a steam carriage in 1772 to travel on common

roads; in 1787 he obtained from the State of Maryland an exclusive right

to make and use steam-carriages, but his invention never came into use.

Then, in 1784, William Symington, one of the early inventors of the

steamboat, was similarly occupied in Scotland in endeavouring to develop

the latent powers of the steam-carriage. He had a working model of one

constructed, which he exhibited in 1786 to the professors of Edinburgh

College; but the state of the Scotch roads was then so bad that he found

it impracticable to proceed further with his scheme, which he shortly

after abandoned in favour of steam navigation.

[Picture: Section of Murdock's Model]

The same year in which Symington was occupied upon his steam-carriage,

William Murdock, the friend and assistant of Watt, constructed his model

of a locomotive at the opposite end of the island--at Redruth in

Cornwall. His model was of small dimensions, standing little more than a

foot high; and it was until recently in the possession of the son of the

inventor, at whose house we saw it a few years ago. The annexed section

will give an idea of the arrangements of this machine.

It acted on the high-pressure principle, and, like Cugnot's engine, ran

upon three wheels, the boiler being heated by a spirit-lamp. Small

though the machine was, it went so fast on one occasion that it fairly

outran its inventor. It seems that one night after returning from his

duties at the Redruth mine, Murdock determined to try the working of his

model locomotive. For this purpose he had recourse to the walk leading

to the church, about a mile from the town. It was rather narrow, and was

bounded on each side by high hedges. The night was dark, and Murdock set

out alone to try his experiment. Having lit his lamp, the water boiled

speedily, and off started the engine with the inventor after it. He soon

heard distant shouts of terror. It was too dark to perceive objects; but

he found, on following up the machine, that the cries proceeded from the

worthy pastor of the parish, who, going towards the town, was met on this

lonely road by the hissing and fiery little monster, which he

subsequently declared he had taken to be the Evil One _in propria

persona_. No further steps were, however, taken by Murdock to embody his

idea of a locomotive carriage in a more practical form.

The idea was next taken up by Murdock's pupil, Richard Trevithick, who

resolved on building a steam-carriage adapted for common roads as well as

railways. He took out a patent to secure the right of his invention in

1802. Andrew Vivian, his cousin, joined with him in the patent--Vivian

finding the money, and Trevithick the brains. The steam-carriage built

on this patent presented the appearance of an ordinary stage-coach on

four wheels. The engine had one horizontal cylinder, which, together

with the boiler and the furnace-box, was placed in the rear of the hind

axle. The motion of the piston was transmitted to a separate crank-axle,

from which, through the medium of spur-gear, the axle of the

driving-wheel (which was mounted with a fly-wheel) derived its motion.

The steam-cocks and the force-pump, as also the bellows used for the

purpose of quickening combustion in the furnace, were worked off the same

crank-axle.

John Petherick, of Camborne, has related that he remembers this first

English steam-coach passing along the principal street of his native

town. Considerable difficulty was experienced in keeping up the pressure

of steam; but when there was pressure enough, Trevithick would call upon

the people to "jump up," so as to create a load upon the engine. It was

soon covered with men attracted by the novelty, nor did their number seem

to make any difference in the speed of the engine so long as there was

steam enough; but it was constantly running short, and the horizontal

bellows failed to keep it up.

This road-locomotive of Trevithick's was one of the first high-pressure

working engines constructed on the principle of moving a piston by the

elasticity of steam against the pressure only of the atmosphere. Such an

engine had been described by Leopold, though in his apparatus it was

proposed that the pressure should act only on one side of the piston. In

Trevithick's engine the piston was not only raised, but was also

depressed by the action of the steam, being in this respect an entirely

original invention, and of great merit. The steam was admitted from the

boiler under the piston moving in a cylinder, impelling it upward. When

the motion had reached its limit, the communication between the piston

and the under side was shut off, and the steam allowed to escape into the

atmosphere. A passage being then opened between the boiler and the upper

side of the piston, which was pressed downwards, the steam was again

allowed to escape as before. Thus the power of the engine was equal to

the difference between the pressure of the atmosphere and the elasticity

of the steam in the boiler.

This steam-carriage excited considerable interest in the remote district

near the Land's End where it had been erected. Being so far removed from

the great movements and enterprise of the commercial world, Trevithick

and Vivian determined upon exhibiting their machine in the metropolis.

They accordingly set out with it to Plymouth, whence it was conveyed by

sea to London.

The carriage safely reached the metropolis, and excited much public

interest. It also attracted the notice of scientific men, amongst others

of Mr. Davies Gilbert, President of the Royal Society, and Sir Humphry

Davy, both Cornishmen like Trevithick, who went to see the private

performances of the engine, and were greatly pleased with it. Writing to

a Cornish friend shortly after its arrival in town, Sir Humphry said: "I

shall soon hope to hear that the roads of England are the haunts of

Captain Trevithick's dragons--a characteristic name." The machine was

afterwards publicly exhibited in an enclosed piece of ground near Euston

Square, where the London and North-Western Station now stands, and it

dragged behind it a wheel-carriage full of passengers. On the second day

of the performance, crowds flocked to see it; but Trevithick, in one of

his odd freaks, shut up the place, and shortly after removed the engine.

It is, however, probable that the inventor came to the conclusion that

the state of the roads at that time was such as to preclude its coming

into general use for purposes of ordinary traffic.

While the steam-carriage was being exhibited, a gentleman was laying

heavy wagers as to the weight which could be hauled by a single horse on

the Wandsworth and Croydon iron tramway; and the number and weight of

waggons drawn by the horse were something surprising. Trevithick very

probably put the two things together--the steam-horse and the

iron-way--and kept the performance in mind when he proceeded to construct

his second or railway locomotive. The idea was not, however, entirely

new to him; for, although his first engine had been constructed with a

view to its employment upon common roads, the specification of his patent

distinctly alludes to the application of his engine to travelling on

railroads. Having been employed at the iron-works of Pen-y-darran, in

South Wales, to erect a forge engine for the Company, a convenient

opportunity presented itself, on the completion of this work, for

carrying out his design of a locomotive to haul the minerals along the

Pen-y-darran tramway. Such an engine was erected by him in 1803, in the

blacksmiths' shop at the Company's works, and it was finished and ready

for trial before the end of the year.

The boiler of this second engine was cylindrical in form, flat at the

ends, and made of wrought iron. The furnace and flue were inside the

boiler, within which the single cylinder, eight inches in diameter and

four feet six inches stroke, was placed horizontally. As in the first

engine, the motion of the wheels was produced by spur gear, to which was

also added a fly-wheel on one side, to secure a rotatory motion in the

crank at the end of each stroke of the piston in the single cylinder.

The waste steam was thrown into the chimney through a tube inserted into

it at right angles; but it will be obvious that this arrangement was not

calculated to produce any result in the way of a steam-blast in the

chimney. In fact, the waste steam seems to have been turned into the

chimney in order to get rid of the nuisance caused by throwing the jet

directly into the air. Trevithick was here hovering on the verge of a

great discovery; but that he was not aware of the action of the blast in

contributing to increase the draught and thus quicken combustion, is

clear from the fact that he employed bellows for this special purpose;

and at a much later date (1815) he took out a patent which included a

method of urging the fire by means of fanners. {70}

[Picture: Trevithick's High Pressure Tram-Engine]

At the first trial of this engine it succeeded in dragging after it

several waggons, containing ten tons of bar-iron, at the rate of about

five miles an hour. Rees Jones, who worked at the fitting of the engine,

and remembers its performances, says, "She was used for bringing down

metal from the furnaces to the Old Forge. She worked very well; but

frequently, from her weight, broke the tram-plates and the hooks between

the trams. After working for some time in this way, she took a load of

iron from Pen-y-darran down the Basin-road, upon which road she was

intended to work. On the journey she broke a great many of the

tram-plates, and before reaching the basin ran off the road, and had to

be brought back to Pen-y-darran by horses. The engine was never after

used as a locomotive." {71}

It seems to have been felt that unless the road were entirely

reconstructed so as to bear the heavy weight of the locomotive--so much

greater than that of the tram-waggons, to carry which the original rails

had been laid down--the regular employment of Trevithick's high-pressure

tram-engine was altogether impracticable; and as the owners of the works

were not prepared to incur so serious a cost, it was determined to take

the locomotive off the road, and employ it as an engine for other

purposes. It was accordingly dismounted, and used for some time after as

a pumping-engine, for which purpose it was found well adapted.

Trevithick himself seems from this time to have taken no further steps to

bring the locomotive into general use. We find him, shortly after,

engaged upon schemes of a more promising character, abandoning the engine

to other mechanical inventors, though little improvement was made in it

for several years. An imaginary difficulty seems to have tended, amongst

other obstacles, to prevent its adoption; viz., the idea that, if a heavy

weight were placed behind the engine, the "grip" or "bite" of its smooth

wheels upon the equally smooth iron rail, must necessarily be so slight

that they would whirl round upon it, and, consequently, that the machine

would not make progress. Hence Trevithick, in his patent, provided that

the periphery of the driving-wheels should be made rough by the

projection of bolts or cross-grooves, so that the adhesion of the wheels

to the road might be secured.

Following up the presumed necessity for a more effectual adhesion between

the wheels and the rails, Mr. Blenkinsop of Leeds, in 1811, took out a

patent for a racked or tooth-rail laid along one side of the road, into

which the toothed-wheel of his locomotive worked as pinions work into a

rack. The boiler of his engine was supported by a carriage with four

wheels without teeth, and rested immediately upon the axles. These

wheels were entirely independent of the working parts of the engine, and

therefore merely supported its weight upon the rails, the progress being

effected by means of the cogged-wheel working into the cogged-rail. The

engine had two cylinders, instead of one as in Trevithick's engine. The

invention of the double cylinder was due to Matthew Murray, of Leeds, one

of the best mechanical engineers of his time; Mr. Blenkinsop, who was not

a mechanic, having consulted him as to all the practical arrangements.

The connecting-rods gave the motion to two pinions by cranks at right

angles to each other; these pinions communicating the motion to the wheel

which worked into the cogged-rail.

Mr. Blenkinsop's engines began running on the railway from the Middleton

Collieries to Leeds, about 3.5 miles, on the 12th of August, 1812. They

continued for many years to be one of the principal curiosities of the

place, and were visited by strangers from all parts. In 1816, the Grand

Duke Nicholas (afterwards Emperor) of Russia observed the working of

Blenkinsop's locomotive with curious interest and admiration. An engine

dragged as many as thirty coal-waggons at a speed of about 3.25 miles per

hour. These engines continued for many years to be thus employed in the

haulage of coal, and furnished the first instance of the regular

employment of locomotive power for commercial purposes.

The Messrs. Chapman, of Newcastle, in 1812, endeavoured to overcome the

same fictitious difficulty of the want of adhesion between the wheel and

the rail, by patenting a locomotive to work along the road by means of a

chain stretched from one end of it to the other. This chain was passed

once round a grooved barrel-wheel under the centre of the engine: so

that, when the wheel turned, the locomotive, as it were, dragged itself

along the railway. An engine, constructed after this plan, was tried on

the Heaton Railway, near Newcastle; but it was so clumsy in its action,

there was so great a loss of power by friction, and it was found to be so

expensive and difficult to keep in repair, that it was soon abandoned.

Another remarkable expedient was adopted by Mr. Brunton, of the Butterley

Works, Derbyshire, who, in 1813, patented his Mechanical Traveller, to go

_upon legs_ working alternately like those of a horse. {73} But this

engine never got beyond the experimental state, for, at its very first

trial, the driver, to make sure of a good start, overloaded the

safety-valve, when the boiler burst and killed a number of the

bystanders, wounding many more. These, and other contrivances with the

same object, projected about the same time, show that invention was

actively at work, and that many minds were anxiously labouring to solve

the important problem of locomotive traction upon railways.

But the difficulties contended with by these early inventors, and the

step-by-step progress which they made, will probably be best illustrated

by the experiments conducted by Mr. Blackett, of Wylam, which are all the

more worthy of notice, as the persevering efforts of this gentleman in a

great measure paved the way for the labours of George Stephenson, who,

shortly after, took up the question of steam locomotion, and brought it

to a successful issue.

The Wylam waggon-way is one of the oldest in the north of England. Down

to the year 1807 it was formed of wooden spars or rails, laid down

between the colliery at Wylam--where old Robert Stephenson had

worked--and the village of Lemington, some four miles down the Tyne,

where the coals were loaded into keels or barges, and floated down past

Newcastle, to be shipped for London. Each chaldron-waggon had a man in

charge of it, and was originally drawn by one horse. The rate at which

the waggons were hauled was so slow that only two journeys were performed

by each man and horse in one day, and three on the day following. This

primitive waggon-way passed, as before stated, close in front of the

cottage in which George Stephenson was born; and one of the earliest

sights which met his infant eyes was this wooden tramroad worked by

horses.

Mr. Blackett was the first colliery owner in the North who took an active

interest in the locomotive. Having formed the acquaintance of Trevithick

in London, and inspected the performances of his engine, he determined to

repeat the Pen-y-darran experiment upon the Wylam waggon-way. He

accordingly obtained from Trevithick, in October, 1804, a plan of his

engine, provided with "friction-wheels," and employed Mr. John Whinfield,

of Pipewellgate, Gateshead, to construct it at his foundry there. The

engine was constructed under the superintendence of one John Steele, an

ingenious mechanic who had been in Wales, and worked under Trevithick in

fitting the engine at Pen-y-darran. When the Gateshead locomotive was

finished, a temporary way was laid down in the works, on which it was run

backwards and forwards many times. For some reason, however--it is said

because the engine was deemed too light for drawing the coal-trains--it

never left the works, but was dismounted from the wheels, and set to blow

the cupola of the foundry, in which service it long continued to be

employed.

Several years elapsed before Mr. Blackett took any further steps to carry

out his idea. The final abandonment of Trevithick's locomotive at

Pen-y-darran perhaps contributed to deter him from proceeding further;

but he had the wooden tramway taken up in 1808, and a plate-way of

cast-iron laid down instead--a single line furnished with sidings to

enable the laden waggons to pass the empty ones. The new iron road

proved so much smoother than the old wooden one, that a single horse,

instead of drawing one, was now enabled to draw two, or even three, laden

waggons.

Encouraged by the success of Mr. Blenkinsop's experiment at Leeds, Mr.

Blackett determined to follow his example; and in 1812 he ordered a

second engine, to work with a toothed driving-wheel upon a rack-rail.

This locomotive was constructed by Thomas Waters, of Gateshead, under the

superintendence of Jonathan Foster, Mr. Blackett's principal

engine-wright. It was a combination of Trevithick's and Blenkinsop's

engines; but it was of a more awkward construction than either. The

boiler was of cast-iron. The engine was provided with a single cylinder

six inches in diameter, with a fly-wheel working at one side to carry the

crank over the dead points. Jonathan Foster described it to the author

in 1854, as "a strange machine, with lots of pumps, cog-wheels, and

plugs, requiring constant attention while at work." The weight of the

whole was about six tons.

When finished, it was conveyed to Wylam on a waggon, and there mounted

upon a wooden frame supported by four pairs of wheels, which had been

constructed for its reception. A barrel of water, placed on another

frame upon wheels, was attached to it as a tender. After a great deal of

labour, the cumbrous machine was got upon the road. At first it would

not move an inch. Its maker, Tommy Waters, became impatient, and at

length enraged, and taking hold of the lever of the safety valve,

declared in his desperation, that "either _she_ or _he_ should go." At

length the machinery was set in motion, on which, as Jonathan Foster

described to the author "she flew all to pieces, and it was the biggest

wonder i' the world that we were not all blewn up." The incompetent and

useless engine was declared to be a failure; it was shortly after

dismounted and sold; and Mr. Blackett's praiseworthy efforts thus far

proved in vain.

He was still, however, desirous of testing the practicability of

employing locomotive power in working the coal down to Lemington, and he

determined on another trial. He accordingly directed his engine-wright

to proceed with the building of a third engine in the Wylam workshops.

This new locomotive had a single 8-inch cylinder, was provided with a

fly-wheel like its predecessor, and the driving-wheel was cogged on one

side to enable it to travel in the rack-rail laid along the road. This

engine proved more successful than the former one; and it was found

capable of dragging eight or nine loaded waggons, though at the rate of

little more than a mile an hour, from the colliery to the shipping-place.

It sometimes took six hours to perform the journey of five miles. Its

weight was found too great for the road, and the cast-iron plates were

constantly breaking. It was also very apt to get off the rack-rail, and

then it stood still. The driver was one day asked how he got on? "Get

on?" said he, "we don't get on; we only get off!" On such occasions,

horses had to be sent to drag the waggons as before, and others to haul

the engine back to the work-shops. It was constantly getting out of

order; its plugs, pumps, or cranks, got wrong; it was under repair as

often as at work; at length it became so cranky that the horses were

usually sent out after it to drag it when it gave up; and the workmen

generally declared it to be a "perfect plague." Mr. Blackett did not

obtain credit amongst his neighbours for these experiments. Many laughed

at his machines, regarding them only in the light of

crotchets,--frequently quoting the proverb that "a fool and his money are

soon parted." Others regarded them as absurd innovations on the

established method of hauling coal; and pronounced that they would "never

answer."

Notwithstanding, however, the comparative failure of this second

locomotive, Mr. Blackett persevered with his experiments. He was

zealously assisted by Jonathan Foster the engine-wright, and William

Hedley, the viewer of the colliery, a highly ingenious person, who proved

of great use in carrying out the experiments to a successful issue. One

of the chief causes of failure being the rack-rail, the idea occurred to

Mr. Hedley that it might be possible to secure adhesion enough between

the wheel and the rail by the mere weight of the engine, and he proceeded

to make a series of experiments for the purpose of determining this

problem. He had a frame placed on four wheels, and fitted up with

windlasses attached by gearing to the several wheels. The frame having

been properly weighted, six men were set to work the windlasses; when it

was found that the adhesion of the smooth wheels on the smooth rails was

quite sufficient to enable them to propel the machine without slipping.

Having found the proportion which the power bore to the weight, he

demonstrated by successive experiments that the weight of the engine

would of itself produce sufficient adhesion to enable it to draw upon a

smooth railroad the requisite number of waggons in all kinds of weather.

And thus was the fallacy which had heretofore prevailed on this subject

completely exploded, and it was satisfactorily proved that rack-rails,

toothed wheels, endless chains, and legs, were alike unnecessary for the

efficient traction of loaded waggons upon a moderately level road.

From this time forward considerably less difficulty was experienced in

working the coal trains upon the Wylam tramroad. At length the rack-rail

was dispensed with. The road was laid with heavier rails; the working of

the old engine was improved; and a new engine was shortly after built and

placed upon the road, still on eight wheels, driven by seven rack-wheels

working inside them--with a wrought-iron boiler through which the flue

was returned so as largely to increase the heating surface, and thus give

increased power to the engine.

[Picture: Improved Wylam Engine]

As may readily be imagined, the jets of steam from the piston, blowing

off into the air at high pressure while the engine was in motion, caused

considerable annoyance to horses passing along the Wylam road, at that

time a public highway. The nuisance was felt to be almost intolerable,

and a neighbouring gentleman threatened to have it put down. To diminish

the noise as much as possible, Mr. Blackett gave orders that so soon as

any horse, or horses, came in sight, the locomotive was to be stopped,

and the frightful blast of the engine thus suspended until the passing

animals had got out of hearing. Much interruption was thus caused to the

working of the railway, and it excited considerable dissatisfaction

amongst the workmen. The following plan was adopted to abate the

nuisance: a reservoir was provided immediately behind the chimney (as

shown in the preceding cut) into which the waste steam was thrown after

it had performed its office in the cylinder; and from this reservoir, the

steam gradually escaped into the atmosphere without noise.

While Mr. Blackett was thus experimenting and building locomotives at

Wylam, George Stephenson was anxiously studying the same subject at

Killingworth. He was no sooner appointed engine-wright of the collieries

than his attention was directed to the means of more economically hauling

the coal from the pits to the river-side. We have seen that one of the

first important improvements which he made, after being placed in charge

of the colliery machinery, was to apply the surplus power of a pumping

steam-engine, fixed underground, to drawing the coals out of the deeper

workings of the Killingworth mines,--by which he succeeded in effecting a

large reduction in the expenditure on manual and horse labour.

The coals, when brought above ground, had next to be laboriously dragged

by horses to the shipping staiths on the Tyne, several miles distant.

The adoption of a tramroad, it is true, had tended to facilitate their

transit. Nevertheless the haulage was both tedious and costly. With the

view of economising labour, Stephenson laid down inclined planes where

the nature of the ground would admit of this expedient. Thus, a train of

full waggons let down the incline by means of a rope running over wheels

laid along the tramroad, the other end of which was attached to a train

of empty waggons placed at the bottom of the parallel road on the same

incline, dragged them up by the simple power of gravity. But this

applied only to a comparatively small part of the road. An economical

method of working the coal trains, instead of by horses,--the keep of

which was at that time very costly, from the high price of corn,--was

still a great desideratum; and the best practical minds in the collieries

were actively engaged in the attempt to solve the problem.

In the first place Stephenson resolved to make himself thoroughly

acquainted with what had already been done. Mr. Blackett's engines were

working daily at Wylam, past the cottage where he had been born; and

thither he frequently went to inspect the improvements made by Mr.

Blackett from time to time both in the locomotive and in the plateway

along which it worked. Jonathan Foster informed us that, after one of

these visits, Stephenson declared to him his conviction that a much more

effective engine might be made, that should work more steadily and draw

the load more effectively.

He had also the advantage, about the same time, of seeing one of

Blenkinsop's Leeds engines, which was placed on the tramway leading from

the collieries of Kenton and Coxlodge, on the 2nd September, 1813. This

locomotive drew sixteen chaldron waggons containing an aggregate weight

of seventy tons, at the rate of about three miles an hour. George

Stephenson and several of the Killingworth men were amongst the crowd of

spectators that day; and after examining the engine and observing its

performances, he observed to his companions, that "he thought he could

make a better engine than that, to go upon legs." Probably he had heard

of the invention of Brunton, whose patent had by this time been

published, and proved the subject of much curious speculation in the

colliery districts. Certain it is, that, shortly after the inspection of

the Coxlodge engine, he contemplated the construction of a new

locomotive, which was to surpass all that had preceded it. He observed

that those engines which had been constructed up to this time, however

ingenious in their arrangements, had proved practical failures. Mr.

Blackett's was as yet both clumsy and expensive. Chapman's had been

removed from the Heaton tramway in 1812, and was regarded as a total

failure. And the Blenkinsop engine at Coxlodge was found very unsteady

and costly in its working; besides, it pulled the rails to pieces, the

entire strain being upon the rack-rail on one side of the road. The

boiler, however, having soon after blown up, there was an end of that

engine; and the colliery owners did not feel encouraged to try any

further experiment.

An efficient and economical working locomotive, therefore, still remained

to be invented; and to accomplish this object Mr. Stephenson now applied

himself. Profiting by what his predecessors had done, warned by their

failures and encouraged by their partial successes, he commenced his

labours. There was still wanting the man who should accomplish for the

locomotive what James Watt had done for the steam-engine, and combine in

a complete form the best points in the separate plans of others,

embodying with them such original inventions and adaptations of his own

as to entitle him to the merit of inventing the working locomotive, in

the same manner as James Watt is to be regarded as the inventor of the

working condensing-engine. This was the great work upon which George

Stephenson now entered, though probably without any adequate idea of the

ultimate importance of his labours to society and civilization.

He proceeded to bring the subject of constructing a "Travelling Engine,"

as he then denominated the locomotive, under the notice of the lessees of

the Killingworth Colliery, in the year 1813. Lord Ravensworth, the

principal partner, had already formed a very favourable opinion of the

new engine-wright, from the improvements which he had effected in the

colliery engines, both above and below ground; and, after considering the

matter, and hearing Stephenson's explanations, he authorised him to

proceed with the construction of a locomotive,--though his lordship was,

by some, called a fool for advancing money for such a purpose. "The

first locomotive that I made," said Stephenson, many years after, {82}

when speaking of his early career at a public meeting in Newcastle, "was

at Killingworth Colliery, and with Lord Ravensworth's money. Yes; Lord

Ravensworth and partners were the first to entrust me, thirty-two years

since, with money to make a locomotive engine. I said to my friends,

there was no limit to the speed of such an engine, if the works could be

made to stand."

Our engine-wright had, however, many obstacles to encounter before he

could get fairly to work with the erection of his locomotive. His chief

difficulty was in finding workmen sufficiently skilled in mechanics, and

in the use of tools, to follow his instructions and embody his designs in

a practical shape. The tools then in use about the collieries were rude

and clumsy; and there were no such facilities as now exist for turning

out machinery of an entirely new character. Stephenson was under the

necessity of working with such men and tools as were at his command; and

he had in a great measure to train and instruct the workmen himself. The

engine was built in the workshops at the West Moor, the leading mechanic

employed being the colliery blacksmith, an excellent workman in his way,

though quite new to the work now entrusted to him.

In this first locomotive constructed at Killingworth, Stephenson to some

extent followed the plan of Blenkinsop's engine. The boiler was

cylindrical, of wrought iron, 8 feet in length and 34 inches in diameter,

with an internal flue-tube 20 inches wide passing through it. The engine

had two vertical cylinders of 8 inches diameter, and 2 feet stroke, let

into the boiler, working the propelling gear with cross heads and

connecting rods. The power of the two cylinders was combined by means of

spurwheels, which communicated the motive power to the wheels supporting

the engine on the rail, instead of, as in Blenkinsop's engine, to

cogwheels which acted on the cogged rail independent of the four

supporting wheels. The engine thus worked upon what is termed the second

motion. The chimney was of wrought iron, round which was a chamber

extending back to the feed-pumps, for the purpose of heating the water

previous to its injection into the boiler. The engine had no springs,

and was mounted on a wooden frame supported on four wheels. In order to

neutralise as much as possible the jolts and shocks which such an engine

would necessarily encounter from the obstacles and inequalities of the

then very imperfect plateway, the water-barrel which served for a tender

was fixed to the end of a lever and weighted, the other end of the lever

being connected with the frame of the locomotive carriage. By this means

the weight of the two was more equally distributed, though the

contrivance did not by any means compensate for the absence of springs.

[Picture: The Spur-gear]

The wheels of the locomotive were all smooth, Mr. Stephenson having

satisfied himself by experiment that the adhesion between the wheels of a

loaded engine and the rail would be sufficient for the purpose of

traction. Robert Stephenson informed us that his father caused a number

of workmen to mount upon the wheels of a waggon moderately loaded, and

throw their entire weight upon the spokes on one side, when he found that

the waggon could thus be easily propelled forward without the wheels

slipping. This, together with other experiments, satisfied him of the

expediency of adopting smooth wheels on his engine, and it was so

finished accordingly.

The engine was, after much labour and anxiety, and frequent alterations

of parts, at length brought to completion, having been about ten months

in hand. It was placed upon the Killingworth Railway on the 25th July,

1814; and its powers were tried on the same day. On an ascending

gradient of 1 in 450, the engine succeeded in drawing after it eight

loaded carriages of thirty tons' weight at about four miles an hour; and

for some time after it continued regularly at work.

Although a considerable advance upon previous locomotives, "Blutcher" (as

the engine was popularly called) was nevertheless a somewhat cumbrous and

clumsy machine. The parts were huddled together. The boiler constituted

the principal feature; and being the foundation of the other parts, it

was made to do duty not only as a generator of steam, but also as a basis

for the fixings of the machinery and for the bearings of the wheels and

axles. The want of springs was seriously felt; and the progress of the

engine was a succession of jolts, causing considerable derangement to the

machinery. The mode of communicating the motive power to the wheels by

means of the spur-gear also caused frequent jerks, each cylinder

alternately propelling or becoming propelled by the other, as the

pressure of the one upon the wheels became greater or less than the

pressure of the other; and when the teeth of the cogwheels became at all

worn, a rattling noise was produced during the travelling of the engine.

As the principal test of the success of the locomotive was its economy as

compared with horse power, careful calculations were made with the view

of ascertaining this important point. The result was, that it was found

the working of the engine was at first barely economical; and at the end

of the year the steam power and the horse power were ascertained to be as

nearly as possible upon a par in point of cost. The fate of the

locomotive in a great measure depended on this very engine. Its speed

was not beyond that of a horse's walk, and the heating surface presented

to the fire being comparatively small, sufficient steam could not be

raised to enable it to accomplish more on an average than about four

miles an hour. The result was anything but decisive; and the locomotive

might have been condemned as useless, had not our engineer at this

juncture applied the steam-blast, and by its means carried his experiment

to a triumphant issue.

The steam, after performing its duty in the cylinders, was at first

allowed to escape into the open atmosphere with a hissing blast, to the

terror of horses and cattle. It was complained of as a nuisance; and an

action at law against the colliery lessees was threatened unless it was

stopped. Stephenson's attention had been drawn to the much greater

velocity with which the steam issued from the exit pipe compared with

that at which the smoke escaped from the chimney. He conceived that, by

conveying the eduction steam into the chimney, by means of a small pipe,

after it had performed its office in the cylinders, allowing it to escape

in a vertical direction, its velocity would be imparted to the smoke from

the fire, or to the ascending current of air in the chimney, thereby

increasing the draft, and consequently the intensity of combustion in the

furnace.

The experiment was no sooner made than the power of the engine was at

once more than doubled; combustion was stimulated by the blast;

consequently the capability of the boiler to generate steam was greatly

increased, and the effective power of the engine augmented in precisely

the same proportion, without in any way adding to its weight. This

simple but beautiful expedient was really fraught with the most important

consequences to railway communication; and it is not too much to say that

the success of the locomotive has in a great measure been the result of

its adoption. Without the steam-blast, by means of which the intensity

of combustion is maintained at its highest point, producing a

correspondingly rapid evolution of steam, high rates of speed could not

have been kept up; the advantages of the multi-tubular boiler (afterwards

invented) could never have been fairly tested; and locomotives might

still have been dragging themselves unwieldily along at little more than

five or six miles an hour.

The steam-blast had scarcely been adopted, with so decided a success,

when Stephenson, observing the numerous defects in his engine, and

profiting by the experience which he had already acquired, determined to

construct a second engine, in which to embody his improvements in their

best form. Careful and cautious observation of the working of his

locomotive had convinced him that the complication arising out of the

action of the two cylinders being combined by spur-wheels would prevent

its coming into practical use. He accordingly directed his attention to

an entire change in the construction and mechanical arrangements of the

machine; and in the following year, conjointly with Mr. Dodds, who

provided the necessary funds, he took out a patent, dated the 28th of

February, 1815, for an engine which combined in a remarkable degree the

essential requisites of an economical locomotive; that is to say, few

parts, simplicity in their action, and directness in the mode by which

the power was communicated to the wheels supporting the engine.

This locomotive, like the first, had two vertical cylinders, which

communicated _directly_ with each pair of the four wheels that supported

the engine, by means of a cross head and a pair of connecting rods. But

in attempting to establish a direct communication between the cylinders

and the wheels that rolled upon the rails, considerable difficulties

presented themselves. The ordinary joints could not be employed to unite

the parts of the engine, which was a rigid mass, with the wheels lolling

upon the irregular surface of the rails; for it was evident that the two

rails of the line of way--more especially in those early days of

imperfect construction of the permanent road--could not always be

maintained at the same level,--that the wheel at one end of the axle

might be depressed into one part of the line which had subsided, whilst

the other wheel would be comparatively elevated; and in such a position

of the axle and wheels, it was obvious that a rigid communication between

the cross head and the wheels was impracticable. Hence it became

necessary to form a joint at the top of the piston-rod where it united

with the cross head, so as to permit the cross head to preserve complete

parallelism with the axle of the wheels with which it was in

communication.

In order to obtain that degree of flexibility combined with direct

action, which was essential for ensuring power and avoiding needless

friction and jars from irregularities in the road, Stephenson made use of

the "ball and socket" joint for effecting a union between the ends of the

cross heads where they united with the connecting rods, and between the

ends of the connecting rods where they were united with the crank-pins

attached to each driving-wheel. By this arrangement the parallelism

between the cross head and the axle was at all times maintained and

preserved, without producing any serious jar or friction on any part of

the machine. Another important point was, to combine each pair of wheels

by means of some simple mechanism instead of by the cogwheels which had

formerly been used. And, with this object, Stephenson made cranks in

each axle at right angles to each other, with rods communicating

horizontally between them.

A locomotive was constructed upon this plan in 1815, and was found to

answer extremely well. But at that period the mechanical skill of the

country was not equal to forging cranked axles of the soundness and

strength necessary to stand the jars incident to locomotive work.

Stephenson was accordingly compelled to fall back upon a substitute,

which, although less simple and efficient, was within the mechanical

capabilities of the workmen of that day, in respect of construction as

well as repair. He adopted a chain which rolled over indented wheels

placed on the centre of each axle, and was so arranged that the two pairs

of wheels were effectually coupled and made to keep pace with each other.

The chain, however, after a few years' use, became stretched; and then

the engines were liable to irregularity in their working, especially in

changing from working back to working forward again. Eventually the

chain was laid aside, and the front and hind wheels were united by rods

on the outside, instead of by rods and crank axles inside, as specified

in the original patent. This expedient completely answered the purpose

required, without involving any expensive or difficult workmanship.

Thus, in 1815, by dint of patient and persevering labour,--by careful

observation of the works of others, and never neglecting to avail himself

of their suggestions,--Stephenson succeeded in manufacturing an engine

which included the following important improvements on all previous

attempts in the same direction:--viz., simple and direct communication

between the cylinders and the wheels rolling upon the rails; joint

adhesion of all the wheels, attained by the use of horizontal

connecting-rods; and finally, a beautiful method of exciting the

combustion of the fuel by employing the waste steam, which had formerly

been allowed to escape uselessly into the air. Although many

improvements in detail were afterwards introduced in the locomotive by

George Stephenson himself, as well as by his equally distinguished son,

it is perhaps not too much to say that this engine, as a mechanical

contrivance, contained the germ of all that has since been effected. It

may in fact be regarded as the type of the present locomotive engine.

Lives of the Engineers The Locomotive. George and Robert Stephenson · 第 5 / 19 章