CONCLUSION

In view of the foregoing facts illustrative of the mental life of

Invertebrates, there remains little ground for denying to creatures

below the backboned phyla a certain modicum of intelligence, well

in accord with their needs. That any Invertebrate is capable of

the process of reasoning is, of course, a debatable question, but

the existence of mental processes in these groups is, apparently,

indisputable, and where there is _mind_ there is _intelligence_,

however limited it may be.

Forel attributes to Insects passions closely akin to those exhibited

by the higher Vertebrates, though these vary considerably with the

diverse species. Wasps, certain species of Ants, and a few Beetles, are

extremely irritable and pugnacious. Among the less intelligent species

no passions are manifest apart from hunger, thirst and sexual appetite.

The memory likewise varies according to the species, and, as might be

expected, is at a minimum in the small-brained forms and most highly

developed in the social Hymenoptera (Bees, Ants and Wasps).

“It must be admitted,” declares Forel, “that Insects are capable

of perceiving, of learning, of recollecting, of associating their

recollections and of utilizing them to accomplish their ends. They have

various emotions and their will is not purely instinctive, but offers

individual plastic modifications, adapted to circumstances.”

Although many authorities are inclined to think that Forel goes too

far in his estimates of Insect Intelligence, Bouvier’s[24] extensive

studies have led him to practically the same conclusions. He rejects

Bethe’s claim that Insects are mere reflex machines, because they

can adapt themselves to circumstances, acquire new habits, learn to

remember, and manifest discernment.

Comparing their organization with ours, McIndoo concludes that Insects

“have perhaps accomplished more than we have.... Furthermore some

Insects, for example Honey Bees and Plant-lice, have evolved methods

for controlling sex; this subject has probably puzzled Man as much as

life itself, yet Man can neither control sex nor knows how to control

it.... Let us cease looking with scorn upon Insects.”

“We prize so highly all our own aptitudes as to believe that they are

unequalled, even when inspired by the least commendable motives,” says

Bouvier. “Though bellicose ourselves, we think it strange that beehives

or ants-nests should engage in warfare. At times we revert to barbarism

by reducing our enemies to slavery, yet we exclaim with surprise at the

habits of slave-making Ants.”

There is nowhere any distinct break in the evolutionary series--no

fundamental distinction between the animal and the human mind.

Protoplasm is protoplasm, wherever found, and mind is mind wherever

it becomes manifest. There can no more be two totally distinct and

fundamentally different kinds of mind than there can be two or more

totally distinct kinds of protoplasm, one human, the other sub-human.

The Amœba and Man are both the product of protoplasmic differentiation,

and the primordial protoplasmic cell embodied in its substance all

potentialities of Life and Mind upon this planet.

The intelligence of invertebrate animals · 第 33 / 34 题