BEES

Sir John Lubbock long ago declared that “if we judge animals by their

intelligence as evidenced in their actions, it is not the Gorilla and

the Chimpanzee, but the Bee, and above all the Ant, which approach

nearest to Man.”

While Bees, Ants and Termites indisputably possess some degree of

intelligence, as distinct from what we are pleased to call “instinct,”

it is doubtful if any naturalist or comparative psychologist of today

would agree with the eminent British scientist in this generalization.

Yet Man has, perhaps, more to learn from the example of Bee life than

from the more intelligent activities of the simian world.

Prof. W. F. Wilson, of the University of Wisconsin, in a recent

lecture, remarked that a Bee knows when it has had enough, and is

satisfied to work in a self-selected domain before it “grabs for more.”

For instance, if a Bee settles itself to work in one corner of a field,

it will not leave that corner until it has exhausted the nectar in all

flowers in that corner. It will not fly to another corner after having

found one flower deficient. Neither will it quit one plant until it has

tried its tongue in all the flowers of that plant. This has been proved

by releasing Bees with different colored powder spread on them and then

watching them at work.

Professor Wilson stated that another experiment demonstrated that Bees

have some mathematical ability. In this experiment it was found that

the Bees realized when a sufficient number were working on one apple

tree and no more tried to get on it.

Another peculiarity noticed by Professor Wilson is this: While Bees

are at work they will not change from a flower of one color to one of

another color until the nectar has been exhausted in the flowers of the

first color. That is, if the Bee begins work on a blue aster, it will

not go next to a red one, but always seeks a blue one again. This fact

was noted by Aristotle in the fourth century B. C., though the belief

is still widely prevalent that Bees “fly about from flower to flower in

a haphazard way.” As a rule “Bees keep to a single species of flower

for collecting pollen and nectar.”

Nevertheless, Bees are partially color-blind, as is evidenced by the

experiments of two German biologists, Prof. F. Frisch and Lothar

Tirala. “These investigators have shown that to the Bee, red and black

look alike, orange and yellow look the same as green, and that there

is no difference in the appearance of blue, violet and purple. But

Bees have one advantage over Man; they can see the rays of ultraviolet

light, which are invisible to our eyes.

“It was also discovered that the mysterious guiding influence by which

the Bee is brought back to its hive is nothing more than experience.

It has long been known that Bees find their way home sooner the longer

they have lived in their hive. To test this common-sense view Bees

were put to sleep by ether, taken to a new hive, and moved some twelve

yards away. None of them could find their way back to the hive until

the third day afterward, when 30 per cent got home. By the eighth day,

however, 90 per cent of them had learned to find their way back to the

hive.”[18]

Some experiments by Professor Young, of Geneva, antedating those of

Professor Frisch, also showed that Bees “build up a knowledge of

the country about the hive.” On the other hand, it seems to be well

established that Bees, like most animals, have a true homing sense, or

sense of direction. “Even Bees with their eyes obscured have been known

to make a ‘bee-line’ for the hive from considerable distances,” says

Thomson.

When, by exception, Bees build their nest in the open, they invent

arrangements which are new and in the true sense intelligent to meet

the new conditions (Bergson). In the face of cumulative evidence, the

great Fabre was forced to modify his theory of immutable instinct,

and grant to Insects a modicum of “discernment,” since they have the

capacity of learning by experience.

Professor Frisch published in the Munich _Medizin Wochenschrift_ some

observations upon the means of communication employed by Bees. “He

placed a dish of sugar solution on a table by an open window. Shortly

after a chance Bee had noted this and flown off with booty therefrom,

the dish was crowded with Bees. When it was removed they quickly

disappeared, save for an occasional reconnoiterer. When a fresh dish

was set out they quickly reappeared in quantities. By touching the back

of each Bee with a spot of color, the experimenter then perceived that

subsequent Bees had been sent, and not escorted.

“The conduct of the rediscoverer on her return to the hive was next

noted. She first gave over her plunder to the workers, and then

executed a curious dance, describing circles and other figures. Her

audience watched her attentively and attempted to touch her. When one

of the marked Bees succeeded in doing this, the latter at once made her

exit and flew to the feeding place; but the unmarked Bees soon ceased

to pay her any attention. It appears that there is here some means

of communication based upon touch rather than upon sight or hearing;

and that it is adequate for giving information as to the presence or

absence of food, but inadequate to give its location unless it be

already known to the recipient of the message.

“Experiments with two dishes of food at a considerable distance apart

verified this. As before, after they had once been discovered the

dishes were removed and ultimately replaced; but when replaced, the

‘white’ dish only was filled, the ‘yellow’ one being left empty. The

‘white’ dish was rediscovered by a ‘white’ Bee; and when the latter

returned to the hive not only the ‘white’ but also the ‘yellow’ Bees

responded to her dance, left the hive and flew to their respective

dishes, the ‘yellow’ Bees of course having the search in vain. As

before, unmarked Bees ignored the dancer.

“That there is a little more flexibility to the signal system than

this might indicate appeared when natural conditions were imitated,

linden and acacia blossoms being offered respectively to groups of

Bees accustomed to seek these. The dancing linden Bee now occasioned

excitement only among the linden Bees, and not among the acacia group.

The same distinction was made when two dishes of sugar were differently

perfumed, suggesting that scent rather than actual modification of

the signals may have been responsible. When blotting paper saturated

with sugar-water was used instead of the dishes, the Bees found some

difficulty in sucking the fluid up, and returned only half laden.

They did not then trouble to perform the dance, showing that this is

reserved for exceptionally rich finds.”[19]

The Bee is good-natured and even long-suffering, but there are limits

to its patience or generosity. So long as nectar is superabundant, the

Bee allows the drones to live in the communal hive without rendering

any service in return. “But one day the decree goes forth that those

who do not work shall not eat, indeed shall not live.... Vigorously and

pitilessly the long-suffering workers at last turn on the drones and

slay them all.”[20]

The intelligence of invertebrate animals · 第 28 / 34 题