Macfarland places the Spiders as following the Cephalopoda in order of
intelligence, as does Sir A. E. Shipley. Says the latter:--
“The Arachnida, together with the Crustacea, Insects, Myriapods,
and Peripatus, make up the great phylum Arthropoda, a phylum which,
from the point of view of numbers of species and individuals, is the
dominant one on this planet, and from the point of view of intelligence
and power of co-operating in the formation of social communities is
surpassed but by the Vertebrata.”[13]
Spiders possess considerable skill as weavers, hunters, miners,
builders and aeronauts. Lacking ears, they “feel” sounds. With but
limited visual powers, they nevertheless unerringly pick out the
particular strand of the web in which a victim Insect has been trapped.
It has been said that the Spider must run to the center of the web
before she can know which strand to follow out and reach the entrapped
victim. Says Gustav Kafka, in his “Animal Psychology,” “Spiders seem to
be endowed with a very keen sense of touch, and know instantly along
which strand of their web to go in order to get to any Insect or other
object that may become caught in their trap.” The layman probably
will wonder why the Spider does not take the shortest path to get its
quarry, instead of first going to the center of the web, which involves
covering a double distance, perhaps on the very next strand of silk.
This is probably due to the Spider’s very limited eyesight, in spite of
the six to eight eyes which it possesses--so limited, in fact, that it
can see ordinarily for a distance of only a few inches.
Nature has provided the spider with an unusually sharp sense of touch,
and it can tell, by the vibration of the connecting strand of silk,
that some object has lighted on the web. It speeds to the center of
the web, from which, by means of its eight legs and this keen sense of
touch it can immediately ascertain by the vibration on which radiating
strand the object may have alighted. “That is why all Spiders go first
to the center of their web to catch a captive that may lie on the outer
radius of the web, and that they may even have passed on the way to the
center.”
One cannot but admire, says Prof. E. L. Bouvier, “the marvelous
vertical orb-web made by those gifted Spiders which are called
indifferently Acaneus or Epeira. Radii spaced at equal distances form
the framework and connect it with the helix where Insects are captured
and which adheres tenaciously to the radii. From the center where the
latter converge there starts a guide-line which connects them with the
ordinary retreat of the animal. Lurking at its post with one hand,
so to speak, upon the guide-line, the Spider perceives the slightest
tremor of the web. Has an Insect been caught in the net? If so, it runs
down the guide-line until it reaches it, binds it fast, and slowly
sucks its sweet juices, on the spot if it is small, but on its retreat
if it is strong.”
The sense of touch is developed in Spiders beyond all comparison with
other animals. “A female orb-weaver, at the center of her web, can tell
friend from foe, male from female of her species, an Insect suitable
for food from one not suitable, an Insect of a certain size from an
inanimate object of the same size, and she can also distinguish between
sizes of any two objects which happen to fly or be thrown into her web.
This is all accomplished by touch vibrations passing along the radii of
the orb on which the eyes of the female Spider rest. Moreover, during
courtship of Spiders this system of touch vibrations is utilized as a
means of signals to inform the male concerning the proper mood of the
female for mating--but pity the dwarfed male should he misinterpret her
signals, for instantly she pounces upon him and devours him without
showing the least mercy.”[14]
It has been demonstrated that these little creatures distinguish
colors and select a special shade of colors for a background of the
marvelously constructed webs. If the observer changes the colors
surrounding the web, the Spider inhabitant at once seeks a new location
and builds a new web. Spiders must have a sense of light and shade,
in order to conceal their webs as they do, and in the case of the
so-called “trap-door” variety, to camouflage the cleverly constructed
hinged entrances to their tunnel homes so as to resemble their
surroundings.
The olfactory pores of both Spiders and Insects are widely scattered
over the body, head and appendages. The more highly developed the
Insect, the more they are arranged in groups, “most of the groups being
found on the legs, wings and mouth parts. So far only a few olfactory
pores have been found on the antennæ, these being present on the bases
of the antennæ of Bees, Grasshoppers, Roaches and Crickets. Briefly
described, an olfactory pore is nothing more than a nerve passing
through a tiny hole in the ‘skin’ or chitin of the Insect” (McIndoo,
_Loc. cit._, Page 470). “The so-called gustatory sense in Insects is
only a phase of the olfactory sense.”
Spiders, according to the latest experiments, are deaf, and only a few
are able to make sounds. Most Insects can hear, but the Cicada is said
to be deaf, and the female both deaf and dumb. Modern research tends
to support Forel’s conclusion that Insects cannot “hear” in the sense
that we do. He compares this perception in them to that in deaf-mutes
who feel the rolling of a carriage at a distance. But nothing final can
at present be said on this question. Schon, for instance, has described
a structure in the tibiæ of Bees which he regards as an auditory
apparatus. Child thinks that he has discovered an auditory organ in
the Mosquito. Many of the experimental results obtained “indicate that
Insects can hear” (McIndoo).
The orb-weaving Spiders have no peers in the art of weaving. They
know how to fasten marvelously regular webs between the branches of
trees, how to pass over rivers on bridges of floating threads, and even
when still young, they know how to use similar threads to take flight
through the air as real aeronauts.
“The most difficult but not the most delicate work in the making of
an orb-web,” says Prof. E. L. Bouvier, “is the establishment of the
suspending cable which stretches between two points at a distance from
each other and supports the whole structure. Sometimes the Spider
fastens its thread at one of these points and then repairs to the
other where it stretches and fastens the cord which has issued from
its spinnerets during the course of its journey. But this process is
not applicable over all sorts of _terrain_ and is even practically
impossible when the two points are separated by a stream of water or
by any other insurpassable obstacle. In this case the Spider stations
itself or suspends itself at one of the points ... and emits a thread
which is carried by the wind until it attaches itself at another
elevated point. According to Fabre the process may differ somewhat,
however: the Spider may suspend herself but soon thereafter reascends
by her thread; the latter then forms a loop which is stretched out and
fastened by the wind as in the preceding cases. In any case the Spider
knows quite well when the attachment has occurred. She then stretches
her cable and runs back and forth across it several times in order to
multiply the number of threads and thus render the cable more firm. The
next thing is to establish another side to the framework: the Spider
suspends herself again, then reascends by means of her thread, follows
the cable to the opposite end, and then seeks a suitable point further
down where she stretches and fastens the thread emitted in the course
of the journey.
“In the same manner, or by simply walking from one point to another,
a diagonal thread is established which serves as the first radius of
the web. Upon this diagonal line a point is chosen to be the center
of the structure; the Spider attaches a second radius at this point
and then proceeds to walk to the framework where she fastens the other
extremity, after which she returns in the opposite direction to stretch
this thread and make of it a definite radius; the excess length is
reserved at the center to form a cushion. Now at one side and now at
the other, in order to render the structure more stable, the Spider
attaches new radii by the aid of those already established. When
finished the radii are spaced at equal distances; they vary in number
according to the species; Fabre counted twenty-one in the angular
Epeira and thirty-two in the fasciated Argiope.
“Resting upon the cushion the Spider now revolves repeatedly about her
own axis, attaching to the radii a central helix whose inter-radiary
elements are straight lines. Then she advances a little farther and
begins to establish a second similar helix which extends to the
framework. This second helix is permanent in the Nephilæ and temporary
in the Argiopæ, the Epeira and most other forms. Since it consists of
cylindrical threads it is not very suitable for purposes of capture.
Consequently as soon as it has carried it to the framework the animal
returns along this helix, placing between its spirals a new helix whose
elements are composed of threads bearing sticky globules. This helix
constitutes a marvelously effective trap. In establishing it the Spider
takes for a support and scaffold the auxiliary helix; but as the work
proceeds the latter is destroyed except among the Nephilæ, in which it
is retained to give more solidity to the structure.”[15]
Professor Bouvier does not credit the Arachnoidea with much
intelligence, and such as they possess he thinks is probably dominated
by a strict automatism. Yet he asks, “Is it possible to ascribe to pure
automatism or to mere reflex action so judicious a bit of architectural
scaffolding? Undoubtedly the psychology of Spiders offers a vast field
for observation and experiment.”
It is clear that the Spider is an amazingly good judge of distance,
and “can draw parallel lines or converging lines with the accuracy
of a draftsman who uses a drawing board and measuring instruments.”
It is also certain that they form memory associations and learn by
experience: “many examples show that they display a certain degree of
discernment when they establish the bases of their shell or nest. And
it is by making use of these faculties that they have been able to
display plasticity in their habits and undergo an evolution in their
industries.
At the present time they are doubtless quite as capable of evolution
as in former times, but this tendency escapes our notice because of
the automatism which dominates it. We are particularly struck by the
extraordinary rôle played by touch in their automatic manifestations.
Spiders nearly always perform their labors at night and it is merely
by touch that they are able to recognize whether their cables are
sufficiently taut, their radii properly spaced, and the spirals of the
helix regularly placed. With their legs and their palps they search for
contacts and measure distances and the sensitiveness of the spinnerets
reveals to them the moment when their silken thread is properly
attached. They seem to work as if blind, being largely guided by simple
tactile reflexes” (Bouvier).
Says the same authority: “The Avicularidae and the closely related
Atypus possess in a very high degree the skill of the miner; they also
know how to construct masonry, for before weaving for their retreat
an envelope of silk they rough-coat it and make it impermeable by
means of a mortar made of earth and saliva.... Fabre has likewise
studied the manner in which the Lycosa of Narbonne builds the
bastion which surrounds the opening of its burrow. It forms it ‘of
little pebbles, bits of wood, scraps of dry leaves, etc., the whole
dexterously interlaced and cemented with the silk.’ And again it is the
_chelicerae_ which are employed. Many Lycosas, especially among the
American species, perform similar labors. McCook reports (1889) that
the Lycosa arenicola builds a bastion in the form of a chimney with
small bits of straw or wood and that ... at the base of this edifice
it builds a little wall of grains or quartz. More skillful still, the
Lycosa carolinenses executes a neat bit of basket work; it curves,
interlaces and fastens pine needles, so as to form a sort of bastion in
the shape of a bird’s nest upside down.”
In discussing the mystery of the Spider’s web-weaving dexterity, Prof.
J. Arthur Thomson, in his chapter on “Animal Intelligence,” (“The
Outline of Science,” vol. 2) says:
“To credit animals with reason, which means experimenting with general
ideas, is, in all probability, too generous. To try to reduce them to
the level of automatic machines is certainly too stingy. The fact is
that the behavior of animals is often intelligent, often instinctive,
and often a subtle mingling of the two. But it is necessary to attach
precise meanings to these terms.
“A young Spider, which never made a web before, may make its
masterpiece true to the specific pattern the very first time. It
does it without any model to copy, and with no trace of the prentice
hand. Sometimes it can make the web in the dark, or in the course of
a forenoon. This is instinctive behavior, depending on hereditary
prearrangements of nerve-cells and muscle-cells, though never without
its psychical aspect--a suffused awareness and a background of
endeavor. But apart from theory, the fact of observation is certain
that inexperienced animals suddenly blossom out into extraordinary
intricacies and niceties of behavior, perfect the very first time, not
requiring to be learned. This is instinct.”
“With reference to the intelligence of Spiders,” remarks Mr. Garrett P.
Serviss, “I find among Mr. Belt’s records an account of the terrible
panics caused by the advance of armies of Ants through the forest, all
sorts of Insects fleeing wildly before them. But a Spider sometimes
escaped by running out to the end of a branch and suspending itself
from a single thread of silk, between the enemies above and the enemies
below.
“There is exhibited an extraordinary repugnance by many people against
admitting that any living being on this earth has been furnished with
anything in the slightest degree resembling the peculiar gifts that
assure to our race its immensely superior status. This seems to me a
petty jealousy. When we dissect the motives of the human heart do we
discover any reason why Man should be the exclusive possessor of sparks
of Divine light?”