Book IV. _Exordium, Narratio, Petitio, Conclusio_

The _exordium_ is such a prelude to the statement of the facts as will

make the hearer[28] open-minded, well disposed, and attentive.

The reader’s sympathy is engaged by the writer’s reference

to himself, to his opponent,[29] to his reader, or to the

occasion. According to the nature of the subject, the

_exordium_ may be either direct (_principium_) or indirect

(_insinuatio_). Its diction must be fluent, correct, unstudied,

i.e., it must avoid harshness, deviation from recognized

usage, and pomp.[30] Especially must the writer avoid any

language that can be turned against him. To begin with a

proverb, though this is advised by some authors,[31] is to

deviate the _exordium_ from its proper function.

_Narratio_, statement of the facts,[32] should be concise, transparently

clear, and plausible (_brevis_, _dilucida_, _verisimilis_). The

application of the ancient maxim is to the connection of _narratio_

with _exordium_ by proper conjunctions and in several possible cases.

Similarly are set forth the ways of connecting it with the following

_petitio_, which is summarily defined. _Conclusio_ in a letter is not, as

in a speech, the logical result of proof. Rather it is the satisfaction

of whatever expectations have been aroused. It may be affirmative,

negative, or conditional, so long as it is a satisfying close. Modes of

connecting it with the rest of the letter again have most space.

Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 · 第 4 / 8 章