MY DEAREST DARLING PERSON,

How sweet and amiable of you to allow a humble being like myself to

write to you. Dropping your own special style (which, to be perfectly

frank with you, I could no more continue through the whole of this

letter than I could dine off treacle and butter-scotch), I beg to say

that I am heartily glad to have this opportunity of telling you a few

things which have been on my mind for a long time. In what corner of

the great realm of abstractions do you make your home? I imagine you

whiling away the hours on some soft couch of imitation down, with a

little army of sweet but irrelevant smiles ready at all times to do

your bidding. You are refined, I am sure. You cultivate sympathy as

some men cultivate orchids, until it blooms and luxuriates in the

strangest and gaudiest shapes. Your real face is known of no other

abstraction; indeed, you never see it yourself, so well-fitted and so

constant is the mask through which you waft the endearments which have

caused you to be avoided everywhere. This, I admit, is imagination;

but is it very far from the truth? Perhaps I ask in vain, for truth

is the very last thing that may be expected of you and of those who

do your bidding upon earth. I will not, therefore, press the question,

but proceed at once to business.

[Illustration]

About a month ago I met your friend, ALGERNON JESSAMY. What is there

about ALGERNON that inspires such distrust? He is very presentable;

some people have gone so far as to call him absolutely good-looking.

He is tall, his figure is good, his clothes fit him admirably, and are

always speckless; his features are regular, his complexion fresh, and

his fair hair, carefully parted in the middle, lies like a smooth and

shining lid upon his head. I pass over all his remaining advantages,

whether of dress or of nature. It is enough to say that, thus

equipped, and with the additional merits of wealth and a good

position, ALGERNON ought to have found no difficulty in being one of

the most popular men in town. Perhaps he would have been if he had

not tried with such a persistent energy to make himself "so deuced

agreeable." The phrase is not mine, but that of SAMMY MIGGS, who has

a contempt for ALGERNON and his methods, which he never attempts to

conceal.

"ALGY, my boy," I have heard him say, while the unfortunate JESSAMY

smiled uneasily, and shifted on his seat, "ALGY, my boy, I've known

you too long to give in to any of your nonsense. All that butter of

yours is wasted here, so you'd better keep it for someone who likes

it. Try it on QUISBY," he continued, indicating the celebrated actor,

who was at that moment frowning furiously over a notice of his latest

performance; "he loves it in firkins, and I'll undertake to say you'll

never get to the bottom of his swallowing capacity. You'll have to

exhaust even your stock, ALGY, my boy; and that's saying a lot."

So thoroughly uncomfortable did the suave and gentle ALGERNON look,

that I afterwards ventured to remonstrate mildly with the gadfly

MIGGS.

"What?" he said, "made him uncomfortable, did I? And a jolly good job

too. Bless you, I know the beggar through and through. I wasn't at

Oxford with him for nothing. Wish I had been. He's the sort of chap

who loses no end of I.O.U.'s at cards one night, and when he wins

piles of ready the next never offers to redeem them. You let me

alone about ALGY. I tell you I know him. There's no bigger humbug in

Christendom with all his soft sawder and gas about everybody being the

dearest and cleverest fellow he's ever met. Bah!"

And therewith SAMMY left me, evidently smarting under some ancient

sore inflicted by the apparently angelic ALGERNON.

However, this little incident was not the one I intended to narrate.

I met ALGY, as I said, about a month ago. It was in Piccadilly. At

first, as I approached, I thought he did not see me, but suddenly

he seemed to become aware of my presence. An electric thrill of joy

ran through him, a smile of heavenly welcome irradiated his face, he

darted towards me with both hands stretched out and almost fell round

my neck before all the astonished cabmen.

"My dear, dear fellow," he gasped, apparently struggling hard with an

overpowering emotion, "this is almost too much. To think that I should

meet the one man of all others whom I have been literally longing to

see. Now you simply must walk with me for a bit. I can't afford to let

you go without having a good talk with you. It always refreshes me so

to hear your opinions of men and things."

Ignoring my assurance that I had an important appointment to keep,

he linked his arm closely in mine and dragged me with him in the

direction from which I had come. How he pattered and chattered

and flattered. He daubed me over with flattery as I have seen

bill-stickers brush a hoarding over with paste. Never in my life had

I felt so small, so mean and such a perfect fool, for though I own

I have no objection to an occasional lollipop of praise, I must say

I loathe it in lumps the size of a jelly-fish. Yet such is the fare

on which JESSAMY compels me to subsist. And the annoying part of

it was that every lump which he crammed down my throat contained

an inferential compliment to himself, which I was forced either

to accept, or in declining it to appear a churl. I was never more

churlish, never less satisfied with myself. Amongst other things we

spoke of the affairs of "The Dustheap," a little Club of which we were

both members. JESSAMY opined it was going to the dogs. "Just look,"

he said, "at the men they've got on the Committee; mere nobodies. I've

always wondered why you are not on it. Men like you and me wouldn't

make the ridiculous mistakes the present lot are constantly making.

Fancy their electing MUMPLEY, a regular outsider, without enough

manners for a school-boy. I really don't care about being in the

same room with him." At this very moment, by one of those curious

coincidences which invariably happen, the abused MUMPLEY himself, a

wealthy but otherwise inoffensive stockbroker, hove in sight. "There

comes the brute himself," said JESSAMY; and in another moment his arms

were round MUMPLEY's neck, and he was protesting, with all the fervour

of a heartfelt conviction, that MUMPLEY was the one man of all others

for whom his heart had been yearning. That being so, I left them

together, and departed to my business.

Now does JESSAMY imagine that that kind of thing makes him a

favourite? It must be admitted that he is not very artistic in his

methods; and I fancy he must sometimes perceive, if I may use a

homely phrase, that he doesn't go down. But the poor beggar can't

help himself. He is driven by a force which he finds it impossible

to resist into the cruel snares that are spread for the over-amiable.

You, my dear GUSH, are that force, and to you, therefore, the sugary

JESSAMY owes his failure to win the appreciation which he courts so

ardently.

And now I think I have relieved my mind of a sufficient load for the

time being. If I can remember anything else that might interest you,

you may count upon me to address you again. Permit me in the meantime

to subscribe myself with all proper curtness,

Yours. &c. DIOGENES ROBINSON.

* * * * *

"THE PRODIGY SON."

[Illustration: Much put out.]

Sir,--I have not seen _Pamela's Prodigy_, but I have just read the

criticism in the _Times_, which says of it, "It must be regarded

either as a boyish effusion or a sorry joke." The criticism

then points out how it lacks "wit, humour, literary skill," and

apparently is wanting in everything that goes to make a successful

play,--everything that is, except the actors. Mrs. JOHN WOOD was in

it: she is a host in herself: not only a host, but the Manageress of

the theatre who, with her partner in the business, is responsible for

the selection of pieces. Now granting the critic to be right--and,

on referring to others, I find a _consensus_ of opinion backing him

up--at whose door lies the responsibility of having deliberately

selected a failure? Under what compulsion could so clever and

experienced an autocrat, sharp as a needle and with the "heye of an

'awk" in theatrical matters, as Mrs. JOHN WOOD, have made so fatal a

mistake--that is, if the critics are right, and if it be a mistake?

"_To err, is human_"--and, including even Mrs. JOHN WOOD, and the

critics, we are all human,--"_To forgive, divine_"--the critics

not being divine could not forgive; the public apparently, did

forgive--and, will, of course, forget. 'Tis all very well to fall

foul of the unhappy author--whom we will not name--_after_ the event;

but why was the piece ever chosen, and why was not the discovery of

its unfitness made during rehearsal? No! "as long as the world goes

round" these things will happen in the best regulated theatres, and

experience is apparently no sort of guide in such matters.--Yours

faithfully,

"NOT THERE, NOT THERE, MY CHILD!"

* * * * *

NOTICE.--Rejected Communications or Contributions, whether MS.,

Printed Matter, Drawings, or Pictures of any description, will in no

case be returned, not even when accompanied by a Stamped and Addressed

Envelope, Cover, or Wrapper. To this rule there will be no exception.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 101, October 31, 1891 · 第 23 / 23 题