James I., with all his pedantry, his absurdities, and his stuffed

breeches, was not without something of the largeness of mind which culture

generally imparts. He could understand Bacon. His Irish policy, evidently

inspired by Bacon, was colonization, plantation as it then was called. For

this there was ample room on the forfeited lands of Tyrone and other

attainted chiefs, so far as legal ownership in the contemplation of

English law was concerned. But the attainders of the chiefs had not

cleared the lands of the members of their septs, in whose minds tribal

ownership was rooted. This was the weak point of the transplantation

policy, as in the sequel tragically appeared. Extensive grants, however,

were made to a colony formed by English and Scottish settlers, undertakers

as they were called. Of Scottish settlers there had before been not a few.

The city of London invested largely in the enterprise. Thus was formed in

Ulster, and in Ulster has continued to exist to the present time, a sort

of Protestant pale. Bacon's philosophic eye ranges complacently over the

prospect of a people of barbarous manners "brought to give over and

discontinue their customs of revenge and blood and of dissolute life and

of theft and rapine, and to give ear to the wisdom of laws and

governments; whereupon immediately followeth the cutting of stones for

building and habitation, and of trees for the seats of houses, orchards,

enclosures, and the like." Beyond doubt this settlement was an improvement

in material respects. Nor, though the new settlers might domineer, was

their domination likely to be more oppressive and insolent than that of

the native chief, with his gallowglasses and his coyne and livery. The

tribal ownership of land had probably become almost a fiction, the chief

treating the land as his own. Little, therefore, was actually lost in

that way by the tribesman, while there was an end of coyne and livery and

the other extortions of the chiefs. On the other hand the chief, however

oppressive, was nominally one of the tribe and a kinsman, and the land was

still tribal in the fancy of the sept. The tribesman was not liable to

eviction. Nor was improvement in agriculture or even in advancement of law

and order likely to be so fascinating to the native Irish, especially to

gallowglasses and kernes, as to Bacon. The adventurers were apt to be of a

sordid class, ravenous, close-fisted, little likely to make themselves

beloved. The eagles of enterprise spread their wings for the Spanish main;

the vultures swooped upon Ireland. The medley of Brehon law and English

law, with the variety of titles, some by forfeiture for treason, others by

ancient grants from the Crown, formed an element in which the art of the

predatory pettifogger had full play. By legal chicane, the chicane of an

alien law, many an Irish Naboth may have been dispossessed. There was,

moreover, the antagonism of religion, greatly intensified by the long

struggle in which the natives, fighting for independence, had looked up to

Rome for support and been fired at heart by the active zeal of her

missionaries.

The government meant well. It sent over an able lord deputy in the person

of Chichester, who did his best for healing and improvement. In

improvement he was somewhat hasty and procrustean. He might have done

better had he only imbibed Bacon's spirit of philosophic toleration, and

not fancied that for Irish barbarism Protestantism of the Anglican type

was the sovereign cure. Bacon, as one of his three specifics for the

recovery of the hearts of the people, had recommended a toleration,

partial and temporary at least, of the Catholic religion, which was to be

combined "with the sending over of some good preachers, especially of that

sort which are vehement and zealous persuaders and not scholastical, to be

resident in principal towns." The government issued a politic manifesto,

promising to all native Irish of the poorer class equal protection and

complete immunity from any oppressive claims of chiefs. But let the

government charm as wisely as it might, it could not charm away the

difference of race, language, and character, the antagonism of religion,

the memories of the long and murderous struggle, the ravenous cupidity and

overbearing attitude of the alien adventurer, the anguish of the native

who saw the stranger in possession of his land.

James called a Parliament for all Ireland, Catholic as well as Protestant.

It was packed for the Crown, which created boroughs for that purpose.

Still, it was something more like a national assembly than Ireland had

ever seen or in fact was destined again to see. The elections to it were

fiercely contested between the races and religions. Its first sitting was

characteristic. There was a division on the election of a speaker. One

party went out into the lobby. In its absence the other party seated its

man in the chair. The party which had gone out, returning and finding what

had been done, seated their man in the other man's lap. The importance of

this Parliament, however, is extolled by Sir John Davies, and one act, at

all events, stands to its credit. It repealed the statute of Kilkenny and

all other laws recognizing and perpetuating distinctions of race,

declaring that their cause had ceased, since the inhabitants of the

kingdom without distinction were henceforth under the protection of the

Crown, and the best way of settling peace was to allow their intercourse

and intermarriage so that they might grow into one nation. There was a

transient ray of sunlight on the dark scene. Efforts were made to improve

Trinity College, and learning shone forth in the person of Usher.

VI

There was still in Ireland a mine charged with the wrath of the

dispossessed added to the hatred of race and religion, the religious

hatred being the more deadly because, the Protestants of Ireland being

Calvinist, the antagonism was extreme. The match was applied to the mine

by the outbreak of revolution in England under Charles I. Strafford,

having passed from the ranks of patriotism to the place left vacant by the

death of Buckingham in the councils of the king, came with his dark look

of command as viceroy to play the part of beneficent despot in Ireland,

and at the same time to raise an army there for his master. The part of

despot he played to perfection, making the Irish Parliament the tool of

his will, applying to it and to the government in general his own and

Laud's high royalist policy of Thorough. The part of beneficent despot he

played to a considerable extent. He set his heel on the rapacity of the

adventurers, compelling the chief of them, the Earl of Cork, to disgorge.

He enforced order and put down piracy, which in the general disorder had

become rife. He fostered the cultivation of flax and the linen trade,

though he paid blackmail to English protectionism by prohibiting the

woollen manufacture. He did his best to reform the State Church, which he

found sunk in torpor, sinecurism, and simony, while its edifices were

ruins and piggeries. Unluckily he was a strict Anglican, whereas the only

Protestantism in Ireland which had life in it was the Calvinistic

Protestantism represented by Usher. He made a mortal enemy by turning the

sumptuous monument of Lady Cork off the place of the high altar. But to

find means of raising an army for his king he had to resort to violent

measures. He dragooned the Parliament into granting extraordinary

supplies. The king had pledged himself in the form of "graces" to respect

and quiet titles to large tracts of land. These graces Strafford thrust

aside. By legal chicane and intimidation of juries he, in defiance of the

king's plighted word, confiscated a great part of the land of Connaught. A

legal raid of the Crown on the estates which the city of London had

purchased in Ulster made the lord deputy another formidable enemy. He

added to the number by trampling on the pride of men of rank and

influence. Strafford had formed his army. That he intended it as a

support to the arbitrary government of Charles is beyond question; his

betrayal of that intention by some loose words uttered in council formed

the most damaging piece of evidence against him; and though the army broke

up on his departure, fears of it continued to haunt the English mind and

to intensify English feeling against the Irish. The Irish Parliament

joined in the impeachment of the man who had trampled on it, and when

Strafford pleaded in defence of his arbitrary measures, that Ireland was a

conquered country, Pym's retort was, "They were a conquered nation! There

cannot be a word more pregnant or fruitful in treason than that word is.

There are few nations in the world that have not been conquered, and no

doubt but the conqueror may give what law he pleases to those that are

conquered; but if the succeeding pacts and agreements do not limit and

restrain that right, what people can be secure? England hath been

conquered, and Wales hath been conquered, and by this reason will be in no

better case than Ireland. If the king by the right of a conqueror gives

laws to his people, shall not the people by the same reason be restored to

the right of the conquered to recover their liberty if they can?"

Revolution was in the air. It stirred the heart of the Catholic cowering

under the penal law, who saw the foot of his arch-enemy the Puritan on the

steps of power. It stirred still more the heart of the disinherited

native, especially on the forfeited domain of Tyrone. One of those great

popular conspiracies of which the Irish have the gift was formed under the

leadership of Phelim O'Neill, who ranked among his countrymen as head of

the great sept of O'Neill, and cherished ancestral traditions of vast

domains and princely power. With Phelim O'Neill was a better man, Roger

Moore, one of the disinherited, a deadly enemy of England. The rebellion

posed as royalist, declaring for the king against the Puritan and

revolutionary Parliament; its aims were Ireland for the Irish, and

Catholicism as the Irish religion. Phelim O'Neill was not a man to

restrain from crime. But the people, once launched in insurrection, were

probably beyond control. They rose upon the English settlers in Ulster,

drove them from their homes, and massacred some thousands with the usual

cruelty, women and children taking part in the fiendish work. Many were

stripped naked and exposed to perish in the cold. Dublin was full of

shivering and famished fugitives. The capital itself narrowly escaped

through fortunate betrayal of the plot, such as in an Irish conspiracy

seldom fails. It was natural that panic should exaggerate the number

murdered, as it was that panic and superstition together should see the

spectres of the English who had been drowned by the rebels at Portadown.

The effect upon the English, above all upon the Puritan mind, was like

that of the Sepoy mutiny and the massacre of Cawnpore. Ruthless

retaliation followed. Where the Protestants got the upper hand, Irish men,

women, and children were butchered without mercy. Thenceforth the Irishman

was to the Puritan a wild beast or worse. All Irishmen who landed in

England to fight for the king, with the women who followed their camps,

were put to the sword. An Irishwoman left behind by a Munster regiment at

the siege of Lyme was torn to pieces by the women of the place.

The English Parliament at once, being short of money, passed, to provide

for the Irish war, an act confiscating in advance two and a half millions

of acres of rebel land as security for a loan; a measure, to say the

least, extreme and sure to make the conflict internecine. The act passed

without a dissentient voice, and was one of the last that received the

assent of Charles.

In Ireland against the dark clouds of the storm one rainbow appeared. The

Protestant Bishop Bedel, though a proselytizer, had by his beneficence won

the love of his Catholic neighbours. He and his family were not only

spared by the rebels, but treated with loving-kindness, and when he died a

farewell salute was fired over his grave.

Thus commenced a course of mutual slaughter which lasted eleven years,

and, according to Sir William Petty, cost, by sword, plague, and famine,

the lives of a third part of the population. A great pasture country was

reduced to the importation of foreign meat. A traveller could ride twenty

or thirty miles without seeing a trace of human life, and wolves, fed on

human flesh, multiplied and prowled in packs within a few miles of Dublin.

Numbers abandoned the country and enlisted in foreign services. Slave

dealers plied their trade and shipped boys and girls to Barbados.

Strafford's place as deputy not having been filled, the government

remained in the hands of the Puritan Lords Justices Parsons and Borlase,

the first an intriguer and jobber, the second a worn-out soldier and a

cipher. They had prorogued the Parliament by which they might have been

restrained. The commander of the army on the king's side and the

representative of the king's interest was Ormonde, the head of the

loyalist house or sept of Butler, a man thoroughly honourable as well as

able and wise, whose character stands out nobly amidst the dark carnival

of evil.

It is difficult to say to which of the contending parties the palm of

atrocity is to be awarded. Probably to that of the government, which knew

no measure in the extermination of Catholics and rebels. Where Ormonde

commanded there was sure to have been comparative mercy. Mercy there

certainly was on the side of the insurgents when they were commanded by

Owen O'Neill, a genuine soldier trained in foreign service and observant

of the rules of civilized war. But a papal legate who was in the Catholic

camp gleefully reports that after a battle won by the confederates no

prisoners had been taken. By the soldiery of the government at least

children were butchered, the saying being that "nits make lice."

The anti-Catholic policy of the Puritan government and the castle had

driven into the arms of insurrection the Catholic lords of the Pale,

English in blood, normally hostile to the tribes though they were. The

Confederation formed at Kilkenny a provisional government with an assembly

of priests and laity combined, which elected a council of war. The

assembly was presently joined by a papal nuncio, Rinuccini, who brought

money from Rome and it seems at the same time encouragement of the

rebellion from Richelieu. The nuncio sought to control everything in the

paramount interest of the Papacy, which thus once more appears as a power

of temporal ambition. The assembly was not unanimous. Of the clergy and

the nuncio the chief aims were the ascendency of the Catholic Church and

the recovery of the confiscated Church lands. The chief aims of the lay

lords were lay; they wanted relief from political disabilities and

recovery of their political power. Restoration to the Church of the abbey

lands, of the grantees of which they were the heirs, was by no means to

their mind.

Of the origin of the rebellion in Ulster King Charles was perfectly

innocent, though he drew suspicion on himself by some careless words.

Nothing worse for his cause could have happened. But when in his wrestle

with the Puritan he was thrown, he began to cast a longing eye on the

forces in Ireland which, though rebel and Catholic, were at all events

hostile to the Puritan. There ensued a series of tangled intrigues with

the Confederates, in the course of which Charles showed his usual

weakness and duplicity, while he was fatally committed by the mingled

rashness and tergiversation of his envoy, Glamorgan, the result being a

disclosure very injurious to the poor king's character and cause. The

Confederacy was divided between a party which was for treating and a party

which was for war to the knife. For war to the knife was the nuncio, an

ecclesiastical termagant of the Becket stamp, inflated with notions of his

own spiritual power and reckless in the pursuit of his own end, which was

to lay Ireland at the feet of the Pope. In all this the high-minded

Ormonde sadly stooped to take a part for his royal master's sake. When the

cause of his royal master was finally lost, he surrendered his command to

the Parliament and left Ireland.

After the execution of Charles the scene shifted again. Abhorrence of

regicide brought about a junction of the more moderate Protestants with

the more moderate Confederates, uniting different parties and sections

under a common profession of loyalty. Ormonde then returned to lead a

mixed and not very harmonious force against Michael Jones, the Republican

commander. He advanced to the attack of Dublin, but was totally defeated

by Jones.

Now on the wings of victory came Cromwell with ten thousand of the New

Model. His proclamation on landing promised to all who would keep the

peace, peace and protection for themselves. That proclamation, the first

utterance of law and order heard in those parts for ten years, was

strictly carried into effect. A soldier was hanged for robbing a native of

a fowl. No disorder, rapine, or outrage upon women is laid to the charge

of the Puritan army in Ireland. Cromwell sat down before Drogheda, which

was held by a large royalist garrison, partly English. The garrison having

refused to surrender on summons, he stormed. Two attacks failed; a third,

led by himself, took the town. He put the garrison to the sword. That a

garrison refusing to surrender on summons and standing a storm might be

put to the sword was the rule of war in those days; it was the law, though

not the rule, of war even in the days of Wellington. Nevertheless, this

was a fell act for a commander who was generally humane in war, and at

Worcester risked his life in persuading Royalists to take quarter. Of this

Cromwell was himself sensible, and he spoke of it with compunction. "I am

persuaded," he said in his despatch to the Parliament, "that this is a

righteous judgment of God upon these barbarous wretches who have imbrued

their hands in so much innocent blood; and that it will tend to prevent

the effusion of blood for the future; which are the satisfactory grounds

to such actions, which otherwise cannot but work remorse and regret." Were

remorse and regret ever breathed by Alva, Parma, or Tilly? What did the

soldiery of those Catholic commanders do when it stormed a Protestant

town? What did the British soldiery, maddened by the recollection of a

massacre far less than that of 1641 do, not only to the Sepoy mutineer,

but to the insurgent people of Oude? When Rupert stormed Leicester, the

town was sacked, and women and children were found among the dead. The

Royalist Carte, in his life of Ormonde, commenting on the slaughter of the

garrison of Drogheda, says, "This was certainly an execrable policy in

that regicide. But it had the effect he proposed. It spread abroad the

terror of his name; it cut off the best body of the Irish troops and

disheartened the rest to such a degree that it was a greater loss in

itself and much more fatal in its consequences than the rout at

Rathmines." This is not a defence, nor much of an excuse. But it testifies

to a motive other than mere thirst of blood and shows that Cromwell spoke

the truth.

There was cruel slaughter again at the storming of Wexford, but it does

not appear that it was ordered by Cromwell. The defences having been

carried, the combat was renewed within the town by the townspeople, who,

it is stated, had provoked wrath by their piracy and by drowning a number

of Protestants in a hulk. The city had been summoned to surrender on fair

terms.

Cromwell was at once called away to the war with Scotland. He left the war

in Ireland to be finished by Ireton and Ludlow, who gradually extinguished

organized resistance, leaving only something between guerilla warfare and

brigandage called "Toryism," a name presently transmitted to a great

political party in England which bore it as a name of honour, in

opposition to that of Whig, on every hypothesis equally humble in its

source.

The two races and religions had fought for the land, and the Saxon and

Protestant had won. It is surely simple to suggest that the winner ought

to have invited the loser to take the prize, especially after such a

display of that loser's sentiments and intentions as the massacre of 1641.

Had it not been made fearfully clear that the two races and religions

could not dwell together in peace? The victorious Puritan drove the

Catholic into Connaught. The Catholic, if he could, would have driven the

Puritan into the sea. The original decree of "To Hell or Connaught," the

hateful sound of which still rings in Irish ears, seems to have been

somewhat mitigated as the wrath of the victor cooled. At all events the

sentence extended to landowners only, not to artisans and labourers, who

were to remain where they were and to be disciplined and civilized by

English masters. A great number of those who had fought on the losing side

were sent away to foreign service, ridding Ireland of a manifest danger

and forming the first instalment of the grand Irish element in the armies

of Catholic Europe. There was also a large deportation to Barbados,

including probably families left behind by the military emigration. This

was cruel work, the more so as there was terrible suffering in the

passage. The whole business was horrible and deplorable. But in passing

sentence on the winner we must remember what the loser, had he been the

winner, would have done. The shadow of an evil destiny was over all.

Deportation was not to slavery for life, but to terminable bondage, one

degree less cruel.

To cast all on Cromwell is most unfair. He had nothing specially to do

with Ireland till he came to put an end to the war. He left it forever

when he had struck his decisive blow. He could no more have given back the

contested land to the Catholics than he could have turned the Shannon to

its source. The act under which the land had been forfeited in advance and

a loan on it raised had been passed by the unanimous vote of Parliament

and had received the assent of the king. The soldiers who held land-scrip

for their pay presented their claims. As little would it have been

possible for Cromwell, even if he had desired it, to license the

celebration of the Mass, which in Puritan eyes was a sign, not only of

idolatry, but of allegiance to a foreign power, that power the mortal

enemy, not of the Protestant religion only, but of the Protestant State.

With liberty of conscience Cromwell declared that he would not interfere.

This was something in an age when the rack and the stake of the

Inquisition were still at work and when Irish troopers in the service of a

Catholic power were butchering the Protestant peasantry of Savoy. If the

Nuncio Rinuccini had got the upper hand in Ireland, a retirement of heresy

into the sanctuary of conscience would scarcely have saved it from the

stake. Cromwell does not appear to have persecuted in Ireland or to have

given the word for persecution.

The Protector united Ireland as well as Scotland to England, thus bringing

the factions under the control of a strong government, Ireland's only hope

of peace. Union assured her free trade with Great Britain and the

dependencies, an inestimable boon, not in the way of material wealth only,

but in that of commercial civilization, as its withdrawal afterwards

fatally proved. Her shipping was at the same time assured of exemption

from the disabilities of the Navigation Laws. The Protector sent her a

good governor in the person of his son Henry, who seems to have identified

himself with the welfare of her people. He sent her a liberal law reformer

in the person of Chief Justice Coke, proposing to himself to treat her as

a blank paper, whereon he could write reforms such as professional bigotry

debarred him from effecting in England. His mortal enemy Clarendon, after

dilating on the iniquities of the settlement, says, "And, which is more

wonderful, all this was done and settled within little more than two years

to that degree of perfection that there were many buildings raised for

beauty as well as use, orderly and regular plantations of trees, and

fences and enclosures raised throughout the kingdom, purchases made by

one from the other at very valuable rates, and jointures made upon

marriages, and all other conveyances and settlements executed, as in a

kingdom at peace within itself, and where no doubt could be made of the

validity of titles." If these material improvements were at first limited

to the domain and race of the victor, they would in time have spread.

Irish History and the Irish Question · 第 3 / 13 段