By the Archdeacon of Chester

No book dealing with memorials of old Cheshire would be complete which

did not give due prominence to those noted antiquaries of former

generations, the Randle Holmes, and acknowledge gratefully and without

stint the indebtedness of subsequent writers and students to their

research and patient investigations. What follows will show, however

inadequately, how great these obligations are. At the outset it may

be said that some confusion has arisen from the fact that the name

Randle Holme was borne by four members of the family in successive

generations, and as a consequence the work of one has sometimes been

assigned to another.

The family of Holme is a distinctly Cheshire one, Robert de Holme

acquiring by marriage at the end of the fourteenth century a moiety

of the manor of Tranmere or Tranmole. The property remained in the

family till the reign of James I., when William Holme of Chester,

on whom it had devolved, sold it. His uncle Thomas was the first to

settle in Chester, and his fourth son was the first Randle Holme.

He was born about 1571, dying in 1655, in the eighty-fourth year of

his age. By his marriage in 1598 with the widow of Thomas Chaloner

of Chester, a distinguished antiquary and herald, he succeeded to

her late husband’s papers, and was thus probably led to take up the

study of genealogy and family history. Chaloner had held an official

position as deputy to the Heralds’ College, and in March 1600-1 he was

succeeded by Randle Holme, who was appointed by William Segar, Norroy

King-of-Arms, as his deputy, to keep a “regester booke of Funerals in

the counties of Chester, Lancaster, and North Wales.” In this capacity

he had to truly enter the arms and crests, &c., “of all such persons

of Coate Armor and worship as it shall please God to call out of this

transitory life”; and to demand and collect the “due fees.” In 1604

he is mentioned as an Alderman of his company, as also is his brother

William, “a stationer,” he himself being “a painter.” In 1615 he was

one of the two sheriffs of the city, and in 1622 rebuilt his house in

Bridge Street, now the “Old King’s Head.” In 1631 he was one of those

selected for “obligatory knighthood,” but he compounded by payment of

£10. In 1633 he was elected Mayor of the city, and at the same time his

son Randle became one of the sheriffs. He was in Chester throughout

the whole of the troublous time of the Civil War, and also during the

violent outbreak of the plague in 1647. In January 1646 he was charged

by the Parliamentarians as having taken the King’s part, and was fined

as a delinquent £160. This apparently he did not pay, for after his

death his son protested against the payment of this large sum, and

some interesting documents are in existence in which it was urged that

he was looked upon as the Parliament’s friend. He died in January

1654-55, and was buried at St. Mary’s-on-the-Hill, the interesting

memorial tablet on wood, bearing his arms, being unfortunately lost.

He was succeeded by his son Randle, born in 1601, who in 1625 had

married the eldest daughter of Matthew Ellis of Overleigh, whose widow

became ten years later his father’s second wife. In 1629 he was one

of the churchwardens of St. Mary’s, holding office for two years; and

in 1643 he became Mayor, and as such was the recipient of numerous

official letters from the chief commanders of the Royalist side. These

and other similar documents were bound up by his son and successor the

third Randle Holme, and are preserved in the Harleian MSS. in the

British Museum. They bear autograph signatures of King Charles I.,

Prince Rupert, Sir John Byron, Sir Francis Gamul, and many others,

and form a most interesting collection. The same description applies

to another volume, giving a full account of the siege of Chester, and

which was written at the time and derived from papers of the Randle

Holmes, the writer in one passage stating that he had “for the most

part gathered this history from the study of Randle Holme”--that

is, the second Randle Holme. This is a sufficient indication of the

historical instinct and practice of the family, and of what we owe to

it for the preservation of accurate records of events that happened.

Randle Holme the Second did not long survive his father--only a little

over four years. A handsome monument to his memory in the Church of St.

Mary-on-the-Hill in Chester gives a pedigree of the family, tracing it

back to “Peter de Lymme, son of Gilbert, Lord of Lymme, who lived in

the time of Edward I.” It also contains three coats of arms, besides

crests, and is a good specimen of heraldic knowledge and genealogical

research. This Randle Holme, though buried at St. Mary’s, lived after

his second marriage, in 1643, in the parish of Holy Trinity, where

his name appears in the list as Mayor in 1644. During the siege of

Chester the Stationers’ Company could not hold their meetings in the

“Golden Phœnix” (the Phœnix Tower), and so they met at “Alderman Holmes

junior’s house in Watergate Street.” In the entry of a meeting “at the

Alderman’s howse” on October 18, 1645, we are told that “the Golden

Phœnix was employed for service for the defence of the garrison of

Chester, the enimie in close seidge about the Cittye.” Whether Randle

Holme the Second was able to secure the remission of the fine demanded

of his father we cannot say. In the Harl. MSS. is a document in which

he has left a record of his family, with the dates of their births and

baptisms, and the names of their god-parents, designated in some of

the entries as “witnesses” and in some as “gossips.” We learn from

this that his first-born and eldest son, the third Randle Holme, was

born on December 24, 1627, and baptized on the 30th of the same month,

and that one of his godfathers was Francis Gamul, the other being his

grandfather, the first Randle Holme.

Randle Holme the Third is the most distinguished of the four who

successively bore that name. He was the author of a most extraordinary

book, entitled _The Academy of Armoury_; and he was also a prominent

Freemason. He took up the business of his father and grandfather, and

in due course was admitted a member of the same company, of which, on

the death of his father, he was duly elected an alderman. He served

the office of churchwarden of St. Mary’s for two years from Easter

1657, and was instrumental in the erection of a new tower or steeple

and the provision of a new peal of four bells, the initials of the

churchwardens (George Chamberlain and Randle Holme), as well as those

of the bell founder, John Scott of Wigan, appearing on them. The peal

has now been enlarged into one of eight. In 1664 he was appointed to

the office of “sewer of the chamber in extraordinary to his Majesty

King Charles II.” A “sewer” was an officer whose function it was to

place the dishes on the table and to remove them afterwards, and some

think that it was also his duty to taste them. It almost looks as if

the title had arisen from the mis-spelling of the word, and as if the

“se_w_er” really was the “se_rv_er.” However, the word is to be found

in Shakespeare, Milton, Dryden, and others. In the Harl. MSS. we have

the certificate of Randle Holme’s appointment, which shows that under

it he was exempt from “bearing any publick office whatsoever.” This

will account for the fact that, unlike his father and grandfather, he

never held any office in the corporation of his native city. We do

not know by what Court influence he obtained this appointment, which,

though it contained certain privileges, must have been purely honorary,

and we do not read of his being called upon on any occasion to fulfil

its duties.

A dispute arose about this time between Randle Holme and the Heralds’

College, whose powers he was charged with usurping, by preparing

coats of arms and hatchments, and receiving fees for so doing. The

controversy was sharp and took a very practical shape, for we learn

from the diary of William Dugdale, Norroy King-of-Arms, that he

pulled down or defaced some “Achievements which Holmes, the Paynter,

of Chester had hung up.” This he did at Budworth, Nether Peover,

and Eastham, and other places in Cheshire. The dispute had nothing

to do with his heraldic knowledge and skill, which cannot have been

disputed, but probably arose from the fact that he had not then (as

he subsequently was) been officially appointed deputy to the Norroy

King-of-Arms. It would have been a dangerous precedent to allow any

unauthorised person, however competent, to undertake such functions,

and might have led to much confusion and to many mistakes, so that

the action of the Norroy King-of-Arms is easily accounted for. The

difficulty, which lasted some five years or thereabouts, was apparently

solved by the appointment of Randle Holme as deputy to the Norroy

King-of-Arms (as his father had been before him), though there is

no record of the date of his appointment. He had probably acted for

his father, and continued the same practice after his father’s death

without waiting for the requisite authority.

It was in 1688 that he issued his extraordinary book--_The Academy

of Armory, or a Storehouse of Armory and Blazon_. From the title it

might be supposed that the work was entirely on heraldic matters,

whereas it treats of almost every subject under the sun, and is a kind

of encyclopædia, arranged, it must be confessed, in a most awkward

form. He began collecting materials for it at a very early age, when

he was only twenty-two; and it was forty years later before the

book was printed. Whilst there can be no doubt that much of what it

contains might well have been omitted, it stands out as a monumental

evidence of the industry of the author as a collector of out-of-the-way

information which he was anxious to preserve, and of his desire to

make the work as complete as possible. The information thus gathered

together is sometimes very valuable, and often very quaint; whilst

specimens of Cheshire dialect, now obsolete, are to be found in

words and phrases which were evidently in common use when the book

was written. The title-page, which is very long, prepares us for the

variety which the book contains, as the following sentence from it will

show: “Very useful for all gentlemen, scholars, Divines, and all such

as desire any knowledge in arts and sciences.”

The chapters are dedicated to various personages or classes of persons,

and some of these lengthy dedications are interesting compositions. The

Fourth Book was never set up in type, and of the latter portion of the

Third Book the only printed example is in the Royal Library at Windsor

Castle. Other copies end with the first part of Book III., concluding

with a valedictory address, explaining how the vast expense entailed

and the inadequate return made him “resolve to go no further.” The book

was printed at Chester, and is the earliest work printed there, and as

such has, of course, a special interest for the city and county. It

is rather remarkable that on the site of his house in Bridge Street

(engraved by Cuitt as _Lamb Row_, the house having subsequently been

converted into a hostelry, “The Lamb”) now stand the printing works of

Mr. Griffiths. In his will his son Randle referred to a “Room in his

dwelling in the Bridge Street formerly made use of as a Printing House

or place.” Dr. Ormerod describes the book as “the strangest jumble on

natural history, mineralogy, and surgery, occasionally diversified by

palmistry, hunters’ terms, the cockpit laws, an essay on Time, and on

Men punished in Hell.” The description is not inaccurate, yet there can

be no doubt that in its eleven hundred folio pages are to be found many

valuable pieces of information, and that in this respect they form “a

storehouse” not only of “Armory and Blazon,” but also of many other

subjects, so that the student who has the patience to explore them is

sure to learn something. They show, too, what an inquiring mind the

author must have had, and how he noted down and kept ready for use the

knowledge he obtained.

[Illustration: Old Lamb Row.]

Randal Holme the Third was also a distinguished Freemason, and probably

one of the earliest connected with Chester. He alludes to the fact that

he was a “Member of the Society called Free-Masons” in his _Academy of

Armory_, and one of his manuscript volumes is entitled _Constitutions

of Masonry_, giving certain particulars as to the names of persons made

Freemasons, and to the initiation fees paid by them. Evidently there

was a lodge of Freemasons at Chester in the seventeenth century, of

which Randle Holme (III.) was a member. It has been supposed by some

that his father also may have been a Mason, as there are some masonic

emblems on the monument put up to his memory in St. Mary’s Church.

The Freemasons of the county showed their respect for his memory, and

commemorated his connection with the church by rebuilding the north

porch in 1892, whilst Mr. Henry Taylor, F.S.A., placed stained-glass

windows of a heraldic nature in the same, with a full account of him.

The laying of the foundation-stone of this porch by the then Provincial

Grand Master, Earl Egerton of Tatton, with full masonic rites, was an

interesting ceremony, and was attended by some two hundred Masons in

their regalia.

It has been already noted that Randle Holme III. lived in Bridge

Street. This house he apparently built about 1670, and did this without

consulting the Corporation, and he was ordered to pull it down, and

fined for persisting in building it. The house, however, was not

demolished until early in the nineteenth century, when the Grosvenor

Bridge was built over the Dee, and it was subsequently converted into a

tavern called “The Lamb.”

Randle Holme III. died on March 12, 1699-1700, in the seventy-third

year of his age. He was thrice married, and had issue eight sons

and six daughters. Of the former only three survived him--Randle,

by his first wife, born in 1659, and George and John by his second.

Randle was taken into partnership by his father when he was thirty-one

years of age--that is, in 1690. In 1691 he became a member of the

Stationers’ Company, of which he was elected an alderman in 1705,

the same year in which he was one of the two sheriffs of the city.

Like his great-grandfather, grandfather, and father, he also served

the office of churchwarden of St. Mary’s, and like them, too, he

was deputy to Norroy King-of-Arms. He continued the work of his

ancestors, and the churchwardens’ accounts of St. Mary’s contain

various entries of payments to him for work done. He died August 30,

1707, aged 48, all his five children having predeceased him. In his

will, referred to above, he bequeaths all his books and collections

of heraldry to his half-brothers George and John, to be equally

divided between them. These books and collections no doubt represented

the work and labours of all four Randle Holmes, as well as what the

first of that name obtained by his marriage with the widow of Thomas

Chaloner. They represented the researches of over a hundred years,

and contained abstracts of many documents which no longer exist, and

accounts of visits paid to many churches, with accurate descriptions

of the monumental inscriptions, and the old heraldic stained glass

in the windows. Early in the eighteenth century they were purchased

by Robert Harley, Earl of Oxford, having been, it is said, first

offered to the Corporation of Chester, who declined to buy them. They

now form a portion of that magnificent collection of manuscripts in

the British Museum known as “the Harleian MSS.,” and run to about

270 volumes. Naturally their contents are extremely diversified, and

they vary considerably in value; but there can be no doubt that to

any one inquiring into the history of Chester, Cheshire, Lancashire,

and North Wales they contain a mine of information, and are simply

invaluable. Unfortunately there is no complete and sufficient index

of their contents, so that laborious perusal of them is necessary, for

the acquisition of the information which they can convey. Allowance,

too, will have to be made for the fact that none of the four were

good mediæval Latin scholars, for none of them had the advantage of a

university education. Consequently in their transcription of old Latin

records many mistakes will be found, and though these may be irritating

to the modern student, they can easily be corrected. The opinion

passed on the first Randle Holme by the late Mr. W. H. Black, F.S.A.,

Assistant Keeper of the Public Records, may virtually be applied to

them all: “In short, he was an industrious and faithful copyist or

collector of historical antiquities, but his philological learning

was too scanty for him to use extreme accuracy on the one hand, or to

invent any of the documents which he professed to transcribe, extract,

or abridge on the other. Therefore his copies may be always relied on

as faithfully transcribed in substance.” Though the man of learned

leisure has not yet appeared who can wade through these volumes and

make us acquainted with the treasures they contain, yet it is true to

say that no historian of Chester or of Cheshire can fulfil his purpose

who does not either first-hand or second-hand (the former course being

the better) derive a great deal of information from these industrious

antiquarians of the seventeenth century. They have set an example

which has been stimulating and fruitful, and it is only right that in

a volume of this character generous and adequate expression should be

given to the debt which we owe to them for the preservation of details

and information which otherwise would have been irrevocably lost. They

have left also in many of the churches in Chester and its neighbourhood

many examples of their heraldic knowledge and skill in the memorials of

deceased persons. Painted as these were on wood, many have disappeared;

those that are still left are full of interest. May we not class these

four Randle Holmes as amongst Chester’s most notable worthies?

Memorials of old Cheshire · 第 59 / 195 题