THE EPISCOPAL MITRE AND PAPAL TIARA.

(Vol. iii., p. 62.)

In answer to the question of an "INQUIRER" respecting the origin of the

peculiar form and first use of the episcopal mitre, I take the liberty of

suggesting that it will be found to be of Oriental extraction, and to have

descended from that country, either directly, or through the medium of

other nations, to the ecclesiastics of Christian Rome. The writers of the

Romish, as well as Reformed Churches, now admit, that most, if not all, of

the external symbols, whether of dress or ceremonial pageantry, exhibited

by the Roman Catholic priesthood, were adopted from the Pagans, under the

plea of being "indifferent in themselves, and applicable as symbolical in

their own rites and usages" (Marangoni, _Delle cose gentili e profane

trasportate nel uso ed ornamento delle chiesi_); in the same manner as many

Romish customs were retained at the Reformation for the purpose of inducing

the Papists to "come in," and conform to the other changes then made

(Southey, _History of the Church_). Thus, while the disciples of Dr. Pusey

extract their forms and symbols from the practices of Papal Rome, the

disciples of the Pope deduce theirs from the practices of Pagan Rome.

With this preface I proceed to show that the episcopal _mitre_ and the

papal _tiara_ are respectively the copies each of a distinct head-dress

originally worn by the kings of Persia and the conterminous countries, and

by the chiefs of their priesthood, the Magi. The nomenclature alone

indicates a foreign extraction. It comes to us through the Romans from the

Greeks; both of which nations employed the terms [Greek: mitra], Lat.

_mitra_, and [Greek: tiara], Lat. _tiara_, to designate two different kinds

of covering for the head in use amongst the Oriental races, each one of a

distinct and peculiar form, though as being foreigners, and consequently

not possessing the technical accuracy of a native, they not unfrequently

confound the two words, and apply them indiscriminately to both objects.

Strictly speaking, the Greek [Greek: mitra], in its primitive notion, means

a long _scarf_, whence it came to signify, in a secondary sense, various

articles of attire composed with a scarf, and amongst others the Oriental

_turban_ (Herod. vii. 62.). But as we descend in time, and remove in

distance from the country where this object was worn, we find that the

Romans affixed another notion to the word, which they used very commonly to

designate the Asiatic or Phrygian cap (Virg. _AEn._ iv. 216.; Servius,

l.c.); and this sense has likewise been adopted in our own language:

"That Paris now with his unmanly sort,

With _mitred_ hat."--Surrey, Virgil, _AEn._ iv.

Thus the word _mitra_ in its later usage came to signify a _cap_ or

_bonnet_, instead of a turban; and it is needless to observe that the

priests of a religion comparatively modern, when they adopted the term,

would have taken it in the sense which was current at their own day. Now,

though the common people were not permitted to wear high bonnets, nor of

any other than a soft and flexible material, the kings and personages of

distinction had theirs of a lofty form, and stiffened for the express

purpose of making them stand up at an imposing elevation above the crown of

the head. In the national collection at Paris there is preserved an antique

gem, engraved by Caylus (_Recueil d'Antiq._, vol. ii. p. 124.), on which is

engraved the head of some Oriental personage, probably a king of Parthia,

Persia, or Armenia, who wears a tall upstanding bonnet, _mitred_ at the top

exactly like a bishop's, with the exception that it has three incisions at

the side instead of a single one. These separate incisions had no doubt a

symbolical meaning amongst the native races, although their allusive

properties are unknown to us; but it is not an unwarrantable inference, nor

inconsistent with the customs of these nations as enduring at this day, to

conclude that the numbers of one, two, or three, were appropriated as

distinctions of different degrees in rank; and that their priests, the

Magi, like those of other countries where the sovereign did not invest

himself with priestly dignities, imitated the habiliments as they assumed

the powers of the sovereign, and wore a bonnet closely resembling his in

form and dignity, with the difference of one large _mitre_ at each side, in

place of the three smaller ones.

If this account be true respecting the origin of the mitre, it will lead us

by an easy step to determine the place where it was first used--at Antioch,

the "Queen of the East," where, as we are told in the Acts of the Apostles,

the followers of Christ were first called "Christians;" thus indicating

that they were sufficiently numerous and influential to be distinguished as

a separate class in that city, while those in Rome yet remained despised

and unknown. Antioch was the imperial residence of the Macedonian dynasty,

which succeeded Alexander, who himself assumed the upright bonnet of the

Persian king (Arrian. iv. 7.), and transmitted it to his successors, who

ruled over Syria for several hundred years, where its form would be ready

at hand as a model emblematic of authority for the bishop who ruled over

the primitive church in those parts.

The tiara of the popes has, in like manner, an Eastern origin; but instead

of being adopted by them directly from its native birth-place, it descended

through Etruria to the Pagan priesthood of ancient Rome, and thence to the

head of the Roman Catholic Church. The [Greek: tiara] of the Greeks, and

_tiara_ of the Latins, expresses the cloth cap or _fez_ of the Parthians,

Persians, Armenians, &c., {145} which was a low scull-cap amongst the

commonalty, but a stiff and elevated covering for the kings and personages

of distinction (Xen. _Anab._ ii. 5, 23.). This imposing tiara is frequently

represented on ancient monuments, where it varies in some details, though

always preserving the characteristic peculiarity of a tall upright

head-dress. It is sometimes truncated at its upper extremity, at others a

genuine round-topped bonnet, like the Phrygian cap when pulled out to its

full length, and stiffened so as to stand erect--each a variety of form

peculiar to certain classes or degrees of rank, which at this period we are

not able to decide and distinguish with certainty. But on a bas-relief from

Persepolis, supposed to have belonged to the palace of Cyrus, and engraved

by Ferrario (_Costume dell' Asia_, vol. iii. tav. 47.), may be seen a

bonnet shaped very much like a beehive, the exact type of the papal tiara,

with three bands (the _triregno_) round its sides, and only wanting the

cross at the summit, and the strawberry-leaved decoration, to distinguish

it from the one worn by Pio Nono: and on a medal of Augustus, engraved on a

larger scale in Rich's _Companion to the Latin Dictionary_, art. Tutulus,

we find this identical form, with an unknown ornament of the top, for which

the popes substituted a cross, reappearing on the skull of a pagan priest.

I may add that the upright tiaras represented on works of ancient art,

which can be proved, or are known to be worn by royal personages, are

truncated at the summit; whence it does not seem an improper inference to

conclude that the round and conical ones belonged to persons inferior to

the kings alone in rank and influence, the Magi; which is the more

probable, since it is clear that they were adopted by the highest priests

of two other religions, those of Pagan and of Christian Rome.

If space admits, I would also add that the official insignia and costume of

a cardinal are likewise derived from the pagan usages of Greece. Amongst

his co-religionists he is supposed to symbolize one of the Apostles of

Christ, who went forth ill clothed and coarsely shod to preach the Gospel;

whereas, in truth, his comfortable hat, warm cloak, and showy stockings,

are but borrowed plumage from the ordinary travelling costume of a Greek

_messenger_ ([Greek: apostolos]). The sentiment of travelling is always

conveyed in the ancient bas-reliefs and vase paintings by certain

conventional signs or accessories bestowed upon the figure represented,

viz., a broad-brimmed and low-crowned hat ([Greek: petasos], Lat.

_petasus_), with long ties (_redimicula_) hanging from its sides, which

served to fasten it under the chin, or sling it behind at the nape of the

neck when not worn upon the head; a wrapping cloak ([Greek: himation], Lat.

_pallium_) made of coarse material instead of fine lamb's wool; and a pair

of stout travelling boots laced round the legs with leathern thongs

([Greek: endromides]), more serviceable for bad roads and rough weather

than their representatives, red silk stockings. All these peculiarities may

be seen in the following engravings (Winhelm. _Mon. Ined. Tratt., Prelim._,

p. xxxv.; Id., tav. 85.; _Rich's Companion_, art. "Ceryx" and "Pallium").

I regret that the nature of your publication does not admit the

introduction of woodcuts, which would have enabled me to present your

readers with the best of all demonstrations for what I advance. In default

of that I have endeavoured to point out the most compendious and accessible

sources where the figures I refer to may be seen in engravings. But if any

reader of "NOTES AND QUERIES" should not have an opportunity of consulting

the books cited, and is desirous of pursuing the investigation to satisfy

himself, I would willingly transmit to him a drawing of the objects

mentioned through Mr. Bell, or any other channel deemed more convenient.

Notes and Queries, Number 69, February 22, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 94 / 168 题