TN.

_Imputed Letters of Sullustius or Sallustius_ (Vol. iii., p. 62.).--I am

sorry to say that the printer has completely spoiled my Query, by printing

_Sullustius_ instead of _Sallustius_ throughout the whole article. I

subjoin a few more particulars concerning them. In the edition printed at

Cambridge (4to. 1710), and published under the auspices of the learned

Wasse, they are included. They are there entitled _Orationes ad C. Caesarem,

de Republica Ordinanda_. Cortius rejects them, and De Brosses accepts them.

Douza, Crispinus, Perizonius, Clericus, &c., all speak in favour of their

authenticity. Allen does not mention them, and Anthon rejects them

entirely. With these additional hints I doubt not but that some of your

obliging correspondents will be able to give me a reply.

Notes and Queries, Number 69, February 22, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 62 / 168 题