"The impression made at St. Petersburg by the execution of

Louis was fully as vivid as at London: already it was evident

that these two capitals were the centres of the great contest

which was approaching. ... An intimate and confidential

correspondence immediately commenced between Count Woronzoff,

the Russian ambassador at London, and Lord Grenville, the

British secretary of state for foreign affairs, which

terminated in a treaty between the powers, signed in London on

the 25th of March. By this convention, which laid the basis of

the grand alliance which afterwards brought the war to a

glorious termination, it was provided that the two powers

should 'employ their respective forces, as far as

circumstances shall permit, in carrying on the just and

necessary war in which they find themselves engaged against

France; and they reciprocally engage not to lay down their

arms without restitution of all the conquests which may have

been made upon either of the respective powers, or upon such

other states or allies to whom, by common consent, they shall

extend the benefit of this treaty.' ... Shortly after [April

25], a similar convention was entered into between Great

Britain and Sardinia, by which the latter power was to receive

an annual subsidy of £200,000 during the whole continuance of

the war, and the former to keep on foot an army of 50,000 men;

and the English government engaged to procure for it entire

restitution of its dominions as they stood at the commencement

of the war. By another convention, with the cabinet of Madrid,

signed at Aranjuez on the 25th of May, they engaged not to

make peace till they had obtained full restitution for the

Spaniards 'of all places, towns, and territories which

belonged to them at the commencement of the war, and which the

enemy may have taken during its continuance.' A similar treaty

was entered into with the court of the Two Sicilies, and with

Prussia [July 12 and 14], in which the clauses, prohibiting

all exportation to France, and preventing the trade of

neutrals with it, were the same as in the Russian treaty.

Treaties of the same tenor were concluded in the course of the

summer with the Emperor of Germany [August 30], and the King

of Portugal [September 26]. Thus was all Europe arrayed in a

great league against Republican France, and thus did the

regicides of that country, as the first fruits of their cruel

triumph, find themselves excluded from the pale of civilized

nations. ... But while all Europe thus resounded with the note

of military preparation against France, Russia had other and

more interested designs in view. Amidst the general

consternation at the triumphs of the French republicans,

Catharine conceived that she would be permitted to pursue,

without molestation, her ambitious designs against Poland [See

POLAND: A. D. 1793-1796]. She constantly represented the

disturbances in that kingdom as the fruit of revolutionary

propagandism, which it was indispensable to crush in the first

instance. ... The ambitious views of Prussia were also ...

strongly turned in the same direction. ... Nor was it only the

ambitious projects of Russia and Prussia against the

independence of Poland which already gave ground for gloomy

augury as to the issue of the war. Its issue was more

immediately affected by the jealousy of Austria and Prussia,

which now broke out in the most undisguised manner, and

occasioned such a division of the allied forces as effectually

prevented any cordial or effective co-operation continuing to

exist between them. The Prussian cabinet, mortified at the

lead which the Imperial generals took in the common

operations, insisted upon the formation of two independent

German armies; one composed of Prussians, the other of

Austrians, to one or other of which the forces of all the

minor states should be joined: those of Saxony, Hanover, and

Hesse being grouped around the standards of Prussia; those of

Bavaria, Wirtemburg, Swabia, the Palatinate, and Franconia,

following the double-headed eagles of Austria. By this means,

all unity of action between the two grand allied armies was

broken up. ... Prince Cobourg was appointed generalissimo of

the allied Armies from the Rhine to the German ocean." In

April, a corps of 20,000 English had been landed in Holland,

"under the command of the Duke of York, and being united to

10,000 Hanoverians and Hessians, formed a total of 30,000 men

in British pay." Holland, as an ally of England, was already

in the Coalition, the French having declared war, in February,

against the two maritime powers, simultaneously.

_Sir A. Alison,

History of Europe,

chapter 13 (volume 4)._

ALSO IN

_F. C. Schlosser,

History of the 18th Century,

volume 6, division 2, chapter 2, section 3_.

FRANCE: A. D. 1793 (April-August):

Minister Genet in America.

Washington's proclamation of neutrality.

See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1793.

{1292}

FRANCE: A. D. 1793 (June).

Flight of most of the Girondists.

Their appeal to the country.

Insurrection in the provinces.

The rising at Lyons, Marseilles, Bordeaux, Toulon.

Progress of the Vendean revolt.

"After this day [of the events which culminated on the 2d of

June, but which are commonly referred to as being of 'the 31st

of May,' when they began], when the people made no other use

of their power than to display and to exercise the pressure of

Paris over the representation, they separated without

committing any excess. ... La Montaigne caused the committees

to be reinstated on the morrow, with the exception of that of

public safety. They threw into the majority their most decided

members. ... They deposed those ministers suspected of

attachment to the' conquered; sent commissioners into the

doubtful departments; annulled the project of the constitution

proposed by the Girondists; and charged the committee of

safety to draw up in eight days a project for the constitution

entirely democratical. They pressed forward the recruiting and

armament of the revolutionary army--that levy of patriotism en

masse. They decreed a forced loan of a million upon the rich.

They sent one after the other, accused upon accused, to the

revolutionary tribunal. Their sittings were no longer

deliberation, but cursory motions, decreed on the instant by

acclamation, and sent immediately to the different committees

for execution. They stripped the executive power of the little

independence and responsibility it heretofore retained.

Continually called into the bosom of their committees,

ministers became no more than the passive executors of the

measures they decreed. From this day, also, discussion was at

an end; action was all. The disappearance of the Girondists

deprived the Revolution of its voice. Eloquence was proscribed

with Vergniaud, with the exception of those few days when the

great party chiefs, Danton and Robespierre, spoke, not to

refute opinions, but to intimate their will, and promulgate

their orders. The Assemblies became almost mute. A dead

silence reigned henceforth in the Convention. In the meanwhile

the 22 Girondists [excepting Vergniaud, Gensonné, Ducos,

Tonfrède, and a few others, who remained under the decree of

arrest, facing all consequences], the members of the

Commission of Twelve, and a certain number of their friends,

warned of their danger by this first blow of ostracism, fled

into their departments, and hurried to protest against the

mutilation of the country. ... Robespierre, Danton, the

Committee of Public Safety, and even the people themselves,

seemed to shut their eyes to these evasions, as if desirous to

be rid of victims whom it would pain them to strike. Buzot,

Barbaroux, Guadet, Louvet, Salles, Pétion, Bergoing, Lesage,

Cressy, Kervélégan and Lanjuinais, threw themselves into

Normandy; and after having traversed it, inciting all the

departments between Paris and the Ocean, established at Caen

the focus and centre of insurrection against the tyranny of

Paris. They gave themselves the name of the Central Assembly

of Resistance to Oppression. Biroteau and Chasset had arrived

at Lyons. The armed sections of this town were agitated with

contrary and already bloody commotion [the Jacobin

municipality having been overthrown, after hard fighting, and

its chief, Chalier, put to death]. Brissot fled to Moulins,

Robaut St. Etienne to Nismes. Grangeneuve, sent by Vergniaud,

Tonfrède, and Ducos, to Bordeaux, raised troops ready to march

upon the capital. Toulouse followed the same impulse of

resistance to Paris. The departments of the west were on fire,

and rejoiced to see the republic, torn into contending

factions, offer them the aid of one of the two parties for the

restoration of royalty. The mountainous centre of France ...

was agitated. ... Marseilles enrolled 10,000 men at the voice

of Rebecqui and the young friends of Barbaroux. They

imprisoned the commissioners of the Convention, Roux and

Antiboul. Royalty, always brooding in the south, insensibly

transformed this movement of patriotism into a monarchical

insurrection. Rebecqui, in despair ... at seeing loyalty avail

itself of the rising in the south, escaped remorse by suicide,

throwing himself into the sea. Lyons and Bordeaux likewise

imprisoned the envoys of the Convention as Maratists. The

first columns of the combined army of the departments began to

move in all directions; 6,000 Marseillais were already at

Avignon, ready to reascend the Rhone, and form a junction with

the insurgents of Nismes and of Lyons. Brittany and Normandy

uniting, concentrated their first forces at Evreux."

_A de Lamartine,

History of the Girondists,

book 43 (volume 3)._

The royalists of the west, "during this almost general rising

of the departments, continued to extend their enterprises.

After their first victories, the Vendeans seized on Bressure,

Argenton, and Thouars. Entirely masters of their own country,

they proposed getting possession of the frontiers, and

opening the way to revolutionary France, as well as

communications with England. On the 6th of June, the Vendean

army, composed of 40,000 men, under Cathelineau, Lescure,

Stofflet, and La Rochejacquelin, marched on Saumur, which it

took by storm. It then prepared to attack and capture Nantes,

to secure the possession of its own country, and become

masters of the course of the Loire. Cathelineau, at the head

of the Vendean troops, left a garrison in Saumur, took

Angers, crossed the Loire, pretended to advance upon Tours

and Lemans, and then rapidly threw himself upon Nantes, which

he attacked on the right bank, while Charette was to attack

it on the left."

_F. A. Mignet,

History of the French Revolution,

chapter 8._

FRANCE: A. D. 1793 (June-October).

The new Jacobin Constitution postponed.

Concentration of power in the Committee of Public Safety.

The irresistible machine of revolutionary government.

"It was while affairs were in this critical condition that the

Mountain undertook the sole conduct of the government in

France. They had hitherto resisted all attempts of the

Girondists to establish a new constitution in place of that of

1791. They now undertook the work themselves, and in four days

drew up a constitution, as simple as it was democratic, which

was issued on the 24th of June. Every citizen of the age of 21

could vote directly in the election of deputies, who were

chosen for a year at a time and were to sit in a single

assembly. The assembly had the sole power of making laws, but

a period was fixed during which the constituents could protest

against its enactments. The executive power was entrusted to

24 men, who were chosen by the assembly from candidates

nominated by electors chosen by the original voters. Twelve

out of the 24 were to be renewed every six months. But this

constitution was intended merely to satisfy the departments,

and was never put into practice. The condition of France

required a greater concentration of power, and this was

supplied by the Committee of Public Safety.

{1293}

Ever since the 6th of April the original members of the

Committee had been re-elected, but on the 10th of July its

composition was changed. Danton ceased to be a member, and

Barère was joined by Robespierre, St. Just, Couthon,

Billaud-Varennes, Collot d'Herbois, and, in a short time,

Carnot. These men became the absolute rulers of France. The

Committee had no difficulty in carrying their measures in the

Convention, from which the opposition party had disappeared.

All the state obligations were rendered uniform and inscribed

in 'the great book of the national debt.' The treasury was

filled by a compulsory loan from the rich. Every income

between 1,000 and 10,000 francs had to pay ten per cent., and

every excess over 10,000 francs had to be contributed in its

entirety for one year. To recruit the army a levee en masse

was decreed. 'The young men shall go to war; the married men

shall forge arms and transport supplies; the wives shall make

tents and clothes and serve in the hospitals; the children

shall tear old linen into lint; the aged shall resort to the

public places to excite the courage of the warriors and hatred

against kings.' Nor were measures neglected against domestic

enemies. On the 6th of September a revolutionary army,

consisting of 6,000 men and 1,200 artillery men, was placed at

the disposal of the Committee to carry out its orders

throughout France. On the 17th the famous 'law of the

suspects' was carried. Under the term 'suspect' were included

all those who by words, acts or writings had shown themselves

in favour of monarchy or of federalism, the relatives of the

emigrants, etc., and they were to be imprisoned until the

peace. As the people were in danger of famine, a maximum

price, already established for corn, was decreed for all

necessaries; if a merchant gave up his trade he became a

suspect, and the hoarding of provisions was punished by death.

On the 10th of October the Convention definitely transferred

its powers to the Committee, by subjecting all officials to

its authority and by postponing the trial of the new

constitution until the peace."

_R. Lodge,

History of Modern Europe,

chapter 23, section 11._

The Committee of Public Safety--the "Revolutionary

Government," as Danton had named it, on the 2d of August, when

he demanded the fearful powers that were given to

it--"disposed of all the national forces; it appointed and

dismissed the ministers, generals, Representatives on Mission,

the judges and juries of the Revolutionary Tribunal. The

latter instrument became its strong arm; it was, in fact, a

court martial worked by civil magistrates. By its agents it

directed the departments and armies, the political situation

without and within, striking down at the same time the rebels

within and the enemies without: for, together with the

constitution were, of course, suspended the municipal laws and

the political machinery of the communes; and thus cities and

villages hitherto indifferent or opposed to the Revolution

were republicanized. By the Tribunal it disposed of the

persons of individuals; by requisition and the law of maximum

(with which we are going to be better acquainted) it disposed

of their fortunes. It can, indeed, be said that the whole of

France was placed in a state of siege; but that was the price

of its salvation. ... But Danton has committed, a great

mistake,--one that he and especially France, will come to rue.

He has declined to become a member of the Revolutionary

Government, which has been established on his motion. 'It is

my firm resolve not to be a member of such a government,' he

had said. In other words, he has declined re-election as a

member of the Committee de Salut Public, now it has been

erected into a dictatorship. He unfortunately lacked all

ambition. ... When afterwards, on September 8, one Gaston

tells the Convention, 'Danton has a mighty revolutionary head.

No one understands so well as he to execute what he himself

proposes. I therefore move that he be added to the

Revolutionary Government, in spite of his protest,' and it is

so unanimously ordered, he again peremptorily declines. 'No, I

will not be a member; but as a spy on it I intend to work.' A

most fateful resignation! for while he still for a short time

continues to exercise his old influence on the government,

both from the outside, in his own person, and inside the

Committee, in the person of Hérault de Sechelles, selected in

his place, he very soon loses ground more and more,--so much

so even that Hérault, his friend, is 'put in quarantine,' as

was said in the Committee. And very natural. A statesman

cannot have power when he shirks responsibility, and without

power he soon loses all influence with the multitude. Those

who now succeed him in power are Robespierre, Barère,

Billaud-Varennes, and Carnot,--the two last very good working

members, good men of the second rank, but after Danton not a

single man is left fit to be leader."

_L. Gronlund,

Ça Ira! or Danton in the French Revolution,

chapter 4._

ALSO IN

_C. A. Fyffe,

History of Modern Europe,

volume 1, chapter 2._

_H. M. Stephens,

History of the French Revolution.

volume 2, chapter 9._

_H. C. Lockwood,

Constitutional History of France,

chapter 1, and appendix 2._

FRANCE: A. D. 1793 (July).

The assassination of Marat.

"Amongst those who had placed faith in the Girondists and

their ideals was a young woman of Normandy, Charlotte Corday.

... When the mob of Paris rose and drove with insult from the

Convention those who in her eyes were the heroic defenders of

the universal principles of truth and justice, she bitterly

resented the wrong that had been done, not only to the men

themselves, but to that France of which she regarded them as

the true representatives. Owing to Marat's persistent cry for

a dictatorship and for shedding of blood, it was he who, in

the departments, was accounted especially responsible both for

the expulsion of the Girondists and for the tyranny which now

began to weigh as heavily upon the whole country as it had

long weighed upon the capital. Incapable as all then were of

comprehending the causes which had brought about the fall of

the Girondists, Charlotte Corday imagined that by putting an

end to this man's life, she could also put an end to the

system of government which he advocated. Informing her friends

that she wished to visit England, she left Caen and travelled

in the diligence to Paris. On her arrival she purchased a

knife, and afterwards obtained entrance into Marat's house on

the pretext that she brought news which she desired to

communicate to him. She knew that he would be eager to obtain

intelligence of the movements of the Girondist deputies still

in Normandy. Marat was ill at the time, and in a bath when

Charlotte Corday was admitted.

{1294}

She gave him the names of the deputies who were at Caen. 'In a

few days,' he said, as he wrote them hastily down, 'I will

have them all guillotined in Paris.' As she heard these words

she plunged the knife into his body and killed him on the

spot. The cry uttered by the murdered man was heard, and

Charlotte, who did not attempt to escape, was captured and

conveyed to prison amid the murmurs of an angry crowd. It had

been from the first her intention to sacrifice her life for

the cause of her country, and, glorying in her deed, she met

death with stoical indifference. 'I killed one man,' she said,

when brought before the revolutionary court, 'in order to save

the lives of 100,000 others.' ... His [Marat's] murder brought

about contrary results to those which the woman who ignorantly

and rashly had flung away her life hoped by the sacrifice to

effect. ... He was regarded as a martyr by no small portion of

the working population of Paris. ... His murder excited

indignation beyond the comparatively narrow circle of those

who took an active part in political life, while at the same

time it added a new impulse to the growing cry for blood."

_B. M. Gardiner,

The French Revolution,

chapter 7._

ALSO IN

_C. Mac Farlane,

The French Revolution,

volume 3, chapter 13._

_J. Michelet,

Women of the French Revolution,

chapter 18-19._

_Mrs. R. K. Van Alstine,

Charlotte Corday._

_A. Dobson,

Four French Women,

chapter 1._

FRANCE: A. D. 1793 (July-December).

The civil war.

Sieges of Lyons and Toulon.

Submission of Caen, Marseilles and Bordeaux.

Crushing of the Vendeans.

"The insurgents in Calvados [Normandy] were easily suppressed;

at the very first skirmish at Vernon [July 13], the insurgent

troops fled. Wimpfen endeavoured to rally them in vain. The

moderate class, those who had taken up the defence of the

Girondists, displayed little ardour or activity. When the

constitution was accepted by the other departments, it saw the

opportunity for admitting that it had been in error, when it

thought it was taking arms against a mere factious minority.

This retractation was made at Caen, which had been the

headquarters of the revolt. The Mountain commissioners did not

sully this first victory with executions. General Carteaux on

the other hand, marched at the head of some troops against the

sectionary army of the south; he defeated its force, pursued

it to Marseilles, entered the town [August 23] after it, and

Provence would have been brought into subjection like

Calvados, if the royalists, who had taken refuge at Toulon,

after their defeat, had not called in the English to their

aid, and placed in their hands this key to France. Admiral

Hood entered the town in the name of Louis XVII., whom he

proclaimed king, disarmed the fleet, sent for 8,000 Spaniards

by sea, occupied the surrounding forts, and forced Carteaux,

who was advancing against Toulon, to fall back on Marseilles.

Notwithstanding this check, the conventionalists succeeded in

isolating the insurrection, and this was a great point. The

Mountain commissioners had made their entry into the rebel

capitals; Robert Lindet into Caen; Tallien into Bordeaux;

Barras and Fréron into Marseilles. Only two towns remained to

be taken Toulon and Lyons. A simultaneous attack from the

south, west, and centre was no longer apprehended, and in the

interior the enemy was only on the defensive. Lyons was

besieged by Kellermann, general of the army of the Alps; three

corps pressed the town on all sides. The veteran soldiers of

the Alps, the revolutionary battalions and the newly levied

troops, reinforced the besiegers every day. The people of

Lyons defended themselves with all the courage of despair. At

first, they relied on the assistance of the insurgents of the

south; but these having been repulsed by Carteaux, the

Lyonnese placed their last hope in the army of Piedmont, which

attempted a diversion in their favour, but was beaten by

Kellermann. Pressed still more energetically, they saw their

first position carried. Famine began to be felt, and courage

forsook them. The royalist leaders, convinced of the inutility

of longer resistance, left the town, and the republican army

entered the walls [October 9], where they awaited the orders

of the convention. A few months after, Toulon itself [in the

siege of which Napoleon Bonaparte commanded the artillery],

defended by veteran troops and formidable fortifications, fell

into the power of the republicans. The battalions of the army

of Italy, reinforced by those which the taking of Lyons left

disposable, pressed the place closely. After repeated attacks

and prodigies of skill and valour, they made themselves

masters of it, and the capture of Toulon finished what that of

Lyons had begun [December 19]. Everywhere the convention was

victorious. The Vendeans had failed in their attempt upon

Nantes, after having lost many men, and their

general-in-chief, Cathelineau. This attack put an end to the

aggressive and previously promising movement of the Vendean

insurrection. The royalists repassed the Loire, abandoned

Saumur, and resumed their former cantonments. They were,

however, still formidable; and the republicans, who pursued

them, were again beaten in La Vendée. General Biron, who had

succeeded General Berruyer, unsuccessfully continued the war

with small bodies of troops; his moderation and defective

system of attack caused him to be replaced by Canclaux and

Rossignol, who were not more fortunate than he. There were two

leaders, two armies, and two centres of operation; ... The

committee of public safety soon remedied this, by appointing

one sole general-in-chief, Lechelle, and by introducing war on

a large scale into La Vendée. This new method, aided by the

garrison of Mayence, consisting of 17,000 veterans, who,

relieved from operations against the coalesced powers after

the capitulation, were employed in the interior, entirely

changed the face of the war. The royalists underwent four

consecutive defeats, two at Châtillon, two at Cholet [the last

being October 17]. Lescure, Bonchamps, and d'Elbée were

mortally wounded: and the insurgents, completely beaten in

Upper Vendée, and fearing that they should be exterminated if

they took refuge in Lower Vendée, determined to leave their

country to the number of 80,000 persons. This emigration

through Brittany, which they hoped to arouse to insurrection,

became fatal to them. Repulsed before Granville, utterly

routed at Mons [Le Mans, December 12], they were destroyed at

Savenay [December 23], and barely a few thousand men, the

wreck of this vast emigration, returned to Vendée. These

disasters, irreparable for the royalist cause, the taking of

their land of Noir-moutiers from Charette, the dispersion of

the troops of that leader, the death of Laroche jacquelin,

rendered the republicans masters of the country.

{1295}

The committee of public safety, thinking, not without reason,

that its enemies were beaten but not subjugated, adopted a

terrible system of extermination to prevent them from rising

again. General Thurreau surrounded Vendée with sixteen

entrenched camps; twelve movable columns, called the infernal

columns, overran the country in every direction, sword and

fire in hand, scoured the woods, dispersed the assemblies, and

diffused terror throughout this unhappy country."

_F. A. Mignet,

History of the French Revolution,

chapter 8._

ALSO IN

_A. Thiers,

History of the French Revolution

(American edition), volume 2, pages 328-335,

and 398-410._

_Marchioness de Larochejaquelain,

Memoirs._

_A. des Echerolles,

Early Life,

volume 1, chapters 5-7._

FRANCE: A. D. 1793 (July-December).

Progress of the war of the Coalition.

Dissensions among the Allies.

Unsuccessful siege of Dunkirk.

French Victories of Hondschotten and Wattignies.

Operations on the Rhine and elsewhere.

History for ready reference, Volume 2, El Dorado to Greaves · 第 146 / 222 段