The extensive shifting of population which had produced its

most important result in the invasion of Peloponnesus by the

Dorians, must have caused great commotions and changes

throughout the whole Greek peninsula; and quite as much north

of the Corinthian isthmus as south of it. But in the part

which lies nearest to the isthmus--the branch peninsula of

Attica--the old inhabitants appear to have held their ground,

repelling invaders, and their country was affected only by an

influx of fugitives, flying from the conquered Peloponnesus.

The Attic people were more nearly akin to the expelled

Achaians and Ionians than to the conquering Dorians, although

a common brotherhood in the Hellenic race was recognized by

all of them. Whatever distinction there may have been before

between Achaians and Ionians now practically disappeared, and

the Ionic name became common to the whole branch of the Greek

people which derived itself from them. The important division

of the race through all its subsequent history was between

Dorians and Ionians. The Æolians constituted a third division,

of minor importance and of far less significance. The

distinction between Ionians and Dorians was a very real one,

in character no less than in traditions and name. The Ionians

were the superior Greeks on the intellectual side. It was

among them that the wonderful genius resided which produced

the greater marvels of art, literature and philosophy in Greek

civilization. It was among them, too, that the institutions of

political freedom were carried to their highest attainment.

Their chief city was Athens, and the splendor of its history

bears testimony to their unexampled genius. On the other hand,

the Dorians were less thoughtful, less imaginative, less broad

in judgment or feeling--less susceptible, it would seem, of a

high refinement of culture; but no less capable in practical

pursuits, no less vigorous in effective action, and sounder,

perhaps, in their moral constitution. Sparta, which stood at

the head of the Doric states, contributed almost nothing to

Greek literature, Greek thought, Greek art, or Greek commerce,

but exercised a great influence on Greek political history.

Other Doric states, especially Corinth, were foremost in

commercial and colonizing enterprise, and attained some

brilliancy of artistic civilization, but with moderate

originality.

Greeks and Phœnicians.

It was natural, as noted above, that the Greeks should be

induced at an early day to navigate the surrounding seas, and

to engage in trade with neighboring nations. They were not

original, it is supposed, in these ventures, but learned more

or less of ship-building and the art of navigation from an

older people, the Phœnicians, who dwelt on the coast of Syria

and Palestine, and whose chief cities were Sidon and Tyre. The

Phœnicians had extended their commerce widely through the

Mediterranean before the Greeks came into rivalry with them.

Their ships, and their merchants, and the wares they bartered,

were familiar in the Ægean when the Homeric poems were

composed.

{993}

They seem to have been the teachers of the early Greeks in

many things. They gave them, with little doubt, the invention

of the alphabet, which they themselves had borrowed from

Egypt. They conveyed hints of art, which bore astonishing

fruits when planted in the fertile Hellenic imagination. They

carried from the East strange stories of gods and demigods,

which were woven into the mythology of the Greeks. They gave,

in fact, to Greek civilization, at its beginning, the greatest

impulse it received. But all that Hellas took from the outer

world it wrought into a new character, and put upon it the

stamp of its own unmistakable genius. In navigation and

commerce the Greeks of the coast-cities and the islands were

able, ere long, to compete on even terms with the Phœnicians,

and it happened, in no great space of time, that they had

driven the latter entirely from the Ægean and the Euxine seas.

Greek Colonies.

They had now occupied with colonies the coast of Asia Minor

and the islands on both their own coasts. The Ionian Greeks

were the principal colonizers of the Asiatic shore and of the

Cyclades. On the former and near it they founded twelve towns

of note, including Samos, Miletus, Ephesus, Chios, and Phocæa,

which are among the more famous cities of ancient times. Their

important island settlements in the Cyclades were Naxos,

Delos, Melos, and Paros. They possessed, likewise, the great

island of Eubœa, with its two wealthy cities of Chalcis and

Eretria. These, with Attica, constituted, in the main, the

Ionic portion of Hellas.

The Dorians occupied the islands of Rhodes and Cos, and

founded on the coast of Asia Minor the cities of Halicarnassus

and Cnidus. The important Æolian colonies in Asia were Smyrna

(acquired later by the Ionians), Temnos, Larissa, and Cyme. Of

the islands they occupied Lesbos and Tenedos.

From these settlements on neighboring coasts and islands the

vigorous Greeks pushed on to more distant fields. It is

probable that their colonies were in Cyprus and Crete before

the eighth century, B. C. In the seventh century B. C., during

a time of confusion and weakness in Egypt, they had entered

that country as allies or as mercenaries of the kings, and had

founded a city, Naucratis, which became an important agent in

the exchange of arts and ideas, as well as of merchandise,

between the Nile and the Ægean. Within a few years past the

site of Naucratis has been uncovered by explorers, and much

has been brought to light that was obscure in Greek and

Egyptian history before. Within the same seventh century,

Cyrene and Barca had been built on the African coast, farther

west. Even a century before that time, the Corinthians had

taken possession of Corcyra (modern Corfu), and they, with the

men of Chalcis and Megara, had been actively founding cities

that grew great and rich, in Sicily and in southern Italy,

which latter acquired the name of "Magna Græcia" (Great

Greece). At a not much later time they had pressed northwards

to the Euxine or Black Sea, and had scattered settlements

along the Thracian and Macedonian coast, including one

(Byzantium) on the Bosphorus, which became, after a thousand

years had passed, the imperial city of Constantinople. About

597 B. C., the Phocæans had planted a colony at Massalia, in

southern Gaul, from which sprang the great city known in

modern times as Marseilles. And much of all this had been

done, by Ionians and Dorians together, before Athens (in which

Attica now centered itself, and which loomed finally greater

in glory than the whole Hellenic world besides) had made a

known mark in history.

Rise of Athens.

At first there had been kings in Athens, and legends had

gathered about their names which give modern historians a

ground-work for critical guessing, and scarcely more. Then the

king disappeared and a magistrate called Archon took his

place, who held office for only ten years. The archons are

believed to have been chosen first from the old royal family

alone; but after a time the office was thrown open to all

noble families. This was the aristocratic stage of political

evolution in the city-state. The next step was taken in 683 B.

C. (which is said to be the beginning of authentic Athenian

chronology) when nine archons were created, in place of the

one, and their term of office was reduced to a single year.

Fifty years later, about 621 B. C., the people of Athens

obtained their first code of written law, ascribed to one

Draco, and described as a code of much severity. But it gave

certainty to law, for the first time, and was the first great

protective measure secured by the people. In 612 B. C. a noble

named Kylon attempted to overthrow the aristocratic government

and establish a tyranny under himself, but he failed.

Legislation of Solon.

Then there came forward in public life another noble, who was

one of the wisest men and purest patriots of any country or

age, and who made an attempt of quite another kind. This was

Solon, the famous lawgiver, who became archon in 594 B. C. The

political state of Athens at that time has been described for

us in an ancient Greek treatise lately discovered, and which

is believed to be one of the hitherto lost writings of

Aristotle. "Not only," says the author of this treatise, "was

the constitution at this time oligarchical in every respect,

but the poorer classes, men, women, and children, were in

absolute slavery to the rich. ... The whole country was in the

hands of a few persons, and if the tenants failed to pay their

rent, they were liable to be haled into slavery, and their

children with them. Their persons were mortgaged to their

creditors." Solon saw that this was a state of things not to

be endured by such a people as the Athenians, and he exerted

himself to change it. He obtained authority to frame a new

constitution and a new code of laws for the state. In the

latter, he provided measures for relieving the oppressed class

of debtors. In the former, he did not create a democratic

government, but he greatly increased the political powers of

the people. He classified them according to their wealth,

defining four classes, the citizens in each of which had

certain political duties and privileges measured to them by

the extent of their property and income. But the whole body of

citizens, in their general assembly (the Ecclesia), were given

the important right of choosing the annual archons, whom they

must select, however, from the ranks of the wealthiest class.

At the same time, Solon enlarged the powers of the old

aristocratic senate--the Areopagus--giving it a supervision of

the execution of the laws and a censorship of the morals of

the people.

{994}

"These changes did not constitute Democracy,--a form of

government then unknown, and for which there was as yet no

word in the Greek language. But they initiated the democratic

spirit. ... Athens, thus fairly started on her

way,--emancipated from the discipline of aristocratic

school-masters, and growing into an age of manly liberty and

self-restraint,--came eventually nearer to the ideal of 'the

good life' [Aristotle's phrase] than any other State in

Hellas."

(W. W. Fowler.)

Tyranny of Pisistratus.

But before the Athenians reached their nearness to this "good

life," they had to pass under the yoke of a "tyrant,"

Pisistratus, who won the favor of the poorer people, and, with

their help, established himself in the Acropolis (560 B. C.)

with a foreign guard to maintain his power. Twice driven out,

he was twice restored, and reigned quite justly and prudently,

on the whole, until his death in 527 B. C. He was succeeded by

his two sons, Hippias and Hipparchus; but the latter was

killed in 514, and Hippias was expelled by the Spartans in 510

B. C.; after which there was no tyranny in Athens.

The Democratic Republic.

On the fall of the Pisistratidæ, a majority of the noble or

privileged class struggled hard to regain their old

ascendancy; but one of their number, Cleisthenes, took the

side of the people and helped them to establish a democratic

constitution. He caused the ancient tribal division of the

citizens to be abolished, and substituted a division which

mixed the members of clans and broke up or weakened the

clannish influence in politics. He enlarged Solon's senate or

council and divided it into committees, and he brought the

"ecclesia," or popular assembly, into a more active exercise

of its powers. He also introduced the custom of ostracism,

which permitted the citizens of Athens to banish by their vote

any man whom they thought dangerous to the state. The

constitution of Cleisthenes was the final foundation of the

Athenian democratic republic. Monarchical and aristocratic

Sparta resented the popular change, and undertook to restore

the oligarchy by force of arms; but the roused democracy of

Athens defended its newly won liberties with vigor and

success.

The Persian Wars.

Not Athens only, but all Greece, was now about to be put to a

test which proved the remarkable quality of both, and formed

the beginning of their great career. The Ionian cities of Asia

Minor had recently been twice conquered, first by Crœsus, King

of Lydia, and then by Cyrus the Great, founder of the Persian

empire, who had overthrown Crœsus (B. C. 547), and taken his

dominions. The Persians oppressed them, and in 500 B. C. they

rose in revolt. Athens and Eretria sent help to them, while

Sparta refused. The revolt was suppressed, and Darius, the

king of Persia, planned vengeance upon the Athenians and

Eretrians for the aid they had given to it. He sent an

expedition against them in 493 B. C., which was mostly

destroyed by a storm. In 490 B. C. he sent a second powerful

army and fleet, which took Eretria and razed it to the ground.

The great Persian army then marched upon Athens, and was met at

Marathon by a small Athenian force of 9,000 men. The little

city of Platæa sent 1,000 more to stand with them in the

desperate encounter. They had no other aid in the fight, and

the Persians were a great unnumbered host. But Miltiades, the

Greek general that day, planned his battle-charge so well that

he routed the Asiatic host and lost but 192 men. The Persians

abandoned their attempt and returned to their wrathful king.

One citizen of Athens, Themistocles, had sagacity enough to

foresee that the "Great King," as he was known, would not rest

submissive under his defeat; and with difficulty he persuaded

his fellow citizens to prepare themselves for future conflicts

by building a fleet and by fortifying their harbors, thus making

themselves powerful at sea. The wisdom of his counsels was

proved in 480 B. C., when Xerxes, the successor of Darius, led

an army of prodigious size into Greece, crossing the

Hellespont by a bridge of boats. This time, Sparta, Corinth,

and several of the lesser states, rallied with Athens to the

defence of the common country; but Thebes and Argos showed

friendship to the Persians, and none of the important

island-colonies contributed any help. Athens was the brain and

right arm of the war, notwithstanding the accustomed

leadership of Sparta in military affairs.

The first encounter was at Thermopylæ, where Leonidas and his

300 Spartans defended the narrow pass, and died in their place

when the Persians found a way across the mountain to surround

them. But on that same day the Persian fleet was beaten at

Artemisium. Xerxes marched on Athens, however, found the city

deserted, and destroyed it. His fleet had followed him, and

was still stronger than the naval force of the Greeks.

Themistocles forced a battle, against the will of the

Peloponnesian captains, and practically destroyed the Persian

fleet. This most memorable battle of Salamis was decisive of

the war, and decisive of the independence of Greece. Xerxes,

in a panic, hastened back into Asia, leaving one of his

generals, Mardonius, with 300,000 men, to pursue the war. But

Mardonius was routed and his host annihilated, at Platæa, the

next year, while the Persian fleet was again defeated on the

same day at Mycale.

The Golden Age of Athens.

The war had been glorious for the Athenians, and all could see

that Greece had been saved by their spirit and their

intelligence much more than by the valor of Sparta and the

other states. But they were in a woful condition, with their

city destroyed and their families without homes. Wasting no

time in lamentations, they rebuilt the town, stretched its

walls to a wider circuit, and fortified it more strongly than

before, under the lead of the sagacious Themistocles. Their

neighbors were meanly jealous, and Sparta made attempts to

interfere with the building of the walls; but Themistocles

baffled them cunningly, and the new Athens rose proudly out of

the ashes of the old.

{995}

The Ionian islands and towns of Asia Minor (which had broken

the Persian yoke) now recognized the superiority and

leadership of Athens, and a league was formed among them,

which held the meetings of its deputies and kept its treasury

in the temple of Apollo on the sacred island of Delos; for

which reason it was called the Confederacy of Delos, or the

Delian League. The Peloponnesian states formed a looser rival

league under the headship of Sparta. The Confederacy of Delos

was in sympathy with popular governments and popular parties

everywhere, while the Spartans and their following favored

oligarchies and aristocratic parties. There were many

occasions for hostility between the two.

The Athenians, at the head of their Confederacy, were strong,

until they impaired their power by using it in tyrannical

ways. Many lesser states in the league were foolish enough to

commute in money payments the contribution of ships and men

which they had pledged themselves to make to the common naval

force. This gave Athens the power to use that force

despotically, as her own, and she did not scruple to exercise

the power. The Confederacy was soon a name; the states forming

it were no longer allies of Athens, but her subjects; she

ruled them as the sovereign of an Empire, and her rule was

neither generous nor just. Thereby the double tie of kinship

and of interest which might have bound the whole circle of

Ionian states to her fortunes and herself was destroyed by her

own acts. Provoking the hatred of her allies and challenging

the jealous fear of her rivals, Athens had many enemies.

At the same time, a dangerous change in the character of her

democratic institutions was begun, produced especially by the

institution of popular jury-courts, before which prosecutions

of every kind were tried, the citizens who constituted the

courts acting as jury and judge at once. This gave them a

valuable training, without doubt, and helped greatly to raise

the common standard of intelligence among the Athenians so

high; but it did unquestionably tend also to demoralizations

that were ruinous in the end. The jury service, which was

slightly paid, fell more and more to an unworthy class, made

up of idlers or intriguers. Party feeling and popular passions

gained an increasing influence over the juries, and demagogues

acquired an increasing skill in making use of them.

But these evils were scarcely more than in their seed during

the great period of "Athenian Empire," as it is sometimes

called, and everything within its bounds was suffused with the

shining splendor of that matchless half-century. The genius of

this little Ionic state was stimulated to amazing achievements

in every intellectual field. Æschylus, Sophocles, Euripides,

Aristophanes, within a single generation, crowded Athenian

literature with the masterpieces of classic drama. Pheidias

and his companions crowned the Acropolis and filled the city

with works that have been the models in art for all ages

since. Socrates began the quizzing which turned philosophy

into honest truth-seeking paths, and Plato listened to him and

was instructed for his mission. Thucydides watched events with

sagacious young eyes, and prepared his pen for the chronicling

of them; while Herodotus, pausing at Athens from his wide

travels, matured the knowledge he had gathered up and

perfected it for his final work. Over all of them came

Pericles to preside and rule, not as a master, or "tyrant,"

but as leader, guide, patron, princely republican,--statesman

and politician in one.

The Peloponnesian War.

The period of the ascendancy of Pericles was the "golden age"

of Athenian prosperity and power, both material and

intellectual. The beginning of the end of it was reached a

little before he died, when the long-threatened war between

Athens and the Peloponnesian league, led by Sparta, broke out

(B. C. 431). If Athens had then possessed the good will of the

cities of her own league, and if her citizens had retained

their old sobriety and intelligence, she might have triumphed

in the war; for she was all powerful at sea and fortified

almost invincibly against attacks by land. But the subject

states, called allies, were hostile, for the most part, and

helped the enemy by their revolts, while the death of Pericles

(B. C. 429) let loose on the people a swarm of demagogues who

flattered and deluded them, and baffled the wiser and more

honest, whose counsels and leadership might have given her

success.

The fatal folly of the long war was an expedition against the

distant city of Syracuse (B. C. 415-413), into which the

Athenians were enticed by the restless and unscrupulous

ambition of Alcibiades. The entire force sent to Sicily

perished there, and the strength and spirit of Athens were

ruinously sapped by the fearful calamity. She maintained the

war, however, until 404 B. C., when, having lost her fleet in

the decisive battle of Ægospotami, and being helplessly

blockaded by sea and land, the city was surrendered to the

Spartan general Lysander. Her walls and fortifications were

then destroyed and her democratic government was overthrown,

giving place to an oligarchy known as the "thirty tyrants."

The democracy soon suppressed the thirty tyrants and regained

control, and Athens, in time, rose somewhat from her deep

humiliation, but never again to much political power in

Greece. In intellect and cultivation, the superiority of the

Attic state was still maintained, and its greatest productions

in philosophy and eloquence were yet to be given to the world.

Spartan and Theban Ascendancy.

After the fall of Athens, Sparta was dominant in the whole of

Greece for thirty years and more, exercising her power more

oppressively than Athens had done. Then Thebes, which had been

treacherously seized and garrisoned by the Spartans, threw off

their yoke (B. C. 379) and led a rising, under her great and

high-souled citizen, Epaminondas, which resulted in bringing

Thebes to the head of Greek affairs. But the Theban ascendancy

was short-lived, and ended with the death of Epaminondas in

362 B. C.

Macedonian Supremacy.

Meantime, while the city-states of Hellas proper had been

wounding and weakening one another by their jealousies and

wars, the semi-Greek kingdom of Macedonia, to the north of

them, in their own peninsula, had been acquiring their

civilization and growing strong. And now there appeared upon

its throne a very able king, Philip, who took advantage of

their divisions, interfered in their affairs, and finally made

a practical conquest of the whole peninsula, by his victory at

the battle of Chæronea (B. C. 338). At Athens, the great

orator Demosthenes had exerted himself for years to rouse

resistance to Philip. If his eloquence failed then, it has

served the world immortally since, by delighting and

instructing mankind.

{996}

King Philip was succeeded by his famous son, Alexander the

Great, who led an army of Macedonians and Greeks into Asia (B.

C. 334), overthrew the already crumbling Persian power,

pursued his conquests through Afghanistan to India, and won a

great empire which he did not live to rule. When he died (B.

C. 323), his generals divided the empire among them and fought

with one another for many years. But the general result was

the spreading of the civilization and language of the Greeks,

and the establishing of their intellectual influence, in

Egypt, in Syria, in Asia Minor, and beyond.

In Greece itself, a state of disturbance and of political

confusion and weakness prevailed for another century. There

was promise of something better, in the formation, by several

of the Peloponnesian states, of a confederacy called the

Achaian League, which might possibly have federated and

nationalized the whole of Hellas in the end; but the Romans,

at this juncture, turned their conquering arms eastward, and

in three successive wars, between 211 and 146 B. C., they

extinguished the Macedonian kingdom, and annexed it, with the

whole peninsula, to the dominions of their wonderful republic.

The Romans.

History for ready reference, Volume 2, El Dorado to Greaves · 第 63 / 222 段