'That we shall sincerely, really, and constantly, through the

grace of God, endeavour, in our several places and callings,

the preservation of the Reformed religion in the Church of

Scotland, in doctrine, worship, discipline and government,

against our common enemies; the reformation of religion in the

kingdoms of England and Ireland, in doctrine, worship,

discipline, and government, according to the Word of God, and

the example of the best Reformed churches; and we shall

endeavour to bring the churches of God in the three kingdoms

to the nearest conjunction and uniformity in religion,

confessing of faith, form of church government directory for

worship and catechizing; that we and our posterity after us,

may as brethren live in faith and love, and the Lord may

delight to dwell in the midst of us. That we shall in like

manner, without respect of persons, endeavour the extirpation

of popery, prelacy (that is, church government by archbishops,

bishops, their chancellors and commissaries, deans, deans and

chapters, archdeacons, and all other ecclesiastical officers

depending on that hierarchy).' Vane, by this introduction of

'according to the Word of God,' left the interpretation of

that word to the free conscience of every man. On the 17th of

August, the solemn league and covenant was voted by the

Legislature and the Assembly of the Church at Edinburgh. The

king in desperate alarm, sent his commands to the Scotch

people not to take such a covenant. In reply, they 'humbly

advised his majesty to take the covenant himself.' The

surpassing service rendered by Vane on this great occasion to

the Parliamentary cause, exposed him to a more violent hatred

from the Royalists than he had yet experienced, and Clarendon

has used every artifice to depreciate his motives and his

sincerity. ... The solemn league and covenant remained to be

adopted in England. The Scottish form of giving it authority

was followed as far as possible. It was referred by the two

Houses to the Assembly of Divines, which had commenced its

sittings on the 1st of the preceding July, being called

together to be consulted with by the Parliament for the

purpose of settling the government and form of worship of the

Church of England. This assembly already referred to,

consisted of 121 of the clergy; and a number of lay assessors

were joined with them, consisting of ten peers, and twenty

members of the House of Commons. All these persons were named

by the ordinance of the two Houses of Parliament which gave

birth to the assembly. The public taking of the Covenant was

solemnized on the 25th of September, each member of either

House attesting his adherence by oath first, and then by

subscribing his name. The name of Vane, subscribed immediately

on his return, appears upon the list next to that of

Cromwell."

_J. Forster,

Statesmen of the Commonwealth: Vane._

ALSO IN:

_J. K. Hosmer,

Life of Young Sir Henry Vane,

chapter 8._

_A. F. Mitchell,

The Westminster Assembly,

lectures 5-6._

_D. Neal,

History of the Puritans,

volume 3, chapter 2._

_S. R. Gardiner,

Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution,

page 187._

The following is the text of the Solemn League and Covenant:

"A solemn league and covenant for Reformation and defence of

religion, the honour and happiness of the King, and the peace

and safety of the three kingdoms of England, Scotland and

Ireland. We noblemen, barons, knights, gentlemen, citizens,

burgesses, ministers of the Gospel, and commons of all sorts

in the kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland, by the

providence of God living under one King, and being of one

reformed religion; having before our eyes the glory of God,

and the advancement of the kingdom of our Lord and Saviour

Jesus Christ, the honour and happiness of the King's Majesty

and his posterity, and the true public liberty, safety and

peace of the kingdoms, wherein everyone's private condition is

included; and calling to mind the treacherous and bloody

plots, conspiracies, attempts and practices of the enemies of

God against the true religion and professors thereof in all

places, especially in these three kingdoms, ever since the

reformation of religion; and how much their rage, power and

presumption are of late, and at this time increased and

exercised, whereof the deplorable estate of the Church and

kingdom of Ireland, the distressed estate of the Church and

kingdom of England, and the dangerous estate of the Church and

kingdom of Scotland, are present and public testimonies: we

have (now at last) after other means of supplication,

remonstrance, protestations and sufferings, for the

preservation of ourselves and our religion from utter ruin and

destruction, according to the commendable practice of these

kingdoms in former times, and the example of God's people in

other nations, after mature deliberation, resolved and

determined to enter into a mutual and solemn league and

covenant, wherein we all subscribe, and each one of us for

himself, with our hands lifted up to the most high God, do

swear,

I. That we shall sincerely, really and constantly, through the

grace of God, endeavour in our several places and callings,

the preservation of the reformed religion in the Church of

Scotland, in doctrine, worship, discipline and government,

against our common enemies; the reformation of religion in the

kingdoms of England and Ireland, in doctrine, worship,

discipline and government, according to the Word of God, and

the example of the best reformed Churches; and we shall

endeavour to bring the Churches of God in the three kingdoms

to the nearest conjunction and uniformity in religion,

confession of faith, form of Church government, directory for

worship and catechising, that we, and our posterity after us,

may, as brethren, live in faith and love, and the Lord may

delight to dwell in the midst of us.

II. That we shall in like manner, without respect of persons,

endeavour the extirpation of Popery, prelacy (that is, Church

government by Archbishops, Bishops, their Chancellors and

Commissaries, Deans, Deans and Chapters, Archdeacons, and all

other ecclesiastical officers depending on that hierarchy),

superstition, heresy, schism, profaneness and whatsoever shall

be found to be contrary to sound doctrine and the power of

godliness lest we partake in other men's sins, and thereby be

in danger to receive of their plagues; and that the Lord may

be one, and His name one in the three kingdoms.

{872}

III. We shall with the same sincerity, reality and constancy,

in our several vocations, endeavour with our estates and lives

mutually to preserve the rights and privileges of the

Parliaments, and the liberties of the kingdoms, and to

preserve and defend the King's Majesty's person and authority,

in the preservation and defence of the true religion and

liberties of the kingdoms, that the world may bear witness

with our consciences of our loyalty, and that we have no

thoughts or intentions to diminish His Majesty's just power

and greatness.

IV. We shall also with all faithfulness endeavour the

discovery of all such as have been or shall be incendiaries,

malignants or evil instruments, by hindering the reformation

of religion, dividing the King from his people, or one of the

kingdoms from another, or making any faction or parties

amongst the people, contrary to the league and covenant, that

they may be brought to public trial and receive condign

punishment, as the degree of their offences shall require or

deserve, or the supreme judicatories of both kingdoms

respectively, or others having power from them for that

effect, shall judge convenient.

V. And whereas the happiness of a blessed peace between these

kingdoms, denied in former times to our progenitors, is by the

good providence of God granted to us, and hath been lately

concluded and settled by both Parliaments: we shall each one

of us, according to our places and interest, endeavour that

they may remain conjoined in a firm peace and union to all

posterity, and that justice may be done upon the wilful

opposers thereof, in manner expressed in the precedent

articles.

VI. We shall also, according to our places and callings, in

this common cause of religion, liberty and peace of the

kingdom, assist and defend all those that enter into this

league and covenant, in the maintaining and pursuing thereof;

and shall not suffer ourselves, directly or indirectly, by

whatsoever combination, persuasion or terror, to be divided

and withdrawn from this blessed union and conjunction, whether

to make defection to the contrary part, or give ourselves to a

detestable indifferency or neutrality in this cause, which so

much concerneth the glory of God, the good of the kingdoms,

and the honour of the King; but shall all the days of our

lives zealously and constantly continue therein, against all

opposition, and promote the same according to our power,

against all lets and impediments whatsoever; and what we are

not able ourselves to suppress or overcome we shall reveal and

make known, that it may be timely prevented or removed: all

which we shall do as in the sight of God. And because these

kingdoms are guilty of many sins and provocations against God,

and His Son Jesus Christ, as is too manifest by our present

distresses and dangers, the fruits thereof: we profess and

declare, before God and the world, our unfeigned desire to be

humbled for our own sins, and for the sins of these kingdoms;

especially that we have not as we ought valued the inestimable

benefit of the Gospel; that we have not laboured for the

purity and power thereof; and that we have not endeavoured to

receive Christ in our hearts, nor to walk worthy of Him in our

lives, which are the causes of other sins and transgressions

so much abounding amongst us, and our true and unfeigned

purpose, desire and endeavour, for ourselves and all others

under our power and charge, both in public and in private, in

all duties we owe to God and man, to amend our lives, and each

one to go before another in the example of a real reformation,

that the Lord may turn away His wrath and heavy indignation,

and establish these Churches and kingdoms in truth and peace.

And this covenant we make in the presence of Almighty God, the

Searcher of all hearts, with a true intention to perform the

same, as we shall answer at that Great Day when the secrets of

all hearts shall be disclosed: most humbly beseeching the Lord

to strengthen us by His Holy Spirit for this end, and to bless

our desires and Proceedings with such success as may be a

deliverance and safety to His people, and encouragement to the

Christian Churches groaning under or in danger of the yoke of

Anti-Christian tyranny, to join in the same or like

association and covenant, to the glory of God, the enlargement

of the kingdom of Jesus Christ, and the peace and tranquility

of Christian kingdoms and commonwealths."

ENGLAND: A. D. 1643 (August-September).

Siege of Gloucester and first Battle of Newbury.

"When the war had lasted a year, the advantage was decidedly

with the Royalists. They were victorious, both in the western

and in the northern counties. They had wrested Bristol, the

second city in the kingdom, from the Parliament. They had won

several battles, and had not sustained a single serious or

ignominious defeat. Among the Roundheads, adversity had begun

to produce dissension and discontent. The Parliament was kept

in alarm, sometimes by plots and sometimes by riots. It was

thought necessary to fortify London against the royal army,

and to hang some disaffected citizens at their own doors.

Several of the most distinguished peers who had hitherto

remained at Westminster fled to the court at Oxford; nor can

it be doubted that, if the operations of the Cavaliers had, at

this season, been directed by a sagacious and powerful mind,

Charles would soon have marched in triumph to Whitehall. But

the King suffered the auspicious moment to pass away; and it

never returned. In August, 1643, he sate down before the city

of Gloucester. That city was defended by the inhabitants and

by the garrison, with a determination such as had not, since

the commencement of the war, been shown by the adherents of

the Parliament. The emulation of London was excited. The

trainbands of the City volunteered to march wherever their

services might be required. A great force was speedily

collected, and began to move westward. The siege of Gloucester

was raised. The Royalists in every part of the kingdom were

disheartened; the spirit of the parliamentary party revived;

and the apostate Lords, who had lately fled from Westminster

to Oxford, hastened back from Oxford to Westminster."

_Lord Macaulay,

History of England,

chapter 1._

After accomplishing the relief of Gloucester, the

Parliamentary army, marching back to London, was intercepted

at Newbury by the army of the king, and forced to fight a

battle, September 20, 1643, in which both parties, as at

Edgehill, claimed the victory. The Royalists, however, failed

to bar the road to London, as they had undertaken to do, and

Essex resumed his march on the following morning.

{873}

"In this unhappy battle was slain the lord viscount Falkland;

a person of such prodigious parts of learning and knowledge,

of that inimitable sweetness and delight in conversation, of

so flowing and obliging a humanity and goodness to mankind,

and of that primitive sincerity and integrity of life, that if

there were no other brand upon this odious and accursed war

than that single loss, it must be most infamous and execrable

to all posterity."

_Earl of Clarendon,

History of the Rebellion,

book 7, section 217._

This lamented death on the royal side nearly evened, so to

speak, the great, unmeasured calamity which had befallen the

better cause three months before, when the high-souled patriot

Hampden was slain in a paltry skirmish with Rupert's horse, at

Chalgrove Field, not far from the borders of Oxfordshire. Soon

after the fight at Newbury, Charles, having occupied Reading,

withdrew his army to Oxford and went into winter quarters.

_N. L. Walford,

Parliamentary Generals of the Great Civil War,

chapter 2._

ALSO IN:

_Sir E. Cust,

Lives of the Warriors of the Civil Wars,

part 2._

_S. R. Gardiner,

History of the Great Civil War,

chapter 10 (volume 1)._

ENGLAND: A. D. 1644 (January).

Battle of Nantwich and siege of Lathom House.

The Irish army brought over by King Charles and landed in

Flintshire, in November, 1643, under the command of Lord

Byron, invaded Cheshire and laid siege to Nantwich, which was

the headquarters of the Parliamentary cause in that region.

Young Sir Thomas Fairfax was ordered to collect forces and

relieve the town. With great difficulty he succeeded, near the

end of January, 1644, in leading 2,500 foot-soldiers and

twenty-eight troops of horse, against the besieging army,

which numbered 3,000 foot and 1,800 horse. On the 28th of

January he attacked and routed the Irish royalists completely.

"All the Royalist Colonels, including the subsequently

notorious Monk, 1,500 soldiers, six pieces of ordnance, and

quantities of arms, were captured." Having accomplished this

most important service, Sir Thomas, "to his great annoyance,"

received orders to lay siege to Lathom House, one of the

country seats of the Earl of Derby, which had been fortified

and secretly garrisoned, with 300 soldiers. It was held by the

high-spirited and dauntless Countess of Derby, in the absence

of her husband, who was in the Isle of Man. Sir Thomas Fairfax

soon escaped from this ignoble enterprise and left it to be

carried on, first, by his cousin, Sir William Fairfax, and

afterwards by Colonel Rigby. The Countess defended her house

for three months, until the approach of Prince Rupert forced

the raising of the siege in the following spring. Lathom House

was not finally surrendered to the Roundheads until December

6, 1645, when it was demolished.

_C. R. Markham,

Life of the Great Lord Fairfax,

chapter 13._

ALSO IN:

_Mrs. Thompson,

Recollections of Literary Characters and Celebrated Places,

volume 2, chapter 2._

_E. Warburton,

Memoirs of Prince Rupert and the Cavaliers,

page 2, chapter 4._

ENGLAND: A. D. 1644 (January-July).

The Scots in England.

The Battle of Marston Moor.

"On the 19th of January, 1644, the Scottish army entered

England. Lesley, now earl of Leven, commanded them. ... In the

meantime, the parliament at Westminster formed a council under

the title of 'The Committee of the Two Kingdoms,' consisting

of seven Lords, fourteen members of the Commons, and four

Scottish Commissioners. Whatever belongs to the executive

power as distinguished from the legislative devolved upon this

Committee. In the spring of 1644 the parliament had five

armies in the field, paid by general or local taxation, and by

voluntary contributions. Including the Scottish army there

were altogether 56,000 men under arms; the English forces

being commanded, as separate armies, by Essex, Waller,

Manchester, and Fairfax. Essex and Waller advanced to blockade

Oxford. The queen went to Exeter in April, and never saw

Charles again. The blockading forces around Oxford had become

so strong that resistance appeared to be hopeless. On the

night of the 3d of June the king secretly left the city and

passed safely between the two hostile armies. There had again

been jealousies and disagreements between Essex and Waller.

Essex, supported by the council of war, but in opposition to

the committee of the two kingdoms, had marched to the west.

Waller, meanwhile, went in pursuit of the king into

Worcestershire, Charles suddenly returned to Oxford; and then

at Copredy Bridge, near Banbury, defeated Waller, who had

hastened back to encounter him. Essex was before the walls of

Exeter, in which city the queen had given birth to a princess.

The king hastened to the west. He was strong enough to meet

either of the parliamentary armies thus separated. Meanwhile

the combined English and Scottish armies were besieging York.

Rupert had just accomplished the relief of Lathom House, which

had been defended by the heroic countess of Derby for eighteen

weeks, against a detachment of the army of Fairfax. He then

marched towards York with 20,000 men. The allied English and

Scots retired from Hessey Moor, near York, to Tadcaster.

Rupert entered York with 2,000 cavalry. The Earl of Newcastle

was in command there. He counselled a prudent delay. The

impetuous Rupert said he had the orders of the king for his

guidance, and he was resolved to fight. On the 2nd of July,

having rested two days in and near York, and enabled the city

to be newly provisioned, the royalist army went forth to

engage. They met their enemy on Marston Moor. The issue of the

encounter would have been more than doubtful, but for

Cromwell, who for the first time had headed his Ironsides in a

great pitched battle. The right wing of the parliamentary army

was scattered. Rupert was chasing and slaying the Scottish

cavalry. ... The charges of Fairfax and Cromwell decided the

day. The victory of the parliamentary forces was so complete

that the Earl of Newcastle left York, and embarked at

Scarborough for the continent. Rupert marched away also, with

the wreck of his army, to Chester. Fifteen hundred prisoners,

all the artillery, more than 100 banners, remained with the

victors; 4,150 bodies lay dead on the plain."

_C. Knight,

Crown History of England,

chapter 25._

ALSO IN:

_T. Carlyle,

Oliver Cromwell's Letters and Speeches,

part 2, letter 8._

_B. M. Cordery and J. S. Phillpotts,

King and Commonwealth,

chapter 7._

_W. Godwin, History of the Commonwealth, chapter 12,

(volume 1)._

_E. Warburton, Memoirs of Prince Rupert and the

Cavaliers, volume 2, chapter 4._

ENGLAND: A. D. 1644 (August-September).

Essex's surrender.

The second Battle of Newbury.

{874}

"The great success at Marston, which had given the north to

the Parliament, was all undone in the south and west through

feebleness and jealousies in the leaders and the wretched

policy that directed the war. Detached armies, consisting of a

local militia, were aimlessly ordered about by a committee of

civilians in London. Disaster followed on disaster. Essex,

Waller, and Manchester would neither agree amongst themselves

nor obey orders. Essex and Waller had parted before Marston

was fought; Manchester had returned from York to protect his

own eastern counties. Waller, after his defeat at Copredy, did

nothing, and naturally found his army melting away. Essex,

perversely advancing into the west, was out-manœuvred by

Charles, and ended a campaign of blunders by the surrender of

all his infantry [at Fowey, in Cornwall, September 2, 1644].

By September 1644 throughout the whole south-west the

Parliament had not an army in the field. But the Committee of

the Houses still toiled on with honourable spirit, and at last

brought together near Newbury a united army nearly double the

strength of the King's. On Sunday, the 29th of October, was

fought the second battle of Newbury, as usual in these

ill-ordered campaigns, late in the afternoon. An arduous day

ended without victory, in spite of the greater numbers of the

Parliament's army, though the men fought well, and their

officers led them with skill and energy. At night the King was

suffered to withdraw his army without loss, and later to carry

off his guns and train. The urgent appeals of Cromwell and his

officers could not infuse into Manchester energy to win the

day, or spirit to pursue the retreating foe."

_F. Harrison, Oliver Cromwell, chapter 5._

ALSO IN:

_B. M. Cordery and J. S. Phillpotts,

King and Commonwealth,

chapters 7._

_S. R. Gardiner,

History of the Great Civil War,

chapters 19 and 21._

ENGLAND: A. D. 1644-1645.

The Self-denying Ordinance.

"Cromwell had shown his capacity for organization in the

creation of the Ironsides; his military genius had displayed

itself at Marston Moor. Newbury first raised him into a

political leader. 'Without a more speedy, vigorous and

effective prosecution of the war,' he said to the Commons

after his quarrel with Manchester, 'casting off all lingering

proceedings, like those of soldiers of fortune beyond sea to

spin out a war, we shall make the kingdom weary of us, and

hate the name of a Parliament.' But under the leaders who at

present conducted it a vigorous conduct of the war was

hopeless. They were, in Cromwell's plain words, 'afraid to

conquer.' They desired not to crush Charles, but to force him

back, with as much of his old strength remaining as might be,

to the position of a constitutional King. ... The army, too,

as he long ago urged at Edgehill, was not an army to conquer

with. Now, as then, he urged that till the whole force was new

modeled, and placed under a stricter discipline, 'they must

not expect any notable success in anything they went about.'

But the first step in such a reorganization must be a change

of officers. The army was led and officered by members of the

two Houses, and the Self-renouncing [or Self-denying]

Ordinance, which was introduced by Cromwell and Vane, declared

the tenure of civil or military offices incompatible with a

seat in either. In spite of a long and bitter resistance,

which was justified at a later time by the political results

which followed this rupture of the tie which had hitherto

bound the army to the Parliament, the drift of public opinion

was too strong to be withstood. The passage of the Ordinance

brought about the retirement of Essex, Manchester, and Waller;

and the new organization of the army went rapidly on under a

new commander-in-chief, Sir Thomas Fairfax, the hero of the

long contest in Yorkshire, and who had been raised into fame

by his victory at Nantwich and his bravery at Marston Moor."

_J. R. Green,

Short History of England,

chapter 8, section 7._

ALSO IN:

_W. Godwin,

History of the Commonwealth,

chapter 15 (volume l)._

_J. K. Hosmer,

Life of Young Sir Henry Vane,

chapter 11._

_J. A. Picton,

Oliver Cromwell,

chapter 10._

_J. Forster,

Statesmen of the Commonwealth: Vane._

ENGLAND: A. D. 1645 (January-February).

The attempted Treaty of Uxbridge.

History for ready reference, Volume 2, El Dorado to Greaves · 第 29 / 222 段