"Maddened by persecution, by the hopelessness of rebellion

within or deliverance from without, the fiercer Catholics

listened to schemes of assassination, to which the murder of

William of Orange lent at the moment a terrible significance.

The detection of Somerville, a fanatic who had received the

host before setting out for London 'to shoot the Queen with

his dagg,' was followed by measures of natural severity, by

the flight and arrest of Catholic gentry, by a vigourous

purification of the Inns of Court, where a few Catholics

lingered, and by the dispatch of fresh batches of priests to

the block. The trial and death of Parry, a member of the House

of Commons who had served in the Queen's household, on a

similar charge, brought the Parliament together in a transport

of horror and loyalty.

{842}

All Jesuits and seminary priests were banished from the realm

on pain of death. A bill for the security of the Queen

disqualified any claimant of the succession who had instigated

subjects to rebellion or hurt to the Queen's person from ever

succeeding to the crown. The threat was aimed at Mary Stuart.

Weary of her long restraint, of her failure to rouse Philip or

Scotland to aid her, of the baffled revolt of the English

Catholics and the baffled intrigues of the Jesuits, she bent

for a moment to submission. 'Let me go,' she wrote to

Elizabeth; 'let me retire from this island to some solitude

where I may prepare my soul to die. Grant this and I will sign

away every right which either I or mine can claim.' But the

cry was useless, and her despair found a new and more terrible

hope in the plots against Elizabeth's life. She knew and

approved the vow of Anthony Babington and a band of young

Catholics, for the most part connected with the royal

household, to kill the Queen; but plot and approval alike

passed through Walsingham's hands, and the seizure of Mary's

correspondence revealed her guilt. In spite of her protests, a

commission of peers sat as her judges at Fotheringay Castle;

and their verdict of 'guilty' annihilated, under the

provisions of the recent statute, her claim to the crown. The

streets of London blazed with bonfires, and peals rang out

from steeple to steeple, at the news of her condemnation; but,

in spite of the prayer of Parliament for her execution, and

the pressure of the Council, Elizabeth shrank from her death.

The force of public opinion, however, was now carrying all

before it, and the unanimous demand of her people wrested at

last a sullen consent from the Queen. She flung the warrant

signed upon the floor, and the Council took on themselves the

responsibility of executing it. Mary died [February 8, 1587]

on a scaffold which was erected in the castle hall at

Fotheringay, as dauntlessly as she had lived. 'Do not weep,'

she said to her ladies, 'I have given my word for you.' 'Tell

my friends,' she charged Melville, 'that I die a good

Catholic.'"

_J. R. Green,

Short History of the English People,

chapter 7, section 6._

"'Who now doubts,' writes an eloquent modern writer, 'that it

would have been wiser in Elizabeth to spare her life?' Rather,

the political wisdom of a critical and difficult act has never

in the world's history been more signally justified. It cut

away the only interest on which the Scotch and English

Catholics could possibly have combined. It determined Philip

upon the undisguised pursuit of the English throne, and it

enlisted against him and his projects the passionate

patriotism of the English nobility."

_J. A. Froude,

History of England,

volume 12, chapter 34._

ALSO IN:

_A. De Lamartine,

Mary Stuart,

chapter 31-34._

_L. S. F. Buckingham,

Memoirs of Mary Stuart,

volume 2, chapter 5-6._

_L. von Ranke,

History of England,

book 3, chapter 5._

_J. D. Leader,

Mary Queen of Scots in Captivity._

_C. Nau,

History of Mary Stuart._

_F. A. Mignet,

History of Mary Queen of Scots,

chapters 9-10._

England: A. D. 1587-1588.

The wrath of Catholic Europe.

Spanish vengeance and ambition astir.

"The death of Mary [Queen of Scots] may have preserved England

from the religious struggle which would have ensued upon her

accession to the throne, but it delivered Elizabeth from only

one, and that the weakest of her enemies; and it exposed her

to a charge of injustice and cruelty, which, being itself well

founded, obtained belief for any other accusation, however

extravagantly false. It was not Philip [of Spain] alone who

prepared for making war upon her with a feeling of personal

hatred: throughout Romish Christendom she was represented as a

monster of iniquity; that representation was assiduously set

forth, not in ephemeral libels, but in histories, in dramas,

in poems, and in hawker's pamphlets; and when the king of

Spain equipped an armament for the invasion of England,

volunteers entered it with a passionate persuasion that they

were about to bear a part in a holy war against the wickedest

and most inhuman of tyrants. The Pope exhorted Philip to

engage in this great enterprize for the sake of the Roman

Catholic and apostolic church, which could not be more

effectually nor more meritoriously extended than by the

conquest of England; so should he avenge his own private and

public wrongs; so should he indeed prove himself most worthy

of the glorious title of Most Catholic King. And he promised,

as soon as his troops should have set foot in that island, to

supply him with a million of crowns of gold towards the

expenses of the expedition. ... Such exhortations accorded

with the ambition, the passions, and the rooted principles of

the king of Spain. The undertaking was resolved."

_R. Southey,

Lives of the British Admirals,

volume 2, page 319._

"The succours which Elizabeth had from time to time afforded

to the insurgents of the Netherlands was not the only cause of

Philip's resentment and of his desire for revenge. She had

fomented the disturbances in Portugal, ... and her captains,

among whom Sir Francis Drake was the most active, had for many

years committed unjustifiable depredations on the Spanish

possessions of South America, and more than once on the coasts

of the Peninsula itself. ... By Spanish historians, these

hostilities are represented as unprovoked in their origin, and

as barbarous in their execution, and candor must allow that

there is but too much justice in the complaint."

_S. A. Dunham,

History of Spain and Portugal,

book 4, section 1, chapter 1._

ALSO IN:

_J. A. Froude,

History of England,

volume 12, chapter 35._

ENGLAND: A. D. 1588.

The Spanish Armada.

"Perhaps in the history of mankind there has never been a vast

project of conquest conceived and matured in so protracted and

yet so desultory a manner, as was this famous Spanish

invasion. ... At last, on the 28th, 29th and 30th May, 1588,

the fleet, which had been waiting at Lisbon more than a month

for favourable weather, set sail from that port, after having

been duly blessed by the Cardinal Archduke Albert, viceroy of

Portugal. There were rather more than 130 ships in all,

divided into 10 squadrons. ... The total tonnage of the fleet

was 59,120: the number of guns was 3,165. Of Spanish troops

there were 19,295 on board: there were 8,252 sailors and 2,088

galley-slaves. Besides these, there was a force of noble

volunteers, belonging to the most illustrious houses of Spain,

with their attendants, amounting to nearly 2,000 in all. ...

The size of the ships ranged from 1,200 tons to 300. The

galleons, of which there were about 60, were huge

round-stemmed clumsy vessels, with bulwarks three or four feet

thick, and built up at stem and stern, like castles.

{843}

The galeasses--of which there were four--were a third larger

than the ordinary galley, and were rowed each by 300

galley-slaves. They consisted of an enormous towering fortress

at the stern, a castellated structure almost equally massive

in front, with seats for the rowers amidships. At stem and

stern and between each of the slaves' benches were heavy

cannon. These galeasses were floating edifices, very wonderful

to contemplate. They were gorgeously decorated. There were

splendid state-apartments, cabins, chapels, and pulpits in

each, and they were amply provided with awnings, cushions,

streamers, standards, gilded saints and bands of music. To

take part in an ostentatious pageant, nothing could be better

devised. To fulfil the great objects of a war-vessel--to sail

and to fight--they were the worst machines ever launched upon

the ocean. The four galleys were similar to the galeasses in

every respect except that of size, in which they were by

one-third inferior. All the ships of the fleet--galeasses,

galleys, galleons, and hulks--were so encumbered with

top-hamper, so over-weighted in proportion to their draught of

water, that they could bear but little canvas, even with

smooth seas and light and favourable winds. ... Such was the

machinery which Philip had at last set afloat, for the purpose

of dethroning Elizabeth and establishing the inquisition in

England. One hundred and forty ships, 11,000 Spanish veterans,

as many more recruits, partly Spanish, partly Portuguese, 2,000

grandees, as many galley slaves, and 300 barefooted friars and

inquisitors. The plan was simple. Medina Sidonia [the

captain-general of the Armada] was to proceed straight from

Lisbon to Calais roads: there he was to wait for the Duke of

Parma [Spanish commander in the Netherlands], who was to come

forth from Newport, Sluys, and Dunkirk, bringing with him his

17,000 veterans, and to assume the chief command of the whole

expedition. They were then to cross the channel to Dover, land

the army of Parma, reinforced with 6,000 Spaniards from the

fleet, and with these 23,000 men Alexander was to march at

once upon London. Medina Sidonia was to seize and fortify the

Isle of Wight, guard the entrance of the harbours against any

interference from the Dutch and English fleets, and--so soon

as the conquest of England had been effected--he was to

proceed to Ireland. ... A strange omission had however been

made in the plan from first to last. The commander of the

whole expedition was the Duke of Parma: on his head was the

whole responsibility. Not a gun was to be fired--if it could

be avoided--until he had come forth with his veterans to make

his junction with the Invincible Armada off Calais. Yet there

was no arrangement whatever to enable him to come forth--not

the slightest provision to effect that junction. ... Medina

could not go to Farnese [Alexander Farnese, Duke of Parma],

nor could Farnese come to Medina. The junction was likely to

be difficult, and yet it had never once entered the heads of

Philip or his counsellors to provide for that difficulty. ...

With as much sluggishness as might have been expected from

their clumsy architecture, the ships of the Armada consumed

nearly three weeks in sailing from Lisbon to the neighbourhood

of Cape Finisterre. Here they were overtaken by a tempest. ...

Of the squadron of galleys, one was already sunk in the sea,

and two of the others had been conquered by their own slaves.

The fourth rode out the gale with difficulty, and joined the

rest of the fleet, which ultimately reassembled at Coruña; the

ships having, in distress, put in first at Vivera, Ribadeo,

Gijon, and other northern ports of Spain. At the Groyne--as

the English of that day were accustomed to call Coruña--they

remained a month, repairing damages and recruiting; and on the

22d of July (N. S.) the Armada set sail. Six days later, the

Spaniards took soundings, thirty leagues from the Scilly

Islands, and on Friday, the 29th of July, off the Lizard, they

had the first glimpse of the land of promise presented them by

Sixtus V. of which they had at last come to take possession.

On the same day and night the blaze and smoke of ten thousand

beacon-fires from the Land's End to Margate, and from the Isle

of Wight to Cumberland, gave warning to every Englishman that

the enemy was at last upon them."

_J. L. Motley,

History of the United Netherlands,

chapter 19._

ALSO IN:

_J. A. Froude,

History of England,

volume 12, chapter 36._

_J. A. Froude,

The Spanish Story of the Armada._

_R. Southey,

Lives of British Admirals,

volume 2, pages 327-334._

_C. M. Yonge,

Cameos from English History,

5th series, chapter 27._

ENGLAND: A. D. 1588.

The Destruction of the Armada.

"The great number of the English, the whole able-bodied

population being drilled, counterbalanced the advantage

possessed, from their universal use of firearms, by the

invaders. In all the towns there were trained bands (a civic

militia); and, either in regular service or as volunteers,

thousands of all ranks had received a military training on the

continent. The musters represented 100,000 men as ready to

assemble at their head-quarters at a day's notice. It was, as

nearly always, in its military administration that the

vulnerable point of England lay. The fitting-out and

victualling of the navy was disgraceful; and it is scarcely an

excuse for the councillors that they were powerless against

the parsimony of the Queen. The Government maintained its

hereditary character from the days of Ethelred the Unready,

and the arrangements for assembling the defensive forces were

not really completed by them until after the Armada was

destroyed. The defeat of the invaders, if they had landed,

must have been accomplished by the people. The flame of

patriotism never burnt purer: all Englishmen alike, Romanists,

Protestant Episcopalians, and Puritans, were banded together

to resist the invader. Every hamlet was on the alert for the

beacon-signal. Some 15,000 men were already under arms in

London; the compact Tilbury Fort was full, and a bridge of

boats from Tilbury to Gravesend blocked the Thames. Philip's

preparations had been commensurate with the grandeur of his

scheme. The dockyards in his ports in the Low Countries, the

rivers, the canals, and the harbours of Spain, Portugal,

Naples, and Italy, echoed the clang of the shipwrights'

hammers. A vast armament, named, as if to provoke Nemesis, the

'Invincible Armada,' on which for three years the treasures of

the American mines had been lavished, at length rode the seas,

blessed with Papal benedictions and under the patronage of the

saints. It comprised 65 huge galleons, of from 700 to 1,300

tons, with sides of enormous thickness, and built high like

castles; four great galleys, each carrying 50 guns and 450

men, and rowed by 300 slaves; 56 armed merchantmen, and 20

pinnaces. These 129 vessels were armed with 2,430 brass and

iron guns of the best manufacture, but each gun was furnished

only with 50 rounds.

{844}

They carried 5,000 seamen: Parma's army amounted to 30,000

men--Spaniards, Germans, Italians and Walloons; and 19,000

Castilians and Portuguese, with 1,000 gentlemen volunteers,

were coming to join him. To maintain this army after it had

effected a landing, a great store of provisions--sufficient

for 40,000 men for six months--was placed on board. The

overthrow of this armament was effected by the navy and the

elements. From the Queen's parsimony the State had only 36

ships in the fleet; but the City of London furnished 33

vessels; 18 were supplied by the liberality of private

individuals; and nearly 100 smaller ships were obtained on

hire; so that the fleet was eventually brought up to nearly

30,000 tons, carrying 16,000 men, and equipped with 837 guns.

But there was sufficient ammunition for only a single day's

fighting. Fortunately for Elizabeth's Government, the

Spaniards, having been long driven from the channel by

privateers, were now unacquainted with its currents; and they

could procure, as the Dutch were in revolt, only two or three

competent pilots. The Spanish commander was the Duke of

Medina-Sidonia, an incapable man, but he had under him some of

the ablest of Philip's officers. When the ships set out from

the Tagus, on the 29th May, 1588, a storm came on, and the

Armada had to put into Coruña to refit. From that port the

Armada set out at the beginning of July, in lovely weather,

with just enough wind to wave from the mastheads the red

crosses which they bore as symbols of their crusade. The Duke

of Medina entered the Channel on the 18th July, and the rear

of his fleet was immediately harassed by a cannonade from the

puny ships of England, commanded by Lord Howard of Effingham

(Lord High Admiral), with Drake, Hawkins, Frobisher, Winter,

Fenner, and other famous captains. With the loss of three

galleons from fire or boarding, the Spanish commander, who was

making for Flanders to embark Parma's army, anchored in Calais

roads. In the night fire-ships--an ancient mode of warfare

which had just been reintroduced by the Dutch--passed in among

the Armada, a fierce gale completed their work, and morning

revealed the remnant of the Invincible Armada scattered along

the coast from Calais to Ostend. Eighty vessels remained to

Medina, and with these he sailed up the North Sea, to round

the British Isles. But the treacherous currents of the Orkneys

and the Hebrides were unknown to his officers, and only a few

ships escaped the tempests of the late autumn. More than

two-thirds of the expedition perished, and of the remnant that

again viewed the hills of Spain all but a few hundreds

returned only to die."

_H. R. Clinton,

From Crécy to Assye,

chapter 7._

In the fighting on the 23d of July, "the Spaniards' shot flew

for the most part over the heads of the English, without doing

execution, Cock being the only Englishman that died bravely in

the midst of his enemies in a ship of his own. The reason of

this was, that the English ships, being far less than the

enemy's, made the attack with more quickness and agility; and

when they had given a broadside, they presently sheered off to

a convenient distance, and levelled their shot so directly at

the bigger and more unwieldy ships of the Spaniards, as seldom

to miss their aim; though the Lord Admiral did not think it

safe or proper to grapple with them, as some advised, with

much more heat than discretion, because that the enemy's fleet

carried a considerable army within their sides, whereas ours had

no such advantage. Besides their ships far exceeded ours in

number and bulk, and were much stronger and higher built;

insomuch that their men, having the opportunity to ply us from

such lofty hatches, must inevitably destroy those that were

obliged, as it were, to fight beneath them. ... On the 24th

day of the month there was a cessation on both sides, and the

Lord Admiral sent some of his smaller vessels to the nearest

of the English harbours, to fetch a supply of powder and

ammunition; then he divided the fleet into four squadrons, the

first of which he commanded himself, the second he committed

to Drake, the third to Hawkins, and the fourth to Frobisher.

He likewise singled out of the main fleet some smaller vessels

to begin the attack on all sides at once, in the very dead of

the night; but a calm happening spoiled his design." On the

26th "the Spanish fleet sailed forward with a fair and soft

gale at southwest and by south; and the English chased them

close at the heels; but so far was this Invincible Armada from

alarming the sea-coasts with any frightful apprehensions, that

the English gentry of the younger sort entered themselves

volunteers, and taking leave of their parents, wives, and

children, did, with incredible cheerfulness, hire ships at

their own charge; and, in pure love to their country, joined

the grand fleet in vast numbers. ... On the 27th of this month

the Spanish Fleet came to an anchor before Calais, their

pilots having acquainted them that if they ventured any

farther there was some danger that the force of the current

might drive them away into the Northern Channel. Not far from

them came likewise the English Admiral to an anchor, and lay

within shot of their ships. The English fleet consisted by

this time of 140 sail; all of them ships of force, and very

tight and nimble sailors, and easily manageable upon a tack.

But, however, the main brunt of the engagement lay not upon

more than 15 or 16 of them. ... The Lord Admiral got ready

eight of his worst ships the very day after the Spaniards came

to an anchor; and having bestowed upon them a good plenty of

pitch, tar, and rosin, and lined them well with brimstone and

other combustible matter, they sent them before the wind, in

the dead time of the night, under the conduct of Young and

Prowse, into the midst of the Spanish fleet. ... The Spaniards

reported that the duke, upon the approach of the fire-ships,

ordered the whole fleet to weigh anchor and stand to sea, but

that when the danger was over every ship should return to her

station. This is what he did himself, and he likewise

discharged a great gun as a signal to the rest to do as he

did; the report, however, was heard but by very few, by reason

their fears had dispersed them at that rate that some of them

ventured out of the main ocean, and others sailed up the

shallows of Flanders. In the meantime Drake and Fenner played

briskly with their cannon upon the Spanish fleet, as it was

rendezvousing over against Graveling. ... On the last day of

the month the wind blew hard at north-west early in the

morning, and the Spanish fleet attempting to get back again to

the Straits of Calais, was driven toward Zealand.

{845}

The English then gave over the chase, because, in the

Spaniards' opinion, they perceived them making haste enough to

their own destruction. For the wind, lying at the W. N. W.

point, could not choose but force them on the shoals and sands

on the coast of Zealand. But the wind happening to come about

in a little time to Southwest and by West they went before the

wind. ... Being now, therefore, clear of danger in the main

ocean, they steered northward, and the English fleet renewed

the chase after them. ... The Spaniards having now laid aside

all the thoughts and hopes of returning to attempt the

English, and perceiving their main safety lay in their flight,

made no stay or stop at any port whatever. And thus this

mighty armada, which had been three whole years fitting out,

and at a vast expense, met in one month's time with several

attacks, and was at last routed, with a vast slaughter on

their side, and but a very few of the English missing, and not

one ship lost, except that small vessel of Cock's. ... When,

therefore, the Spanish fleet had taken a large compass round

Britain, by the coasts of Scotland, the Orcades, and Ireland,

and had weathered many storms, and suffered as many wrecks and

blows, and all the inconveniences of war and weather, it made

a shift to get home again, laden with nothing but shame and

dishonour. ... Certain it is that several of their ships

perished in their flight, being cast away on the coasts of

Scotland and Ireland, and that above 700 soldiers were cast on

shore in Scotland. ... As for those who had the ill fortune to

be drove upon the Irish shore, they met with the most

barbarous treatment; for some of them were butchered by the

wild Irish, and the rest put to the sword by the Lord Deputy."

_W. Camden,

History of Queen Elizabeth._

ALSO IN:

_S. R. Gardiner,

Historical Biographies: Drake._

_E. S. Creasy,

Fifteen Decisive Battles,

chapter 10._

_C. Kingsley,

Westward Ho!

chapter 31._

_R. Hakluyt,

Principal Navigations, &C.

(E. Goldsmid's ed.), volume 7._

ENGLAND: A. D. 1596.

Alliance with Henry IV. of France against Spain.

See FRANCE: A. D. 1593--1598.

ENGLAND: A. D. 1596.

Dutch and English expedition against Cadiz.

See SPAIN: A. D. 1596.

ENGLAND: A. D. 1597.

Abolition of the privileges of the Hanse merchants.

See HANSA TOWNS.

ENGLAND: A. D. 1600.

The first charter to the East India Company.

See INDIA: A. D. 1600-1702.

ENGLAND: A. D. 1601.

The first Poor Law.

See POOR LAWS, THE ENGLISH.

ENGLAND: A. D. 1603.

Accession of King James I.

The Stuart family.

History for ready reference, Volume 2, El Dorado to Greaves · 第 21 / 222 段