DIFFICULTIES OF THIS VIEW.

This, then, is the state of the case: Matter attracts matter directly as

the mass, and inversely as the squares of the distances. This law is

derived from the planetary motions; space is, consequently, a void; and,

therefore, the power which gives mechanical momentum to matter, is

transferred from one end of creation to the other, without any physical

medium to convey the impulse. At the present day the doctrines of

Descartes are considered absurd; yet here is an absurdity of a far

deeper dye, without we resort to the miraculous, which at once

obliterates the connection between cause and effect, which it is the

peculiar province of physical science to develop. Let us take another

view. The present doctrine of light teaches that light is an undulation

of an elastic medium necessarily filling all space; and this branch of

science probably rests on higher and surer grounds than any other. Every

test applied to it by the refinements of modern skill, strengthens its

claims. Here then the Newtonian vacuum is no longer a void. If we get

over this difficulty, by attributing to this medium a degree of tenuity

almost spiritual, we shall run upon Scylla while endeavoring to shun

Charybdis. Light and heat come bound together from the sun, by the same

path, and with the same velocity. Heat is therefore due also to an

excitement of this attenuated medium. Yet this heat puts our atmosphere

in motion, impels onward the waves of the sea, wafts our ships to

distant climes, grinds our corn, and in various ways does the work of

man. If we expose a mass of metal to the sun's rays for a single hour

the temperature will be raised. To do the same by an artificial fire,

would consume fuel, and this fuel would generate the strength or force

of a horse. Estimate, therefore, the amount of force received from the

sun in a single day for the whole globe, and we shall find that nothing

but a material medium will suffice to convey this force.

Let us appeal to analogy. The undulations of our atmosphere produce

sound; that is, convey to the ear a part of a mechanical force imparted

to a solid body--a bell for instance. Let us suppose this force to equal

one pound. On account of the elasticity of the bell, the whole of the

force is not instantaneously imparted to the surrounding air; but the

denser the air the sooner it loses its motion. In a dense fluid like

water, the motion is imparted quickly, and the sound is not a ring but a

click. If we diminish the density of the air, the loss of motion is

retarded; so that we might conceive it possible, provided the bell could

be suspended in a _perfect vacuum_, without a mechanical tie, and there

was no friction to overcome from the rigidity of its particles, that the

bell would vibrate forever, although its sound could never reach the

ear. We see, therefore, that the mechanical effect in a given time, is

owing to the density of the medium. But can we resort to such an

analogy? Every discovery in the science confirms more and more the

analogy between the motions of air and the medium of space; the angle of

reflexion and incidence follows the same law in both; the law of

radiation and interference; and if experiments were instituted, there

can be but little doubt that sound has also got its spectrum.

Outlines of a mechanical theory of storms · 第 25 / 118 题