The task of standardizing the clinics was a difficult one. O

Produced by Bryan Ness, Henry Gardiner and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This

file was produced from images generously made available

by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)

* * * * *

Transcriber's Note: The original publication has been replicated

faithfully except as shown in the Transcriber's Amendments at the end of

the text. Words in italics are indicated like _this_. Obscured letters in

the original publication are indicated with {?}. Text emphasized with bold

characters or other treatment is shown like =this=. Footnotes are located

near the end of the text.

* * * * *

Dispensary Department Bulletin No. 1

NURSES' PAPERS

ON

TUBERCULOSIS

PUBLISHED BY THE

CITY OF CHICAGO

MUNICIPAL TUBERCULOSIS SANITARIUM

SEPTEMBER 1914

CITY OF CHICAGO MUNICIPAL TUBERCULOSIS SANITARIUM

STAFF OF NURSES

--OF THE--

DISPENSARY DEPARTMENT

ROSALIND MACKAY, R. N., Superintendent of Nurses

ANNA G. BARRETT

BARBARA H. BARTLETT

OLIVE E. BEASON

ELLA M. BLAND

KATHRYN M. CANFIELD

MABEL F. CLEVELAND

ELRENE M. COOMBS

MARGARET M. COUGHLIN

STELLA W. COULDREY

EMMA W. CRAWFORD

FANNIE J. DAVENPORT

ROXIE A. DENTZ

C. ETHEL DICKINSON

ANNA M. DRAKE

MARY E. EGBERT

MAUDE F. ESS{?}

SARA D. FAROLL

MARY FRASER

AUGUSTA A. GOUGH

FRANCES M. HEINRICH

LAURA K. HILL

ISABELLA J. JENSEN

EMMA E. JONES

LETTA D. JONES

JEANETTE KIPP

ELSA LUND

MARY MACCONACHIE

JOSEPHINE V. MARK

ISABEL C. MCKAY

ANNA V. MCVADY

ANNIE MORRISON

KATHERINE M. PATTERSON

LAURA A. REDMOND

GRACE M. SAVILLE

BERYL SCOTT

FLORENCE T. SINGLETON

MABELLE SMITH

FLORENCE A. SPENCER

HARRIETT STAHLEY

GENEVIEVE E. STRATTON

ANNABEL B. STUBBS

ALICE J. TAPPING

OLIVE TUCKER

ELIZABETH M. WATTS

MARY C. WRIGHT

MARY C. YOUNG

KARLA STRIBRNA, Interpreter.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

THEODORE B. SACHS, M. D., President

GEORGE B. YOUNG, M. D., Secretary

W. A. WIEBOLDT.

GENERAL OFFICE

105 West Monroe Street

FRANK E. WING, Executive Officer.

[Illustration: FIELD NURSES, DISPENSARY DEPARTMENT CHICAGO MUNICIPAL

TUBERCULOSIS SANITARIUM]

Dispensary Department Bulletin No. 1

NURSES' PAPERS

ON

TUBERCULOSIS

READ BEFORE THE

NURSES' STUDY CIRCLE

OF THE

DISPENSARY DEPARTMENT

CHICAGO MUNICIPAL TUBERCULOSIS SANITARIUM

PUBLISHED BY THE

CITY OF CHICAGO

MUNICIPAL TUBERCULOSIS SANITARIUM

105 WEST MONROE STREET

SEPTEMBER 1914

CONTENTS

PAGE

Introduction--Nurses' Tuberculosis Study Circle 5

Historical Notes on Tuberculosis 7

ROSALIND MACKAY, R. N.

Visiting Tuberculosis Nursing in Various Cities of the United

States 11

ANNA M. DRAKE, R. N.

Provisions for Outdoor Sleeping 30

MAY MACCONACHIE, R. N.

Some Points in the Nursing Care of the Advanced Consumptive 37

ELSA LUND, R. N.

Open Air Schools in This Country and Abroad 44

FRANCES M. HEINRICH, R. N.

Notes on Tuberculin for Nurses 56

NURSES' TUBERCULOSIS STUDY CIRCLE

It is well known that the gathering of facts and study of literature

essential to the preparation of a paper on a certain subject is a very

productive method of acquiring information. If the paper is to be

presented to your own group of co-workers, and the subject covered by it

represents an important phase of their work, or an analysis of some of its

underlying principles, then there is a further incentive to do your best,

as well as an opportunity for a general discussion which acts as a sieve

for the elimination of false ideas and gradual formulation of true

conceptions.

Lectures on various phases of the work being done by a particular group of

people are very important. Papers by the workers themselves are, however,

greatest incentives to study and self-advancement.

With this view in mind, I suggested the organization of a Tuberculosis

Study Circle by the Dispensary Nurses of the Municipal Tuberculosis

Sanitarium. The nurses chosen to present papers on particular phases of

tuberculosis are given access to the library of the General Office of the

Sanitarium; they are also given the assistance of the General Office in

procuring all the necessary information through correspondence with

various organizations and institutions in Chicago and other cities.

As the program stands at present, the Nurses' Study Circle meets twice a

month. At one of these meetings a lecture on some important phase of

tuberculosis is given by an outside speaker, and at the next meeting a

paper is read by one of the nurses. At all of these meetings the

presentation of the subject is followed by general discussion. The program

since January, 1914, was as follows:

January 9th, 1914--"Historical Notes on Tuberculosis," by Miss Rosalind

Mackay, Head Nurse, Stock Yards Dispensary of the Municipal Tuberculosis

Sanitarium.

January 23rd, 1914--"Channels of Infection and the Pathology of

Tuberculosis," by Professor Ludwig Hektoen of the University of Chicago.

February 13th, 1914--"Visiting Tuberculosis Nursing in Various Cities of

the United States," by Miss Anna M. Drake, Head Nurse, Policlinic

Dispensary of the Municipal Tuberculosis Sanitarium.

March 13th, 1914--"Provisions for Outdoor Sleeping," by Miss May

MacConachie, Head Nurse, St. Elizabeth Dispensary of the Municipal

Tuberculosis Sanitarium.

March 27th, 1914--"What Should Constitute a Sufficient and Well Balanced

Diet for Tuberculous People," by Mrs. Alice P. Norton, Dietitian of Cook

County Institutions.

April 10th, 1914--"Some Points in the Nursing Care of the Advanced

Consumptive," by Miss Elsa Lund, Head Nurse of the Iroquois Memorial

Dispensary of the Municipal Tuberculosis Sanitarium.

May 15th, 1914--"Open Air Schools in This Country and Abroad," by Miss

Frances M. Heinrich, Head Nurse of the Post-Graduate Dispensary of the

Municipal Tuberculosis Sanitarium.

May 29th, 1914--"Efficient Disinfection of Premises After Tuberculosis,"

by Professor P. G. Heinemann, Department of Bacteriology, University of

Chicago.

The organization of the Tuberculosis Study Circle among the nurses of the

Dispensary Department of the Municipal Tuberculosis Sanitarium, calling

forth the best efforts of the nurses in getting information on various

phases of tuberculosis for presentation to their co-workers in an

interesting manner has, no doubt, stimulated the progress of our entire

nursing force. The first five papers presented by the nurses are given in

this series. The pamphlet is published with the idea of attracting the

attention of other organizations to this method of stimulating more

intensive study among their nurses.

=THEODORE B. SACHS, M. D., President=

Chicago Municipal Tuberculosis Sanitarium.

HISTORICAL NOTES ON TUBERCULOSIS

By ROSALIND MACKAY, R. N.

Head Nurse, Stock Yards Dispensary of the Chicago Municipal

Tuberculosis Sanitarium.

So far as our information goes, pulmonary tuberculosis has always existed.

It is, as Professor Hirsch remarks, "A disease of all times, all

countries, and all races. No climate, no latitude, no occupation, forms a

safeguard against the onset of tuberculosis, however such conditions may

mitigate its ravages or retard its progress. Consumption dogs the steps of

man wherever he may be found, and claims its victims among every age,

class and race."

Hippocrates, the most celebrated physician of antiquity (460-377 B. C.),

and the true father of scientific medicine, gives a description of

pulmonary tuberculosis, ascribing it to a suppuration of the lungs, which

may arise in various ways, and declares it a disease most difficult to

treat, proving fatal to the greatest number.

Isocrates, also a Greek physician and contemporary of Hippocrates, was the

first to write of tuberculosis as a disease transmissible through

contagion.

Aretaeus Cappadox (50 A. D.) describes tuberculosis as a special

pathological process. His clinical picture is considered one of the best

in literature.

Galen (131-201 A. D.) did not get much beyond Hippocrates in the study of

tuberculosis, but was very specific in his recommendation of a milk diet

and dry climate. He held it dangerous to pass an entire day in the company

of a tuberculous patient.

During the next fifteen centuries, a period known as the Dark Ages and

characterized by most intense intellectual stagnation, little was added to

the knowledge of pulmonary tuberculosis. In the seventeenth century

Franciscus Sylvius brought out the relationship between phthisis and

nodules in the lymphatic glands. This was the first step toward accurate

knowledge of the pathology of tuberculosis.

Richard Morton, an English physician, wrote, in 1689, of the wide

prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis, and recognized the two types of

fever: the acute inflammatory at the beginning, and the hectic at the

end. He also recognized the contagious nature of the disease and

recommended fresh air treatment. He believed the disease curable in the

early stages, but warned us of its liability to recur. Morton taught that

the tubercle was the pathological evidence of the disease.

In 1690, Leeuwenhoek, a Dutch lens maker, started the making of short

range glasses which resulted later in the modern microscope, making

possible the establishment of the germ theory of disease, including the

establishment of that theory for tuberculosis.

Starck, whose observations and writings were published in 1785 (fifteen

years after his death), gave a more accurate description of tubercles than

had ever been given before, and showed how cavities were formed from them.

Leopold Auenbrugger introduced into medicine the method of recognizing

diseases of the chest by percussion, tapping directly upon the chest with

the tips of his fingers. The results of his investigations were published

in a pamphlet in 1761. This new practice was ignored at first, but after

the work of Auenbrugger was translated he attained a European reputation

and a revolution in the knowledge of diseases of the chest followed.

Boyle recognized in miliary tubercle, as it was afterwards called by him,

the anatomical basis of tuberculosis as a general disease, and, in 1810,

published the results of one of the most complete researches in pathology.

He described the stages in the development of the disease, using miliary

tubercle as its starting point. He opposed the theory that inflammation

caused tuberculosis and declared hemorrhage a result and not a cause of

consumption.

Laennec discovered one of the most important, perhaps, of all methods of

medical diagnosis--that of auscultation. By means of the stethoscope,

which he invented in 1819, he recognized the physical signs and made the

first careful study of the healing of tuberculosis; he gave also one of

the best accounts of the sputum of the consumptive. He believed that every

manifestation of the disease in man or animals was due to one and the same

cause.

Up to this time the views which were held concerning the infectious nature

of tuberculosis were not based upon direct experiment, but in 1843 Klenke

produced artificial tuberculosis by inoculation. He injected tuberculous

matter into the jugular vein of a rabbit, and six months later found

tuberculosis of the liver and lungs. He did not continue, however, his

researches; so they were soon forgotten.

To Villemin, a French physician, belongs the immortal fame of being the

first to show the essential distinction in tuberculosis between the virus

causing the disease and the lesion produced by it. By inoculating animals,

he demonstrated that tuberculosis is a specific disease caused by a

specific agent. His paper presented in 1865 before the Academy of Medicine

in France contained a detailed account of his experimental investigations.

This was a most remarkable contribution to scientific medicine.

It remained for Robert Koch in 1882, after years of painstaking

investigation, to announce to the world the discovery of a definite

bacillus as the causative agent in all forms of tuberculous lesions. Koch

isolated, cultivated outside the body, described and differentiated the

infective organism of tuberculosis and proved that it could continue to

produce the same lesions indefinitely. He showed the presence of the

bacilli in all known tuberculous lesions and in tuberculous expectoration,

and demonstrated the virulence in sputum which had been dried for eight

weeks.

Following directly upon the knowledge of the cause of tuberculosis came

the recognition of its curability, and the proper means of its prevention.

Although good food and fresh air have always been considered of importance

in the treatment of the disease, it was not until the middle of the

nineteenth century that anything like systematic treatment was undertaken.

Dr. George Bodingon of Sutton Coldfield, England, wrote an essay in 1840

advocating fresh air treatment. He denounced the common hospital in large

towns as a most unfit place for consumptive patients, and established a

home for their care, but met with so much opposition that it was soon

closed.

In 1856, Hermann Brehmer wrote a thesis on the subject which has been the

foundation of our modern treatment. He opened a small sanatorium in 1864.

Five years later he established the sanatorium at Goerbersdorf, in

Silesia, which eventually became the largest in the world. He advocated

life in the open air, abundant dietary and constant medical supervision.

He believed that the heart of the large majority of consumptives is small

and undeveloped, and that this predisposes them to the disease. In

accordance with this theory he put a great deal of emphasis on exercise in

the treatment of his patients. He built walks of various grades on the

grounds of his sanatorium and installed a system of walking exercise.

Patients began with the lowest grade, gradually accustoming themselves to

ascend to the highest. Brehmer was himself a consumptive, and was cured by

the method he so firmly believed in.

Dr. Dettweiler, who opened the second sanatorium in Germany, at

Falkenstein, near Frankfort, was also a consumptive, having developed

tuberculosis during the arduous campaign in the Franco-Prussian War in

1871. He entered the Goerbersdorf Sanatorium as a patient, becoming later

an assistant of Brehmer. Dr. Dettweiler laid great emphasis upon rest in

treatment.

In 1888, Dr. Otto Walther opened his famous sanatorium at Nordrach in the

Black Forest, in Germany.

The first sanatorium for the care of the consumptive in the United States

was opened at Saranac Lake by Dr. Edward L. Trudeau in 1884. He was the

pioneer of the sanatorium treatment in this country, and an example of

what a man, although tuberculous himself, can do for his fellow men. In

1874, a seemingly helpless invalid, he made his home in the Adirondack

Mountains. A little more than twenty-five years ago he became the founder

of a village now crowded with tuberculous patients. The Saranac Lake

institution, which began with one small cottage, has since developed into

the best known sanatorium in this country.

In 1891, Dr. Herman Biggs posted the first anti-spitting ordinance in the

street railway cars of New York.

Dr. Lawrence Flick brought about the formation of the first

anti-tuberculosis society in 1892, and in 1894 the City of New York

adopted a law to enforce notification and registration.

Dr. Philip of Edinburgh was the first to systematically and completely

organize the anti-tuberculosis campaign. In 1887 he inaugurated that new

institution, the anti-tuberculosis dispensary, which has since rendered

such inestimable service. The fundamental principle of the Edinburgh

system is that the disease should be sought out in its haunts.

The first dispensary in the United States was opened in New York in 1904,

modeled after the Edinburgh system. About the same time came the Open Air

Schools--Charlottenburg establishing one in 1904 and Providence, R. I.,

following in 1908. The first Day Camp in the United States was opened in

1905 in Boston. New Jersey established the first Preventorium for Children

at Farmingdale in 1909. All this naturally led to better provision for

advanced cases; sanatoria for hopeful cases at small cost; factory

inspection; and, in some countries, industrial colonies for arrested

cases.

The tuberculosis patient of today presents a hopefulness previously

undreamt of. The outlook is brighter with promise than ever before, and we

have every reason to look forward to a steady reduction in the mortality

rate from this dread disease; but the extinction of tuberculosis will be

achieved only when the social and economic problems have been solved.

VISITING TUBERCULOSIS NURSING IN VARIOUS CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES

By ANNA M. DRAKE, R. N.

Head Nurse, Policlinic Dispensary of the Municipal Tuberculosis

Sanitarium.

BALTIMORE

In 1903, the first visiting tuberculosis nurse was assigned in Baltimore

to follow up patients of the Johns Hopkins Hospital Out-patient

Department. Her duties were varied as are the duties of the present day

tuberculosis nurse. She was to instruct patients in the use of sunlight

and fresh air and was allowed to furnish them with special diet in the

shape of milk and eggs. She investigated home conditions and helped

improve sleeping quarters. She placed patients in sanatoria, or brought

them back to the dispensary for treatment. She gave bedside care to

advanced cases, if she could not get them into hospitals, and applied to

relief organizations for help in solving the problems of the family. From

time to time other nurses of the Baltimore Visiting Nurse Association were

assigned to the work, other dispensaries and agencies began referring

cases to be followed up, and the work grew to such proportions as to be

almost unmanageable for a private organization.

In 1910, the Tuberculosis Division of the Baltimore Health Department was

organized. It began its activities with a corps of fifteen nurses and a

visiting list of 1,617 patients turned over to it by the Baltimore

Visiting Nurse Association. The object of the Tuberculosis Division was to

bring under the supervision of the Health Department all persons in the

city suffering with pulmonary tuberculosis. Ambulatory cases were to be

given advice and instruction; advanced cases, bedside care, if needed, or

hospital care, if available. At present, it is upon the advanced cases, as

well as those who are in contact with them, that the nurses of the

Tuberculosis Division concentrate their efforts. The Staff at present

consists of a Superintendent and sixteen Field Nurses. The city is

divided into sixteen districts, a nurse being assigned to each district.

Each nurse is responsible for the care of all cases of tuberculosis in her

district.

In 1912, the Tuberculosis Division opened two municipal tuberculosis

dispensaries. These dispensaries receive patients on alternate days from 3

to 5 p. m., nurses in districts nearest the dispensaries alternating for

clinic duty. Other dispensaries are the Phipps Tuberculosis Dispensary at

Johns Hopkins' Hospital, and the University of Maryland Hospital

Tuberculosis Dispensary.

The problems which chiefly concern the Tuberculosis Division in its

efforts to control the spread of tuberculosis in Baltimore are the failure

of physicians to report cases to the Department of Health until the

patient is in a dying condition, and the inadequate provision for hospital

care of advanced cases. These conditions are particularly marked in the

case of colored patients, who are found going in and out of homes,

restaurants, and laundries, as cooks, waitresses and servants of various

kinds, as long as they are able to drag themselves about.

The nurses of the Tuberculosis Division are graduate nurses and are

registered. They are paid $75 a month, with car fare and telephone

expenses, and are allowed two weeks' vacation with pay. They are not

required to take a Civil Service examination, but are carefully selected

with a view to obtaining women of a high grade of efficiency. They wear

uniforms of blue denim with simple hats and coats, but not of uniform

design. Each nurse wears under the lapel of her coat a badge reading

"Nurse--Baltimore Health Department," which she uses on occasions. The

nurses report to the Superintendent each morning at 8:30 to hand in

reports of the previous day's work, to stock their bags, and to receive

new work for the day. At noon each nurse reports at her branch office, of

which there are seven, each situated on border lines of adjoining

districts. An hour is spent at the branch office for lunch and rest, for

receiving telephone calls and for restocking the bags for afternoon

rounds. The nurse leaves her district at four o'clock to attend to about

an hour's clerical work, which is usually done at home.

The average number of patients per nurse is 212, about four per cent of

whom are bed cases. These bed patients are visited two or three times a

week, while ambulatory cases are visited on an average of twice a month.

During the year 1912 the sixteen nurses made 72,058 visits for instruction

and nursing care.

NEW YORK

The oldest tuberculosis clinic in New York City is connected with the New

York Nose, Throat and Lung Hospital; it was established in 1894. In 1895,

the Presbyterian Hospital established a special tuberculosis clinic. In

1902, the Vanderbilt Clinic organized a special class for the treatment of

tuberculosis. In 1903, Gouverneur and Bellevue Hospitals and, in 1904,

Harlem Hospital added Tuberculosis Clinics. These were followed during the

next few years by the establishment of many others. In 1906, when the

Tuberculosis Relief Committee of the New York Charity Organization Society

began its work among the tuberculous poor of the city, it met at every

turn instances of overlapping and duplication in the work done by the

various clinics. This lack of co-operation, with the resulting

difficulties encountered by the Committee in its endeavor to efficiently

administer its special tuberculosis fund, demonstrated the advisability of

forming an organization having as its object the co-ordination of the work

of the various tuberculosis clinics. In 1908, nine of these clinics and

several allied philanthropic agencies were organized into the Association

of Tuberculosis Clinics. Today there are 29 clinics, 14 philanthropic

institutions and organizations, five departments of municipal and state

government, six tuberculosis institutions, and numerous other institutions

and organizations having special interest in tuberculosis work. Of the 29

clinics, eleven are under the supervision of the Department of Health,

three are connected with city hospitals, and the remainder are operated by

private institutions. This voluntary association of private and municipal

dispensaries, sharing equal responsibilities and acknowledging equal

obligations, is a striking feature of tuberculosis work in New York and

presents a unique example of co-operation.

The task of standardizing the clinics was a difficult one. One clinic had

ten rooms with every convenience. Another had one room and no

conveniences. Some clinics made no provision for sputum beyond a cuspidor;

others provided gauze or paper napkins when patients entered the room. Two

clinics provided no drinking water; two had a metal water cooler in the

waiting room; one provided sanitary drinking cups; and another had two

enamel drinking cups chained to the wall. Some clinics had sanitary

fountains; in others the nurse kept a glass on hand for the patients.

Neither was there any uniformity in matters of dress. Nurses and doctors

at some clinics wore ordinary street clothes. At other clinics, gowns or

aprons, with or without sleeves, were worn. Three clinics occupied

separate buildings of their own. Four clinics provided separate

waiting-rooms for tuberculous patients. At one dispensary the tuberculous

patients had the use of the general waiting room, there being no other

clinics held at that time; other clinics made no distinction, tuberculous

patients using the general waiting room in company with patients attending

other clinics. After studying the conditions existing in the various

clinics, it was decided that to belong to the association each clinic must

subscribe to and comply with the following regulations:

a. Tuberculous patients must be segregated in a separate class.

b. Home supervision of all cases by a graduate nurse especially assigned

for this purpose must be maintained.

c. Each dispensary must serve a certain district, and all cases living

outside of this district must be transferred to the clinic serving

the district within which they live.

Early in the history of the Association objection was made to this last

rule by teachers of medicine, who held that it tended to deprive them of

teaching material; but they soon fell in line with the other dispensaries

when they saw the advantage it afforded them of improving their methods

without loss of teaching material, and the further opportunity of securing

home supervision.

From time to time it has been necessary for the Association to adopt

certain methods of procedure in the administration of the various clinics.

The general policy of the Association is as follows:

(1) Each clinic should arrange for a physician to visit and treat in

their homes patients who are too ill to attend clinic, for whom

hospital care cannot be provided.

(2) Special children's clinics should be established wherever the size

of the clinic warrants it.

(3) Sputum of every patient should be examined once a month; patients

should be re-examined once a month, and the results entered on the

records.

(4) The physician should use the nurse's report of home conditions as a

basis for advising patients.

(5) Patients refusing to attend the proper dispensary shall be dismissed

as delinquent and reported to the Health Department.

(6) All supervising nurses should be affiliated with some local relief

organization in order to better organize the relief work of the

clinic.

(7) The home of every patient should be visited at least once a month.

(8) The classification of the National Association for the Study and

Prevention of Tuberculosis should be followed for recording stages

of disease and condition on discharge.

(9) A uniform system of record keeping should be used by nurses in order

to facilitate the compiling of monthly reports.

(10) The staff of physicians should be sufficient to allow at least

fifteen minutes for the examination of every new case, and at least

six minutes for every old case.

(11) There should be at least one nurse for every 100 patients on the

clinic register.

(12) Sputum cups, or a proper substitute, should be furnished to

patients to take home.

(13) Paper or gauze handkerchiefs should be given to each patient on

entrance to the clinic.

(14) No cuspidors should be used.

(15) Sanitary fountains or sanitary drinking cups should be provided.

(16) Gowns with sleeves should be worn by physicians. Nurses should wear

gowns with sleeves or washable uniforms while on duty in the

dispensary.

That the Association found it necessary to make so many recommendations

for the administration of the various clinics is evidence of the diverse

systems, and in some instances, the entire lack of system, in vogue in

some dispensaries. The salary of nurses in privately operated tuberculosis

dispensaries averages about $75 per month; no standard uniform is in use.

The first tuberculosis visiting nurse of the New York Department of Health

was appointed March 1st, 1903. By January, 1910, the staff had grown to

158, the Health Department becoming practically responsible for the home

supervision of every registered case of tuberculosis in New York not under

the care of a private physician or in an institution.

The organization of the work of the new Health Department tuberculosis

nurses has been based upon the district system in force among the

Associated Clinics. In each clinic district a staff of Health Department

nurses is maintained, charged with the sanitary supervision of cases of

pulmonary tuberculosis in that district. They visit at least once a month

all "at home" cases; that is, cases not regularly attending clinics, not

in an institution, or not under a private physician's care. These nurses

report daily at the tuberculosis clinic, which is used as a district

headquarters, and there receive assignments. One nurse is detailed as

Captain, or supervising nurse of the district, and acts as official

intermediary between the clinic and the Department of Health. Each morning

the nurse telephones to the Department of Health the daily report of her

staff and of the clinic, and obtains information received at the

Department regarding cases in the district. In case of death or removal of

tuberculous patients from a home the district nurses order disinfection of

the premises and bedding; they make arrangements for admission of patients

to hospitals or sanatoria, investigate complaints made by citizens, see

that regulations of the Department of Health regarding expectoration are

observed, and use their authority to induce delinquent cases to resume

attendance at the proper clinic. They also visit families of patients in

hospitals at intervals. Each nurse keeps a complete index of all cases of

pulmonary tuberculosis in her district, which is at all times accessible

to nurses and physicians at the clinic.

In the Department of Health clinics, the plan is as follows: a supervising

nurse who does no district work, and several field nurses, each assigned

to special duties on clinic days, such as registration room, throat room,

examining rooms, etc. Field nurses are also responsible for the care of

patients in their sub-districts, each nurse carrying an average of about

125 patients on her visiting list at one time.

BOSTON

A staff of twenty-five nurses, working from the Out-patient Department of

the Boston Consumptives' Hospital, has the supervision of all tuberculosis

cases in their homes, and the follow-up work on all discharged sanatorium

and hospital cases in the city of Boston.

All cases of tuberculosis reported to the Health Department, whether under

the care of a private physician or not, are visited at least once by a

nurse from this staff, to see that they are carrying out a proper plan of

isolation.

The Boston Consumptives' Hospital Dispensary, centrally located, is open

every morning and one or two evenings a week. Three or four nurses are on

duty in the clinic each morning, taking histories, attending nose and

throat room and preparing patients for examination. At the dispensary only

a medical history of new patients is taken, the social history being

obtained by the nurse on her first visit to the home. Pulse, temperature

and weight are also taken at the dispensary, after which the patient waits

his turn for examination. Each new patient is given an examination in the

nose and throat room; old patients also, if necessary. After examination

or treatment, all patients return to the general waiting room. From here

each patient is called before the Chief of Clinic, who notes the general

progress of the patient, the results of the last examination or any

remarks recorded by the physician, and the report of home conditions as

reported by the nurse. The Chief of Clinic advises the patient in

accordance with the needs indicated. He makes no examinations, but sees

each patient every time he comes to the clinic and is thus able to follow

very carefully the progress of each patient and to advise such changes in

treatment as may seem necessary.

The city is divided into twenty-two districts, each nurse being

responsible for the care of all tuberculous patients in her district. The

number of patients cared for by each nurse is from 100 to 180. A very

small percentage of bedside care is given; far advanced patients as a rule

are sent to hospitals.

Boston tuberculosis nurses do not wear uniforms. They are paid $900 a

year, with no increase for length of service or efficiency.

BUFFALO

The purpose of the Buffalo Association for the Relief and Control of

Tuberculosis has been to stimulate progress in fighting tuberculosis. It

very modestly shares with the city officials and with private charities

the credit for the work accomplished. All it claims for itself is that it

has been able, and will continue, to "point the way." How thoroughly it

has succeeded in this may be seen by the progress made since 1909 when the

Buffalo Association made its first appeal for funds. At that time Buffalo

had:

(1) A dispensary maintained by the Buffalo Charity Organization

Society.

(2) The Erie County Hospital for advanced cases.

(3) A day camp, with a capacity of thirty patients, supported by a group

of women.

(4) One visiting nurse supplied by the District Nursing Association.

The present facilities are:

(1) A dispensary, open every day and one evening a week, with a nose

and throat clinic, and a dental clinic with a paid dentist in

attendance.

(2) The J. N. Adam Memorial Hospital for early cases, capacity 125,

supported by the city.

(3) The Municipal Hospital for the care of advanced cases, supported by

the city.

(4) The Erie County Hospital, as before.

(5) Tuberculosis Division of the Department of Health with two

tuberculosis inspectors and six visiting tuberculosis nurses.

(6) An Open Air Camp, with a capacity of from seventy to one hundred

patients, with a special department for children. Patients are kept

day and night. The camp has three resident trained nurses and one

interne, and is visited daily by the Association's paid medical

director.

(7) Two open air schools, with another promised.

(8) A City Hospital Commission, with a plan for the erection of a

pavilion for 500 advanced cases as the first of a general hospital

scheme.

(9) Teachers soon to be appointed for the education of tuberculous

children.

(10) The trades unions organized to promote the campaign among their own

members in a unique organization.

(11) The whole community alert to the menace of tuberculosis, willing to

shoulder the community burden and to assume the community

responsibility.

The Dispensary is now operated by the Association for the Relief and

Control of Tuberculosis, and the nurses are supplied by the Health

Department. The nursing staff consists of a supervising nurse and six

field nurses, the latter receiving $720 per year. They wear no uniform.

They give a limited amount of bedside care, some member of the family

being taught to properly care for the patient, if he cannot be sent to a

hospital. Recently an additional nurse was engaged by the Association to

follow up cases on whom no diagnosis has been made and who have not

returned to the dispensary for re-examination. Since the Dispensary was

opened in 1909, there have been over one thousand such cases. Many of

these had suspicious signs when examined, but there has hitherto been no

means of keeping in touch with them, as the nurses have been obliged to

confine their attention to positive cases. One of the chief difficulties

of the Buffalo campaign, as elsewhere, has been the fact that more than

half of the cases have probably already infected others. This latest

movement of the Association should anticipate this condition to a certain

extent, and is one more means by which it is "blazing the trail" toward

its goal,--"No uncared for tuberculosis in Buffalo in 1915."

PHILADELPHIA AND PENNSYLVANIA

In the General Appropriations Act of 1907 the Legislature of Pennsylvania

granted to the State Department of Health, in addition to its regular

budget, the sum of $400,000, "to establish and maintain, in such places in

the State as may be deemed necessary, dispensaries for the free treatment

of indigent persons affected with tuberculosis, for the study of social

and occupational conditions that predispose to its development, and for

continuing research experiments for the establishment of possible immunity

and cure of said disease."

Immediately after securing the above appropriation, the State Department

of Health began to establish dispensaries throughout the state, one or

more in each county. The staff of each dispensary consists of a chief, who

is also county medical inspector, and a corps of assistant physicians and

visiting nurses. There is a supervising nurse with one assistant at

Harrisburg, who oversee and inspect the work of the staff nurses.

The number of nurses in the dispensaries throughout the state varies from

a nurse shared by another organization or a practical nurse giving part

time, to from four to seven nurses in one dispensary. There are now more

than 115 State Department Tuberculosis Dispensaries in Pennsylvania,

Philadelphia having three.

An idea of the general plan of the work may be gained from a description

given of the State Department Dispensary No. 21, located in Philadelphia,

by Dr. Francine:

"There are at present five nurses employed at Dispensary No. 21,

two of whom give their whole time to following up the return

cases from the State Sanatoria. As soon as the case is

discharged from the sanatorium, that information, with other

data regarding the condition on discharge, etc., is sent to us

at once. At the end of a stated period, if that case has not

been returned, the nurse looks it up, and gets it to come in.

The nurses make out detailed reports on all cases discharged

from the sanatoria, at periods of six months, whether our own

patients or not. These will be and are valuable for statistical

data. Practically all the data for reports as to subsequent

results in cases discharged from the sanatoria, which have

appeared in this country at least, have been made up from

information gleaned by writing the discharged patient and having

him fill out his own report. It does not tax the imagination

unduly to conclude which is the more accurate, the answers to

questioning by a trained worker (we have selected for this work

the two nurses who have been with us longest) who in addition

takes the temperature, pulse, etc., herself, and usually

succeeds in getting the patient back to the dispensary for at

least one re-examination; or such answers as a patient may see

fit to make to a printed questionnaire.

For the purpose of regular dispensary and inspection work, the

dispensary limits itself to receiving patients from certain

districts of the city, though as a state institution it is

impossible for the dispensary to refuse any case, no matter

where they live, if they insist upon treatment. Usually by a

little persuasion, however, we can get the patients to go to the

dispensary in their district, co-operating in this way with the

Phipps Institute of the University of Pennsylvania, the Gray's

Ferry State Dispensary, the Kensington Tuberculosis Dispensary

and the Frankford State Dispensary. The section of the city from

which we draw our cases is divided, for purposes of inspection

and Social Service Work, into three districts with a nurse

assigned to each, and this gives each of our nurses, roughly

speaking, about seventy-five patients per month to take care of.

These patients must be visited regularly every two weeks, which

gives the nurse at least one hundred and fifty visits a month to

pay, not including the visits to new cases.

Every new case which is admitted to the dispensary must be

visited within one week of the day of admission. The nurses come

in from their visiting work and report daily at 12:30 o'clock,

for one hour in the dispensary office, and new cases, according

to the district in which they live, are assigned to the nurse

having charge of that district. The advantage of having a nurse

report daily to the dispensary at a time when all the doctors

are there, lies in the fact that the doctor has thus the

opportunity of talking over with the nurse the new cases which

she is to visit and of making any suggestions which he has

gleaned from the history and examination of the patient. It is

thus possible for the nurses to visit the new cases in the

afternoon of the same day. The advantage of this close

co-operation between doctor and nurse must be at once apparent.

Further, each nurse is required to report to every physician one

morning a month, with the histories in hand of all the patients

of that particular doctor which are on her list. This is

valuable, because in no other way can the doctor get so thorough

an understanding of the home conditions and social problems of a

given patient as by talking the situation over directly and

personally with the nurse in charge."

A similar plan is in operation at the other two State Department Clinics

in Philadelphia.

The best known tuberculosis dispensary in Philadelphia, conducted by a

private organization, is the dispensary connected with the Henry Phipps

Institute. This dispensary during the eleven years of its existence has

contributed greatly to the standardization of tuberculosis dispensary

work, not only in Philadelphia, but throughout the entire country.

Connected with a scientifically conducted hospital for advanced cases,

with its laboratories and other improved medical facilities, the

Dispensary of the Henry Phipps Institute occupies a high place among the

similar institutions of this country. The nursing staff of the Henry

Phipps Dispensary consists of three visiting tuberculosis nurses, aided by

two additional nurses (both colored) assigned by other organizations to

work on the Phipps Dispensary staff, one by the Whittier Centre, and the

other by the Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Tuberculosis. Some

of the important features of the work of this dispensary in its relation

to nurses are as follows:

(1) An efficient training school for tuberculosis nurses, affording the

opportunity of hospital and dispensary training.

(2) A course of lectures on tuberculosis given to the nursing profession

at large.

(3) Intensive home work among tuberculous families.

Visiting tuberculosis work in Philadelphia is also done in connection with

the Presbyterian Hospital Tuberculosis Clinic, St. Stevens Church

Tuberculosis Clinic, and by the Visiting Nurse Society of Philadelphia.

PITTSBURGH

The Tuberculosis League Hospital of Pittsburgh was opened in 1907 for

incipient and advanced cases, with a capacity of eighty beds. The League

conducts at present a night camp, an open air school, a farm colony, a

post-graduate course for nurses and tuberculosis clinics for medical

students at its dispensary. There is also a post-graduate course in

tuberculosis for nurses. The course requires eight months and nurses

receive during that time $25 a month. Only registered nurses are accepted.

The training is along the following lines: nursing advanced cases in

hospital, open air school work, sanatorium care of early cases, service in

dental, nose and throat clinics, and in the dispensary for ambulant cases,

district nursing, service in baby clinics, educational work, and

laboratory work. Patients discharged from the hospital, families of

patients in the hospital, and cases reporting at various tuberculosis

dispensaries, are given complete follow-up care by the nurses taking the

course, thus giving them excellent training in public health work,

especially that phase of public health nursing dealing with tuberculosis.

At present there are nine nurses taking the course. The Dispensary of the

Tuberculosis League employs six nurses.

Pittsburgh has also a State Department of Health Tuberculosis Clinic, with

ten nurses, each caring for from 90 to 100 patients per month. These

nurses give a small percentage of bedside care and are not in uniform,

except when on duty in the dispensary. They are paid $70 per month. The

plan of work is similar to that of the Philadelphia State Dispensary.

The Department of Public Health of Pittsburgh employs four visiting

nurses, who investigate home conditions and instruct patients reported to

the department who are not under the close supervision of a private

physician, the State Department Clinic, or the Tuberculosis League Clinic.

The nurses are able to correlate, in a way, the work of the two

dispensaries by assigning patients to the clinic in the district in which

they live. They receive $75 per month and are not in uniform.

Pittsburgh, then, has in all twenty visiting tuberculosis nurses, under

three separate and distinct organizations.

CLEVELAND

In Cleveland, as in nearly every other city, the work of organizing the

fight against tuberculosis was accomplished by private organizations, the

Anti-Tuberculosis League and the Visiting Nurse Association. For a number

of years the Health Department confined itself to keeping a card

catalogue of reported cases. In 1910 sufficient funds were voted by the

City Council to enable the establishment of a separate Bureau of

Tuberculosis, whose duty should be the development of municipal

tuberculosis work. This Bureau has taken over and gradually developed five

dispensaries, with a staff of twenty-four visiting tuberculosis nurses,

and paid physicians, besides the director and office force. The work in

Cleveland is centralized in its Health Department.

General dispensaries are required to refer all cases of tuberculosis to

the tuberculosis dispensaries, and physicians are required to report all

cases to the Health Department. On report cards and sputum blanks is the

statement: "All cases of tuberculosis reported to the department will be

visited by a nurse from this department unless otherwise requested by the

physician." With very few exceptions the physicians are glad to have a

nurse call, and every effort is made to co-operate with the physicians in

handling the case.

The city is divided into five districts, with a dispensary located in each

district. Patients are treated only at the dispensary serving the district

in which they live. "This plan prevents cases wandering from one clinic to

another and enables the nursing force to do more intensive work in each

district."

Once a week the chief of the Bureau of Tuberculosis and the Superintendent

of Nurses meet with each separate dispensary staff, and cases are

carefully considered and work discussed. In addition, meetings of the

active nursing staff are held, informal talks on tuberculosis being given,

or the work of allied organizations studied, speakers coming from the

Associated Charities, Department of Health, Settlement Houses, etc. Each

nurse is held responsible for the handling of every individual case in her

district. By thus making the nurse responsible, the interest in her work

is increased and much better results are obtained. If the problem

presented is one that will take more time and energy than the busy

dispensary nurse can give, it is referred to a Special Case Committee.

All dispensary cases are visited in the home within twenty-four hours

after the first visit to the dispensary, where a complete history of the

case is taken. The patient and family are instructed and each member urged

to come to the clinic for examination. Homes where a death from

tuberculosis has occurred are visited immediately, with the consent of the

physician. The family is carefully instructed as to disinfection, and

advised to go to the physician or dispensary for examination.

Cleveland nurses wear uniforms. Each nurse carries about three hundred

patients, a very small percentage being bed cases, usually not more than

two patients at a time. Nurses receive $60 for each of the first three

months; $65 for each of the next nine; $70 a month for the second year;

the third year $80; and the fourth year $85.

DETROIT

The Detroit Board of Health maintains a staff of ten visiting tuberculosis

nurses. They give a small percentage of bedside care, wear a uniform, and

receive $1,000 per year. They work in connection with the Board of Health

Dispensary and have the same general follow-up plan as other cities.

MILWAUKEE

Nurses' Papers on Tuberculosis : read before the Nurses' Study Circle of the Dispensary Department, Chicago Municipal Tuberculosis Sanitarium · 第 1 / 6 段