to enable the outline to be distinctly traced. The best preserved and

most important feature was the chancel arch, which was 8 feet in width.

Its architecture, which was extremely simple, was of the early Norman

style. It had three orders on the side next the nave (see Fig. 179),

each side having two nook shafts, built in courses and provided with

cushion caps. The inner jambs were plain, and the aperture in the wall

was simply faced with a square ingoing of ashlar, and enclosed on the

side next the chancel (Fig. 180) with a single square-edged arch

springing from a very plain impost.

Mr. Muir points out that when he visited the church the walls, “except

the west one, which wants the gable, are at about their full height; but

[Illustration: FIG. 181.--Cruggleton Church. Plan.]

most of the dressed stones have been torn from the corners of both

compartments, the chancel arch and other parts easily got at.” He could

not discern traces of there having

[Illustration: FIG. 182.--Cruggleton Church. North Doorway as Restored.]

ever been more than two windows, “that on the east a small and very

plain round headed one, widely splayed within, and the west one of the

same shape, but much broader, and set square in the wall.” In the

restoration carried out by Mr. Galloway great care has been taken to

restore every part (so far as precedent could be obtained) to its

original condition. As an example of Mr. Galloway’s patient research we

may quote his account of the steps by which the original design of the

south doorway was ascertained. “To begin with, a stone or two of the

internal sconsions remained _in situ_. This gave the position and size

internally of the long demolished doorway. Part of the paving and

massive rubble steps at the outside also remained. Of the external

features there seemed at first to be no trace. The discovery of one

stone threw a flood of light on it. This was the base of a column which

had never been shifted out of its position, but simply lifted and laid

on its side, with the bottom bed outwards, so as to look like an

ordinary courser. I also found about the same place several plain arch

stones, also a capital of simple form, and from these materials, and

especially the base found _in situ_, there could be no doubt that the

external features were a plain ring like that of the chancel arch

carried on engaged columns. In taking down some of a dry stone dyke a

large rybat and an arch stone checked and chamfered were found, which

could only be part of the actual doorway. The only uncertainty is the

height; the original may have been lower, but we cannot be certain. I

adhered to the proportions usual in other examples.” Fig. 182 shows the

restored doorway, “a recovery out of the long forgotten past.”

MONYMUSK CHURCH, ABERDEENSHIRE.

A few remains of the ancient church of Monymusk still survive and are

incorporated with the modern church now erected on the old site. The

village is situated in the valley of the Don, about one mile from the

station of the branch railway to Alford, and is about seven miles up the

valley from Kintore Junction. Monymusk is a place of great antiquity,

being one of the oldest seats of the Culdees in the North of Scotland. A

church is said to have been founded here by Malcolm Canmore, who

[Illustration: FIG. 183.--Monymusk Church. Plan.]

vowed it to St. Andrew, and marked off the tower with his spear before

engaging in battle against the Mormaer of Moray. Dr. Skene[152] points

out that the community of Keledei at Monimusc were connected with St.

Andrews, having probably been founded by the Bishop of St. Andrews. The

church here, like that at St. Andrews, was dedicated to St. Mary. The

Culdees first appear at Monymusk in 1170, and it is said that Gilchrist,

Earl of Mar (1199-1207), built them a convent on condition that they

should subject themselves to canonical rule. Disputes having arisen

between the Culdees and the Bishop of St. Andrews, an arrangement was

finally come to, by which the Keledei were allowed to retain their lands

and dues, they promising to do nothing to the prejudice of the church of

St. Andrews or the parish church of Monymusk. They were thus brought

under the more direct control of the Bishop who is called the

[Illustration: FIG. 184.--Monymusk Church. View from South-West.]

founder of their house, and they were thus assimilated to the state into

which the Keledei of St. Andrews had been brought. Like them, they

consisted of a prior or head, with twelve members, and, like them, were

excluded from all parochial functions. In 1245 the Keledei of Monymusk

had entirely disappeared, and instead we have a confirmation by Pope

Innocent II. to the “prior and convent of Monymusk of the Order of St.

Augustine.”

The remains of the ancient Norman church establish the antiquity of the

foundation. These consist of the lower part of the tower and the chancel

arch. The church, as it now stands (Fig. 183), is a plain oblong modern

structure 45 feet in length by 20 feet 3 inches in width internally,

with a north wing or aisle, and galleries in the north, west, and east

divisions entered from outside stairs. The ancient tower at the west end

and the ancient chancel arch at the east end clearly fix the length of

the original structure, and the modern side walls probably mark the

position of the original side walls. To the east of the chancel arch

there is an apartment about 15 feet square, used as a vestry, and in

continuation of this structure to the eastward are the roofless walls of

a building 34 feet in length. This enclosure is used as a burial-place.

It has a modern doorway in the north wall, and all the walls are so

covered with ivy that no traces of ancient work, if such exist, can be

discovered.

[Illustration: FIG. 185.--Monymusk Church. Chancel Arch.]

The west tower (Fig. 184) is 22 feet by 23 feet externally. It appears

to have been almost entirely rebuilt, except the doorway in the west

wall, which seems to be ancient. It has plain square jambs and round

arch head, with hood mould enclosing the arch stones. The opening in the

west wall of the tower leading into the church has been by a round

archway 9 feet in width, now built up. This wall has been much altered,

but there appear to have been Norman imposts to the arch. The chancel

arch (Fig. 185) is 8 feet 6 inches wide. It has had a large attached

centre shaft and two smaller side shafts in each jamb. The north centre

shaft has been removed and a wooden substitute introduced. The shafts

have all had Norman caps of the cushion pattern (see enlarged sketch in

Fig. 185), but they are now so battered as to be scarcely

distinguishable. The arch is much concealed under the east gallery. To

the right of it is a monumental tablet of the seventeenth century, which

bears the arms of Leslie and Forbes impaled.

From the style of the architecture of the Norman remains, it seems most

probable that they form part of the convent erected by the Earl of Mar

in the beginning of the thirteenth century.

ST. BRANDON’S, BIRNIE, MORAYSHIRE.

Birnie is believed to have been the original seat of the Bishop of Moray

before he migrated, in the first place, to Kineddar, then to Spynie, and

finally to Elgin. Simeon, the fourth Bishop, was buried here in 1184.

The church is situated about three miles south from Elgin, near the

river Lossie, and the road to it from Elgin passes through a pleasant,

well cultivated country, diversified with numerous undulations and

woods.

[Illustration: FIG. 186.--Birnie Church. Plan.]

The church, which is dedicated to St. Brandon, stands on the top of a

small alluvial hill and is conspicuous from a distance. It is evidently

ancient, and, although perfectly plain externally, impresses one at

sight, from the nature of its masonry, as being of Norman workmanship.

The stone work is all of square dressed freestone ashlar, both

externally and internally. The west wall was rebuilt in 1734 (the date

on the belfry), when the church was shortened by a few feet, and

although the old materials were reused, the inferiority of the new

workmanship to the old is very apparent.

As it now stands, the edifice (Fig. 186) consists of nave and chancel,

without aisles. The former measures 42 feet long by 18 feet 6 inches

wide internally, and the latter is 16 feet long by 13 feet wide. The

nave has a doorway in the south wall, and another immediately opposite

it in the north wall. The chancel has a small round-headed window in

each of the north and south walls, and it is remarkable that there is no

window in the east wall. There is also a doorway in the south wall of

the chancel, which has evidently been added or enlarged at a

comparatively late period. Every part of the building, both externally

and internally, is perfectly plain. The only portion which presents the

smallest approach to ornament is the chancel arch (Fig. 187). The

opening is 7 feet 6 inches in width, and is flanked at each side by a

substantial semi-circular attached shaft, which has a moulded base and a

heavy Norman cap of the pattern founded on the cushion, with

[Illustration: FIG. 187.--Birnie Church. Chancel Arch and Font.]

numerous subdivisions. The upper part of the cap has also a small

stepped ornament, similar to what exists at Jedburgh and elsewhere. The

square abacus of the caps carries an arch which forms one square order,

and the angles of the jambs support another square order on each side of

the first. The architecture, though simple, is good, and, together with

the chancel arch, indicates a rather advanced date in the Norman period,

probably towards the end of the twelfth century. Within the chancel arch

there stands a very interesting relic of Norman design, probably of

older date than the church. This is the stone font, the upper part of

which consists of a semi-hemispherical stone basin, with portions cut

off vertically, like a cushion cap, while the top plinth has small

portions at the angles cut off, thus making it an irregular octagon. The

pedestal on which the basin rests is circular, and is fluted with small

spirals passing round it. This, we understand, was supplied recently.

The church also contains a very rare and interesting specimen of the

ancient square shaped Celtic bell, which may possibly indicate that the

present church was preceded by a Celtic monastery, of which this is a

relic, but of which no record remains.

ST. ORAN’S CHAPEL, IONA, ARGYLLSHIRE.

St. Oran’s Chapel is the name given to a small edifice which stands in

the ancient burial-ground situated a short distance south-west from the

cathedral. The name of the churchyard is “Relig Oran,” being so called

from Oran, one of St. Columba’s companions, who was probably the first

of his followers who died on the island.

As stated in the Introduction,[153] this chapel is supposed by Dr.

Reeves to have been built by Queen Margaret about 1074. The chapel (Fig.

188) is a plain oblong, 30 feet long by 16 feet wide internally. As

often happens in West Highland chapels, there is no window in the east

wall.

[Illustration: FIG. 188.--St. Oran’s Chapel. Plan.]

The only light was obtained from two narrow windows near the east end,

one in the north and the other in the south wall, immediately opposite

one another.

The entrance doorway (Fig. 189) is in the west wall. It is more

elaborate than most of the West Highland chapels, having (Fig. 190) two

nook shafts on each side with plain cushion caps, surmounted by a

semi-circular arch in two orders with a label, all of which have been

elaborately carved with Norman enrichments. Those of the label consist

of a series of round and rather pointed knobs. The outer order seems to

have been carved with a bird’s head ornament, and the inner order with a

kind of chevron. All the carved work, however, is greatly decayed by

exposure to the weather. The building has a gable at each end, and has

had a wooden roof. In the interior of the south wall a somewhat

elaborate monument (Fig. 191) has been inserted, which, from its style,

is evidently of late date. The canopy consists of two orders, one of an

ogee form, with weather table, which has been ornamented with crockets,

and has a crucifixion introduced in the pinnacle at the top of the arch.

The label terminations at each side

[Illustration: FIG. 189.--St. Oran’s Chapel. View from West.]

consist of animals like lions of an exaggerated size. The inner arch has

a large cusp which has been filled with Celtic carved scroll work, but

it is now much decayed. A broken piscina stands at the west side of the

monument. A number of very interesting and finely carved Celtic

monumental slabs are preserved in the chapel, and a great many more,

some of

[Illustration: FIG. 190.--St. Oran’s Chapel. West Doorway.]

them said to be the monuments of Scottish, Irish, and Norwegian kings,

lie exposed in the churchyard, and are gradually wasting away. They are

all elaborately carved with the floral ornament peculiar to this part of

the country, while some also contain the dog-tooth ornament, which was

revived here at a late date. This will be further referred to in

connection with Iona Cathedral.

[Illustration: FIG. 191.--St. Oran’s Chapel. Monument.]

Mr. Romilly Allen has shown that the Norman carved work in England was

executed between 1135 and 1190, and that hardly any carving exists on

churches of an earlier date. It could, therefore, not be looked for here

till towards the end of the twelfth century. The carved work in the west

doorway of the chapel, being of a somewhat advanced character of

ornament, can, therefore, scarcely be earlier than about the beginning

of the thirteenth century.

THE CHAPEL IN EDINBURGH CASTLE, KNOWN AS “ST. MARGARET’S CHAPEL.”

When treating of Edinburgh Castle in the _Castellated and Domestic

Architecture of Scotland_,[154] this chapel was briefly described and

illustrated; but it has been thought of sufficient importance to be

included in this volume, with additional illustrations[155] and

descriptive matter.

[Illustration: FIG. 192.--St. Margaret’s Chapel, Edinburgh Castle. Plan

and Sections.]

The exterior walls of the chapel (Fig. 192) form an oblong, measuring 31

feet 7 inches from east to west, by 16 feet in width at the east end and

14 feet 4 inches at the west end. The angles of the structure are thus

not right angles. Although the building is extremely simple in its

external aspect, it is more ornamental and of a more developed form of

plan in the

[Illustration: FIG. 193.--St. Margaret’s Chapel, Edinburgh Castle.

Elevations.]

interior. The plan comprises a nave with a chancel arch, and a chancel

which has a round apse formed within the square east end of the

exterior. The nave is 15 feet 10 inches long by 10 feet 4 inches and 9

feet 9 inches wide at the east and west ends respectively. The chancel

is 9 feet 7½ inches long, and the same width at the west end. The total

interior length is 27 feet 4½ inches. The nave is waggon vaulted,

without ribs; and the apse is roofed with a vault forming the quadrant

of a dome. The nave vault is about 10 feet 8 inches high. (See sections,

Fig. 192.)

The chapel stands on the extreme summit of the Castle rock, and the rock

which is seen rising against it on all sides, except the north (on which

side the level outside is nearly the same as that of the floor), has, it

is understood, in recent years been partially cut away on the south,

east, and west sides. (Fig. 193.) This operation has to be kept in view

in considering the masonry of the exterior walls, for on those three

sides there has necessarily been a certain amount of underbuilding,

which is consequently of a much more modern character than Norman

masonry.

[Illustration: FIG. 194.--St. Margaret’s Chapel, Edinburgh Castle. View

from South-West.]

The genuine surviving Norman masonry begins below the line of the south

windows (see Fig. 194). The first two or three courses, which extend up

to the sills of the south windows, are built of reddish stone, above

which are five courses of a bluish grey stone, the upper course being

above the windows. All the masonry above that level on the south and

north sides is later work.

The masonry of the north and east sides has been greatly interfered

with, as has also that of the west end, where, however, there are

several consecutive Norman courses. The east wall appears to have been

carried to a greater height than the other walls (Fig. 194), as if some

higher building had been attached to the chapel.

The alterations above referred to show that the side and end walls have

been raised, and we have no doubt that the upper part of the west gable

above the window, with the ridge course, is modern, or at least of a

date long subsequent to the original building.

The present porch in front of the entrance door on the north side, near

the west end, is quite modern, although the doorway itself is ancient. A

[Illustration: FIG. 195.--St. Margaret’s Chapel, Edinburgh Castle.

Elevation of Chancel Arch.]

square-headed doorway, with splayed opening, has, possibly in the

sixteenth or seventeenth centuries, been cut through the west wall (see

Fig. 194). There are indications of a narrow doorway having formerly

opened into the chancel on the north side. It is now built up, and forms

an ambry on the inside. (See Fig. 192.)

There are three windows in the south wall, one of them being in the

chancel. There is also a window in each of the end walls, the one in the

west end being at a considerably higher level than the other (see Fig.

194). All the windows are splayed widely on the inside, and slightly so

on the outside, and they are round arched. They are all about 8 inches

wide by about 2 feet high. The two westmost windows in the south

[Illustration: FIG. 196.--St. Margaret’s Chapel, Edinburgh Castle.

Chancel Arch Details.]

wall, and the high window in the west gable, give light to the nave; the

east window in the south wall, and that in the east wall, light the

chancel, the former being in the south side, and the latter in the

centre of the circular apse.

There is a locker on the north side of the chancel, and a piscina

projects, without any recess in the wall, from the south side. This

piscina

[Illustration: FIG. 197.--St. Margaret’s Chapel, Edinburgh Castle.

Chancel Arch.]

has a very new look, as if it had been rewrought or renewed; but we have

no reason to doubt but that it faithfully represents the original

piscina. It has the usual drain.

The chancel arch (Fig. 195), while quite in proportion to the chapel, is

little larger than an ordinary doorway. Its opening measures 5 feet 1

inch wide by 6 feet 4 inches to the springing of the arch, and 9 feet in

height, measuring from the nave floor to the soffit of the arch, and

there is a step up to the chancel. Each jamb (Fig. 196) has two

monolithic shafts, set in nooks, with cushion cups. The arch, which is

in two corresponding orders, is decorated with the ordinary chevron

design. (Fig. 197.) Enclosing the arch is a label moulding, enriched

with a lozenge pattern. The arch on the chancel side is quite plain.

The arched roof of the nave, which is built with carefully-dressed

stones, seems to be of a later date than the walls, the masonry being

finer, and of a different and lighter coloured stone.

The existence of this chapel was long lost sight of, till the late Sir

Daniel Wilson, in the course of his explorations in Old Edinburgh,

discovered the true nature of the building. He thinks that it is in all

probability the chapel used by Queen Margaret during her residence in

the Castle before her death in 1093, and that it is probably the most

ancient chapel in Scotland. It does not, however, appear to be a very

early specimen of Norman work, but rather a fairly-advanced example of

the style, both in plan and decoration. Had the chapel been erected in

the eleventh century, it would certainly have been of a much ruder style

of architecture. No Norman building of that period can be shown to exist

in Scotland. Sir Daniel supposes it to be earlier than the Norman part

of Holyrood, which was founded in 1128; though probably no part was

erected till a considerable time thereafter. Now, the doorway on the

south side of Holyrood (the only Norman portion of that building

remaining) is not unlike the chancel arch here. The caps of the shafts,

the chevron decoration of the arches, and the enriched label are all

similar in design, and there is no reason whatever for supposing the one

to be older than the other.

After the chapel was discovered, it was intended to be used for its

original purpose; a font was gifted to it, and the windows were filled

with stained glass. It has now, however, degenerated into a shop for the

sale of nicknacks to tourists.

DUNFERMLINE ABBEY, FIFESHIRE.

Situated north of the Forth, or “Scots Water,” in the heart of the old

Pictish kingdom, Dunfermline was from an early period occupied as a

secure and pleasant site by the kings of Scotland. Here Malcolm Canmore

had his tower (of which a few crumbling remains still survive), and here

he entertained the royal fugitives from England, and married the

Princess Margaret, one of these refugees, in 1070.

The King and Queen ended their lives in 1093, within a few days of each

other--the first at the siege of Alnwick, and the other in Edinburgh

Castle.

According to Turgot, her confessor and biographer, Queen Margaret,

immediately after her marriage, founded a church “in that place where

the nuptials were celebrated.” This church was dedicated to the Holy

Trinity in 1074. It became the place of royal sepulture, and Queen

Margaret was buried there a few days after her death. From that time

onwards there are continuous references to grants to the Church of the

Holy Trinity, and to interments of royal personages therein.

As no notice has been preserved of the erection of any new church till

the building of the choir in the first quarter of the thirteenth

century, it has been supposed that the nave of the existing structure

(which is in the Norman style) may have been the church founded and

erected by Queen Margaret. But the style of the building forbids this

supposition. None of the English cathedrals were founded till the end of

the eleventh century, and few were carried out till the expiry of the

first quarter of the twelfth century. Scotland would certainly not be in

advance of England in its style of architecture, and we know that

little, if any, Norman work was executed in this country till the days

of David I. Professor Innes is, therefore, no doubt right when he

says--“The original church of Canmore, perhaps not of stone, must have

been replaced by a new edifice when it was dedicated in the reign of

David I.”[156] The style of the structure is early Norman, and would

naturally follow the erection of Durham Cathedral, which took place

about twenty-five years earlier.

Probably the original church of Malcolm stood where the new choir was

afterwards erected, and David I. added the Norman nave to it. The nature

of the site seems to favour this view, as the ground to the west slopes

rapidly away, and scarcely allows room for the west end of the nave;

while the conventual buildings, for want of suitable space, have had to

be carried with an archway over a public street.

It is believed that Alexander I. contemplated the erection of the church

into an abbey, and had possibly made arrangements for the introduction

of monks. At any rate, in the year of the accession of his successor,

David I. (1124), canons of the Order of St. Augustine were brought from

Canterbury and established at Dunfermline.

It was, no doubt, soon after that event that David I. carried out

extensive works at the new monastery, and probably added the Norman nave

to the then existing church of his parents, Margaret and Malcolm. The

monastery continued to flourish, and was largely endowed. The early

church was soon found to be too small, and it was resolved to rebuild

it, so as to form a new choir and transept worthy of the dignity and

importance of the convent. This was accordingly carried out between 1216

and 1226, when the choir, with its aisles, the transept, and the

presbytery were erected. Abbot Patrick, who had formerly been Dean

[Illustration: FIG. 198.--Dunfermline Abbey. Plan.]

and Prior of Canterbury, presided at Dunfermline during the whole of the

above time. After him came Abbot William (II.), whom we find appealing

to Pope Honorius III. for certain patronages and presentations on

account of the great expense incurred during the last ten years in

carrying on the extended fabric, whereby the monastery had been greatly

impoverished. Again, in 1231, a similar appeal was made to Pope Gregory

IX., both on account of the expenses of the church,

[Illustration: FIG. 199.--Dunfermline Abbey. Plan of Nave.]

The ecclesiastical architecture of Scotland from the earliest Christian times to the seventeenth century; vol. 1/3 · 第 14 / 27 段