AN OBJECT OF SYMPATHY.

CAN a man murder his wife? The point seems doubtful, to judge by the

common experience of the Courts, and the general tone of public opinion,

when a charge for this questionable offence is under consideration or

comment. On the whole, it would seem to be desirable that we should

cease to use the term "Murder" of Wife-killing, and create a special

term for that offence--if offence it can be called. May we suggest

either "Wife-icide," or "Spousi-cide," or "Uxori-cide"? It would be the

correlative, in cases of feminine life-taking, of "justifiable homicide"

in the case of male.

It was very touching to observe the general expression of newspaper

sympathy with an individual lately convicted for having pushed a little

too far, perhaps, the natural feeling of exasperation and impatience

with a wife who may safely be assumed to have been a very aggravating

person. "Poor monomaniac," "unfortunate gentleman," and so forth, are

terms which testify to the natural tenderness of the public feeling

towards one who is subjected to such painful consequences for so venial

an act of temporary irritation.

We are glad to see that this touching and well-directed sympathy is

confined to this unfortunate victim of a rash impulse. As for the woman

who provoked him, we observe only a considerate silence, or the

expression of a feeling equivalent to the well-known Cornish

verdict--"Sarved her right."

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 62, Feb 3, 1872 · 第 27 / 29 题