A REPUBLIC OF PRAIRIE DOGS.

On returning from our expedition in quest of the young Count, I

learned that a burrow, or village, as it is termed, of prairie dogs,

had been discovered on the level summit of a hill, about a mile from

the camp. Having heard much of the habits and peculiarities of these

little animals, I determined to pay a visit to the community. The

prairie dog is, in fact, one of the curiosities of the far West, about

which travellers delight to tell marvellous tales, endowing him at

times with something of the politic and social habits of a rational

being, and giving him systems of civil government and domestic

economy, almost equal to what they used to bestow upon the beaver.

The prairie dog is an animal of the coney kind, and about the size of

a rabbit. He is of a sprightly mercurial nature; quick, sensitive, and

somewhat petulant. He is very gregarious, living in large communities,

sometimes of several acres in extent, where innumerable little heaps

of earth show the entrances to the subterranean cells of the

inhabitants, and the well beaten tracks, like lanes and streets, show

their mobility and restlessness. According to the accounts given of

them, they would seem to be continually full of sport, business and

public affairs; whisking about hither and thither, as if on gossiping

visits to each other's houses, or congregating in the cool of the

evening, or after a shower, and gambolling together in the open air.

Sometimes, especially when the moon shines, they pass half the night

in revelry, barking or yelping with short, quick, yet weak tones, like

those of very young puppies. While in the height of their playfulness

and clamor, however, should there be the least alarm, they all vanish

into their cells in an instant, and the village remains blank and

silent. In case they are hard pressed by their pursuers, without any

hope of escape, they will assume a pugnacious air, and a most

whimsical look of impotent wrath and defiance.

The prairie dogs are not permitted to remain sole and undisturbed

inhabitants of their own homes. Owls and rattlesnakes are said to take

up their abodes with them; but whether as invited guests or unwelcome

intruders, is a matter of controversy. The owls are of a peculiar

kind, and would seem to partake of the character of the hawk; for they

are taller and more erect on their legs, more alert in their looks and

rapid in their flight than ordinary owls, and do not confine their

excursions to the night, but sally forth in broad day.

Some say that they only inhabit cells which the prairie dogs have

deserted, and suffered to go to ruin, in consequence of the death in

them of some relative; for they would make out this little animal to

be endowed with keen sensibilities, that will not permit it to remain

in the dwelling where it has witnessed the death of a friend. Other

fanciful speculators represent the owl as a kind of housekeeper to the

prairie dog; and from having a note very similar, insinuate that it

acts, in a manner, as family preceptor, and teaches the young litter

to bark.

As to the rattlesnake, nothing satisfactory has been ascertained of

the part he plays in this most interesting household; though he is

considered as little better than a sycophant and sharper, that winds

himself into the concerns of the honest, credulous little dog, and

takes him in most sadly. Certain it is, if he acts as toad eater, he

occasionally solaces himself with more than the usual perquisites of

his order; as he is now and then detected with one of the younger

members of the family in his maw.

Such are a few of the particulars that I could gather about the

domestic economy of this little inhabitant of the prairies, who, with

his pigmy republic, appears to be a subject of much whimsical

speculation and burlesque remarks, among the hunters of the far West.

It was towards evening that I set out with a companion, to visit the

village in question. Unluckily, it had been invaded in the course of

the day by some of the rangers, who had shot two or three of its

inhabitants, and thrown the whole sensitive community in confusion. As

we approached, we could perceive numbers of the inhabitants seated at

the entrances of their cells, while sentinels seemed to have been

posted on the outskirts, to keep a look out. At sight of us, the

picket guards scampered in and gave the alarm; whereupon every

inhabitant gave a short yelp, or bark, and dived into his hole, his

heels twinkling in the air as if he had thrown a somerset.

We traversed the whole village, or republic, which covered an area of

about thirty acres; but not a whisker of an inhabitant was to be seen.

We probed their cells as far as the ramrods of our rifles would reach,

but could unearth neither dog, nor owl, nor rattlesnake. Moving

quietly to a little distance, we lay down upon the ground, and watched

for a long time, silent and motionless. By and bye, a cautious old

burgher would slowly put forth the end of his nose, but instantly draw

it in again. Another, at a greater distance, would emerge entirely;

but, catching a glance of us, would throw a somerset, and plunge back

again into his hole. At length, some who resided on the opposite side

of the village, taking courage from the continued stillness, would

steal forth, and hurry off to a distant hole, the residence possibly

of some family connexion, or gossiping friend, about whose safety they

were solicitous, or with whom they wished to compare notes about the

late occurrences.

Others still more bold, assembled in little knots, in the streets and

public places, as if to discuss the recent outrages offered to the

commonwealth, and the atrocious murders of their fellow burghers.

We rose from the ground and moved forward, to take a nearer view of

these public proceedings, when, yelp! yelp! yelp!--there was a shrill

alarm passed from mouth to mouth; the meetings suddenly dispersed;

feet twinkled in the air in every direction; and in an instant all had

vanished into the earth.

The dusk of the evening put an end to our observations, but the train

of whimsical comparisons produced in my brain, by the moral attributes

which I had heard given to these little politic animals, still

continued after my return to camp; and late in the night, as I lay

awake after all the camp was asleep, and heard in the stillness of the

hour, a faint clamor of shrill voices from the distant village, I

could not help picturing to myself the inhabitants gathered together

in noisy assemblage, and windy debate, to devise plans for the public

safety, and to vindicate the invaded rights and insulted dignity of

the republic.

* * * * *

_North American Review_.--The April number is for the most part

excellent. But we are forcibly reminded by it of a defect in the

Reviews of this country, which it seems to us, might with some little

exertion, be remedied. The fault to which we allude, is their

tardiness in noticing the publications of the day. In this number of

the North American, we find several pages devoted to a review of

_Burkhardt's Travels in Africa_, which have been before the public

_sixteen years_, while the crowd of new works of undoubted merit which

fill our book stores, have not as yet, with but few exceptions,

attracted the attention of the reviewers. In this book-making age, we

are aware that it is impossible for a Quarterly to review the

twentieth part of the productions constantly issuing from the press:

but if, as we suppose, it is the design of these periodicals to direct

the taste of the public in every department of science and literature,

surely they should contain reviews of such works selected from the

mass, as are best worthy attention; and should endeavor to keep pace

with the stream of publication. We can see little value in a review of

a book after every reading man in the community has perused it, and

formed his opinion upon its merits. Thus to lag behind the march of

current literature, deprives the criticisms of the reviewer of much of

their value and weight. In the instance to which we have alluded, it

might well be asked whether the travels of Burkhardt, English reviews

of which we read ten or twelve, or more years ago, could have the same

claim upon the public interest as the newer works of Burnes,

Jacquemont, Bennet and many others, whose books possess the charm of

novelty? We subjoin the contents of the April number: 1. Politics of

Europe: 2. Coleridge: 3. Mineral Springs of Nassau: 4. Life of G. D.

Boardman: 5. National Gallery: 6. Italy: 7. Last Days of Pompeii: 8.

Immigration: 9. Burkhardt's Travels in Africa: 10. Popular Education.

The first article contains a spirited review of the political events

in France since the revolution of 1830, and of the foreign and

internal policy of Louis Philippe. The progress of the _juste milieu_

system is well delineated, and a forcible picture is drawn of the

present posture of the French government. We do not entirely coincide

with the writer's ideas of the onward course of the cause of liberty,

(or perhaps more correctly, of revolution) in France; but consider the

article generally correct and instructive. That on Coleridge is

admirable: and we heartily rejoice that in a work so much looked up to

in England as is the North American, for the expression of our

literary opinions, justice so ample should have been done to that

extraordinary mind. A Baltimore newspaper, in allusion to the article

in question, speaks of "the pitiful shifts to which the reviewer is

driven to account for a fact which he admits, viz.--that there is but

here and there an individual who understands him," [Coleridge.] "What

stronger proof do we want," says the journalist, "of that confusion of

thought and mysticism with which he has been charged?" We think _far_

stronger proofs are necessary to support the accusation. That but few

comprehend the metaphysical treatises of Coleridge, is owing to the

simple fact, that few are so thoroughly versed in psychological

knowledge as to maintain a position in the van of the science, the

post universally acceded to Coleridge by the learned in ethics. It is

for this class of men that he has written, and in whose applauses he

has received a plentiful reward. These, at least, will not hesitate to

say that so far from being justly charged with confusion of thought,

and its consequence confusion of expression, no man who ever lived

thought _more distinctly even when thinking wrong_, or more intimately

felt and comprehended the power of _the niceties of words_. That his

philosophical disquisitions are abstruse, is the fault of the

subjects, and not of the language in which he has treated them, than

which none can be more lucid or appropriate.

The article on Italy is interesting--also that on the National

Gallery. In the notice of the _Last Days of Pompeii_, justice is by no

means done to that most noble of modern novels.

* * * * *

The _London Quarterly Review for February_, American Edition, No. 1.

Vol. 2. is printed on good paper, with excellent type. It contains, 1.

Wanderings in New South Wales, by George Bennet, Esq. F. L. S. Fellow

of the Royal College of Surgeons: 2. Correspondence of Victor de

Jacquemont: 3. Population of Great Britain and Ireland: 4. Coleridge's

Table Talk: 5. Egypt and Thebes: 6. Rush on the Prophecies: 7. The

Church and the Voluntary System: 8. Recent German Belles Lettres: 9.

England, France, Russia and Turkey: 10. Sir Robert Peel's Address. The

eighth article contains much information on a subject with which

Americans are, for the most part, indifferently conversant.

Coleridge's Table Talk is highly interesting, as every authentic

fragment of his sentiments and opinions must be. The work reviewed in

this article, is published by Mr. Henry Coleridge, a near relative of

the departed philosopher and poet, and is made up from notes of

numerous conversations, taken down by the publisher immediately after

their occurrence. They bear the impress of Coleridge's mind, will be

read with interest by all classes, and probably do more to make the

general reader acquainted with him and his opinions, than all else

that has been written.--We take this opportunity of noticing the

excellent American Edition of the London, Edinburg, Foreign and

Westminster Reviews, combined. It does much honor to Mr. Foster of New

York, the publisher; and the compression of matter is such, without

being printed too fine, as to give to subscribers for the sum of eight

dollars, these four periodicals for which upwards of twenty dollars

was formerly paid. The paper, type, and execution, are good.

* * * * *

_The Life of Samuel Drew_, the shoemaker and philosopher of Cornwall,

by his son, is published by Harper & Brothers, and consists of 360

pages. Drew was an extraordinary man, whose works, especially his

theological ones, have gained him no little celebrity. It now appears

that he had much to do with the writings attributed to Dr. Coke.

* * * * *

_The Life of the Emperor Napoleon, Vol. 1, by H. Lee. New York,

Charles De Behr._ This work has great merits and remarkable faults.

Published ostensibly as a corrector of the numerous errors of other

biographers of Napoleon, and especially those of Sir Walter Scott and

Lockhart, it cannot but be read with interest. The errors detected and

set right, are numerous and important. In most instances Mr. Lee

clearly makes out his charges--in some we are sorry to see that he

seems to be governed by a spirit of captiousness: And we cannot but

object to the tone of his strictures upon Sir Walter Scott. Milder

language would better have graced his cause. We have prepared a review

of this work, which we are compelled to postpone to the next number of

the Messenger.

* * * * *

_Celebrated Trials of all Countries, and remarkable cases of Criminal

Jurisprudence, selected by a Member of the Philadelphia Bar.

Philadelphia, E. L. Carey and A. Hart._ Such a book as this was much

wanted. The records of criminal trials were scattered through the

newspapers or buried in some huge tomes of antique law reports, almost

inaccessible to the ordinary reader. And this book seems fitted to

supply the deficiency to a considerable extent. It is a large octavo,

and contains a selection of criminal trials from the early period of

1588, down to the present day, among them some of the most celebrated

cases on record, such as that of Sir Walter Raleigh in 1602, of the

Earl of Strafford in 1643, of Alexis Petrowitz Czarowitz in 1815, of

the rebels, Kilmarnock, Cromartie, Balmerino, &c. in 1745, and others

of equal interest--the judicial proceedings in relation to which,

belong to history. The contents of the work are highly interesting,

but we cannot withhold our censure of their arrangement. The trials

are huddled together without the slightest attention to chronological

order; and it would seem that the gentleman of the Philadelphia Bar,

who is made responsible for the compilation of the work, could merely

have selected the several cases leaving the printer to arrange them as

he pleased. The consequence is, that the reader finds himself shifting

backward and forward, from century to century, in a complete medley of

dates. This is to be lamented, because the history of criminal

jurisprudence is a history of the progress of civil liberty, and of

the expansion of the human mind. And the interest which we find in

tracing the progress of just and equitable rules in the trials of

malefactors, is marred by this defect of arrangement. As future

volumes of this work are partly promised, it is to be hoped that in

them this fault will be amended.

* * * * *

_No Fiction_. _A Narrative founded on recent and interesting facts, by

the Rev. Andrew Reed, D.D._ has been republished by the Harpers. With

a plot of great simplicity, and with diction equally simple, this work

has attained much celebrity. It is indeed thrillingly interesting.

_Martha_, a more recent effort by the same writer, is however, in

every respect a book of greater merit.

* * * * *

_Memoirs of Celebrated Women of all Countries. By Madame Junot.

Philadelphia, Carey, Lea and Blanchard._ These memoirs are amusing,

and so far we can recommend them highly, but no farther. Their

morality is questionable indeed; and they bear upon their face, in a

certain pervading air of romance, sufficient evidence of their own

inauthenticity. There is a sad mistake too in the title of the work.

These are not memoirs of celebrated women in _all_ countries: they are

merely Madame Junot's celebrated women in a few particular regions.

The greater part of them have no pretensions to celebrity. It has been

remarked that the sketch of Marina Minszech will afford a fair sample

of the Duchess's biographical style. In this opinion we concur, and as

it is a pretty fable, we advise all to read it who have no inclination

for the book entire.

* * * * *

_Influence, a Moral Tale, by the author of Miriam. Philadelphia, Key

and Biddle._ There is an air of modest tranquillity about this book

which we admire. It is a pleasing tale addressed to the young, to

serious parents, and to friends--and it pretends to be nothing more.

Its style too is unobjectionable. If the work developes in the author

no extraordinary capabilities, it is, we think, because there was no

intention of developing them.

* * * * *

_Lives of the English Pirates, Highwaymen and Robbers, by Whitehead.

Philadelphia, Carey and Hart._ These lines will be read in spite of

all that a too fastidious taste may say to the contrary. We see no

very good reason why they should not be.

* * * * *

_Confessions of a Poet, 2 vols. Carey, Lea and Blanchard._ The most

remarkable feature in this production is the bad paper on which it is

printed, and the typographical ingenuity with which matter barely

enough for one volume has been spread over the pages of two. The

author has very few claims to the sacred name he has thought proper to

assume. And indeed his own idea on this subject seem not to satisfy

himself. He is in doubt, poor man, of his own qualifications, and

having proclaimed himself a poet in the title page, commences his book

by disavowing all pretensions to the character. We can enlighten him

on this head. There is nothing of the _vates_ about him. He is no

poet--and most positively he is no prophet. He is a writer of notes.

He is fond of annotations; and composes one upon another, putting

Pelion upon Ossa. Here is an example: "_Ce n'est pas par affectation

que j'aie mis en Francais ces remarques, mais pour les detourner de la

connoissance du vulgaire._" Now we are very sure that none but _le

vulgaire_, to speak poetically, will ever think of getting through

with the confessions: thus there the matter stands. Lest his book

should _not_ be understood he illustrates it by notes, and then lest

the notes _should_ be understood, why he writes them in French. All

this is very clear, and very clever to say no more. There is however

some merit in this book, and not a little satisfaction. The author

avers upon his word of honor that in commencing this work he loads a

pistol, and places it upon the table. He farther states that, upon

coming to a conclusion, it is his intention to blow out what he

supposes to be his brains. Now this is excellent. But, even with so

rapid a writer as the poet must undoubtedly be, there would be some

little difficulty in completing the book under thirty days or

thereabouts. The best of powder is apt to sustain injury by lying so

long "in the load." We sincerely hope the gentleman took the

precaution to examine his priming before attempting the rash act. A

flash in the pan--and in such a case--were a thing to be lamented.

Indeed there would be no answering for the consequences. We might even

have a second series of the Confessions.

* * * * *

_The Language of Flowers, embellished with fine colored engravings.

Philadelphia, Carey, Hart and Co._ This is a book which will find

favor in the eyes of the ladies, and thus, _par consequence_ in the

eyes of the gentlemen. Its motto is pretty and apposite:

By all those token-flowers that tell

What words can never speak so well.

* * * * *

_Mr. and Miss Edgeworth's Practical Education_ has been republished by

the Harpers. Its character is well established.

* * * * *

_The Highland Smugglers. By the author of Adventures of a Kussilbush,

&c. 3 vols. Carey, Hart and Co._ This book is very much praised and we

think justly. It is full of exquisite descriptions of that region of

romance the Scottish Highlands, and has _a manner of its own_.

* * * * *

Mr. Lockhart's excellent novel _Valerius_ is republished by the

Harpers. The scene is in the time of Trajan, and the subject is

managed in that masterly style which we look for in Lockhart. We have

heard objections urged to the antique nature of his tale--ill-mannered

sneers, and by men who should know better, at travelling back to Roman

history for interest which could as well be found at home. _Procul--O

procul este profani!_ Valerius is a book _to live_.

* * * * *

_An Account of Col. Crockett's Tour to the North and Down East,

written by himself. Carey, Hart and Co._ We see no reason why Col.

Crockett should not be permitted to expose himself if he pleases, and

to be as much laughed at as he thinks proper--but works of this kind

have had their day, and have fortunately lost their attractions. We

think this work especially censurable for the frequent vulgarity of

its language.

* * * * *

_Illorax de Courcy, an auto-biographical novel, by Josiah Templeton,

Esq., 2 vols. Baltimore, William and Joseph Neal._ We have looked at

this book attentively--for we confess it was impossible to read it. A

glance over one or two pages will be sufficient to convince any

reasonable person that it is a mere jumble of absurdities. The

gentleman should not have thrust his name (if it be not a _nom de

guerre_,) into the title page.

* * * * *

_A Winter in the West, by a New Yorker. New York, Harper and

Brothers._ This is a work of great sprightliness, and is replete with

instruction and amusement. The writer evinces much talent in producing

an interesting narrative of a journey performed in the most

unpropitious period of the year. His observations on life in the

backwoods are sensible, and we should imagine correct, and his details

in relation to Michigan particularly interest us. The adventures of

the road are told with great vivacity, and although there are no

thrilling scenes or surprising incidents in the book, it cannot be

read with indifference. The traits of Indian character scattered

through its pages are vivid and striking, and the reflections on the

condition of that fast failing race mark the philanthropic spirit of

the author. Mr. Hoffman, formerly connected with the New York

American, and now Editor of a Monthly Magazine, is the reputed author

of this spirited work.

* * * * *

Note: The journal of Mrs. Frances Ann Butler, better known as Miss

Fanny Kemble, has, after a long delay, made its appearance; but at so

late a period that we are unable to present our readers with our

opinions at large of its merits, which we regret the more, as the work

has created much excitement in the literary and fashionable world.

Numerous extracts from its pages have been published in the

newspapers, and the daring authoress has received but little mercy

from any quarter. It will be reviewed in our next.

The southern literary messenger, Vol. I., No. 8, April, 1835 · 第 88 / 89 题