The Finance Committee which has been appointed in this session has

already made two reports. Every conclusion that I had before drawn, as

you know, from my own observation, I have the satisfaction of seeing

there confirmed by that great public authority. Large as was the sum by

which the committee of 1791 found the estimate of 1786 to have been

exceeded in the actual produce of four years of peace, their own

estimate has been exceeded during the war by a sum more than one third

larger. The same taxes have yielded more than half a million beyond

their calculation. They yielded this, notwithstanding the stoppage of

the distilleries, against which, you may remember, I privately

remonstrated. With an allowance for that defalcation, they have yielded

sixty thousand pounds annually above the actual average of the preceding

four years of peace. I believe this to have been without parallel in all

former wars. If regard be had to the great and unavoidable burdens of

the present war, I am confident of the fact.

But let us descend to particulars. The taxes which go by the general

name of Assessed Taxes comprehend the whole, or nearly the whole,

domestic establishment of the rich. They include some things which

belong to the middling, and even to all but the very lowest classes.

They now consist of the duties on houses and windows, on male servants,

horses, and carriages. They did also extend to cottages, to female

servants, wagons, and carts used in husbandry, previous to the year

1792,--when, with more enlightened policy, at the moment that the

possibility of war could not be out of the contemplation of any

statesman, the wisdom of Parliament confined them to their present

objects. I shall give the gross assessment for five years, as I find it

in the Appendix to the Second Report of your committee.

1791 ending 5th April 1792 £1,706,334

1792 1793 1,585,991

1793 1794 1,597,623

1794 1795 1,608,196

1795 1796 1,625,874

Here will be seen a gradual increase during the whole progress of the

war; and if I am correctly informed, the rise in the last year, after

every deduction that can be made, affords the most consoling and

encouraging prospect. It is enormously out of all proportion.

There are some other taxes which seem to have a reference to the same

general head. The present minister many years ago subjected bricks and

tiles to a duty under the excise. It is of little consequence to our

present consideration, whether these materials have been employed in

building more commodious, more elegant, and more magnificent

habitations, or in enlarging, decorating, and remodelling those which

sufficed for our plainer ancestors. During the first two years of the

war, they paid so largely to the public revenue, that in 1794 a new duty

was laid upon them, which was equal to one half of the old, and which

has produced upwards of 165,000_l._ in the last three years. Yet,

notwithstanding the pressure of this additional weight,[40] there has

been an actual augmentation in the consumption. The only two other

articles which come under this description are the stamp-duty on gold

and silver plate, and the customs on glass plates. This latter is now, I

believe, the single instance of costly furniture to be found in the

catalogue of our imports. If it were wholly to vanish, I should not

think we were ruined. Both the duties have risen, during the war, very

considerably in proportion to the total of their produce.

We have no tax among us on the most necessary articles of food. The

receipts of our Custom-House, under the head of Groceries, afford us,

however, some means of calculating our luxuries of the table. The

articles of tea, coffee, and cocoa-nuts I would propose to omit, and to

take them instead from the excise, as best showing what is consumed at

home. Upon this principle, adding them all together, (with the exception

of sugar, for a reason which I shall afterwards mention,) I find that

they have produced, in one mode of comparison, upwards of 272,000_l._,

and in the other mode upwards of 165,000_l._, more during the war than

in peace.[41] An additional duty was also laid in 1795 on tea, another

on coffee, and a third on raisins,--an article, together with currants,

of much more extensive use than would readily be imagined. The balance

in favor of our argument would have been much enhanced, if our coffee

and fruit ships from the Mediterranean had arrived, last year, at their

usual season. They do not appear in these accounts. This was one

consequence arising (would to God that none more afflicting to Italy, to

Europe, and the whole civilized world had arisen!) from our impolitic

and precipitate desertion of that important maritime station. As to

sugar,[42] I have excluded it from the groceries, because the account of

the customs is not a perfect criterion of the consumption, much having

been reëxported to the North of Europe, which used to be supplied by

France; and in the official papers which I have followed there are no

materials to furnish grounds for computing this reëxportation. The

increase on the face of our entries is immense during the four years of

war,--little short of thirteen hundred thousand pounds.

The increase of the duties on beer has been regularly progressive, or

nearly so, to a very large amount.[43] It is a good deal above a

million, and is more than equal to one eighth of the whole produce.

Under this general head some other liquors are included,--cider, perry,

and mead, as well as vinegar and verjuice; but these are of very

trifling consideration. The excise duties on wine, having sunk a little

during the first two years of the war, were rapidly recovering their

level again. In 1795 a heavy additional duty was imposed upon them, and

a second in the following year; yet, being compared with four years of

peace to 1790, they actually exhibit a small gain to the revenue. And

low as the importation may seem in 1796, when contrasted with any year

since the French treaty in 1787, it is still more than 3000 tuns above

the average importation for three years previous to that period. I have

added sweets, from which our factitious wines are made; and I would have

added spirits, but that the total alteration of the duties in 1789, and

the recent interruption of our distilleries, rendered any comparison

impracticable.

The ancient staple of our island, in which we are clothed, is very

imperfectly to be traced on the books of the Custom-House: but I know

that our woollen manufactures flourish. I recollect to have seen that

fact very fully established, last year, from the registers kept in the

West Riding of Yorkshire. This year, in the West of England, I received

a similar account, on the authority of a respectable clothier in that

quarter, whose testimony can less be questioned, because, in his

political opinions, he is adverse, as I understand, to the continuance

of the war. The principal articles of female dress for some time past

have been muslins and calicoes.[44] These elegant fabrics of our own

looms in the East, which serve for the remittance of our own revenues,

have lately been imitated at home, with improving success, by the

ingenious and enterprising manufacturers of Manchester, Paisley, and

Glasgow. At the same time the importation from Bengal has kept pace with

the extension of our own dexterity and industry; while the sale of our

printed goods,[45] of both kinds, has been with equal steadiness

advanced by the taste and execution of our designers and artists. Our

woollens and cottons, it is true, are not all for the home market. They

do not distinctly prove, what is my present point, our own wealth by our

own expense. I admit it: we export them in great and growing quantities:

and they who croak themselves hoarse about the decay of our trade may

put as much of this account as they choose to the creditor side of money

received from other countries in payment for British skill and labor.

They may settle the items to their own liking, where all goes to

demonstrate our riches. I shall be contented here with whatever they

will have the goodness to leave me, and pass to another entry, which is

less ambiguous,--I mean that of silk.[46] The manufactory itself is a

forced plant. We have been obliged to guard it from foreign competition

by very strict prohibitory laws. What we import is the raw and prepared

material, which is worked up in various ways, and worn in various shapes

by both sexes. After what we have just seen, you will probably be

surprised to learn that the quantity of silk imported during the war has

been much greater than it was previously in peace; and yet we must all

remember, to our mortification, that several of our silk ships fell a

prey to Citizen Admiral Richery. You will hardly expect me to go through

the tape and thread, and all the other small wares of haberdashery and

millinery to be gleaned up among our imports. But I shall make one

observation, and with great satisfaction, respecting them. They

gradually diminish, as our own manufactures of the same description

spread into their places; while the account of ornamental articles which

our country does not produce, and we cannot wish it to produce,

continues, upon the whole, to rise, in spite of all the caprices of

fancy and fashion. Of this kind are the different furs[47] used for

muffs, trimmings, and linings, which, as the chief of the kind, I shall

particularize. You will find them below.

The diversions of the higher classes form another and the only

remaining head of inquiry into their expenses: I mean those diversions

which distinguish the country and the town life,--which are visible and

tangible to the statesman,--which have some public measure and standard.

And here, when, I look to the report of your committee, I, for the first

time, perceive a failure. It is clearly so. Whichever way I reckon the

four years of peace, the old tax on the sports of the field has

certainly proved deficient since the war. The same money, however, or

nearly the same, has been paid to government,--though the same number of

individuals have not contributed to the payment. An additional tax was

laid in 1791, and during the war has produced upwards of 61,000_l._,

which is about 4000_l._ more than the decrease of the old tax, in one

scheme of comparison, and about 4000_l._ less, in the other scheme. I

might remark, that the amount of the new tax, in the several years of

the war, by no means bears the proportion which it ought to the old.

There seems to be some great irregularity or other in the receipt. But I

do not think it worth while to examine into the argument. I am willing

to suppose that many, who, in the idleness of peace, made war upon

partridges, hares, and pheasants, may now carry more noble arms against

the enemies of their country. Our political adversaries may do what they

please with that concession. They are welcome to make the most of it. I

am sure of a very handsome set-off in the other branch of expense,--the

amusements of a town life.

There is much gayety and dissipation and profusion which must escape and

disappoint all the arithmetic of political economy. But the theatres are

a prominent feature. They are established through every part of the

kingdom, at a cost unknown till our days. There is hardly a provincial

capital which does not possess, or which does not aspire to possess, a

theatre-royal. Most of them engage for a short time, at a vast price,

every actor or actress of name in the metropolis: a distinction which in

the reign of my old friend Garrick was confined to very few. The

dresses, the scenes, the decorations of every kind, I am told, are in a

new style of splendor and magnificence: whether to the advantage of our

dramatic taste, upon the whole, I very much doubt. It is a show and a

spectacle, not a play, that is exhibited. This is undoubtedly in the

genuine manner of the Augustan age, but in a manner which was censured

by one of the best poets and critics of that or any age:--

Migravit ab aure voluptas

Omnis ad incertos oculos, et gaudia vana:

Quatuor aut plures aulæa premuntur in horas,

Dum fugiunt equitum turmæ, peditumque catervæ;--

I must interrupt the passage, most fervently to deprecate and abominate

the sequel:--

Mox trahitur manibus regum fortuna retortis.

I hope that no French fraternization, which the relations of peace and

amity with systematized regicide would assuredly sooner or later draw

after them, even if it should overturn our happy Constitution itself,

could so change the hearts of Englishmen as to make them delight in

representations and processions which have no other merit than that of

degrading and insulting the name of royalty. But good taste, manners,

morals, religion, all fly, wherever the principles of Jacobinism enter;

and we have no safety against them but in arms.

The proprietors, whether in this they follow or lead what is called the

town, to furnish out these gaudy and pompous entertainments, must

collect so much more from the public. It was but just before the

breaking out of hostilities, that they levied for themselves the very

tax which, at the close of the American war, they represented to Lord

North as certain ruin to their affairs to demand for the state. The

example has since been imitated by the managers of our Italian Opera.

Once during the war, if not twice, (I would not willingly misstate

anything, but I am not very accurate on these subjects,) they have

raised the price of their subscription. Yet I have never heard that any

lasting dissatisfaction has been manifested, or that their houses have

been unusually and constantly thin. On the contrary, all the three

theatres have been repeatedly altered, and refitted, and enlarged, to

make them capacious of the crowds that nightly flock to them; and one of

those huge and lofty piles, which lifts its broad shoulders in gigantic

pride, almost emulous of the temples of God, has been reared from the

foundation at a charge of more than fourscore thousand pounds, and yet

remains a naked, rough, unsightly heap.

I am afraid, my dear Sir, that I have tired you with these dull, though

important details. But we are upon a subject which, like some of a

higher nature, refuses ornament, and is contented with conveying

instruction. I know, too, the obstinacy of unbelief in those perverted

minds which have no delight but in contemplating the supposed distress

and predicting the immediate ruin of their country. These birds of evil

presage at all times have grated our ears with their melancholy song;

and, by some strange fatality or other, it has generally happened that

they have poured forth their loudest and deepest lamentations at the

periods of our most abundant prosperity. Very early in my public life I

had occasion to make myself a little acquainted with their natural

history. My first political tract in the collection which a friend has

made of my publications is an answer to a very gloomy picture of the

state of the nation, which was thought to have been drawn by a statesman

of some eminence in his time. That was no more than the common spleen of

disappointed ambition: in the present day I fear that too many are

actuated by a more malignant and dangerous spirit. They hope, by

depressing our minds with a despair of our means and resources, to drive

us, trembling and unresisting, into the toils of our enemies, with whom,

from the beginning of the Revolution in France, they have ever moved in

strict concert and coöperation. If, with the report of your Finance

Committee in their hands, they can still affect to despond, and can

still succeed, as they do, in spreading the contagion of their pretended

fears among well-disposed, though weak men, there is no way of

counteracting them, but by fixing them down to particulars. Nor must we

forget that they are unwearied agitators, bold assertors, dexterous

sophisters. Proof must be accumulated upon proof, to silence them. With

this view, I shall now direct your attention to some other striking and

unerring indications of our flourishing condition; and they will, in

general, be derived from other sources, but equally authentic: from

other reports and proceedings of both Houses of Parliament, all which

unite with wonderful force of consent in the same general result.

Hitherto we have seen the superfluity of our capital discovering itself

only in procuring superfluous accommodation and enjoyment, in our

houses, in our furniture, in our establishments, in our eating and

drinking, our clothing, and our public diversions: we shall now see it

more beneficially employed in improving our territory itself: we shall

see part of our present opulence, with provident care, put out to usury

for posterity.

To what ultimate extent it may be wise or practicable to push inclosures

of common and waste lands may be a question of doubt, in some points of

view: but no person thinks them already carried to excess; and the

relative magnitude of the sums laid out upon them gives us a standard of

estimating the comparative situation of the landed interest. Your House,

this session, appointed a committee on waste lands, and they have made a

report by their chairman, an honorable baronet, for whom the minister

the other day (with very good intentions, I believe, but with little

real profit to the public) thought fit to erect a board of agriculture.

The account, as it stands there, appears sufficiently favorable. The

greatest number of inclosing bills passed in any one year of the last

peace does not equal the smallest annual number in the war, and those of

the last year exceed by more than one half the highest year of peace.

But what was my surprise, on looking into the late report of the Secret

Committee of the Lords, to find a list of these bills during the war,

differing in every year, and[48] larger on the whole by nearly one

third! I have checked this account by the statute-book, and find it to

be correct. What new brilliancy, then, does it throw over the prospect,

bright as it was before! The number during the last four years has more

than doubled that of the four years immediately preceding; it has

surpassed the five years of peace, beyond which the Lords' committees

have not gone; it has even surpassed (I have verified the fact) the

whole ten years of peace. I cannot stop here. I cannot advance a single

step in this inquiry without being obliged to cast my eyes back to the

period when I first knew the country. These bills, which had begun in

the reign of Queen Anne, had passed every year in greater or less

numbers from the year 1723; yet in all that space of time they had not

reached the amount of any two years during the present war; and though

soon after that time they rapidly increased, still at the accession of

his present Majesty they were far short of the number passed in the four

years of hostilities.

In my first letter I mentioned the state of our inland navigation,

neglected as it had been from the reign of King William to the time of

my observation. It was not till the present reign that the Duke of

Bridgewater's canal first excited a spirit of speculation and adventure

in this way. This spirit showed itself, but necessarily made no great

progress, in the American war. When peace was restored, it began of

course to work with more sensible effect; yet in ten years from that

event the bills passed on that subject were not so many as from the year

1793 to the present session of Parliament. From what I can trace on the

statute-book, I am confident that all the capital expended in these

projects during the peace bore no degree of proportion (I doubt, on

very grave consideration, whether all that was ever so expended was

equal) to the money which has been raised for the same purposes since

the war.[49] I know that in the last four years of peace, when they rose

regularly and rapidly, the sums specified in the acts were not near one

third of the subsequent amount. In the last session of Parliament, the

Grand Junction Company, as it is called, having sunk half a million, (of

which I feel the good effects at my own door,) applied to your House for

permission to subscribe half as much more among themselves. This Grand

Junction is an inosculation of the Grand Trunk; and in the present

session, the latter company has obtained the authority of Parliament to

float two hundred acres of land, for the purpose of forming a reservoir,

thirty feet deep, two hundred yards wide at the head, and two miles in

length: a lake which may almost vie with that which once fed the now

obliterated canal of Languedoc.

The present war is, above all others of which we have heard or read, a

war against landed property. That description of property is in its

nature the firm base of every stable government,--and has been so

considered by all the wisest writers of the old philosophy, from the

time of the Stagyrite, who observes that the agricultural class of all

others is the least inclined to sedition. We find it to have been so

regarded in the practical politics of antiquity, where they are brought

more directly homo to our understandings and bosoms in the history of

Borne, and above all, in the writings of Cicero. The country tribes were

always thought more respectable than those of the city. And if in our

own history there is any one circumstance to which, under God, are to be

attributed the steady resistance, the fortunate issue, and sober

settlement of all our struggles for liberty, it is, that, while the

landed interest, instead of forming a separate body, as in other

countries, has at all times been in close connection and union with the

other great interests of the country, it has been spontaneously allowed

to lead and direct and moderate all the rest. I cannot, therefore, but

see with singular gratification, that, during a war which has been

eminently made for the destruction of the lauded proprietors, as well as

of priests and kings, as much has been done by public works for the

permanent benefit of their stake in this country as in all the rest of

the current century, which now touches to its close. Perhaps after this

it may not be necessary to refer to private observation; but I am

satisfied that in general the rents of lands have been considerably

increased: they are increased very considerably, indeed, if I may draw

any conclusion from my own little property of that kind. I am not

ignorant, however, where our public burdens are most galling. But all of

this class will consider who they are that are principally menaced,--how

little the men of their description in other countries, where this

revolutionary fury has but touched, have been found equal to their own

protection,--how tardy and unprovided and full of anguish is their

flight, chained down as they are by every tie to the soil,--how

helpless they are, above all other men, in exile, in poverty, in need,

in all the varieties of wretchedness; and then let them well weigh what

are the burdens to which they ought not to submit for their own

salvation.

The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol. 05 (of 12) · 第 32 / 34 段