LITERATURE

The subject is more or less explicitly dealt with in most of the works

mentioned at the end of the last two lectures, and also in books on

Moral Philosophy too numerous to mention. Classical vindications of

the authority of the Moral Consciousness are Bishop Butler's _Sermons_,

and Kant's _Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals_ and

other ethical writings (translated by T. K. Abbott). I have expressed

my own views on the subject with some fullness in the third book of my

_Theory of Good and Evil_.

[1] See especially Book II. Lect. iii.

[2] 'We do not infer a character to be virtuous, because it pleases:

but in feeling that it pleases after such a particular manner, we in

effect feel that it is virtuous.' (_Treatise_, Part I, Section ii.,

ed. Green and Grose, vol. ii. p. 247.) 'The distinction of moral good

and evil is founded in the pleasure or pain, which results from the

view of any sentiment, or character; and as that pleasure or pain

cannot be unknown to the person who feels it, it follows that there is

just so much virtue in any character as every one places in it, and

that 'tis impossible in this particular we can ever be mistaken.'

(_Ibid._ vol. ii. p. 311.)

[3] There are no doubt ways of making Morality the law of the Universe

without what most of us understand by Theism, though not without

Religion, and a Religion of a highly metaphysical character; but

because such non-theistic modes of religious thought exist in Buddhism,

for instance, it does not follow that they are reasonable, and, at all

events, they are hardly intelligible to most Western minds. Such

non-theistic Religions imply a Metaphysic quite as much as Christianity

or Buddhism. There have been Religions without the idea of a personal

God, but never without Metaphysic, _i.e._ a theory about the ultimate

nature of things.

[4] Tennyson's _Wages_.

[5] The doctrine of St. Thomas Aquinas is 'Cum possit Deus omnia

efficere quae esae possunt, non autem quae contradictionem implicant,

omnipotens merito dicitur.' (_Summa Theol_., Pars I. Q. xxv. art. 8.)

{87}

Philosophy and Religion Six Lectures Delivered at Cambridge · 第 35 / 44 题