1. The claim of Christianity to be the special or absolute
Religion not dependent upon miracles.
2. Ritschlian Theologians right in resting the truth of
Christianity mainly upon the appeal made by Christ to
the individual Conscience: but wrong in disparaging
(_a_) philosophical arguments for Theism, (_b_) the
relative truth of non-Christian systems, (_c_) the
value of Doctrine and necessity for Development, . . . . . 161
3. Christian doctrine (esp. of the Logos) is an attempt to
express the Church's sense of the unique value of Christ
and His Revelation. The necessity for recognizing
development both in Christian Ethics and in Theology, . . 164
4. Some reflections on our practical attitude towards
Christian doctrine. Some means of expressing the unique
position of Christ wanted. The old expressions were
influenced by philosophy of the time, but not valueless.
Illustrations. Need of re-interpretation and further
development, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
5. The doctrine of continuous Revelation through the
Spirit is a part of Christianity, and the condition
of its acceptance as the final or absolute Religion, . . . 185
{1}