CHAPTER XIII

_On Certain Happenings in the Baltic_

“_British submarines may take to themselves the credit of having

damaged our trade and shipping in the Baltic._”—CAPTAIN PERSIUS.

Before our Russian allies abandoned the sword and the ploughshare for

revolution and famine the Baltic was alive with naval doings.

Occasionally it even became the scene of intense activity. When the

former subjects of the Little Father obtained their liberty, and thereby

shackled themselves with a greater tyranny, the inland sea of Northern

Europe passed to the enemy. The unweaned democracy of Russia sought

peace with paper and not with a sword, hugging the delusion that a new

heaven and a new earth could be created with the aid of the devil and

the whirlwind. The Baltic became a vast German lake. With the acumen of

a committee of Frankfort Jews, and in pursuance of the much-vaunted

Mittel-Europa policy that was both commercial and political, the

Fatherland at once projected a canal between the Baltic and the Black

Sea. This, of course, would have rendered the Empire entirely

independent of the sea-water and long-distance route from Odessa, the

granary of the South.

Great Britain was Russia’s only ally in the Baltic before she

surrendered. Two or three battle-cruisers from the neighbourhood of the

Orkneys would doubtless have been a desirable addition to her naval

strength, but there were good and sufficient reasons why they were

withheld. What would have happened had there been no revolution can only

be surmised. Certainly there was a time when the appearance of large

British vessels was not regarded as altogether visionary. Sir John

Jellicoe, when Commander-in-Chief of the Grand Fleet, stated that it

would be difficult to go to the Baltic, but not impossible, and he hoped

the day might come when the two Navies would fight a common foe. That

day never arrived. Submarines alone represented the might and majesty of

the British Navy; and excellent representatives they made. These

underseas craft, which threaded their way through the tortuous channels

of the Cattegat and the Sound, or were conveyed in sections from

Archangel by inland water transport, rendered yeoman service. Some of

the boats put in three long years of hard and hazardous work before the

signature of the fatuous Brest-Litovsk Treaty negatived further effort

and the ice-bound condition of the frozen waters made escape impossible.

Their tasks accomplished, they were blown up by their own crews. The

battered plates of seven worthy successors of the gallant little

_Revenge_ lie buried deep in the Gulf of Finland. Not every British

victory is perpetuated to an apathetic posterity by such visible tokens

as a sail-of-the-line or a gun at the United Service Museum. There are

other and grimmer relics which will never meet the public eye.

Scouting for months in conditions bordering on life in the Arctic,

eternally on the prowl for the High Sea Fleet, sinking men-of-war and

German cargoes, holding the enemy at bay while the Russian Fleet secured

safety in the Gulf of Finland and the Huns sought to corner it at

Reval—these and other things must be put to the credit of British

submarines in the 160,000 odd square miles of waterway which constitute

the changeful northern sea. Flat and sandy coast, rocky and precipitous

cliff, treacherous shallows, weather as fitful as the temper of a

fractious child, added to the anxieties of the watchers. If ever there

existed a legitimate excuse for jumpy nerves, surely it was here. Yet

throughout their long vigil officers and men upheld the worthy tradition

of the British sea game. Not one enemy merchant ship was sunk without

warning, or before ample time had been afforded every member of the crew

to secure safety in the boats. No shot was fired until they had pulled

away from the danger zone. If the distance from land was great, the

submarine stood by until a neutral took charge of the refugees. “That

bloody wild beast that slumbers in man” of whom Robert Louis Stevenson

makes mention was never allowed to awake, though often enough there was

sufficient of insolence and bitter hate on the part of the enemy to

arouse it.

The case of the s.s. _Nicomedia_, of Hamburg, is typical of British

methods in the Baltic. This big steamer was laden with 6700 tons of

valuable ore for the hungry melting-pots of Essen. E 19 hauled her up,

gave her complement ‘fain’its’ to gather their belongings and stow them

into the boats, patiently waited for them to clear out, and then sent

the ship to the bottom with the assistance of a dynamite cartridge. No

cold-blooded-murder tricks sullied the fair fame of the English-speaking

seafarers, who thus gave the lie direct to the Teutonic assertion that

submarine warfare could only be carried on if it set at nought the

common decencies of humanity.

The sportsmanlike behaviour of the British was entirely unappreciated by

the enemy. They deliberately falsified the accounts which they sent

broadcast throughout the world as part of their propaganda work. For

instance, neutrals were informed that the commander of a British

submarine had blown up the s.s. _Germania_ in Swedish territorial waters

by placing a bomb in her hold. When sighted off the Swedish coast the

vessel was bound for Stettin with a cargo of 2750 tons of concentrated

iron ore. Shots were fired as a signal to her captain to stop, and also

to warn him that he was making straight for a dangerous sandbank. They

were disregarded, with the inevitable result that the _Germania_ ran

ashore. Then, and not till then, the British boat entered Swedish

waters, intent only on saving the crew and helping to salve the vessel.

Not a soul was found on board. After spending an hour in a useless

endeavour to move the steamer, the ship’s papers and some fresh meat

were removed to the submarine. When the British officers and men left

the _Germania_ the engine-room was already partly submerged. On the

water reaching the boilers they quite naturally blew up. No attempt was

made to destroy the vessel.

After the high seas had been swept of much Teutonic baggage, the Baltic

alone remained to the German merchant service as a field for possible

operations with surface vessels. Westward of the Skager-Rack the way was

barred by the British Grand Fleet; eastward, the German High Sea Fleet

felt more or less confident of supremacy, though not positively sure.

The Russian Baltic Fleet, consisting of four pre-Dreadnought

battleships, six armoured cruisers, four protected cruisers, over a

hundred destroyers, twenty or more submarines, and four Dreadnoughts in

the making,[30] was obviously numerically weaker than that of the second

naval Power in the world. It was not in a position to undertake a

vigorous offensive. The strategy adopted, to quote Admiral Kanin, was

that of regarding the Baltic Fleet as “a continuation of the extreme

flank of the Army.” Its task was “as far as possible to support the

movements of the army, protecting it against envelopment by the German

Fleet.” The element of uncertainty, from the enemy’s point of view, was

introduced by England as usual. Had the latter not declared war, Germany

could have swamped the Russian Fleet and landed troops for the invasion

of Russia without fear of molestation from the sea. As it was she had to

keep both eyes open, for on each flank she had maritime enemies. It was

scarcely likely that any of Britain’s battleships would venture to

render assistance, but what of her submarines? The machines in which

Germany placed so much faith were not her secret. They represented no

new departure. Britain might attempt to get a squadron or two through

the narrow passageway. When the devil gets among tailors, complications

are more than likely.

Evidence that the Germans anticipated inroads from hostile underwater

craft is afforded by the vigilance of their guard at the doors affording

entry and exit. Three E boats once tried to make the passage in company.

Two of them got through unscathed, though trawlers were busily hunting

for poachers at the time. No. 3 got into difficulties with a sweep slung

between two of the afore-mentioned watch-dogs. She ran smack into the

hawser, seeing nothing, got entangled, and gave her commander furiously

to think on ways and means of possible extrication. By the ‘feel’ of it

the officer knew approximately where the cable had caught, so he went

astern, cocked the boat’s nose up a little, and attempted to ‘step’ over

it. The manœuvre was executed with celerity. Rapidity of movement is the

soul of underwater warfare. Once let the watchers above become aware

that they had a ‘bite,’ and an explosive charge would come rattling down

the line with the ease of a load of bricks on an aerial railway. Then

good-bye to the Baltic and all deeps. They must have felt the tug, but

it was so momentary that it is more than likely it was put down to

jetsam, and one does not waste good material on lumps of sunken

wreckage. The string of death rasped along the keel of the submarine,

slipped over the bow, and freed itself. If the commander of E — failed

to mutter an audible exclamation of thankfulness, he at least breathed a

little more freely as a sign of relieved tension. He had lived an hour

in less than sixty seconds, and for aught I know added a grey hair or

two to his head as outward and visible indications of inward

perturbation.

On another occasion a squadron of the High Sea Fleet left the sheltering

shores of Kiel Bay for a trip in the Baltic. Three additional British

submarines were detailed to pass through the Sound. No patrol work this;

their orders were to attack. They left their base in company, intending

to make the passage of fifty miles together on the first favourable

night. During the voyage one of the craft developed a minor malady, to

which submarines are subject. As she could not keep up with the others,

and instructions were not to be disregarded, the lame duck had perforce

to limp her way alone. Her consorts aroused no suspicion until they had

actually entered the Baltic. Then the enemy became aware of their

presence. While trawlers and torpedo-boats hunted for them, four

merchantmen in line abreast, supported by warships, swept the entrance

to prevent others from following suit.

The third submarine, restored to health, arrived twenty-four hours late.

The commander fully appreciated what was happening. He sought salvation

in bluff. As the sweepers were showing navigation lights he quite

reasonably argued that if he made a similar display he might possibly

get through. He came to the surface, lamps were placed in position, the

operation began. For a time it looked as if the artful little ruse would

be successful. Then from out the surrounding darkness a torpedo-boat was

felt rather than seen coming full tilt at the submarine. It took the

latter three minutes to submerge, according to the log-book; the surface

craft occupied a little longer in reaching the spot. Even then it was a

mighty close shave. There were not many feet of blue water between the

enemy’s keel and the submarine’s conning-tower.

After an interval the British commander thought he would try his luck

again, minus lights. He waited his opportunity, riding quietly on the

waves in the meantime, and keeping a pair of keen eyes to his

night-glasses. Presently a ship came along, seemingly intent on

navigating the difficult passage through the Sound. The low-lying craft

awakened into life, and followed at a respectful distance. There was

just a chance that she would not be detected. The blackness of the night

prevented the officer from being certain of the nature of his pilot,

otherwise he would scarcely have used her as a screen. A mouse does not

creep behind a cat. Meantime she was making no great speed, and looked

like some old tub loaded to the Plimsoll mark with merchandise.

Then for no apparent reason the vessel suddenly developed marked

eccentricity, went dead slow, then put on full speed, altered course,

and made in the direction of her follower. The submarine again sought

refuge in the chilly and inhospitable waters, and her company listened

to the threshing of propellers racing above. She returned home, “prior

to making a further attempt.” Thus the commander in his official

communication to My Lords of the Admiralty.

In October 1914 it was announced that the cruiser _Prinz Adalbert_ had

been sunk by two shots from a submarine off Libau, with the loss of most

of her crew. According to a Petrograd report, her demise “was effected

after much skilful manœuvring” by a British submarine. The cruiser was

not actually the _Prinz Adalbert_, but a vessel of the same class. The

warship bearing that name fell a victim to a British torpedo in the

autumn of the following year.[31]

A light cruiser—name unknown—and a torpedo-boat were taking an airing

when a certain British submarine of the celebrated ‘E’ class met them.

The larger vessel was torpedoed forward, apparently set on fire, and

showed signs of sinking by the head. As the torpedo-boat sought to

pounce on the enemy the submarine passed under her stern and struck the

cruiser in or near the after-magazine. There was a double explosion. The

torpedo-boat and her tornado of shell were dodged a second time. Three

minutes later the periscope showed no cruiser.

On the 10th October, 1914, an attempt was made by enemy submarines to

sink the Russian _Admiral Makaroff_, at the moment busily engaged in

searching a suspicious fishing-boat flying the Dutch commercial flag.

Several torpedoes were fired, but missed, and the armoured cruiser beat

off the enemy. On the next day, however, the German craft atoned for

previous bad marksmanship by sinking the _Pallada_, a sister ship of the

_Admiral Makaroff_, while she was scouting in company with the _Bayan_.

This success was achieved through the ‘neutral flag’ trick. The

submarine lay in waiting behind a vessel displaying Dutch colours. The

ruse was discovered too late. Although subjected to a heavy fire, the

submarine got a shot home which apparently exploded the magazines. This

vessel, armed with two 8–in., eight 6–in., and many smaller guns, had a

normal complement of 568 men. Not a soul was saved. An interesting

sequel to this disaster was furnished by the announcement of the Russian

Naval Headquarters Staff that during the course of their predatory

operations on the 10th and 11th a German submersible had been sunk by

the fire of the _Bayan_, a second foundered through striking a mine, and

a third was put to flight by a torpedo-boat. Admiral von Essen,

Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Baltic Fleet, told the Tsar that

twenty unsuccessful submarine attacks had been made within two months

previous to the sinking of the _Pallada_.

Early in 1915 the German cruiser _Gazelle_ was attacked off the Danish

coast by a submarine whose nationality was not disclosed, although

rumour had it that she was Russian, but commanded by a British officer.

Despite a big hole in her side made by the explosion, the cruiser was

able to keep afloat and reach Sassnitz with the assistance of a ferry

steamer. As a withering fire was kept up by the enemy, and floating

mines were flung out indiscriminately as a further means of protection,

a second shot was impracticable.

A lonely Russian submarine boldly attacked an enemy squadron of ten

battleships and a swarm of torpedo-boats in the following summer. One

evening, when far out in the Baltic, the commander picked up dense black

clouds of smoke on the horizon. Then the funnels of warships and their

massive hulls rose out of the sea. They were proceeding in two columns,

the smaller vessels on the flanks of the larger ones.

An hour or more passed before the squadron was sufficiently near for

action. As the vessels approached, the commander concluded that his best

position would be on the port side of the oncoming ships, between the

enemy and the light. He raised his periscope, and believing he had ample

time to change his position before the torpedo-boat in the van of the

right column came abreast of him, proceeded to carry out the manœuvre.

The submarine rose a matter of fifteen feet to bring her periscope again

into use. The ‘eye’ revealed the distance between her and the first of

the oncoming battleships as certainly not more than sixty yards. The

officer fired a torpedo, dived immediately, and struck the ram of the

object at which he had aimed. As no German battleship draws less than

twenty-six feet of water, the boat had evidently not submerged

sufficiently rapidly.

Everybody on board firmly believed that their craft would founder. Only

those who have been in a similar occurrence or a railway collision can

appreciate the appalling suddenness of such a crash. The electric light

bulbs burst, the boat assumed a list to starboard, something in the

superstructure snapped, water came in. Apparently the engines had

sustained no damage from the shock, for they continued to work without

any appreciable loss of speed. The boat descended seventy-five feet.

Then the sound of a great tumult penetrated her steel plates. The

commander afterward declared that when he heard the explosion he was

perfectly convinced that the boat in her damaged state could not

withstand the pressure of the water. He tried to reach the surface

several times, but on each occasion was compelled to descend because the

thud of screws above told only too plainly that the enemy vessels were

still in the same area, some doubtless assisting the wounded battleship,

others zigzagging about in the hope that the assailant might be made to

pay the full penalty. When the officer tried to use the periscope he

found it to be irretrievably damaged, and about as useless as a broken

cowl on a chimney-stack. It revealed a blank. At 11.30 the commander,

hearing nothing to suggest the presence of the enemy, rose to the

surface after having been below four hours. The submarine reached port

without further incident, and was docked for repairs. To this day the

commander does not know whether the vessel he aimed at was put _hors de

combat_.

Late in June 1915 a number of enemy warships bombarded Windau with

9.4–in. guns, and also tried to effect a descent on the coast with a

view to co-operating with the German army in Courland. The invasion

project was entirely unsuccessful, and the naval forces were compelled

to retire. The defence seems mainly to have been the work of

torpedo-boats; no mention was made on either side of the presence of

submarines. A similar attempt made three weeks before had robbed the

Russians of the _Yenissei_, which fell a victim to a U-boat. According

to reports furnished by commanders of Russian submarines, three of the

enemy vessels were sunk or damaged by mines previously dropped by the

wrecked vessel.

Early in the following month Russian naval forces came across two enemy

light cruisers and destroyers on outpost duty between Gothland and

Windau. On this occasion the tables were turned, and the Germans lost a

mine-layer. The _Albatross_, the ship in question, was so severely

handled that she ran aground near Oestergarn, and became a total wreck,

her consort, the _Augsburg_, managing to escape in the fog. While the

Russian squadron continued its course northward, two cruisers, four

destroyers, and a flotilla of U-boats joined battle, but speedily

retreated after the armoured cruiser _Roon_ had been badly damaged. On

being reinforced by a battle squadron, another attempt was made against

the Russian vessels, including a spirited submarine attack on the

_Rurik_. The latter was saved by a destroyer, which was reported to have

sunk one of the hostile underwater craft. The 2nd July was a disastrous

day for Germany in the Baltic. In addition to the _Albatross_ she lost a

battleship of the _Pommern_ type at the hands of Commander Max K.

Horton.[32] On the 30th, E 1 sank a large transport, despite a

determined effort on the part of the latter to run down the attacking

party.

The next happening of importance from the point of view of the submarine

war was a dramatic series of actions at the entrance of the Gulf of Riga

in the succeeding August. These were carried out with the object of

assisting Hindenburg’s land offensive in the direction of the great

seaport of Riga, whose fall would open the road to Petrograd. The

weather, mostly calm and foggy, was entirely favourable to the enemy,

who slipped past the patrols and were able to sweep up many mines that

barred further progress. In this dangerous operation it would have been

nothing short of miraculous had the enemy escaped scot-free, and one or

two vessels were destroyed. The Russian warships put up an excellent

defence, with the result that the attempt to capture the old city of the

Merchant-Venturers completely failed and the Gulf was evacuated.

Again British submarines were to the fore. Commander Noel F. Laurence in

E 1 torpedoed the Dreadnought cruiser _Moltke_ in thick weather on the

19th. This great vessel of 23,000 tons, a sister ship of the more

romantic _Goeben_, mounting ten 11–in. guns, was believed to have taken

part in the infamous raid on Scarborough. Although the _Moltke_ did not

sink, she was sufficiently damaged to be placed temporarily out of

commission, thereby easing the situation for a time by denuding Germany

of a very formidable fighting machine. Laurence, whose boat had been the

first British submarine to penetrate the Baltic, narrowly escaped having

E 1 rammed on this occasion. A torpedo-boat missed her by a few feet

only. The Tsar acknowledged the officer’s services by decorating him

with the St George’s Cross of the Fourth Class.

In this month of August 1915, so big with events in the Baltic, the

enemy committed a flagrant breach of international law by firing on the

British submarine E 13 while she was ashore in Danish territorial

waters. The outrage was intensified by the attacking torpedo-boat firing

shrapnel and bringing machine-guns to bear on the members of the crew

struggling in the water.

E 13, in charge of Lieutenant-Commander Layton, grounded on the island

of Saltholm, and was given the usual twenty-four hours’ grace to get

off. Long before the time-limit had expired a German torpedo-boat let

off a torpedo at a range of about 300 yards, and opened fire with all

her other available weapons. The torpedo exploded on hitting the bottom,

close to E 13. Within a few seconds the submarine was a mass of flame.

Unable to offer any defence, the officer ordered the crew to abandon the

ship. Had it not been for the intervention of a Danish man-of-war, which

lowered her boats and steamed between the attacker and the attacked,

probably not a soul would have been saved.

Fishermen who witnessed the tragedy avowed they had never seen any

bravery to equal that of the helpless crew. When E 13 was refloated by

the Danish authorities the hull was found to be riddled with shells, but

her colours were still on the charred staff. Fifteen bluejackets lost

their lives in an attack which Sweden’s leading newspaper characterized

as “wilful murder.”

Acting under the orders of the Russian Commander-in-Chief, the British

boats in the Baltic carried on as before. They rendered valuable support

to the Allies by cutting off supplies of timber, ore, and coal consigned

to the Fatherland, and sinking transports and merchantmen whenever

bigger prey was undiscoverable. “The capture of an enemy’s merchant

ships,” as Mr David Hannay has so well said, “is the maritime equivalent

for the occupation of territory.” This active warfare was carried out

despite vigorous search on the part of Zeppelins and seaplanes.

E — was treated with three bombs from an enemy aircraft. Then the

latter, apparently not satisfied with the result, dropped seven more.

Sixty minutes later the submarine came up to have a look round, and was

obliged to retreat hurriedly on account of a biplane coming toward her

at great speed. Five bombs followed her passage below. After a lapse of

forty-five minutes E — again rose to the surface. Subsequent events are

best related by reference to the commander’s log:

Decided to rise and get the gun into action. Got under way on a

north course at 10 knots with the upper deck awash. The biplane was

sighted on the starboard bow at 6.20 p.m., and we opened fire at

3000 yards. The biplane immediately sheered off, and got out of

range after the eighth round, and then kept three miles astern of

us. I decided to run north till dark or till the aeroplane retired,

and then to return under water to —— position. At 7.30 we lost sight

of the aeroplane, and at 8.30 decided to turn and dive south. Just

then the aeroplane was sighted. Dived. Heard nine distant

explosions. Decided to remain down till dark.

For a month business was bad in the ‘big event’ line, but things

brightened in October, although E 19, sighting a German cruiser and two

escorts outside Danish territorial waters off Klintholm Moen, had rather

an unpleasant ten minutes in trying to hit one of them. The large

warship opened fire with great promptitude, while the smaller fry

cruised about trailing high explosive charges. E 19 dodged, got in a

neat shot at one of the torpedo-boats, and was rewarded by the knowledge

that she sank.

On the 23rd October the cruiser _Prinz Adalbert_, although escorted by a

couple of destroyers, one on each bow, was sent to the bottom by a

British submarine near Libau. Regarding the manner of her death, the

commander of the boat which wrought her destruction has this to say:

Fired bow tube at enemy’s fore-bridge. Observed very vivid flash of

explosion along water-line at point of aim. This was immediately

followed by very large concussion, and entire ship was immediately

hidden in huge columns of thick grey smoke, fore magazine having

evidently been exploded by torpedo.

For some unknown reason a newspaper correspondent’s account of the loss

of this ship was allowed to be sent by the German official wireless to

New York. The writer asserted that the affair took place in hazy

weather—“ideal conditions for an attack,” according to the British

commander—and that the vessel was struck by two torpedoes almost

simultaneously. According to him the _Prinz Adalbert_ went down

“immediately, like a piece of iron.” How the following paragraph came to

be passed by the censor is a greater mystery: “The enemy submarines in

the Baltic offer a difficult problem. The Admiralty is confronted with

the practically impossible task of keeping them out. The Admiralty can

mine or set barrier nets in the Sound between Denmark and Sweden only up

to the three-mile limit, where the neutral waters of the two countries

begin. The problem is causing the Admiralty serious thought.”

The range was some 1300 yards, and the “very large concussion” so great

that it upset the working of the torpedo mechanism of the submarine and

necessitated the craft’s burying herself in deep water to avoid injury

from the great masses of _débris_ that were falling over a wide area.

The _Prinz Adalbert_ was not wrecked, but annihilated.

The light cruiser _Undine_ was dispatched by two torpedoes in three

minutes, while convoying the steam ferry _Preussen_ from Trelleborg to

Sassnitz on the 7th November, 1915. The first missile missed, and merely

put a couple of attendant torpedo-boats on the _qui vive_. In attempting

to ram the assailant, one of them uncovered her charge, with the result

that the second weapon struck the _Undine_ full amidships. The

underwater craft, uninjured by the withering fire of the disconcerted

cruiser, ducked and was seen no more. As a neutral captain remarked,

“the submarines pop up everywhere, and disappear again with an alertness

which only an intimate knowledge of the waters would allow. Several

times they have been seen in close proximity to the mine-field, but they

seem to be as much at home as in the North Sea.” A little later the

_Preussen_ played into the enemy’s hands by ramming and sinking her

escorting torpedo-boat, of whose company only five were picked up.

The _Flying Dutchman_ of the Great War was surely the German light

cruiser _Bremen_, completed in 1904 at the port whose name she bore.

This little 3200–ton warship, mounting ten 4.1–in. guns and fourteen

smaller weapons, was reported from time to time as having been seen in

the Atlantic, the North Sea, and the Pacific. Then she appeared—and

disappeared—in the Baltic. On the 18th December, 1915, Berlin admitted

her loss, together with a torpedo-boat escorting her. This double event

of the previous day was due to a British submarine.

In May 1916, when the eastern and southern parts of the Baltic were once

more free from ice, British submarines lost no time in renewing their

activity, to the utter discomfiture of traders who did not mind running

big risks for big money. A German convoy was also intercepted off the

coast of Sweden by Russian torpedo-boats, destroyers, and submarines.

The squadron sank the auxiliary cruiser _König von Sachsen_, and set

fire to another auxiliary ship, the _Hermann_. The latter was afterward

blown up by her crew.

The raid in the Gulf of Finland in November 1916, again under cover of a

fog, showed the efficiency of the Russian Baltic Fleet to be still

unimpaired, but the Revolution achieved what the enemy failed to do.

“Confusion and mistrust prevailed”: in these words Admiral Koltchak

summed up the whole unhappy situation. In October 1917 the German High

Sea Fleet held the mastery of the Gulf of Riga. The most belligerent

representative of the London Press went frantic because the enemy’s

object had been carried out “without any interference from the British

Fleet, which, as we are accustomed to say, commands the sea.” Presumably

it would have had battleships and vessels of Sir David Beatty’s

celebrated ‘Cat Class’ forging ahead through the entrance, disregarding

the imminent likelihood of their being sent to the bottom by U-boats and

mine-fields. The difficulties surmounted by underwater craft in

penetrating the Baltic, to which I have already drawn attention, is

surely sufficient answer to the most amateur of amateur strategists,

who, indeed, were somewhat roughly handled by Sir Eric Geddes in the

House of Commons. What it was possible for the British Navy to do it

achieved.

On the 23rd it was announced that a British submarine had fired two

torpedoes at an enemy Dreadnought of the _Markgraf_ class mounting ten

12–in. guns, with what result was unknown. The Germans made it somewhat

too hot with shells from ships and bombs from seaplanes for her

commanding officer to wait and see. She certainly succeeded in blowing

up a big transport.

Opportunity is four-fifths of the battle where underwater craft are

concerned. As the war progressed and Britain learned how to tackle those

of the enemy, so the Germans gained experience in dodging our boats.

Three Dreadnoughts, a light cruiser, and several torpedo craft hailing

from Kiel were chased for four hours by one of our submarines. Every

ounce of energy was got out of the motors, but never once did she

succeed in getting closer than eight miles. A decent-sized gun would

have reached readily enough, but no torpedo has ever achieved so distant

a range. The squadron covered a wide area of sea, frequently changed

course, and manœuvred in such a way that the British skipper candidly

confessed that his German rival “made use of very confusing and

successful anti-submarine tactics.”

This chapter cannot be other than a faint and incomplete outline of

happenings in the Baltic between 1914 and 1917. The British campaign

ended in April 1918. When the German naval forces and transports

approached Hangö, South-west Finland, four ‘E’ and three ‘C’ boats were

taken outside the harbour of Helsingfors and blown up. The crews made

their way, not without difficulty and danger, to Petrograd. “Whether it

be wise in men to do such actions or no,” said Sir William Temple over

two centuries ago, “I am sure it is so in States to honour them.”

Russia had gone into ‘Committee.’ The Baltic had ceased to be a battle

area. A chapter in which the names of Horton, Laurence, Goodhart, and

Crombie afforded something more than a tinge of romance had been added

to the history books. To quote Admiral Kanin, successor to the

hard-working and reforming von Essen, Russia had been “helped

extraordinarily by the English submarines.” The boats were

“magnificent,” the officers “fine young fellows.” Their bearing was

“wonderful—and their coolness!”

War in the Underseas · 第 13 / 16 章