BAYREUTH IN ENGLAND

I purposely dwell on the faults of Bayreuth in order to show that there

is no reason in the world why as good and better performances of The

Ring should not be given in England. Wagner's scores are now before the

world; and neither his widow nor his son can pretend to handle them with

greater authority than any artist who feels the impulse to interpret

them. Nobody will ever know what Wagner himself thought of the artists

who established the Bayreuth tradition: he was obviously not in a

position to criticize them. For instance, had Rubini survived to create

Siegmund, it is quite certain that we should not have had from Wagner's

pen so amusing and vivid a description as we have of his Ottavio in the

old Paris days. Wagner was under great obligations to the heroes and

heroines of 1876; and he naturally said nothing to disparage their

triumphs; but there is no reason to believe that all or indeed any of

them satisfied him as Schnorr of Carolsfeld satisfied him as Tristan, or

Schroder Devrient as Fidelio. It is just as likely as not that the

next Schnorr or Schroder may arise in England. If that should actually

happen, neither of them will need any further authority than their own

genius and Wagner's scores for their guidance. Certainly the less their

spontaneous impulses are sophisticated by the very stagey traditions

which Bayreuth is handing down from the age of Crummles, the better.

The Perfect Wagnerite: A Commentary on the Niblung's Ring · 第 49 / 51 题