Jena, October 31, 1891

Gracious and honored Lady:

I hope that these lines, with the assurance that I thoroughly approve

the aims of the International Peace and Arbitration Association and am

ready and willing to become a member, will reach you while you are

still in Vienna.

Although I believe with Heraclitus that battle is the father of all

things, yet I hope and wish with all my heart that the better stock of

competition for the higher blessings of civilization may displace the

savage and cruel conflict of races and the bloody warfare between

nations, which at present still, as in the Middle Ages, brings the

greatest wretchedness to the “highly civilized” nations of the present

day.

May the Peace Congress in Rome on the ninth of November be attended by

the best results!

With especially high respect, your devoted

Ernst Haeckel

XXX

UNION FOR RESISTANCE TO ANTI-SEMITISM

A. G. von Suttner, Count Hoyos, Baron Leitenberger, and Professor

Nothnagel found the Union · Article in the _Neue Freie Presse_

Before I write of the congress in Rome I want to go back a bit. In

the spring of 1891—consequently before the founding of the

Interparliamentary Group and the Peace Association in Vienna—my

husband had also brought into existence an association of which I

wish to tell.

We were still in the Caucasus when, at the beginning of the eighties, we

were informed of the Anti-Semitic movement started in Prussia, and

propagated by Court Chaplain Stöcker. This phenomenon, I need hardly

say, aroused lively disgust in us. We set forth the arguments against

this reversion to the Middle Ages in various articles written for the

Vienna papers on which we were regular collaborators, but the articles

were returned to us on the ground that in Austria there was no

Anti-Semitism, and if any of it should spread from Prussia to us the

only proper attitude toward it would be contemptuous silence. Later

events showed that this attitude was not the proper one. Wrong must be

withstood if it is recognized as such; there is no other way. In such

cases silence, though professing to express contempt, is itself

contemptible. Not only must the victims react against it, it is also for

those who are not personally concerned to antagonize a wrong wherever

they see it. Their silence is complicity, and generally springs from the

same motives as the silence of the victims,—that is, from timidity. Only

not to come into any collision, only not to subject one’s self to

annoyances,—that is the motive at bottom, even if it does outwardly bear

itself as genteel reserve.

After we came home the Anti-Semitic movement in Vienna had taken on

especially brutal forms. In the year 1891 it had even gone as far as

violence. The indignation which my husband felt boiled over.

“Something must be done!” was his decision.

And he sat down and wrote a constitution and a plan of action and an

appeal. And now what he had to do was to find some prominent men who

would go hand in hand with him. That same evening—we were just then in

Vienna—he went to look up Count Hoyos in his residence on the

Kolowratring. “The gentleman is not in,” said the servant; “he is

downstairs in the club.” My husband immediately betook himself to the

lower floor, where the clubrooms were situated, and sent for the count,

who was sitting at a whist table.

“What is it, dear Suttner, anything very urgent?”

“Yes, justice for the persecuted—”

“Out with it!”

Count Hoyos took hold of the matter enthusiastically, and proposed to

invite his whist partner, Baron Leitenberger, the well-known Liberal

manufacturer, to join the provisory committee. So he also was called

out, and a few moments later the formation of the league was a settled

thing among these three. The next day Professor Nothnagel, so highly

regarded both as a man and as a savant, came in with them; and a short

time afterwards the constituting assembly met, with these four men at

the speakers’ table. After the appeal had been printed in the papers,

several hundred, including personages prominent in Viennese society and

politics, had joined. On the day after the first meeting the _Neue Freie

Presse_ published the following article, which will give the best

explanation of the author’s ideas and purposes:

Memoirs of Bertha von Suttner: The Records of an Eventful Life (Vol. 1 of 2) · 第 119 / 177 题