A LETTER

FROM A CANDIDATE FOR THE PRESIDENCY IN ANSWER TO SUTTIN

QUESTIONS PROPOSED BY MR. HOSEA BIGLOW, INCLOSED IN

A NOTE FROM MR. BIGLOW TO S. H. GAY, ESQ., EDITOR OF

THE NATIONAL ANTISLAVERY STANDARD.

[Curiosity may be said to be the quality which pre-eminently

distinguishes and segregates man from the lower animals. As we trace the

scale of animated nature downward, we find this faculty of the mind (as

it may truly be called) diminished in the savage, and quite extinct in

the brute. The first object which civilized man proposes to himself I

take to be the finding out whatsoever he can concerning his neighbours.

_Nihil humanum a me alienum puto_; I am curious about even John Smith.

The desire next in strength to this (an opposite pole, indeed, of the

same magnet) is that of communicating intelligence.

Men in general may be divided into the inquisitive and the

communicative. To the first class belong Peeping Toms, eaves-droppers,

navel-contemplating Brahmins, metaphysicians, travellers, Empedocleses,

spies, the various societies for promoting Rhinothism, Columbuses,

Yankees, discoverers, and men of science, who present themselves to the

mind as so many marks of interrogation wandering up and down the world,

or sitting in studies and laboratories. The second class I should again

subdivide into four. In the first subdivision I would rank those who

have an itch to tell us about themselves,--as keepers of diaries,

insignificant persons generally, Montaignes, Horace Walpoles,

autobiographers, poets. The second includes those who are anxious to

impart information concerning other people,--as historians, barbers, and

such. To the third belong those who labour to give us intelligence about

nothing at all,--as novelists, political orators, the large majority of

authors, preachers, lecturers, and the like. In the fourth come those

who are communicative from motives of public benevolence,--as finders of

mares'-nests and bringers of ill news. Each of us two-legged fowls

without feathers embraces all these subdivisions in himself to a greater

or less degree, for none of us so much as lays an egg, or incubates a

chalk one, but straightway the whole barn-yard shall know it by our

cackle or our cluck. _Omnibus hoc vitium est._ There are different

grades in all these classes. One will turn his telescope toward a

back-yard, another toward Uranus; one will tell you that he dined with

Smith, another that he supped with Plato. In one particular, all men may

be considered as belonging to the first grand division, inasmuch as they

all seem equally desirous of discovering the mote in their neighbour's

eye.

To one or another of these species every human being may safely be

referred. I think it beyond a peradventure that Jonah prosecuted some

inquiries into the digestive apparatus of whales, and that Noah sealed

up a letter in an empty bottle, that news in regard to him might not be

wanting in case of the worst. They had else been super or subter human.

I conceive, also, that, as there are certain persons who continually

peep and pry at the key-hole of that mysterious door through which,

sooner or later, we all make our exits, so there are doubtless ghosts

fidgeting and fretting on the other side of it, because they have no

means of conveying back to the world the scraps of news they have picked

up. For there is an answer ready somewhere to every question, the great

law of _give and take_ runs through all nature, and if we see a hook, we

may be sure that an eye is waiting for it. I read in every face I meet a

standing advertisement of information wanted in regard to A. B., or that

the friends of C. D. can hear of him by application to such a one.

It was to gratify the two great passions of asking and answering, that

epistolary correspondence was first invented. Letters (for by this

usurped title epistles are now commonly known) are of several kinds.

First, there are those which are not letters at all,--as letters patent,

letters dimissory, letters inclosing bills, letters of administration,

Pliny's letters, letters of diplomacy, of Cato, of Mentor, of Lords

Lyttelton, Chesterfield, and Orrery, of Jacob Behmen, Seneca (whom St.

Jerome includes in his list of sacred writers), letters from abroad,

from sons in college to their fathers, letters of marque, and letters

generally, which are in no wise letters of mark. Second, are real

letters, such as those of Gray, Cowper, Walpole, Howel, Lamb, the first

letters from children (printed in staggering capitals), Letters from New

York, letters of credit, and others, interesting for the sake of the

writer or the thing written. I have read also letters from Europe by a

gentleman named Pinto, containing some curious gossip, and which I hope

to see collected for the benefit of the curious. There are, besides,

letters addressed to posterity,--as epitaphs, for example, written for

their own monuments by monarchs, whereby we have lately become possessed

of the names of several great conquerors and kings of kings, hitherto

unheard of and still unpronounceable, but valuable to the student of the

entirely dark ages. The letter which St. Peter sent to King Pepin in the

year of grace 755 I would place in a class by itself, as also the

letters of candidates, concerning which I shall dilate more fully in a

note at the end of the following poem. At present, _sat prata

biberunt_. Only, concerning the shape of letters, they are all either

square or oblong, to which general figures circular letters and

round-robins also conform themselves.--H. W.]

DEER SIR its gut to be the fashun now to rite letters to the candid 8s

and i wus chose at a publick Meetin in Jaalam to du wut wus nessary fur

that town. i writ to 271 ginerals and gut ansers to 209. tha air called

candid 8s but I don't see nothin candid about em. this here 1 wich I

send wus thought satty's factory. I dunno as it's ushle to print

Poscrips, but as all the ansers I got hed the saim, I sposed it wus

best. times has gretly changed. Formaly to knock a man into a cocked hat

wus to use him up, but now it ony gives him a chance fur the cheef

madgustracy.--H. B.

* * * * *

DEAR SIR,--You wish to know my notions

On sartin pints thet rile the land;

There 's nothin' thet my natur so shuns

Ez bein' mum or underhand;

I 'm a straight-spoken kind o' creetur

Thet blurts right out wut 's in his head,

An' ef I 've one pecooler feetur,

It is a nose thet wunt be led.

So, to begin at the beginnin',

An' come direcly to the pint,

I think the country's underpinnin'

Is some consid'ble out o' jint;

I aint agoin' to try your patience

By tellin' who done this or thet,

I don't make no insinooations,

I jest let on I smell a rat.

Thet is, I mean, it seems to me so,

But, ef the public think I 'm wrong,

I wunt deny but wut I be so,--

An', fact, it don't smell very strong;

My mind 's tu fair to lose its balance

An' say wich party hez most sense;

There may be folks o' greater talence

Thet can't set stiddier on the fence.

I 'm an eclectic; ez to choosin'

'Twixt this an' thet, I 'm plaguy lawth;

I leave a side thet looks like losin',

But (wile there 's doubt) I stick to both;

I stan' upon the Constitution,

Ez preudunt statesmun say, who 've planned

A way to git the most profusion

O' chances ez to _ware_ they 'll stand.

Ez fer the war, I go agin it,--

I mean to say I kind o' du,--

Thet is, I mean thet, bein' in it,

The best way wuz to fight it thru;

Not but wut abstract war is horrid,--

I sign to thet with all my heart,--

But civlyzation _doos_ git forrid

Sometimes upon a powder-cart.

About thet darned Proviso matter

I never hed a grain o' doubt,

Nor I aint one my sense to scatter

So 's no one could n't pick it out;

My love fer North an' South is equil,

So I 'll jest answer plump an' frank,

No matter wut may be the sequil,--

Yes, Sir, I _am_ agin a Bank.

Ez to the answerin' o' questions,

I 'm an off ox at bein' druv,

Though I aint one thet ary test shuns

'll give our folks a helpin' shove;

Kind o' promiscoous I go it

Fer the holl country, an' the ground

I take, ez nigh ez I can show it,

Is pooty gen'ally all round.

I don't appruve o' givin' pledges;

You 'd ough' to leave a feller free,

An' not go knockin' out the wedges

To ketch his fingers in the tree;

Pledges air awfle breachy cattle

Thet preudunt farmers don't turn out,--

Ez long 'z the people git their rattle,

Wut is there fer 'm to grout about?

Ez to the slaves, there 's no confusion

In _my_ idees consarnin' them,--

_I_ think they air an Institution,

A sort of--yes, jest so,--ahem:

Do _I_ own any? Of my merit

On thet pint you yourself may jedge;

All is, I never drink no sperit,

Nor I haint never signed no pledge.

Ez to my principles, I glory

In hevin' nothin' o' the sort;

I aint a Wig, I aint a Tory,

I 'm jest a candidate, in short;

Thet 's fair an' square an' parpendicler,

But, ef the Public cares a fig,

To hev me an' thin' in particler,

Wy I 'm a kind o' peri-wig.

The Biglow Papers · 第 53 / 91 题