INTRODUCTION.

When, more than three years ago, my talented young parishioner, Mr.

Biglow, came to me and submitted to my animadversions the first of his

poems which he intended to commit to the more hazardous trial of a city

newspaper, it never so much as entered my imagination to conceive that

his productions would ever be gathered into a fair volume, and ushered

into the august presence of the reading public by myself. So little are

we short-sighted mortals able to predict the event! I confess that there

is to me a quite new satisfaction in being associated (though only as

sleeping partner) in a book which can stand by itself in an independent

unity on the shelves of libraries. For there is always this drawback

from the pleasure of printing a sermon, that, whereas the queasy stomach

of this generation will not bear a discourse long enough to make a

separate volume, those religious and godly-minded children (those

Samuels, if I may call them so) of the brain must at first lie buried in

an undistinguished heap, and then get such resurrection as is

vouchsafed to them, mummy-wrapt with a score of others in a cheap

binding, with no other mark of distinction than the word

"_Miscellaneous_" printed upon the back. Far be it from me to claim any

credit for the quite unexpected popularity which I am pleased to find

these bucolic strains have attained unto. If I know myself, I am

measurably free from the itch of vanity; yet I may be allowed to say

that I was not backward to recognize in them a certain wild, puckery,

acidulous (sometimes even verging toward that point which, in our rustic

phrase, is termed _shut-eye_) flavour, not wholly unpleasing, nor

unwholesome, to palates cloyed with the sugariness of tamed and

cultivated fruit. It may be, also, that some touches of my own, here and

there, may have led to their wider acceptance, albeit solely from my

larger experience of literature and authorship.[3]

I was, at first, inclined to discourage Mr. Biglow's attempts, as

knowing that the desire to poetize is one of the diseases naturally

incident to adolescence, which, if the fitting remedies be not at once

and with a bold hand applied, may become chronic, and render one, who

might else have become in due time an ornament of the social circle, a

painful object even to nearest friends and relatives. But thinking, on a

further experience, that there was a germ of promise in him which

required only culture and the pulling up of weeds from around it, I

thought it best to set before him the acknowledged examples of English

compositions in verse, and leave the rest to natural emulation. With

this view, I accordingly lent him some volumes of Pope and Goldsmith, to

the assiduous study of which he promised to devote his evenings. Not

long afterwards he brought me some verses written upon that model, a

specimen of which I subjoin, having changed some phrases of less

elegancy, and a few rhymes objectionable to the cultivated ear. The poem

consisted of childish reminiscences, and the sketches which follow will

not seem destitute of truth to those whose fortunate education began in

a country village. And, first, let us hang up his charcoal portrait of

the school-dame.

"Propt on the marsh, a dwelling now, I see

The humble school-house of my A, B, C,

Where well-drilled urchins, each behind his tire,

Waited in ranks the wished command to fire;

Then all together, when the signal came,

Discharged their _a-b abs_ against the dame,

Who, 'mid the volleyed learning, firm and calm,

Patted the furloughed ferule on her palm,

And, to our wonder, could detect at once,

Who flashed the pan, and who was downright dunce.

There young Devotion learned to climb with ease

The gnarly limbs of Scripture family-trees,

And he was most commended and admired

Who soonest to the topmost twig perspired;

Each name was called as many various ways

As pleased the reader's ear on different days,

So that the weather, or the ferule's stings,

Colds in the head, or fifty other things,

Transformed the helpless Hebrew thrice a week

To guttural Pequot or resounding Greek,

The vibrant accent skipping here and there,

Just as it pleased invention or despair;

No controversial Hebraist was the Dame;

With or without the points pleased her the same;

If any tyro found a name too tough,

And looked at her, pride furnished skill enough;

She nerved her larynx for the desperate thing,

And cleared the five-barred syllables at a spring.

Ah, dear old times! there once it was my hap,

Perched on a stool, to wear the long-eared cap;

From books degraded, there I sat at ease,

A drone, the envy of compulsory bees."

I add only one further extract, which will possess a melancholy interest

to all such as have endeavoured to glean the materials of Revolutionary

history from the lips of aged persons, who took a part in the actual

making of it, and, finding the manufacture profitable, continued the

supply in an adequate proportion to the demand.

"Old Joe is gone, who saw hot Percy goad

His slow artillery up the Concord road,

A tale which grew in wonder, year by year,

As, every time he told it, Joe drew near

To the main fight, till, faded and grown gray,

The original scene to bolder tints gave way;

Then Joe had heard the foe's scared double-quick

Beat on stove drum with one uncaptured stick,

And, ere death came the lengthening tale to lop,

Himself had fired, and seen a red-coat drop;

Had Joe lived long enough, that scrambling fight

Had squared more nearly to his sense of right,

And vanquished Percy, to complete the tale,

Had hammered stone for life in Concord jail."

I do not know that the foregoing extracts ought not to be called my own

rather than Mr. Biglow's, as, indeed, he maintained stoutly that my file

had left nothing of his in them. I should not, perhaps, have felt

entitled to take so great liberties with them, had I not more than

suspected an hereditary vein of poetry in myself, a very near ancestor

having written a Latin poem in the Harvard _Gratulatio_ on the accession

of George the Third. Suffice it to say, that, whether not satisfied with

such limited approbation as I could conscientiously bestow, or from a

sense of natural inaptitude, I know not, certain it is that my young

friend could never be induced to any further essays in this kind. He

affirmed that it was to him like writing in a foreign tongue,--that Mr.

Pope's versification was like the regular ticking of one of Willard's

clocks, in which one could fancy, after long listening, a certain kind

of rhythm or tune, but which yet was only a poverty-stricken _tick,

tick_ after all,--and that he had never seen a sweet-water on a trellis

growing so fairly, or in forms so pleasing to his eye, as a fox-grape

over a scrub-oak in a swamp. He added I know not what, to the effect

that the sweet-water would only be the more disfigured by having its

leaves starched and ironed out, and that Peg[=a]sus (so he called him)

hardly looked right with his mane and tail in curl-papers. These and

other such opinions I did not long strive to eradicate, attributing them

rather to a defective education and senses untuned by too long

familiarity with purely natural objects, than to a perverted moral

sense. I was the more inclined to this leniency since sufficient

evidence was not to seek, that his verses, as wanting as they certainly

were in classic polish and point, had somehow taken hold of the public

ear in a surprising manner. So, only setting him right as to the

quantity of the proper name Pegasus, I left him to follow the bent of

his natural genius.

There are two things upon which it would seem fitting to dilate somewhat

more largely in this place,--the Yankee character and the Yankee

dialect. And, first, of the Yankee character, which has wanted neither

open maligners, nor even more dangerous enemies in the persons of those

unskilful painters who have given to it that hardness, angularity, and

want of proper perspective, which, in truth, belonged, not to their

subject, but to their own niggard and unskilful pencil.

New England was not so much the colony of a mother country, as a Hagar

driven forth into the wilderness. The little self-exiled band which came

hither in 1620 came, not to seek gold, but to found a democracy. They

came that they might have the privilege to work and pray, to sit upon

hard benches and listen to painful preachers as long as they would, yea,

even unto thirty-seventhly, if the spirit so willed it. And surely, if

the Greek might boast his Thermopylae, where three hundred men fell in

resisting the Persian, we may well be proud of our Plymouth Rock, where

a handful of men, women, and children not merely faced, but vanquished,

winter, famine, the wilderness, and the yet more invincible _storge_

that drew them back to the green island far away. These found no lotus

growing upon the surly shore, the taste of which could make them forget

their little native Ithaca; nor were they so wanting to themselves in

faith as to burn their ship, but could see the fair west wind belly the

homeward sail, and then turn unrepining to grapple with the terrible

Unknown.

As Want was the prime foe these hardy exodists had to fortress themselves

against, so it is little wonder if that traditional feud is long in wearing

out of the stock. The wounds of the old warfare were long ahealing, and an

east wind of hard times puts a new ache in every one of them. Thrift was

the first lesson in their horn-book, pointed out, letter after letter, by

the lean finger of the hard schoolmaster, Necessity. Neither were those

plump, rosy-gilled Englishmen that came hither, but a hard-faced,

atrabilious, earnest-eyed race, stiff from long wrestling with the Lord in

prayer, and who had taught Satan to dread the new Puritan hug. Add two

hundred years' influence of soil, climate, and exposure, with its necessary

result of idiosyncrasies, and we have the present Yankee, full of

expedients, half-master of all trades, inventive in all but the beautiful,

full of shifts, not yet capable of comfort, armed at all points against the

old enemy Hunger, longanimous, good at patching, not so careful for what is

best as for what will _do_, with a clasp to his purse and a button to his

pocket, not skilled to build against Time, as in old countries, but against

sore-pressing Need, accustomed to move the world with no {pou sto} but his

own two feet, and no lever but his own long forecast. A strange hybrid,

indeed, did circumstance beget, here in the New World, upon the old Puritan

stock, and the earth never before saw such mystic-practicalism, such

niggard-geniality, such calculating-fanaticism, such cast-iron-enthusiasm,

such unwilling humour, such close-fisted-generosity. This new _Graeculus

esuriens_ will make a living out of any thing. He will invent new trades

as well as tools. His brain is his capital, and he will get education at

all risks. Put him on Juan Fernandez, and he would make a spelling-book

first, and a salt-pan afterwards. _In c[oe]lum, jusseris, ibit_,--or the

other way either,--it is all one, so any thing is to be got by it. Yet,

after all, thin, speculative Jonathan is more like the Englishman of two

centuries ago than John Bull himself is. He has lost somewhat in

solidity, has become fluent and adaptable, but more of the original

groundwork of character remains. He feels more at home with Fulke

Greville, Herbert of Cherbury, Quarles, George Herbert, and Browne, than

with his modern English cousins. He is nearer than John, by at least a

hundred years, to Naseby, Marston Moor, Worcester, and the time when, if

ever, there were true Englishmen. John Bull has suffered the idea of the

Invisible to be very much flattened out of him. Jonathan is conscious

still that he lives in the world of the Unseen as well as of the Seen.

To move John, you must make your fulcrum of solid beef and pudding; an

abstract idea will do for Jonathan.

* * * * *

*** TO THE INDULGENT READER.

My friend, the Rev. Mr. Wilbur, having been seized with a dangerous fit

of illness, before this Introduction had passed through the press, and

being incapacitated for all literary exertion, sent to me his notes,

memoranda, &c., and requested me to fashion them into some shape more

fitting for the general eye. This, owing to the fragmentary and

disjointed state of his manuscripts, I have felt wholly unable to do;

yet, being unwilling that the reader should be deprived of such parts of

his lucubrations as seemed more finished, and not well discerning how to

segregate these from the rest, I have concluded to send them all to the

press precisely as they are.

COLUMBUS NYE, _Pastor of a Church in Bungtown Corner_.

* * * * *

It remains to speak of the Yankee dialect. And, first, it may be

premised, in a general way, that any one much read in the writings of

the early colonists need not be told that the far greater share of the

words and phrases now esteemed peculiar to New England, and local there,

were brought from the mother-country. A person familiar with the dialect

of certain portions of Massachusetts will not fail to recognize, in

ordinary discourse, many words now noted in English vocabularies as

archaic, the greater part of which were in common use about the time of

the King James translation of the Bible. Shakspeare stands less in need

of a glossary to most New Englanders than to many a native of the Old

Country. The peculiarities of our speech, however, are rapidly wearing

out. As there is no country where reading is so universal and newspapers

are so multitudinous, so no phrase remains long local, but is

transplanted in the mail-bags to every remotest corner of the land.

Consequently our dialect approaches nearer to uniformity than that of

any other nation.

The English have complained of us for coining new words. Many of those

so stigmatized were old ones by them forgotten, and all make now an

unquestioned part of the currency, wherever English is spoken.

Undoubtedly, we have a right to make new words, as they are needed by

the fresh aspects under which life presents itself here in the New

World; and, indeed, wherever a language is alive, it grows. It might be

questioned whether we could not establish a stronger title to the

ownership of the English tongue than the mother-islanders themselves.

Here, past all question, is to be its great home and centre. And not

only is it already spoken here by greater numbers, but with a far higher

popular average of correctness, than in Britain. The great writers of

it, too, we might claim as ours, were ownership to be settled by the

number of readers and lovers.

As regards the provincialisms to be met with in this volume, I may say

that the reader will not find one which is not (as I believe) either

native or imported with the early settlers, nor one which I have not,

with my own ears, heard in familiar use. In the metrical portion of the

book, I have endeavoured to adapt the spelling as nearly as possible to

the ordinary mode of pronunciation. Let the reader who deems me

overparticular remember this caution of Martial:--

"_Quem recitas, meus est, O Fidentine, libellus;

Sed male cum recitas, incipit esse tuus._"

A few further explanatory remarks will not be impertinent.

The Biglow Papers · 第 32 / 91 题