II

H. G. Wells is not the hero of this book. I am holding my roses for a

figure that has not yet appeared upon my little stage. But the career

of Mr. Wells, whose novels have almost every quality except charm, is

interesting to contemplate. That he is a born novelist was clear to me

so early as the year 1895, when one of his best stories appeared--_The

Wheels of Chance_. Not long after came the novels of science and

socialism that carried his name around the world; he was discussed

in the salons of Paris and in the prisons of Siberia. His books were

all busy, noisy, talkative, restless; they reflected in their almost

truculent mental aggressiveness the mass of undigested and indigestible

quasi-scientific fodder that perhaps disturbs more than it nourishes

the twentieth century stomach; they made many readers fondly believe

they were living the intellectual life. I mistakenly supposed he would

keep up this squirrel-cage activity to the end of his days; for I

mistakenly supposed in all this clatter he was incapable of hearing the

voice of the spirit. I used to think that if all the world suddenly

became religious except one man, that man would be H. G. Wells.

The war, which diverted the energies of so many quiet thinkers to

matters of immediate and practical efficiency, produced a rather

different effect upon this interesting man. He began to regard things

that are temporal in relation to those of eternal import. He became

converted--I have no hesitation in using the good old word--and while

I can see no evidence of conviction of sin, for humility is not his

most salient characteristic, he did come to believe and believes now,

that religion ought to be the motive power of man. What direction

his ideas may take in the future I cannot divine; but I am thankful

for his conversion, if only for the reason that it inspired him to

produce a masterpiece, _Mr. Britling Sees It Through_. This novel is

not only far and away his best book, it is the ablest work of fiction

about the war that I have read. But it owes its eminence not to its

accurate reporting of the course of social history during the war, for

after all, the much admired hockey-game is not much higher than major

journalism, but rather to the profound sense of spiritual values which

is the core of the book.

I regard it as unfortunate that Mr. Wells felt it necessary to follow

up the triumph of this tale with a treatise on theology called _God

the Invisible King_, and with a propagandist novel, called _The Soul

of a Bishop_. For the last-named book illustrates all the faults of

its species, as well as the cardinal sin against art. _Mr. Britling

Sees It Through_ is religious; _The Soul of a Bishop_ is sectarian. And

_God the Invisible King_, while it should be read with sympathy for its

author's sincerity and newly-found idealism, has all the arrogance and

cock-sureness of an old-fashioned theologian without the preliminary

years of devoted learning that gave the old-fashioned one some right

to a hearing, provided of course he could induce any one to listen to

him. No orthodox evangelist has ever been more sure of God than Mr.

Wells. The novel was properly named _Mr. Britling Sees It Through_; and

we might with equal propriety name the treatise, _Mr. Britling Sees

Through It_.

Strange and unfortunate that Mr. Wells should think that the religious

element in Mr. Britling needed additional emphasis. A work of art

founded on eternal verities will accomplish more for the cause

of religion than any tract. Solely from the moral point of view,

_Anna Karenina_ is a more impressive book than most of its author's

subsequent exhortations.

_The Soul of a Bishop_ is not a realistic novel, for there is no

real character in it. It is already on its way to limbo, along with

_Robert Elsmere_ and _The Inside of the Cup_. But it is an excellent

illustration of the fate that awaits an artist when he sacrifices the

truth of art for the enforcement of personal opinion. There was a time

when the excitement over the question of trades-unions produced by

_Put Yourself in His Place_ was at fever heat; but that novel today is

almost forgotten, while _The Cloister and the Hearth_ will be read by

generation after generation, simply because it is a great story.

Archibald Marshall, a Realistic Novelist · 第 9 / 16 题