SOLDIERS
[Illustration: SOLDIERS OF THE PERIOD
From Meyrick’s _Inquiry into Antient Armour_.]
“By an Act of Parliament, 27 Henry II., 1181, called ‘An Assize
of Arms,’ confirmed and enlarged by 13 Edward I., 1285, every
man, according to his estate and degree, was obliged to provide a
determinate quantity of such arms and armour as were then in use.[11]
Constables were provided to see that their arms were correct, and
proper persons, at stated periods, were appointed to _muster and train_
them.
Every Freeman that had in chattels or rent to the value of sixteen
marks was to have a coat of mail (_loricam_), a helmet (_cassidem_),
a shield, and a lance; and so in proportion to his wealth. Another
Assize of Arms was passed 36 Henry III., 1252, and in 1285 the Statute
of Winchester. These made some alterations in the qualification and
in the weapon. By 27 Edward I., 1298, armed horses were ordered to be
provided. The Statute of 4 and 5 Philip and Mary, c. 3, 1537, changed
the weapons for those of more modern construction. It also provided
that all persons having an estate valued at £1000 or more should,
after the 1st of May 1558, keep six horses and ten light horses,
with furniture, etc. By the 33 Henry VIII., c. 5, Commissioners were
appointed to see that the inhabitants of cities and boroughs were
properly provided with arms, etc. Thus cities, according to their
wealth or position, were obliged to have ready so many trained men.
In 1335 the City of London provided twenty-five men in arms and 500
archers for the war against France. In 1360, 1400 to serve in France.
Henry VIII. called upon the City to supply him with 1500 men in July
1545. The French threatening the Isle of Wight, on the 4th of August
1545, the citizens sent 1000 soldiers to Dover. In 1557 Queen Mary
caused a levy to be made of 1000 horsemen, 4000 footmen, and 2000
pioneers, to assist Philip of Spain against the King of France. In
1558 another was made to protect Calais; and in 1560 another to assist
the Queen’s Troops against the French, who were besieging Leith,
in Scotland. In 1562 a large number were sent to serve at Havre de
Grace. Orders were received from the Council in 1578 to keep 2000 men
in readiness. The Lord Mayor, in 1580, issued a precept assessing
the Companies for providing and furnishing 1000 men. The Stationers’
Company had to provide twenty men, thirteen shot, and seven pikemen.
The cost of their provision, furnishing, and training was £20:10:4; and
for powder and other charges, £11:3s. In 1585, 4000 men, with armour,
ensigns, drums, fifes, and other furniture for the wars, the greater
part being shot, mustered at Mile End, 14th April, and were reviewed
by Queen Elizabeth, 18th May. In 1596 the City twice raised, in less
than twelve hours, 1000 men, completely armed, for the relief of the
French, besieged by the Spaniards, in Calais. In 1589, 1000 men were
provided, fully equipped, to assist in placing Henry of Navarre on the
French throne. In 1600, 500 men for service in Ireland. In 1624, 2000
for the Low Countries. In 1638–40, 200 men in all, for service against
the Scots.”
There was an ancient and time-honoured march, known as the “old English
march,” which fell into disuse some time before the accession of
Charles the First, when Sir Edward Cecil, Lord Wimbledon, persuaded
the King to issue a warrant, ordering it to be revived. The point
raised is extremely interesting. The Warrant runs thus—it is dated 7th
Feb. 1632:—“Whereas the ancient custome of Nations hath ever bene to
use one certaine and constant forme of march in the warres, whereby
to be distinguished one from another: and whereas the march of this
our English Nation, so famous in all honourable achievements and
glorious warres of this our Kingdome in forraigne parts (being, by the
approbation of Strangers themselves, confessed and acknowledged the
best of all Marches) was, through the negligence and carelessness of
drummers, and by long discontinuance, so altered and changed from the
ancient gravitie and majestie thereof, as it was in danger utterly to
have bene lost and forgotten. It pleased our late deare brother prince
Henry to revive and rectifie the same, by ordayning an establishment
of one certaine Measure which was beaten in his presence at Greenwich,
anno 1610. In confirmation whereof, wee are graciously pleased, at the
instance and humble sute of our right trusty, etc., Edward, Viscount
Wimbledon, etc., to set down and ordaine this present establishment
hereunder expressed. Willing and commanding all drummers within our
Kingdome of England and principalitie of Wales exactly and precisely to
observe the same as well in this our Kingdome as abroad in the service
of any forraigne prince or state without any addition or alteration
whatsoever. To the end that so ancient, famous, and commendable a
custome may be preserved as a patterne and precedent to all posteritie.”
[Illustration: YEOMAN OF THE GUARD, TIME OF HENRY VIII.
E. Gardner’s Collection.]
About the time of Henry the Seventh we first find mention made of coat-
and conduct-money, a clothing allowance and subsistence for men on
joining the army, which was sometimes advanced by the counties where
the men were raised, to be afterwards repaid by the Government. These
charges varied according to the times. In 1492 the conduct-money was
calculated at the rate of 6d. for every twenty miles each soldier
should march, to be reckoned from his residence to the place of joining
the army; each soldier to swear to the number of the miles marched by
him. In 1574 it was fixed at a halfpenny per mile. In 1627, coat-money
to have been settled at 12s. 6d., and conduct-money at 8d. per diem,
accounting twelve miles for a day’s march. In 1640 it was 8d. per diem,
but the day’s march was not less than fifteen miles.
In dress and weapons armour had not yet disappeared, but it was much
less cumbrous. The corselet, with a morion, or open head-piece, and
thigh guards were still in general use; but plates of armour were
frequently fastened to any ordinary tunic for the defence of the
shoulders, arms, and chest. The pike-men, with their twenty-foot
pikes, wore corselets, and were much disinclined to march more than
five or six miles a day, owing to the weight of their dresses and
weapons. The bill-men were in lighter armour, and their weapons were
shorter than the pike, but very effective against cavalry. The bill
was a hook-shaped blade fastened to a wooden staff, with a projecting
prong at the end and back. Pike-men and bill-men were employed in
protecting archers from cavalry and in covering such field-guns as
were in use. Civic guards and watchmen were armed with bills. The
archers wore a buff-padded jacket, with sometimes an under-shirt of
light chain-armour. A jerkin, of leather or cloth, was indiscriminately
worn by all ranks. The firearms were of two kinds, leaving out of view
artillery. The first could be fired with a rest, and the second were
practically very light artillery. The harquebus and the small petronel
belonged to the first class, and the culverin, the long petronel, and
the muschite (from the French mosquet, a hawk) to the second. Two
men were required to handle the weapons of the second class. They
had long barrels. They were fired with a match, the barrels resting
on an iron fork sticking in the ground. The harquebus was originally
a musket-stock with a bow fixed to it; but the term was now used to
mean the long-barrelled hand-gun with a touch hole and priming pan and
trigger on the right side, which was rapidly driving out other weapons
and rendering armour useless.
[Illustration: A KNIGHT IN ARMOUR
From Meyrick’s _Inquiry into Antient Armour_.]
[Illustration: PIKEMAN
From Grose’s _Military Antiquities_.]
Musters of the citizens were frequent in the reign of Henry the Eighth
and Queen Elizabeth.[12] A history of the muster of the citizens on the
8th of May 1539, the 31st of Henry the Eighth, is given at length in
the _Records of the Corporation_, Journal 14, folio 166. “They marched
from Mile end to Whitehall, and from thence to Leadenhall, Sir Wm.
Forman, Knt., Lord Mayor was in bright harness, whereof the curass, the
maynsers, gaunteletts and other parts were gilt upon the crests and
bordures, and with that he had a coat of black velvet with a rich cross
embroidered, and a great massy chain of gold about his neck, and on his
head a cap of black velvet with a rich jewel, he had a goodly jennett
richly trapped, with embroidery of gold set upon crimson velvet. About
him attended 4 foot men, all apparelled in white satin hose and all
puffed over with white sarcenet.” In 1559, July 2 and 3, according to
_Stow’s Chronicle_, edit. 1615, p. 639, “the Citizens mustered before
Queen Elizabeth in Greenwich Park, 1400 men being present; 800 pikemen
in fine corselets; 400 harquebuts in shirts of maile, with morins; and
200 halberters in Alman rivets.” A large number of the citizens were
also present. The price of armour at this date, as given in several
records, was for “a Corslett, 30s.; Harquebus complete, 8s.; a Murrion,
6s. 8d.; Almaine rivette, 10s.; a musket, flask, touch-box and tassels,
17s. 6d.; Gunpowder, 12d. per pound.”
Here, for instance (_Archæologia_, vol. xxxii. p. 32), is an account of
a muster before Henry the Eighth.
“Than the sayd lorde mayor and hys brethren assemblyd thym selffs
ageyn, and after longe consultac’on, they fyrst determyned, that
no alyen, although he were a denyzen, shuld mustre, but onely mere
Englysshmen; ffurther they thought yt not convenyent that all the hole
number of Englysshmen shulde mustre and goo owte of the cytye for
especyall consyderac’ons; nor that suche as had jakks, brygandynes,
or cotes of fence, shulde goo yn the mustre, but onely they appoynted
syche whiche were hable p’sones, & hadde whyte harnes with whyte
cotes, bowes, arrowes, halberds, bills or polaxes; and none other
except soche as bare moryse pykes or handgonnes, whiche onely hadde
plents and sculls, with whyte cotes and whyte cappes with fethers;
and all thys company was comaunded to be yn whyte hose and clenly
shodde. Whan yt was knowen that the Kyng hymselff wolde se the Mustre,
to se howe gladly ev’y man p’pared hym, what desyre ev’y man had
to do hys prince s’rvice yt was a joyfull syght to beholde of ev’y
Inglysshman. Than ev’y man of substance provyded hymself a cote of
sylke, & garnished theyre bassenetts with turbes of sylke sett with
broches, ouches and fethers; some had theyre harnes and polaxes
gylted, some had theyr breastplates cov’yd with sylvr bullyon—ev’y man
devysed to doo hys best to s’ve hys prynce and of thys sorte the most
parte had chaynes of golde. The meaner sorte were yn cotes of white
cotton, clenly hosed and shodde with the armes of the cytye before &
behynde. The constables were all yn jouetts of whyte sylke over theyre
harnes, with battayl axes gylt, & chaynes abowte theyre necks. The
sayd lorde mayor, aldermen, recorder, shryves, & such as hadde bene
shryeves, were yn whyte harnes, & o’vr that cotes of black velvet,
with the armes of the cytye rychely pyrled and embroderyd upon the
same, with great chaynes of golde about theyre necks, mountyd on good
horsses well styrryng & rychely trapped, with battell axes yn theyre
handes, & cappes of velvett yn theyre heddes; and ev’y alderman had
iiij halberdars yn whyte sylke or buffe cotes attendyng on thej, with
gylt halbards, and the mayer had xvj apparrellyd as you shall here
hereafter; all theys were captayns of the bataylls, as you shall
p’ceyve yn theyre settyng forward. The chamberlayn and councellors
of the cytye, & the aldermens deputyes whiche were assigned to be
wyffelers on horsebacke, were all yn cotes of whyte damask over theyr
harnes, mountyd on good horsses, well trappyd, with great chaynes
abowte theyre necks, and propre javilyns or battle axes yn theyre
handes, with cappes of velvett on theyre heddes with ryche ouches. The
wyffelers on fote were iiij C. propre lyght p’sones app’ellyd yn whyte
sylke or buffe jerkyns, without harnes, or whyte hose and whyte shoes,
every man havyng a slaugh sworde or a javelyn to kepe the people yn
araye, with chaynes abowte theyre necks and fethers yn theyre cappes.
The mynstrells also were all yn whyte, and so were the standard berers,
which were the tallyst men yn ev’y warde, all app’ellyd yn sylke, for
whome were made XXX newe standards with the devyses of the Cytye.... To
see howe full of lordes, ladyes, and gentilwomen the wyndowes yn every
strete were, and howe the strets of the cytye were replenysshed with
people, many men wolde have thought that they that musteryd had rather
byn straungers than cytezens, consydering that the stretes everywhere
were so full of people, whiche was to straungers a great mervell. To
reporte what good order the cytezens kept yn passing forward; what
payne the wyffelers bothe on horseback & fote tooke yn keepyng the
soulders yn araye; howe ryche the juells, chaynes, and app’ell were;
how many goodly, talle, & comley men were there, & the nombre of
the same, my wytt ys insuffycyent to exp’sse or my penne to write.
Wherfore, I remytt theys poynts to theym that sawe and nombret them,
and desyeryng them to remember the nombre that passed yn the muster,
and not to forget yn theyr accompt theym that taryed at home or stode
yn the stretes, for the one without the other sheweth not the hole
puyssance of the cytye. But, whatsoever was doon and what payne so ever
was takyn, all was to the cytezens a great gladness.”
[Illustration: MUSKETEER
From Grose’s _Military Antiquities_.]
It will thus be seen that military array had arrived at a new and
quite another kind of splendour. Armour had not gone out, but it was
less cumbrous, and people believed less in its value. It availed to a
certain extent against sword and pike, but not at all against bullet.
The pikemen who carried pikes eighteen or twenty feet in length wore a
breastplate; the billmen had lighter armour, their weapon was a hook or
a staff. Both pikemen and billmen were employed in covering field-guns
against cavalry. Watchmen also carried bills. The firearms were the
harquebus or arquebus; the small petronel; the culverin; the long
petronel and the musket. The larger kinds were fired with the barrel
resting on a fork stuck in the ground. Swords and daggers were, of
course, carried, and gentlemen wore expensive chain and plate armour.
Henry VIII. had a wonderful suit of armour made in Germany. It was
engraved with illustrations from the lives of martyrs and saints, some
of which are reproduced on p. 382, from the illustrations given in
_Archæologia_.