DUST-SHOWERS AND RED-RAIN.

Recent scientific investigations in Europe and America have thrown

some interesting light on the nature of these very curious phenomena.

The results arrived at may be brought familiarly before our readers.

Mr Charles Darwin, in the narrative of his voyage in the _Beagle_,

states that while he was at St Jago, one of the Cape de Verd islands,

in January 1832: 'The atmosphere was generally very hazy; this appears

chiefly due to an impalpable dust, which is constantly falling, even

on vessels far out at sea. The dust,' he goes on to say, 'is of a

brown colour, and under the blow-pipe, easily fuses into a black

enamel. It is produced, as I believe, from the wear and tear of

volcanic rocks, and must come from the coast of Africa.' The same

opinion was held by scientific men generally, as well of the dust met

with in the North Atlantic, as of that which sometimes falls on the

islands and shores of the Mediterranean: Africa was supposed to be the

original source of the air-borne particles. Some of the dust, however,

having been sent to Ehrenberg of Berlin, that celebrated _savant_,

after a microscopical examination, laid an account of his inquiry

before the Akademie der Wissenschaften, in May 1844, in which he

shewed that the dust, so far from being inorganic, contained numerous

specimens of a species of flint-shelled animalcules, or infusoria,

known as polygastrica, and minute portions of terrestrial plants. The

investigation led him to certain conclusions: '1. That meteoric

dust-rain is of terrestrial origin. 2. That the same is not a rain of

volcanic ashes. 3. That it is necessarily a dust carried up to a great

height by a strong current of air or whirlwind from a dried-up

swamp-region. 4. That the dust neither demonstrably nor necessarily

comes from Africa, notwithstanding that the wind may blow from thence

as the nearest land when the dust falls, because there are in it no

forms whatsoever exclusively native to Africa.' These were remarkable

facts, but warranted by the evidence: one, if not more, of the

animalcules was proved to be peculiar to America, and that country was

naturally inferred to be the quarter from which they had been derived.

The inquiry once begun was followed up; other specimens of dust were

submitted to the same critical test, and found generally to contain a

much greater number and variety of infusoria than the first--mostly

fresh-water forms, but with a few of marine origin; whence the

conclusion, that they had been brought from a coast-region; and

especially remarkable was the fact, that among all the forms there was

not one peculiar to the African continent. One example was known to

belong to the Isle of France, the others were chiefly South American.

After an examination of six specimens, obtained at different

intervals, Ehrenberg discovered that they contained four organisms in

common. 'I now consider myself,' he observes, 'justified in the

conclusion, that all the Atlantic dust may come only from one and the

same source, notwithstanding its extent and annual amount. The

constant yellow and reddish colour of the dust, produced by

ferruginous matter, its falling with the trade-winds and not with the

harmattan, increase the interest of the phenomena.'

It had always been supposed, that the dust which traversed the

Mediterranean was borne from the Great Sahara; but in a quantity

collected on board the ship _Revenge_, at Malta, an infusoria peculiar

to Chili was met with, which, with other characteristics, proved the

dust to be the same as that observed on the Atlantic. Their colour,

too, was identical; while the Sahara is a 'dazzling white sand:' hence

the dust brought across the Mediterranean by the sirocco was not

peculiar to Africa. The conclusion here arrived at was still further

verified by another sirocco-storm in May 1846, which extended to

Genoa, and bore with it a dust that 'covered the roofs of the city in

great abundance.' This, as was clearly ascertained, contained

formations identical with those which had been collected off the Cape

de Verd; and it was shewn that the dust-showers of the Atlantic, and

those of Malta and Genoa, were 'always of a yellow ochre-like

colour--not gray, like those of the kamsin, in North Africa.' The

peculiar colour of the dust was found to be caused by iron-oxide; and

from one-sixth to one-third of the whole proved to consist 'of

determinable organic parts.' In the following year, 1847, Ehrenberg

had another opportunity of testing his conclusions, in specimens of

dust which had fallen in Italy and Sicily in 1802 and 1813; the same

result came out on examination; 'several species peculiar to South

America, and none peculiar to Africa.'

Thus, omitting the two last-mentioned instances, there had been five

marked falls of dust between 1830 and 1846; how many others passed

without notice, it would now be impossible to ascertain. The showers

sometimes occur at a distance of 800 miles from the coast of Africa,

and this region lies between the parallels of 17 and 25 degrees north

latitude, and whence, as we have seen, they extend to the northern

shores of the Mediterranean. In the dust collected from these various

falls, there have been found altogether nineteen species of infusoria;

of which eight were polythalamia, seven polygastrica, and two

phytolitharia, these chiefly constituting the flint-earth portion of

the dust. The iron was composed of the gaillonilla, and 'the carbonic

chalk earth corresponded tolerably well to the smaller number of

polythalamia.' The uniform character of the specimens obtained at

intervals over so long a course of years is especially remarkable.

To turn, now, for a few moments to the second phenomenon indicated in

our title. In October 1846, a fearful and furious hurricane visited

Lyon and the district between that city and Grenoble, during which

occurred a fall of blood-rain. A number of drops were caught and

preserved, and when the moisture had evaporated, there was seen the

same kind of dust--of yellowish-brown or red colour--as that which had

fallen in a dry state on the occasions already referred to. The

strictest pains were taken to ascertain that it was not the common

dust swept from roads during a gale of wind; and when placed under the

microscope, it exhibited a greater proportion of fresh-water and

marine formations than the former instances. Phytolitharia were

numerous, as also 'neatly-lobed vegetable scales;' which, as Ehrenberg

observes, is sufficient to disprove the assertion, that the substance

is formed in the atmosphere itself, and is not of European origin. For

the first time, a living organism was met with--the '_Eunotia

amphyoxis_, with its ovaries green, and therefore capable of life.'

Here was a solution of the mystery: the dust, mingling with the drops

of water falling from the clouds, produced the red rain. Its

appearance is that of reddened water, and it cannot be called

blood-like without exaggeration.

Again, in March 1847, a coloured snow fell in the Tyrol, presenting a

most singular appearance, and, when dried, leaving behind a

brick-coloured dust. Most of the organised forms therein contained

were European and American, with a few African; and again the

microscope shewed it to be similar to the dust before examined,

leaving no room to suppose it of local origin. 'The predominating

forms, numerically, of one kind of dust, are also the predominating

forms in all the rest,' as Ehrenberg observes; and says further:

'Impossible as it is to conceive of all the storms now compared from

1830 to 1847, as having a continuous genetic connection, it is equally

impossible also to imagine the masses of dust transported by them,

with such a degree of similarity, _not to have a genetic

connection_.... The great geographic extent of the phenomenon of a

reddish dust nearly filling the atmosphere, and itself filled with

organisms so similar, many of which are characteristic of South

America, not only admits of, but demands a more earnest attention to

the probable cyclical relations in the upper and lower atmosphere,

whereby very great masses of fixed terrestrial matter, earths and

metals, and especially flint-earths, chalk, iron, and coal, apparently

heterogeneous, and yet related by certain peculiarities, are held

swimming in the atmosphere, now like clouds thinly spread by

whirlwinds or electricity over a broad space, and now condensed, and,

like the dust of the fir-blossoms, falling in showers in every

direction.'

Ehrenberg, then, states his views as to the cause of the phenomenon.

'Although far from attaching undue weight to a hypothesis, I cannot

but consider it a matter of duty to seek for a connection in the

facts, and feel myself constrained--on account of the above-mentioned

particulars, and in so far as they justify a conclusion--to suppose an

atmospheric current, connecting America and Africa with the region of

the trade-winds, and sometimes, particularly about the 15th and 16th

of May, turning towards Europe, and bringing with it this very

peculiar, and apparently not African dust, in countless measure. If

instead of attacking hypothesis by hypothesis, we strive with united

effort to multiply scientific observations, we may then hope for a

progressive explanation of these mysterious relations, so especially

worthy of study.'

Some progress has already been made by a transatlantic investigator in

the explanation so much desired by the distinguished naturalist.

Lieutenant Maury, of Washington--an outline of whose views regarding

the winds was given in No. 412 of this Journal--finds in Ehrenberg's

researches a beautiful and interesting confirmation of his own theory;

namely, that the trade-winds of either hemisphere cross the belt of

equatorial calms. Observations at the Peak of Teneriffe have proved

that, while the trade-wind is sweeping along the surface of the ocean

in one direction, a current in the higher regions of the atmosphere is

blowing in the reverse direction. According to Lieutenant Maury, a

perpetual upper current prevails from South America to North Africa,

the volume being equal to that which flows southward by the north-east

trade-wind. This wind, it should be remembered, does not touch the

African continent, but the limits of its northern border are variable;

whence the fact, that the falls of dust vary between 17 and 25 degrees

of north latitude, as before stated. As the belt of calms shifts its

position, so will there be a variation in the locality of the

descending atmospheric current.

The dust-showers take place most frequently in spring and autumn; that

is, 'after the equinoxes, but at intervals varying from thirty to

fifty days;' the cause being, that the equatorial calms, at the time

of the vernal equinox, extend to four degrees on either side the

equator; and as the rainy season then prevails between those limits,

no dust can consequently be taken up in those latitudes. But the same

period is the dry season in the valley of the lower Orinoco, and the

surface of that extensive region is in a favourable condition to give

off dust; and at the time of the autumnal equinox, another part of the

great Amazonian basin is parched with drought, on which Lieutenant

Maury observes: 'May not, therefore, the whirlwinds which accompany

the vernal equinox sweep over the lifeless plains of the lower

Orinoco, take up the "rain-dust," which descends in the northern

hemisphere in April and May--and may it not be the atmospherical

disturbances which accompany the autumnal equinox, that take up the

microscopic organisms from the upper Orinoco and the great Amazonian

basin for the showers of October?' Humboldt gives a striking picture

of the region in question, and, if the phrase may be permitted, of its

dust-producing capabilities; so that the origin of this light powder,

as regards one locality, may be said to be placed beyond a doubt.

As yet, the reason why the dust falls, as it were, concretely, and not

generally diffused through the atmosphere, is not known; it is one of

the obscure points waiting further investigation. Why it should travel

so far to fall in a particular spot is, in the present state of our

knowledge, not easy to explain. The coarsest dust is generally the

first to fall; and it seems clear, that the descent occurs when and

where the conditions are favourable. Lieutenant Maury considers, 'that

certain electrical conditions are necessary to a shower of dust as

well as to a thunder-storm;' and that, in the periodical intervals, we

may get a clue to the rate of motion of the upper aerial currents,

which appear to be 'remarkable for their general regularity, their

general direction, and sharpness of limits.'

It is scarcely possible not to feel that the investigations here

briefly sketched, possess unusual interest. As Ehrenberg says, the

subject is one 'of vast, manifold, and rapidly-increasing importance,

and is but the beginning of a future great department of knowledge.'

Now that it has been published in a connected form, and the attention

of scientific observers directed to it, we may hope soon to hear of

corroborative evidence from all parts of the world. We may mention, as

bearing on the question, that sand-showers are not unfrequent in

China. Dr M'Gowan of Ningpo, in a communication to the Asiatic Society

of Bengal, states, that at the beginning of 1851, three showers

occurred within five weeks; the last, which commenced on the 26th

March, and continued four days, being the heaviest. The wind during

the time varied from north-east to north-west, the breeze interrupted

by occasional calms. No rain had fallen for six weeks; and though, as

the doctor observes, 'neither cloud, fog, nor mist obscured the

heavens, yet the sun and moon were scarcely visible; the orb of day

appeared as if viewed through a smoked glass, the whole sky presenting

a uniform rusty hue. At times, this sameness was disturbed, exhibiting

between the spectator and the sun the appearance of a water-spout,

owing to the gyratory motions of the impalpable mineral. The sand

penetrated the most secluded apartments; furniture wiped in the

morning, would be so covered with it in the afternoon, that one could

write on it legibly. In the streets, it was annoying--entering the

eyes, nostrils, and mouth, and grating under the teeth. My ophthalmic

patients generally suffered a relapse, and an unusual number of new

cases soon after presented themselves. Were such heavy sand-storms of

frequent occurrence, diseases of the visual organs would prevail to a

destructive extent.'

These showers sometimes spread over several provinces at once, and far

out to sea. The Chinese call them yellow-sand. Their source is the

great desert of Gobi, or Sand-Ocean, more than 2000 miles long, and

from 300 to 400 broad, in the interior of Asia. Dr M'Gowan states,

that the fall amounted to ten grains per square foot, but without

specifying whether this quantity includes the whole duration of the

shower. During calms, it remains suspended. The dust thus raised from

the Mongolian steppes gives the peculiar tinge to the Yellow Sea.

Notwithstanding the annoyance of these dust-showers, they have a

valuable compensation. The Chinese, whose closeness of observation in

agricultural matters is well known, assert that they are always

followed by a fruitful season--not, it is true, as cause, but as

effect. The explanation is, that the soil of the provinces most

subject to the visitation, being of a compact character, is loosened

and lightened by the sand borne on the wind from the Tatarian plains,

and at the same time, the lighter fertilising matters carried away by

the great rivers are replaced; and thus, that which at first sight

appears an unmitigated evil, becomes the cause of good harvests, for

they invariably follow a fall of sand.

Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 432 Volume 17, New Series, April 10, 1852 · 第 6 / 19 题