XIII.

The question can, however, be tolerably settled by turning over the

means which enable music to awaken emotion--emotion which we recognise

as human, as distinguished from the mere emotion of pleasure attached

to all beautiful sights and sounds. Once we have understood what these

means are, we can enquire to what extent they are employed in the

music of various schools and epochs, and thus judge, with some chance

of likelihood, whether the music which strikes us as serene and

vigorous could have affected our ancestors as turbid and enervating.

'Tis a dull enough psychological examination; but one worth making,

not merely for the sake of music itself, but because music, being the

most emotional of all the arts, can serve to typify the good or

mischief which all art may do, according to which of our emotions it

fosters.

* * * * *

'Tis repeating a fact in different words, not stating anything new, to

say that all beautiful things awaken a specific sort of emotion, the

emotion or the mood of the beautiful. Yet this statement, equivalent

to saying that hot objects give us the sensation of heat, and wet

objects the sensation of wetness, is well worth repeating, because we

so often forget that the fact of beauty in anything is merely the fact

of that thing setting up in ourselves a very specific feeling.

* * * * *

Now, besides this beauty or quality producing the emotion of the

beautiful, there exist in things a lot of other qualities also

producing emotion, each according to its kind; or rather, the

beautiful thing may also be qualified in some other way, as the thing

which is useful, useless, old, young, common, rare, or whatever you

choose. And this coincidence of qualities produces a coincidence of

states of mind. We shall experience the feeling not merely of beauty

because the thing is beautiful, but also of surprise because it is

startling, of familiarity because we meet it often, of attraction

(independently of beauty) because the thing suits or benefits us, or

of repulsion (despite the beauty) because the thing has done us a bad

turn or might do us one. This is saying that beauty is only one of

various relations possible between something not ourselves and our

feelings, and that it is probable that other relations between them

may exist at the same moment, in the same way that a woman may be a

man's wife, but also his cousin, his countrywoman, his school-board

representative, his landlady, and his teacher of Latin, without one

qualification precluding the others.

Now, in the arts of line, colour, and projection, the arts which

usually copy the appearance of objects existing outside the art, these

other qualities, these other relations between ourselves and the

object which exists in the relation of beauty, are largely a matter of

superficial association--I mean, of association which may vary, and of

which we are most often conscious.

We are reminded by the picture or statue of qualities which do not

exist in it, but in its prototype in reality. A certain face will

awaken disgust when seen in a picture, or reverence or amusement,

besides the specific impression of beauty (or its reverse), because we

have experienced disgust, awe, amusement in connection with a similar

face outside the picture.

So far, therefore, as art is imitative, its non-artistic emotional

capacities are due (with a very few exceptions) to association; for

the feelings traceable directly to fatigue or disintegration of the

perceptive faculty usually, indeed almost always, prevent the object

from affecting us as beautiful. It is quite otherwise when we come to

music. Here the coincidence of other emotion resides, I believe, not

in the _musical thing itself_, not in the musician's creation without

prototype in reality, resembling nothing save other musical

structures; the coincidence resides in the elements out of which that

structure is made, and which, for all its complexities, are still very

strongly perceived by our senses. For instance, certain rhythms

existing in music are identical with, or analogous to, the rhythm of

our bodily movements under varying circumstances: we know

alternations of long and short, variously composed regularities and

irregularities of movement, fluctuations, reinforcements or

subsidences, from experience other than that of music; we know them in

connection with walking, jumping, dragging; with beating of heart and

arteries, expansion of throat and lungs; we knew them, long before

music was, as connected with energy or oppression, sickness or health,

elation or depression, grief, fear, horror, or serenity and happiness.

And when they become elements of a musical structure their

associations come along with them. And these associations are the more

powerful that, while they are rudimentary, familiar like our own

being, perhaps even racial, the musical structure into which they

enter is complete, individual, _new_: 'tis comparing the efficacy of,

say, Mozart Op. So-and-so, with the efficacy of somebody sobbing or

dancing in our presence.

So far for the associational power of music in awakening emotions. But

music has another source of such power over us. Existing as it does in

a sequence, it is able to give sensations which the arts dealing with

space, and not with time, could not allow themselves, since for them a

disagreeable effect could never prelude an agreeable one, but merely

co-exist with it; whereas for music a disagreeable effect is

effaceable by an agreeable one, and will even considerably heighten

the latter by being made to precede it. Now we not merely associate

fatigue or pain with any difficult perception, we actually feel it; we

are aware of real discomfort whenever our senses and attention are

kept too long on the stretch, or are stimulated too sharply by

something unexpected. In these cases we are conscious of something

which is exhausting, overpowering, unendurable if it lasted:

experiences which are but too familiar in matters not musical, and,

therefore, evoke the remembrance of such non-musical discomfort, which

reacts to increase the discomfort produced by the music; the reverse

taking place, a sense of freedom, of efficiency, of strength arising

in us whenever the object of perception can be easily, though

energetically, perceived. Hence intervals which the ear has difficulty

in following, dissonances to which it is unaccustomed, and phrases too

long or too slack for convenient scansion, produce a degree of

sensuous and intellectual distress, which can be measured by the

immense relief--relief as an acute satisfaction--of return to easier

intervals, of consonance, and of phrases of normal rhythm and length.

Thus does it come to pass that music can convey emotional suggestions

such as painting and sculpture, for all their imitations of reality,

can never match in efficacy; since music conveys the suggestions not

of mere objects which may have awakened emotion, but of emotion

itself, of the expression thereof in our bodily feelings and

movements. And hence also the curious paradox that musical emotion is

strong almost in proportion as it is vague. A visible object may, and

probably will, possess a dozen different emotional values, according

to our altering relations therewith; for one relation, one mood, one

emotion succeeds and obliterates the other, till nothing very potent

can remain connected with that particular object. But it matters not

how different the course of the various emotions which have expressed

themselves in movements of slackness, agitation, energy, or confusion;

it matters not through what circumstances our vigour may have leaked

away, our nerves have been harrowed, our attention worn out, so long

as those movements, those agitations, slackenings, oppressions,

reliefs, fatigues, harrowings, and reposings are actually taking place

within us. In briefer phrase, while painting and sculpture present us

only with objects possibly connected with emotions, but probably

connected with emotions too often varied to affect us strongly; music

gives us the actual bodily consciousness of emotion; nay (in so far as

it calls for easy or difficult acts of perception), the actual mental

reality of comfort or discomfort.

Laurus Nobilis: Chapters on Art and Life · 第 66 / 131 题