Aye, Prince, you have a brother--

_Orazio_. The Duke--he'll scourge you.

_Marcello_. Nay, _the second_, sir,

Who, like an envious river, flows between

Your footsteps and Ferrara's throne....

_Orazio_. Stood he before me there,

By you, in you, as like as you're unlike,

Straight as you're bowed, young as you are old,

And many years nearer than him to Death,

The falling brilliancy of whose white sword

Your ancient locks so silverly reflect,

I would deny, outswear, and overreach,

And pass him with contempt, as I do you.

Jove! How we waste the stars: set on, my friends.

And so the revelling band pass onward, singing still, as they vanish

down the darkened street:

Strike, you myrtle-crownèd boys,

Ivied maidens, strike together!...

and Marcello is left alone:

I went forth

Joyfully, as the soul of one who closes

His pillowed eyes beside an unseen murderer,

And like its horrible return was mine,

To find the heart, wherein I breathed and beat,

Cold, gashed, and dead. Let me forget to love,

And take a heart of venom: let me make

A staircase of the frightened breasts of men,

And climb into a lonely happiness!

And thou, who only art alone as I,

Great solitary god of that one sun,

I charge thee, by the likeness of our state,

Undo these human veins that tie me close

To other men, and let your servant griefs

Unmilk me of my mother, and pour in

Salt scorn and steaming hate!

A moment later he learnt that the duke has suddenly died, and that the

dukedom is his. The rest of the play affords an instance of Beddoes'

inability to trace out a story, clearly and forcibly, to an appointed

end. The succeeding acts are crowded with beautiful passages, with vivid

situations, with surprising developments, but the central plot vanishes

away into nothing, like a great river dissipating itself among a

thousand streams. It is, indeed, clear enough that Beddoes was

embarrassed with his riches, that his fertile mind conceived too easily,

and that he could never resist the temptation of giving life to his

imaginations, even at the cost of killing his play. His conception of

Orazio, for instance, began by being that of a young Bacchus, as he

appears in the opening scene. But Beddoes could not leave him there; he

must have a romantic wife, whom he has deserted; and the wife, once

brought into being, must have an interview with her husband. The

interview is an exquisitely beautiful one, but it shatters Orazio's

character, for, in the course of it, he falls desperately in love with

his wife; and meanwhile the wife herself has become so important and

interesting a figure that she must be given a father, who in his turn

becomes the central character in more than one exciting scene. But, by

this time, what has happened to the second brother? It is easy to

believe that Beddoes was always ready to begin a new play rather than

finish an old one. But it is not so certain that his method was quite as

inexcusable as his critics assert. To the reader, doubtless, his faulty

construction is glaring enough; but Beddoes wrote his plays to be acted,

as a passage in one of his letters very clearly shows. 'You are, I

think,' he writes to Kelsall, 'disinclined to the stage: now I confess

that I think this is the highest aim of the dramatist, and should be

very desirous to get on it. To look down on it is a piece of

impertinence, as long as one chooses to write in the form of a play,

and is generally the result of one's own inability to produce anything

striking and affecting in that way.' And it is precisely upon the stage

that such faults of construction as those which disfigure Beddoes'

tragedies matter least. An audience, whose attention is held and

delighted by a succession of striking incidents clothed in splendid

speech, neither cares nor knows whether the effect of the whole, as a

whole, is worthy of the separate parts. It would be foolish, in the

present melancholy condition of the art of dramatic declamation, to wish

for the public performance of _Death's Jest Book_; but it is impossible

not to hope that the time may come when an adequate representation of

that strange and great work may be something more than 'a possibility

more thin than air.' Then, and then only, shall we be able to take the

true measure of Beddoes' genius.

Perhaps, however, the ordinary reader finds Beddoes' lack of

construction a less distasteful quality than his disregard of the common

realities of existence. Not only is the subject-matter of the greater

part of his poetry remote and dubious; his very characters themselves

seem to be infected by their creator's delight in the mysterious, the

strange, and the unreal. They have no healthy activity; or, if they

have, they invariably lose it in the second act; in the end, they are

all hypochondriac philosophers, puzzling over eternity and dissecting

the attributes of Death. The central idea of _Death's Jest Book_--the

resurrection of a ghost--fails to be truly effective, because it is

difficult to see any clear distinction between the phantom and the rest

of the characters. The duke, saved from death by the timely arrival of

Wolfram, exclaims 'Blest hour!' and then, in a moment, begins to ponder,

and agonise, and dream:

And yet how palely, with what faded lips

Do we salute this unhoped change of fortune!

Thou art so silent, lady; and I utter

Shadows of words, like to an ancient ghost,

Arisen out of hoary centuries

Where none can speak his language.

Orazio, in his brilliant palace, is overcome with the same feelings:

Methinks, these fellows, with their ready jests,

Are like to tedious bells, that ring alike

Marriage or death.

And his description of his own revels applies no less to the whole

atmosphere of Beddoes' tragedies:

Voices were heard, most loud, which no man owned:

There were more shadows too than there were men;

And all the air more dark and thick than night

Was heavy, as 'twere made of something more

Than living breaths.

It would be vain to look, among such spectral imaginings as these, for

guidance in practical affairs, or for illuminating views on men and

things, or for a philosophy, or, in short, for anything which may be

called a 'criticism of life.' If a poet must be a critic of life,

Beddoes was certainly no poet. He belongs to the class of writers of

which, in English literature, Spenser, Keats, and Milton are the

dominant figures--the writers who are great merely because of their art.

Sir James Stephen was only telling the truth when he remarked that

Milton might have put all that he had to say in _Paradise Lost_ into a

prose pamphlet of two or three pages. But who cares about what Milton

had to say? It is his way of saying it that matters; it is his

expression. Take away the expression from the _Satires_ of Pope, or from

_The Excursion_, and, though you will destroy the poems, you will leave

behind a great mass of thought. Take away the expression from

_Hyperion_, and you will leave nothing at all. To ask which is the

better of the two styles is like asking whether a peach is better than a

rose, because, both being beautiful, you can eat the one and not the

other. At any rate, Beddoes is among the roses: it is in his expression

that his greatness lies. His verse is an instrument of many modulations,

of exquisite delicacy, of strange suggestiveness, of amazing power.

Playing on it, he can give utterance to the subtlest visions, such as

this:

Just now a beam of joy hung on his eyelash;

But, as I looked, it sunk into his eye,

Like a bruised worm writhing its form of rings

Into a darkening hole.

Or to the most marvellous of vague and vast conceptions, such as this:

I begin to hear

Strange but sweet sounds, and the loud rocky dashing

Of waves, where time into Eternity

Falls over ruined worlds.

Or he can evoke sensations of pure loveliness, such as these:

So fair a creature! of such charms compact

As nature stints elsewhere: which you may find

Under the tender eyelid of a serpent,

Or in the gurge of a kiss-coloured rose,

By drops and sparks: but when she moves, you see,

Like water from a crystal overfilled,

Fresh beauty tremble out of her and lave

Her fair sides to the ground.

Or he can put into a single line all the long memories of adoration:

My love was much;

My life but an inhabitant of his.

Or he can pass in a moment from tiny sweetness to colossal turmoil:

I should not say

How thou art like the daisy in Noah's meadow,

On which the foremost drop of rain fell warm

And soft at evening: so the little flower

Wrapped up its leaves, and shut the treacherous water

Close to the golden welcome of its breast,

Delighting in the touch of that which led

The shower of oceans, in whose billowy drops

Tritons and lions of the sea were warring,

And sometimes ships on fire sunk in the blood,

Of their own inmates; others were of ice,

And some had islands rooted in their waves,

Beasts on their rocks, and forest-powdering winds,

And showers tumbling on their tumbling self,

And every sea of every ruined star

Was but a drop in the world-melting flood.

He can express alike the beautiful tenderness of love, and the hectic,

dizzy, and appalling frenzy of extreme rage:--

... What shall I do? I speak all wrong,

And lose a soul-full of delicious thought

By talking. Hush! Let's drink each other up

By silent eyes. Who lives, but thou and I,

My heavenly wife?...

I'll watch thee thus, till I can tell a second

By thy cheek's change.

In that, one can almost feel the kisses; and, in this, one can almost

hear the gnashing of the teeth. 'Never!' exclaims the duke to his son

Torrismond:

There lies no grain of sand between

My loved and my detested! Wing thee hence,

Or thou dost stand to-morrow on a cobweb

Spun o'er the well of clotted Acheron,

Whose hydrophobic entrails stream with fire!

And may this intervening earth be snow,

And my step burn like the mid coal of Aetna,

Plunging me, through it all, into the core,

Where in their graves the dead are shut like seeds,

If I do not--O, but he is my son!

Is not that tremendous? But, to find Beddoes in his most characteristic

mood, one must watch him weaving his mysterious imagination upon the

woof of mortality. One must wander with him through the pages of

_Death's Jest Book_, one must grow accustomed to the dissolution of

reality, and the opening of the nettled lips of graves; one must learn

that 'the dead are most and merriest,' one must ask--'Are the ghosts

eaves-dropping?'--one must realise that 'murder is full of holes.' Among

the ruins of his Gothic cathedral, on whose cloister walls the Dance of

Death is painted, one may speculate at ease over the fragility of

existence, and, within the sound of that dark ocean,

Whose tumultuous waves

Are heaped, contending ghosts,

one may understand how it is that

Death is mightier, stronger, and more faithful

To man than Life.

Lingering there, one may watch the Deaths come down from their cloister,

and dance and sing amid the moonlight; one may laugh over the grotesque

contortions of skeletons; one may crack jokes upon corruption; one may

sit down with phantoms, and drink to the health of Death.

In private intercourse Beddoes was the least morbid of human beings. His

mind was like one of those Gothic cathedrals of which he was so

fond--mysterious within, and filled with a light at once richer and less

real than the light of day; on the outside, firm, and towering, and

immediately impressive; and embellished, both inside and out, with

grinning gargoyles. His conversation, Kelsall tells us, was full of

humour and vitality, and untouched by any trace of egoism or

affectation. He loved discussion, plunging into it with fire, and

carrying it onward with high dexterity and good-humoured force. His

letters are excellent: simple, spirited, spicy, and as original as his

verse; flavoured with that vein of rattling open-air humour which had

produced his school-boy novel in the style of Fielding. He was a man

whom it would have been a rare delight to know. His character, so

eminently English, compact of courage, of originality, of imagination,

and with something coarse in it as well, puts one in mind of Hamlet: not

the melodramatic sentimentalist of the stage; but the real Hamlet,

Horatio's Hamlet, who called his father's ghost old truepenny, who

forged his uncle's signature, who fought Laertes, and ranted in a grave,

and lugged the guts into the neighbour room. His tragedy, like

Hamlet's, was the tragedy of an over-powerful will--a will so strong as

to recoil upon itself, and fall into indecision. It is easy for a weak

man to be decided--there is so much to make him so; but a strong man,

who can do anything, sometimes leaves everything undone. Fortunately

Beddoes, though he did far less than he might have done, possessed so

rich a genius that what he did, though small in quantity, is in quality

beyond price. 'I might have been, among other things, a good poet,' were

his last words. 'Among other things'! Aye, there's the rub. But, in

spite of his own 'might have been,' a good poet he was. Perhaps for him,

after all, there was very little to regret; his life was full of high

nobility; and what other way of death would have befitted the poet of

death? There is a thought constantly recurring throughout his

writings--in his childish as in his most mature work--the thought of the

beauty and the supernal happiness of soft and quiet death. He had

visions of 'rosily dying,' of 'turning to daisies gently in the grave,'

of a 'pink reclining death,' of death coming like a summer cloud over

the soul. 'Let her deathly life pass into death,' says one of his

earliest characters, 'like music on the night wind.' And, in _Death's

Jest Book_, Sibylla has the same thoughts:

O Death! I am thy friend,

I struggle not with thee, I love thy state:

Thou canst be sweet and gentle, be so now;

And let me pass praying away into thee,

As twilight still does into starry night.

Did his mind, obsessed and overwhelmed by images of death, crave at last

for the one thing stranger than all these--the experience of it? It is

easy to believe so, and that, ill, wretched, and abandoned by Degen at

the miserable Cigogne Hotel, he should seek relief in the gradual

dissolution which attends upon loss of blood. And then, when he had

recovered, when he was almost happy once again, the old thoughts,

perhaps, came crowding back upon him--thoughts of the futility of life,

and the supremacy of death and the mystical whirlpool of the unknown,

and the long quietude of the grave. In the end, Death had grown to be

something more than Death to him--it was, mysteriously and

transcendentally, Love as well.

Death's darts are sometimes Love's. So Nature tells,

When laughing waters close o'er drowning men;

When in flowers' honied corners poison dwells;

When Beauty dies: and the unwearied ken

Of those who seek a cure for long despair

Will learn ...

What learning was it that rewarded him? What ghostly knowledge of

eternal love?

If there are ghosts to raise,

What shall I call,

Out of hell's murky haze,

Heaven's blue pall?

--Raise my loved long-lost boy

To lead me to his joy.--

There are no ghosts to raise;

Out of death lead no ways;

Vain is the call.

--Know'st thou not ghosts to sue?

No love thou hast.

Else lie, as I will do,

And breathe thy last.

So out of Life's fresh crown

Fall like a rose-leaf down.

Thus are the ghosts to woo;

Thus are all dreams made true,

Ever to last!

1907.

Books and Characters, French & English · 第 48 / 56 题