PREFACE.

The publication at this time of a speech of the Presidential Canvass of

1860, may seem uncalled for, and be imputed to other than the motives

that influence me. I nevertheless submit it to the candid consideration

of the public, and especially of such as having heretofore entertained

wrong views on the chief question involved in the canvass of 1860 and

the position of the lamented DOUGLAS, may desire truthful information.

The speech at the time of its delivery was intended as a vindication of

that noble-hearted, but then much-abused and misrepresented patriot. The

grave of DOUGLAS now shields him from the shafts of partisan animosity.

Even his enemies concede, that in his last and self-sacrificing efforts

to unite the Democracy of the North in support of an insulted government

and outraged constitution, he earned the meed due to eminent patriotism.

A perusal of the following pages may, perhaps, convince some, before

doubting, that DOUGLAS was as wise a statesman and as true a patriot in

November, 1860, as he was in May, 1861, when the people of Chicago with

one accord united in a grand ovation to do him honor, not as a partisan

leader, but as a pillar and hope of the Republic in its day of mortal

peril. If what I have written shall induce but even a few candid men to

think better of the departed DOUGLAS, as a statesman and patriot, than

they were wont to think, I will be more than rewarded for my own labor

in his vindication. But I have other motives than this.

The time is not far distant, and I would gladly accelerate its advance,

when the conservative sentiment of the nation will revive and have

utterance, and demand the re-enthronement of the spirit of compromise

and peace--the guardian genius of the unity of the nation. Men of

extreme and violent opinions, both North and South, whose fanaticism,

folly and ambition have brought our great American Republic to its

present sad estate, must give way before the incoming tide of a just

public opinion on the relations of the Federal government to slavery.

The people of the United States have neither the heart nor the means for

a protracted warfare with each other in regard to negro slavery. The war

is mainly the result of misunderstandings and erroneous opinions in both

the slaveholding and non-slaveholding sections of the Union, which

dispassionate investigation will remove. When the deluded men of the

South shall come to understand by abundant evidence, which the good

sense and patriotism of true Union men will furnish, that the spirit of

the war on the part of the loyal States is one springing not from hatred

to the Southern people and their institutions, but from earnest love of

the Federal Union, and a determination to defend and re-establish it in

all the integrity of its principles, they will gladly return to their

first love and welcome the protection of the banner which has ever been

the symbol of the power and glory of the United American people. If,

however, the war on the part of professedly loyal men shall be guided by

any other feeling than love for the Union and a sacred regard for all

the obligations of its Constitution, the preservation of the Union will

be impossible. The non-slaveholding States may, perhaps, bind the

seceded States to them by the stern power of military subjugation, as

Poland is bound to Russia, or Hungary to Austria, but the subjugation of

one section of the Republic by another will never unite their people in

the fraternal bonds of a true Federal Union.

The traditions and historic glory that surround the Federal Government

as our fathers formed it, are yet dear to the hearts of the whole

American people. That government still belongs to them--it is their

heritage, and they, I trust, will yet restore and preserve it. The

horoscope of the future daily brightens with hopeful signs, not the

least of which is the fact that the President of the United States, who

was elected to his high office upon a declaration of political

principles logically involving the extermination of slavery as existing

in fifteen States of the Federal Union, and which could not therefore be

carried out without making the Union "a divided house," has himself

become the supporter of a constitutional and conservative policy in

regard to slavery. Let us thank God and take courage. If the government

will but stand firmly on constitutional ground, we will not despair of

the Republic.

It is also due to truth to say that one object I have in the present

publication is to disabuse the minds of some of my fellow-citizens,

whose good opinion I value, who have been misled by false statements

charging me with sympathy with the Southern rebellion. The opinions now

published were the result of patient investigation, and are still held

with earnest conviction, confirmed by the events of the past year. Of

their justice and patriotism, and whether or not they are the opinions

of a sympathizer with rebellion, candid men will judge.

The speech is published with a few verbal alterations, as it was

delivered, for the reason that in that form its true spirit can best be

understood. Due allowance will therefore be made for its style, which is

that of a popular address.

JOSEPH K. EDGERTON.

FORT WAYNE, IND., December, 1861.

The Relations of the Federal Government to Slavery Delivered at Fort Wayne, Ind., October 30th 1860 · 第 5 / 18 题